George Zimmerman's bloody head

Not disclosing to the judge he had access to a large sum of money before the bail hearing may cost him a year he could have spent out of jail. This is getting closer and closer to a plea every day.

Considering that goes to Zimmerman's character, it could be a nail in his coffin. It was a BIG mistake on his part.

Stop being stupid. Was he asked? If not, it doesn't say anything about him, does it?
 
Not disclosing to the judge he had access to a large sum of money before the bail hearing may cost him a year he could have spent out of jail. This is getting closer and closer to a plea every day.

Considering that goes to Zimmerman's character, it could be a nail in his coffin. It was a BIG mistake on his part.

Stop being stupid. Was he asked? If not, it doesn't say anything about him, does it?

It says thatmaybe he did not have access to his PayPal account while sitting in lock up.
 
But if he knowingly puts him self in danger

LOL! If I knowingly walk thru a bad neighborhood and put myself in danger, I don't get to defend myself? I don't care who you are, that's funny right there.

That depends. Are you buying crack ? or headed to the store to get something ? Your question is stupid and has nothing to do with Zimmerman case. He was not just walking along minding his business, he was actively pursuing Trayvon. He admitted that he was. He was moving into the situation. That was a stupid question.

Actively pursuing Trayvon doesn't mean he can't defend himself. You're silly.

But it does apparently mean Trayvon can't defend himself.

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Black guy started it!

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Other dude says black guy started it. Black guy started it!

Can't wait for the "statistics confirm our racial prejudices" people.
 
Last edited:
That depends. Are you buying crack ? or headed to the store to get something ? Your question is stupid and has nothing to do with Zimmerman case. He was not just walking along minding his business, he was actively pursuing Trayvon. He admitted that he was. He was moving into the situation. That was a stupid question.

Actively pursuing Trayvon doesn't mean he can't defend himself. You're silly.

Meh. Your ignorant. Not a bad thing unless you do it deliberately.

Yeah, understanding self defense makes ME ignorant. :cuckoo:
 
That depends. Are you buying crack ? or headed to the store to get something ? Your question is stupid and has nothing to do with Zimmerman case. He was not just walking along minding his business, he was actively pursuing Trayvon. He admitted that he was. He was moving into the situation. That was a stupid question.

Actively pursuing Trayvon doesn't mean he can't defend himself. You're silly.

But it does apparently mean Trayvon can't defend himself.

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Black guy started it!

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Other dude says black guy started it. Black guy started it!

Can't wait for the "statistics confirm our racial prejudices" people.

Yeah, if Zimmerman attacked him, Trayvon can defend himself.
It's always sad when a Hispanic Democrat shoots a black kid.
 
Actively pursuing Trayvon doesn't mean he can't defend himself. You're silly.

But it does apparently mean Trayvon can't defend himself.

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Black guy started it!

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Other dude says black guy started it. Black guy started it!

Can't wait for the "statistics confirm our racial prejudices" people.

Yeah, if Zimmerman attacked him, Trayvon can defend himself.
It's always sad when a Hispanic Democrat shoots a black kid.

Who the fuck cares what political ideology he is of... he murdered that kid. And last time I checked, he's being defended by die hard conservatives because he was rightful in shooting that "no limit nigga" as they like to claim. Like it's worthy of him being murdered.
 
Not disclosing to the judge he had access to a large sum of money before the bail hearing may cost him a year he could have spent out of jail. This is getting closer and closer to a plea every day.

There are a lot of fucking idiots around here, aren't there? Can anyone show me any requirement for a defendant to disclose his finances? If not, stop pretending one exists.

There's no requirement but Zimmerman let the lie be told to the court that he was penniless. And lying to the court IS illegal. Bond is usually set to discourage people from fleeing. His bond is something he can currently pay out of pocket and skip the country without leaving his family in a financial bind.

The judge better hope he is still in the country.
 
I would bet that Zimmerman followed his Lawyer's advice and that advice is a lot more knowledgeable then the posters here.
 
Not disclosing to the judge he had access to a large sum of money before the bail hearing may cost him a year he could have spent out of jail. This is getting closer and closer to a plea every day.

There are a lot of fucking idiots around here, aren't there? Can anyone show me any requirement for a defendant to disclose his finances? If not, stop pretending one exists.

Florida Statutes:

903.035 - Applications for bail information provided hearing on application for modification penalty for providing false or misleading information or omitting material information. - 2011 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate
903.046 - Purpose of and criteria for bail determination. - 2011 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate

903.035 Applications for bail; information provided; hearing on application for modification; penalty for providing false or misleading information or omitting material information.—
(1)(a) All information provided by a defendant, in connection with any application for or attempt to secure bail, to any court, court personnel, or individual soliciting or recording such information for the purpose of evaluating eligibility for, or securing, bail for the defendant, under circumstances such that the defendant knew or should have known that the information was to be used in connection with an application for bail, shall be accurate, truthful, and complete without omissions to the best knowledge of the defendant.
(b) The failure to comply with the provisions of paragraph (a) may result in the revocation or modification of bail.
(2) An application for modification of bail on any felony charge must be heard by a court in person, at a hearing with the defendant present, and with at least 3 hours’ notice to the state attorney.
(3) Any person who intentionally provides false or misleading material information or intentionally omits material information in connection with an application for bail or for modification of bail is guilty of a misdemeanor or felony which is one degree less than that of the crime charged for which bail is sought, but which in no event is greater than a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

903.046 Purpose of and criteria for bail determination.—
(1) The purpose of a bail determination in criminal proceedings is to ensure the appearance of the criminal defendant at subsequent proceedings and to protect the community against unreasonable danger from the criminal defendant.
(2) When determining whether to release a defendant on bail or other conditions, and what that bail or those conditions may be, the court shall consider:
(a) The nature and circumstances of the offense charged.
(b) The weight of the evidence against the defendant.
(c) The defendant’s family ties, length of residence in the community, employment history, financial resources, and mental condition.
<<SNIP>>​


The Judge could choose to just basically say "meh" it wouldn't have changed the outcome of the bond hearing and let it go. He could also reopen the bond hearing and and require submission of records from the paypal accounts documenting balances over time. If the balances were low and spiked after Zimmerman was in jail, probably no big deal as Zimmerman may not have had access to the records especially since it appears the brother-in-law was involved with the site and he was never called to the stand during the original bond hearing. If on the other hand there was a significant amount of money before Zimmerman was arrested, then the judge might have issues with it. We'll have to wait and see.

>>>>
 
Last edited:
Does THIS face look like it survived a broken nose not even a good month ago?

201200004452_0.jpg


Again, crystal clear evidence of not one single, solitary scratch on his face, body or anywhere else for that matter...the man is fit as a fiddle, looking like a super model with his coifed hair.

No evidence of a black eye, no broken nose, no scars, not even a scratch...pure, clean smooth skin....like he just walked of a model runway.

Does that face look like it was just in the struggle that left him near death?

Is it becoming more clear why Angela Corey didn't need much to come to her conclussion?

The man has been Bullshatting from the beginning...he's a big-time bullshatter.

RWers....where do you stand on the case now?

Are you still buying George Zimmerman's swill hook, line and sinker?

Or are you ready to accept the FACTS of the case as it stands?

What say you?

A broken nose will cause a black eye.
Angela Corey has not played a full hand. When time comes she will.
The fact as we know it is enough to convict him.
Head bashed on concrete do not leave clean cuts with drips of blood and no concussion. and would leave permanent scare I got a pimple on my scap and hair will not grow on the site of the pimple.
 
I notice something wierd about the people of Sanford. Lots of men look just like Zimmerman. one of his friends, a neighbor and the office beside him in court. Too much of an incident.
 
Does THIS face look like it survived a broken nose not even a good month ago?

201200004452_0.jpg


Again, crystal clear evidence of not one single, solitary scratch on his face, body or anywhere else for that matter...the man is fit as a fiddle, looking like a super model with his coifed hair.

No evidence of a black eye, no broken nose, no scars, not even a scratch...pure, clean smooth skin....like he just walked of a model runway.

Does that face look like it was just in the struggle that left him near death?

Is it becoming more clear why Angela Corey didn't need much to come to her conclussion?

The man has been Bullshatting from the beginning...he's a big-time bullshatter.

RWers....where do you stand on the case now?

Are you still buying George Zimmerman's swill hook, line and sinker?

Or are you ready to accept the FACTS of the case as it stands?

What say you?

Police report said bloody nose, not broken nose.

And as far as I know, Zimmerman's medical records haven't been released, anyway.
 
Zimmermans medical records will show hehad a broken nose and lacerations or else his lawyers have all been driveling idiots.
 
Zimmermans medical records will show hehad a broken nose and lacerations or else his lawyers have all been driveling idiots.

I see that one of Zimmerman's prior lawyers told some news guy (Anderson Cooper) that Zimmerman had suffered a broken nose. But I don't see where his new attorney said that. Zimmerman's father may have said it at the bail hearing, but that's not clear to me. That would be pretty close to his new lawyer adopting it, I suppose.

Can you link me up?
 
Not disclosing to the judge he had access to a large sum of money before the bail hearing may cost him a year he could have spent out of jail. This is getting closer and closer to a plea every day.

There are a lot of fucking idiots around here, aren't there? Can anyone show me any requirement for a defendant to disclose his finances? If not, stop pretending one exists.

There's no requirement but Zimmerman let the lie be told to the court that he was penniless. And lying to the court IS illegal. Bond is usually set to discourage people from fleeing. His bond is something he can currently pay out of pocket and skip the country without leaving his family in a financial bind.

The judge better hope he is still in the country.

If he skipped, where could he go that would not ship him back ? $200,000 is not allot of money if you are on the run. There is also the fact that a bunch of folks would like to see him dead.
 
But it does apparently mean Trayvon can't defend himself.

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Black guy started it!

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Other dude says black guy started it. Black guy started it!

Can't wait for the "statistics confirm our racial prejudices" people.

Yeah, if Zimmerman attacked him, Trayvon can defend himself.
It's always sad when a Hispanic Democrat shoots a black kid.

Who the fuck cares what political ideology he is of... he murdered that kid. And last time I checked, he's being defended by die hard conservatives because he was rightful in shooting that "no limit nigga" as they like to claim. Like it's worthy of him being murdered.

If the eyewitness is right, Zimmerman's head was being pounded into the ground by Trayvon. Zimmerman was crying for help. Zimmerman finally shot the kid. The alternative was possible death from blunt force trauma to the head. It's called self defense. It doesn't matter who started the fight at the point that Zimmerman was yelling for help, believing his life was in danger, the kid should have stopped.
 
If the eyewitness is right, Zimmerman's head was being pounded into the ground by Trayvon. Zimmerman was crying for help. Zimmerman finally shot the kid. The alternative was possible death from blunt force trauma to the head. It's called self defense.

And there is a different witness that says that the person on top at the time of the shooting rose and stepped way from the body on the ground. We know that was Zimmerman.


It doesn't matter who started the fight at the point that Zimmerman was yelling for help, believing his life was in danger, the kid should have stopped.

First, that's false. Under Florida Statutes 776.041 a person looses their self defense immunity if they were the initial aggressor and if they were committing a forcible felony (such as aggravated assault) OR they were presented with an opportunity of escape and proceeded with the hostilities.

Secondly, it has not been determined that it was Zimmerman yelling for help. Some witnesses say Zimmerman, some say the boy, the Zimmerman family claims it was him, the Martin family claims it was him. Independent audio analysis excluded Zimmerman (but would not be conclusive), we have not heard any results from police or FBI audio forensic analysis yet.


>>>>
 
But it does apparently mean Trayvon can't defend himself.

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Black guy started it!

Fight breaks out between a black guy and any other dude. Other dude says black guy started it. Black guy started it!

Can't wait for the "statistics confirm our racial prejudices" people.

Yeah, if Zimmerman attacked him, Trayvon can defend himself.
It's always sad when a Hispanic Democrat shoots a black kid.

Who the fuck cares what political ideology he is of... he murdered that kid. And last time I checked, he's being defended by die hard conservatives because he was rightful in shooting that "no limit nigga" as they like to claim. Like it's worthy of him being murdered.

Who cares what race he is either?
Murder? I don't think that word means what you think it means.
 

Forum List

Back
Top