Global warming has STALLED since 1998

It means the whole AGW argument is wrong. The global mean temperature operates independently of human activity. That's what it means. We have introduced hundreds of millions of metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, yet the temperature has not risen, it has stalled, and is showing signs of dropping.

So, why don't get invoked natural cycles when there's a stall? The deniers keep saying proponents ignore cycles, when the real truth is the deniers only cite them when it's convenient. Cycles are a part of the deal and a slowdown in temperature rise has absolutely nothing to do with the known properties of GHGs. What happens when the cycle reverses? Warming comes back with a vengeance. It's that lack of logic on the part of the deniers that shows they don't really care about the science, only the politics.

"A lack of logic" does not count as a valid argument. You are ignoring cycles. You completely ignored the medieval warming period, and the fact that it was WARMER during antiquity. Warming isn't coming back. It is pure ignorance of reality on the alarmists part to continue saying that a dramatic reversal will occur. We are at 390 ppm right now, we should be experiencing drastic changes in global mean temperature. Not so.
 
And that means what?

It means the whole AGW argument is wrong.

No, that is not what it means. Did you even read your own link?





The global mean temperature operates independently of human activity. That's what it means.

Again, wrong.

Read the original source: Climate science: A sensitive matter | The Economist

And read the article below the "sea change" one in your link.

Climate change may be happening more slowly than scientists thought. But the world still needs to deal with it

In both articles, they acknowledge global climate change is still occuring and needs to be deal with. You are a fool for interpreting "more slowly" to mean "not happening".

The climate changes regardless of human activity. I just don't believe human activity is causing it. So whatever we do as a race will have zero impact on it.
 
It means the whole AGW argument is wrong.

No, that is not what it means. Did you even read your own link?







Again, wrong.

Read the original source: Climate science: A sensitive matter | The Economist

And read the article below the "sea change" one in your link.

Climate change may be happening more slowly than scientists thought. But the world still needs to deal with it

In both articles, they acknowledge global climate change is still occuring and needs to be deal with. You are a fool for interpreting "more slowly" to mean "not happening".

The climate changes regardless of human activity. I just don't believe human activity is causing it. So whatever we do as a race will have zero impact on it.

Human fingerprints are all over global warming.
 
No, that is not what it means. Did you even read your own link?







Again, wrong.

Read the original source: Climate science: A sensitive matter | The Economist

And read the article below the "sea change" one in your link.



In both articles, they acknowledge global climate change is still occuring and needs to be deal with. You are a fool for interpreting "more slowly" to mean "not happening".

The climate changes regardless of human activity. I just don't believe human activity is causing it. So whatever we do as a race will have zero impact on it.

Human fingerprints are all over global warming.

Again, how?
 
It means the whole AGW argument is wrong.

No, that is not what it means. Did you even read your own link?







Again, wrong.

Read the original source: Climate science: A sensitive matter | The Economist

And read the article below the "sea change" one in your link.

Climate change may be happening more slowly than scientists thought. But the world still needs to deal with it

In both articles, they acknowledge global climate change is still occuring and needs to be deal with. You are a fool for interpreting "more slowly" to mean "not happening".

The climate changes regardless of human activity. I just don't believe human activity is causing it. So whatever we do as a race will have zero impact on it.


The problem with you people is that as usual you simply think something is "true" because you want it to be true.

ummhmm
 
Last edited:
Global warming has STALLED since 1998...er, just as predicted in our peer reviewed AGW Models! Yeah, that's the ticket!
 
Templar, welcome!

The Warmers are a Cult, you cannot talk reason or science with them -- it's an article of FAITH that mankind is causing "Global Warming"
 

Forum List

Back
Top