Goldman Sachs: A Harris win will be a boost to the economy; A Trump win a downturn.

[JLW]

LONDON, Sept 4 (Reuters) - U.S. economic growth would likely get the biggest boost in the coming two years from the Democrats, headed by Kamala Harris, winning the White House and Congress in this November's elections, according to Goldman Sachs.

Under a Republican sweep, or even with a divided government led by Donald Trump, economic output would take a hit next year..

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/goldman-sachs-sees-biggest-boost-us-economy-harris-win-2024-09-04/

Goldman Sachs Says Harris, Democrats Better For Economy Than Trump

The firm's report could surprise some voters, who generally give the GOP and Trump an edge on issues like the economy and inflation.

www.cpapracticeadvisor.com

***************

It is well known that the economy does better under Democrats than Republicans. This election appears no different. Vote Democratic if you want prosperity; Vote Trumpist if you want Recession.

 

[EMH]

Goldman Sachs

was invested in oil, gold, the long bond, and defense stocks on 910....


and they also do not want the 911 investigation re-opened...

 

[wamose]

Banks and corporations always prefer political leaders who are idiots and can be easily manipulated. Bank and corporate profits are good for banks and corporations but not the economy or the American worker. Goldman Sacks likes crooked politicians like the ones who charged the American taxpayer to bail them out for 50 billion in bad loans they made to Mexico. John Corzine made so much money on that scam that he was able to spend 60 million of (his own money) to get elected Senator of NJ. Harris fits right in there as an easy mark. So yeah, Crooked banks and corporations would love Harris, even as they hate the American middle class. MAGA

 

[shockedcanadian]

LONDON, Sept 4 (Reuters) - U.S. economic growth would likely get the biggest boost in the coming two years from the Democrats, headed by Kamala Harris, winning the White House and Congress in this November's elections, according to Goldman Sachs.

Under a Republican sweep, or even with a divided government led by Donald Trump, economic output would take a hit next year..

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/goldman-sachs-sees-biggest-boost-us-economy-harris-win-2024-09-04/

Goldman Sachs Says Harris, Democrats Better For Economy Than Trump

The firm's report could surprise some voters, who generally give the GOP and Trump an edge on issues like the economy and inflation.

www.cpapracticeadvisor.com

***************

It is well known that the economy does better under Democrats than Republicans. This election appears no different. Vote Democratic if you want prosperity; Vote Trumpist if you want Recession.

This is about as good as Harris getting an endorsement from Liz Cheney.,

 

[1srelluc]

I suspect that GS is aware that it will take measures that are not friendly to them to unfuck what Biden/Harris has done.

Thank goodness Trump thought of the future when he picked Vance because four years won't do it.

We are looking at a generational unfucking.

 

[Resnic]

LONDON, Sept 4 (Reuters) - U.S. economic growth would likely get the biggest boost in the coming two years from the Democrats, headed by Kamala Harris, winning the White House and Congress in this November's elections, according to Goldman Sachs.

Under a Republican sweep, or even with a divided government led by Donald Trump, economic output would take a hit next year..

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/goldman-sachs-sees-biggest-boost-us-economy-harris-win-2024-09-04/

Goldman Sachs Says Harris, Democrats Better For Economy Than Trump

The firm's report could surprise some voters, who generally give the GOP and Trump an edge on issues like the economy and inflation.

www.cpapracticeadvisor.com

***************

It is well known that the economy does better under Democrats than Republicans. This election appears no different. Vote Democratic if you want prosperity; Vote Trumpist if you want Recession.

It's in goldman sachs best interest to keep Democrats in office because they are the ones that allow them personally to be rich beyond belief.

They buy democratic politicians all the time. They pay them like 1/4 of anmillion dollars to come there and speak. Goldman sachs, a huge huge financial industry actually needs a politician to come and speak? No, no they pay them to come and speak as a way to hide the fact they are really paying the politician to push laws to make them richer. It's a bribe disguised as a speech.

Hillary Clinton gets paid 225,000 dollars per speech to them.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969

Bill and hillary have made about 153,000,000 just in speeches.

$153 million in Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking fees, documented | CNN Politics

Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, combined to earn more than $153 million in paid speeches from 2001 until Hillary Clinton launched her presidential campaign last spring, a CNN analysis shows.

www.cnn.com

Obama does it.

Obama criticised for '$400,000 Wall Street speech'

The former US president previously admonished "fat cat bankers".

www.bbc.com

All higher up Democrats get paid vast amounts of money by goldman sachs for "speeches".

 

[EMH]

This is about as good as Harris getting an endorsement from Liz Cheney.,

It is the SAME TEAM, the Zionist 911 Fascist crowd, all war all the time, just only to help ISRAEL not America.