GoFundMe acct started to help 'Sweet Cakes' fight off Gay Nazi's and state

[Papageorgio]

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

Yeah, ok, you haven't even bothered to look into anything. Each of the examples had defenders, the people fighting.. They were simply overwhelmed.

So none have been successful. Thanks for the admission.

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

Because they aren't organized enough to defend themselves. Fucking moron.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

its making the playing field level Superman and its being aimed at young kids that aren't black or of the special group . Also doesn't matter to me as my kids are in their 40s , I'm just interested because I can see whats being done . Course , its the wrong way to go but that's how the lefties work !!

Yeah, like I said, I have no problem with programs based off helping kids stricken by poverty but it crosses the line to me when government programs are only open for one race. That teaches children to be racists.

 

[pismoe]

well , that was my point Superman , they are elevating the special kids over the other kids . Serves 2 purposes , makes the special kids feel superior while knocking down the other non special kids .

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Very very special kids.

 

[pismoe]

all the kids should be treated equally or treated differently on merit only .

 

[Iceweasel]

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

That's not being successful. Part of success is this thing called survival. For countries it means being able to effectively defend yourself. Sure, you can spend all your money on goodies for everybody but without a military anyone can walk in and take it.

What about Woodstock? Maybe that's next. Marxism sounds great until you run out of everyone's money.

 

[Iceweasel]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

 

[Iceweasel]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Greece.

...oh wait.

LOL. I'd expect an idiot to try to Blame the failure of Greece on socialism. Tell me more about workers getting the means of production in Greece

The workers got a lot of other people's money. So did the non workers. LOLing doesn't change facts.

 

[Marxist]

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

That's not being successful. Part of success is this thing called survival. For countries it means being able to effectively defend yourself. Sure, you can spend all your money on goodies for everybody but without a military anyone can walk in and take it.

What about Woodstock? Maybe that's next. Marxism sounds great until you run out of everyone's money.

They had defense forces and fought bravely. Lol, Woodstock.. Run out of money? You fail to understand how these places functioned and now a post money world would work.. Idiot.

 

[Marxist]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Greece.

...oh wait.

LOL. I'd expect an idiot to try to Blame the failure of Greece on socialism. Tell me more about workers getting the means of production in Greece

The workers got a lot of other people's money. So did the non workers. LOLing doesn't change facts.

That's not socialism, and if you say facts one more fucking time..

 

[Marxist]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

Then every single country throughout history is a failure, no Matter what they accomplished. Capitalism wAsnt the way, unless you count the initial means of production already being established. They were a success, they had democracy, adequate food..

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

Then every single country throughout history is a failure, no Matter what they accomplished. Capitalism wAsnt the way, unless you count the initial means of production already being established. They were a success, they had democracy, adequate food..

Stupid socialist lies.

 

[Iceweasel]

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

That's not being successful. Part of success is this thing called survival. For countries it means being able to effectively defend yourself. Sure, you can spend all your money on goodies for everybody but without a military anyone can walk in and take it.

What about Woodstock? Maybe that's next. Marxism sounds great until you run out of everyone's money.

They had defense forces and fought bravely. Lol, Woodstock.. Run out of money? You fail to understand how these places functioned and now a post money world would work.. Idiot.

Yes, I fail to see how a post money world works since it's the pipe dream of an infant. Adults know better. Bravery is good but no indication they had a working system in place. Rapid failure doesn't really buttress the argument.

 

[Marxist]

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

That's not being successful. Part of success is this thing called survival. For countries it means being able to effectively defend yourself. Sure, you can spend all your money on goodies for everybody but without a military anyone can walk in and take it.

What about Woodstock? Maybe that's next. Marxism sounds great until you run out of everyone's money.

They had defense forces and fought bravely. Lol, Woodstock.. Run out of money? You fail to understand how these places functioned and now a post money world would work.. Idiot.

Yes, I fail to see how a post money world works since it's the pipe dream of an infant. Adults know better. Bravery is good but no indication they had a working system in place. Rapid failure doesn't really buttress the argument.

You need to research the subject more instead of saying it's the pipe dream of infants. Bravery is good, yes, but they did have a working system, show me how it wasn't. They failed due to violence against them, I won't use that to judge the inner workings of a territory.

 

[Iceweasel]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

Then every single country throughout history is a failure, no Matter what they accomplished. Capitalism wAsnt the way, unless you count the initial means of production already being established. They were a success, they had democracy, adequate food..

How the US a failed country? Or Germany or Japan for that matter. Yes, they did fail but capitalism got them and back on their feet and they are doing well now. When did the Paris commies bounce back?

 

[Marxist]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

Then every single country throughout history is a failure, no Matter what they accomplished. Capitalism wAsnt the way, unless you count the initial means of production already being established. They were a success, they had democracy, adequate food..

Stupid socialist lies.

Socialist lies? LOL

 

[Marxist]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

Then every single country throughout history is a failure, no Matter what they accomplished. Capitalism wAsnt the way, unless you count the initial means of production already being established. They were a success, they had democracy, adequate food..

How the US a failed country? Or Germany or Japan for that matter. Yes, they did fail but capitalism got them and back on their feet and they are doing well now. When did the Paris commies bounce back?

I am referring to any country that fails due to military force against them, and all territories that follow capitalism/have a state will eventually fail. The paris commies? They were working people who were actively oppressed, they couldn't bounce back.

 

[Iceweasel]

You need to research the subject more instead of saying it's the pipe dream of infants. Bravery is good, yes, but they did have a working system, show me how it wasn't. They failed due to violence against them, I won't use that to judge the inner workings of a territory.

Survival is part of success, sorry if it doesn't fit your juvenile world view. And why should I research every stupid comment on the internet? A baseless assertion is just that. A failed point, if you will.

 

[Marxist]

You need to research the subject more instead of saying it's the pipe dream of infants. Bravery is good, yes, but they did have a working system, show me how it wasn't. They failed due to violence against them, I won't use that to judge the inner workings of a territory.

Survival is part of success, sorry if it doesn't fit your juvenile world view. And why should I research every stupid comment on the internet? A baseless assertion is just that. A failed point, if you will.

Whatever you want to say man, not my fault you're stuck in the chains of capitalist thought. Survival is part of success, yes, and every country will eventually fail, that doesn't change the successes they've had. Rome fell, but had many successes, and we admire that.

 

[Iceweasel]

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

It means the country failed. Capitalism was the way it funded itself. You have yet to demonstrate how they were a success even then but a failed Marxist regime is a failed regime, period.

Then every single country throughout history is a failure, no Matter what they accomplished. Capitalism wAsnt the way, unless you count the initial means of production already being established. They were a success, they had democracy, adequate food..

How the US a failed country? Or Germany or Japan for that matter. Yes, they did fail but capitalism got them and back on their feet and they are doing well now. When did the Paris commies bounce back?

I am referring to any country that fails due to military force against them, and all territories that follow capitalism/have a state will eventually fail. The paris commies? They were working people who were actively oppressed, they couldn't bounce back.

You just said every single country. Like I said, Germany failed but came back. Thanks to capitalism. Those are known facts, claiming it will fail due to capitalism is a belief, not a fact.