Inthemiddle
Rookie
- Oct 4, 2011
- 6,354
- 675
- 0
- Banned
- #561
LOL, you did not prove a damned thing and you know it.
Yes I did. I provided examples that span centuries of the area being called "Palestine" or the equivalent of the same in other languages.
The name comes from the Anglicization of the Latin 'Palestina' not the Greek.
1) Do you even know the Greek word from which the Latin word is derived? No, you don't. Either that, or you're deliberately ignoring it so that you can repeat your lies.
2) At best, you're describing the etymology of the English word (and only a very small part of it) and reducing your argument to say nothing more than the fact that since the English word for "Palestine" derives from the Latin, the name is "invented" and the region is not really what it is. That kind of argument is completely illogical.
The name refers to the old Phillistine tribe and the Romans renamed the area from Judea to spite the Jews who revolted and were slaughter on so many crosses that trees almost disapeared from a thirty mile radius of Jerusalem.
They renamed what they called their province that included the region. The name predates the Romans. You even admit that the origins of the modern name predate the Romans. Using such a fact to try to prove that the Romans invented the name is logically absurd.
And the Palestinians are Arab
Not ethnically. Do you even know what "Arab" ethnicity is all about? Obviously not.
not Phillistine
I never said that modern day Palestinians are Philistines. That's a straw man. I said that modern day Palestinians are a mixing of many ancient peoples; that they are descended from the ancient peoples of Canaan with ethnic influences from other people who immigrated and conquered the area at various times in history (which is the case for any modern ethnicity).
and are related to the other Semetic groups to include the Jews, but they are Arab.
Again, ethnically the Palestinians are not Arabs. But you don't know anything about Arabic ethnicity or what constitutes an "Arab" or the differing usages of the word.
You are a nutball.
No, I'm a knowledgeable person. You are deliberately ignoring information, because a full treatment of all the information and facts renders your position absurd. Which is probably why, instead of presenting additional facts and information, you're now resorting to nothing more than name calling in an attempt to make your point. Why don't you try explaining how Arab identity factors into the whole thing? Why don't you try explaining where the Latin term "Palestina" relates to the Greek term from 400 years earlier? Why don't you also try explaining why Shakespeare uses the word "Palestine" if the area was not called that between Roman times and the British Mandate? Why don't you also try explaining why the etymological history is only relevant back to Roman times, and why the history before that doesn't mater?