Global Warming is political "science" and politicians need a question put to them

So NASA and the IPCC are "left wing science"?
GMAFB!

And let me just divorce you the latest climate denier's talking point, or rather someone better verse in the scientific nomenclature that I:







Not everyone is a left wing liar fudge baker.

Some NASA people actually tell the truth, and explain why the oceans are not rising in the process...





analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.


READ THIS CAREFULLY AND LAUGH... why are oceans NOT RISING???


The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for



OR THERE IS NO SEA LEVEL RISE BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT

90% of EARTH ICE ON ANTARCTICA IS GROWING

WE TOOK THE WARMERS TO COURT ON THAT ISSUE IN 2007






  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.


And when they lost in court, nothing happened, the media lied, and the fraud continued...


If 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is growing, is increasing co2 to blame for it - LOL!!!!
 
Or do you ?
dr-evil-evil-laugh.gif
 
Not everyone is a left wing liar fudge baker.

Some NASA people actually tell the truth, and explain why the oceans are not rising in the process...





analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.


READ THIS CAREFULLY AND LAUGH... why are oceans NOT RISING???


The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for



OR THERE IS NO SEA LEVEL RISE BECAUSE THERE IS NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT

90% of EARTH ICE ON ANTARCTICA IS GROWING

WE TOOK THE WARMERS TO COURT ON THAT ISSUE IN 2007






  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.


And when they lost in court, nothing happened, the media lied, and the fraud continued...


If 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is growing, is increasing co2 to blame for it - LOL!!!!
"fudge packer"? What are you, twelve?

and once again, you just ignore what you don't like and isolate what you do. For your education;


While the Arctic sea ice is growing faster and higher during the winter months, it is more than offset by the melting in the summer months. So what we've seen is that the increased rate of sea ice growth in the winter helps to mitigate the melting during the summer. However, ultimately the warming summer temperatures continue to overall reduce the extent of sea ice.


Also, for clarification:

Mr Justice Barton yesterday said that while the film was "broadly accurate" in its presentation of climate change, he identified nine significant errors in the film, some of which, he said, had arisen in "the context of alarmism and exaggeration" to support the former US vice-president's views on climate change.
 
Due to the absolute overreaction by world governments to the changing climate...zero of the dooms day predictions made by the believers have materialized....we are being played....
But that isn't true at all.




 
But that isn't true at all.




I'm not talking predictions of warming temps...that's a 50/50 bet that anyone can make...I'm talking about predictions of doom...end of the world stuff we keep hearing...none of them have materialized....we can handle this without ruining our lives...and giving up our freedom...don't let the governments of the world and the UN use this as a tool against you....even the massive storm season this year wasn't anything we haven't seen before....
 
Climate change is not the end of the world nor the end of civilization....we have many bigger problems than the climate...we are adaptable and can mitigate climate increases and decreases without wreaking the American economy....
Natural climate change could make it very difficult to support eight billion humans.

Natural climate change has caused extinctions of many species.

However, as you said, humans as a species can survive climate change because we are able to adapt and we can use technology to provide for our needs. Maybe not in the same numbers as we have now but we will survive.

This AGW is a bunch of horseshit. No science to it.
 
This AGW is a bunch of horseshit. No science to it.
Well for one thing, as the northern permafrost keeps shrinking as we know it is, aside from methane being released in unprecedented amounts , also the gradual decrease in annual surface ice will cause the earth to deflect less and less sunlight, raising sea temperatures (affecting the breakage of Antarctic glaciers in the southern hemisphere )and worsening the storms, and son on.

In 2012, exactly 9 years ago, New York City got a little
wake up call with Sandy, which was only a cat 2.

Hurricane-Sandy-NYCSubways.jpg
 
Well for one thing, as the northern permafrost keeps shrinking as we know it is, aside from methane being released in unprecedented amounts , also the gradual decrease in annual surface ice will cause the earth to deflect less and less sunlight, raising sea temperatures (affecting the breakage of Antarctic glaciers in the southern hemisphere )and worsening the storms, and son on.

In 2012, exactly 9 years ago, New York City got a little
wake up call with Sandy, which was only a cat 2.

View attachment 559714

as the northern permafrost keeps shrinking as we know it is, aside from methane being released in unprecedented amounts ,

Unprecedented? How do you know?

In 2012, exactly 9 years ago, New York City got a little
wake up call with Sandy, which was only a cat 2.


No hurricanes before fossil fuels, eh?
 
as the northern permafrost keeps shrinking as we know it is, aside from methane being released in unprecedented amounts ,

Unprecedented? How do you know?
I do my homework.
Understanding Arctic methane emissions is crucial to forecasting the region's impact on global climate. Ongoing efforts suffer large uncertainties when upscaling emissions since direct observations rarely cover scales relevant to both process-level (fine-scale) biogeochemistry and land models that operate on much larger scales. We bridge these scale gaps via high-resolution airborne detection of methane hotspots (25-m2 pixels) across a 30,000-km2 study domain. We quantified a key spatial property of Arctic methane emissions: their power law dependence on distance to nearest standing water. From the ground, we verified that wide-ranging methane fluxes follow the same spatial power law pattern as domain-wide hotspots. These conclusions can improve scaling of emissions in Arctic land models and potentially reduce the disparity between ground-based and atmospheric emission budgeting.
In 2012, exactly 9 years ago, New York City got a little
wake up call with Sandy, which was only a cat 2.


No hurricanes before fossil fuels, eh?
Not in NYC since1821.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top