Good God... The TDS Has Reached Apocalyptic Levels

Michael Moore sent a "personal appeal" to the Ayatollah of Iran.

Quote:

"I have just sent the Ayatollah of Iran a personal appeal asking him not to respond to our assassination of his top General with violence of any kind, but rather let me & millions of Americans fix this peacefully."

Michael Moore on Twitter

And a screenshot in case it gets deleted:

View attachment 298623


Can you believe this shit??

This is borderline sedition and this traitorous fat fuck should be charged under the Logan Act. The depravity of the left knows no bounds.
Sedition?

18 U.S.C. § 2384 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 2384. Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

I don't see Moore's tweet fitting that description

18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Since Moore owe's no allegiance to the U.S., I don't see his tweet fitting that description either.

Maybe this will help you...

images

I said BORDERLINE sedition, numbnuts.

Why am I not surprised that a dipshit like you would defend a prominent American filmmaker kowtowing to a foreign regime that likes to murder our troops and allies?

Oh wait I know why... because you're a regressive America hating leftist fuck knob.
LOLOL

It's not even borderline. You're just another retard. His tweet doesn't come close to violating either of those laws. And btw, pointing out you're an imbecile is not defending him. It's pointing out you're an imbecile.

Whatever you say, turncoat.
 
Good on ya Mike. Lotsa twatish Trump acolytes around. Plenty of Deplorables on this board. Doubt it will do much. Iran is a basket case. Bit like the Trump supporters on this board. But worth a try nonetheless....

Lot of snowflake assholes like you on here. Don’t be angry that your Democrats look like idiots. You get to have President Trump till 2024 and you’ll lose the House this year as well and I will be the first to laugh in your face and tell you I told you so. Loser


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Blah, blah, blah...
 
Apparently Trumpettes only recognize wag the dog, when it’s done by D presidents.

Apparently Obozos only care about wag the dog when it's done by R presidents.

But since Trump isn't impeached then wag the dog doesn't apply.

Thanks for playing!

Er, he has been impeached by the House...

No he hasn't, and even one of the Dims star witnesses says so: Democrat witness says Trump not impeached until articles sent to Senate
 
I said BORDERLINE sedition, numbnuts.

Why am I not surprised that a dipshit like you would defend a prominent American filmmaker kowtowing to a foreign regime that likes to murder our troops and allies?

Oh wait I know why... because you're a regressive America hating leftist fuck knob.

It's not even close to sedition you fucking moron. It's called the First Amendment. You might have heard of it.
 
Apparently Trumpettes only recognize wag the dog, when it’s done by D presidents.

Apparently Obozos only care about wag the dog when it's done by R presidents.

But since Trump isn't impeached then wag the dog doesn't apply.

Thanks for playing!

Er, he has been impeached by the House...

No he hasn't, and even one of the Dims star witnesses says so: Democrat witness says Trump not impeached until articles sent to Senate

Fuck off, Idiot.

Donald Trump impeached after historic vote
 
I said BORDERLINE sedition, numbnuts.

Why am I not surprised that a dipshit like you would defend a prominent American filmmaker kowtowing to a foreign regime that likes to murder our troops and allies?

Oh wait I know why... because you're a regressive America hating leftist fuck knob.

It's not even close to sedition you fucking moron. It's called the First Amendment. You might have heard of it.

"RREEEEEEEEEEE STOP CALLING OUT OUR MOUTHPIECES!!"
 
Apparently Trumpettes only recognize wag the dog, when it’s done by D presidents.

Apparently Obozos only care about wag the dog when it's done by R presidents.

But since Trump isn't impeached then wag the dog doesn't apply.

Thanks for playing!

Er, he has been impeached by the House...

No he hasn't, and even one of the Dims star witnesses says so: Democrat witness says Trump not impeached until articles sent to Senate

Fuck off, Idiot.

Donald Trump impeached after historic vote

Impeachment is a 2 step process, idiot.

1) The vote.
2) The transmission of the articles of impeachment to the Senate. THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED.

And as has already been stated, the Democrats OWN WITNESS is calling them out on this:

“Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial,” Mr. Feldman wrote in an editorial. “Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.”

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all,” Mr. Feldman wrote for Bloomberg.

Should the House indefinitely delay sending its findings to the
Senate, “then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached,” Mr. Feldman added.

Deal with it, snowflake.
 
Apparently Trumpettes only recognize wag the dog, when it’s done by D presidents.

Apparently Obozos only care about wag the dog when it's done by R presidents.

But since Trump isn't impeached then wag the dog doesn't apply.

Thanks for playing!

Er, he has been impeached by the House...

No he hasn't, and even one of the Dims star witnesses says so: Democrat witness says Trump not impeached until articles sent to Senate

Fuck off, Idiot.

Donald Trump impeached after historic vote

Impeachment is a 2 step process, idiot.

1) The vote.
2) The transmission of the articles of impeachment to the Senate. THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED.

And as has already been stated, the Democrats OWN WITNESS is calling them out on this:

“Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial,” Mr. Feldman wrote in an editorial. “Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.”

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all,” Mr. Feldman wrote for Bloomberg.

Should the House indefinitely delay sending its findings to the
Senate, “then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached,” Mr. Feldman added.

Deal with it, snowflake.

Since when has an editorial become law? Deal with it, Petal...
 
Apparently Obozos only care about wag the dog when it's done by R presidents.

But since Trump isn't impeached then wag the dog doesn't apply.

Thanks for playing!

Er, he has been impeached by the House...

No he hasn't, and even one of the Dims star witnesses says so: Democrat witness says Trump not impeached until articles sent to Senate

Fuck off, Idiot.

Donald Trump impeached after historic vote

Impeachment is a 2 step process, idiot.

1) The vote.
2) The transmission of the articles of impeachment to the Senate. THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED.

And as has already been stated, the Democrats OWN WITNESS is calling them out on this:

“Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial,” Mr. Feldman wrote in an editorial. “Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.”

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all,” Mr. Feldman wrote for Bloomberg.

Should the House indefinitely delay sending its findings to the
Senate, “then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached,” Mr. Feldman added.

Deal with it, snowflake.

Since when has an editorial become law? Deal with it, Petal...

What part of "this is the Democrats OWN WITNESS" do you not understand you illiterate fuckwit?
 
What part of "this is the Democrats OWN WITNESS" do you not understand you illiterate fuckwit?

A witness calling them out doesn't mean it hasn't happened you Moronic Buffoon..
That's like saying everything that Trump tweets is a fact, when 99.9 % of it is Fake News.

But, you're a dumbarse Deplorable. What would you know?
 
Michael Moore sent a "personal appeal" to the Ayatollah of Iran.

Quote:

"I have just sent the Ayatollah of Iran a personal appeal asking him not to respond to our assassination of his top General with violence of any kind, but rather let me & millions of Americans fix this peacefully."

Michael Moore on Twitter

And a screenshot in case it gets deleted:

View attachment 298623


Can you believe this shit??

This is borderline sedition and this traitorous fat fuck should be charged under the Logan Act. The depravity of the left knows no bounds.
No worries. It won't be read. How do I know? An Iman guy over on twitter said that there is music in the background of the "appeal" and they frown on music...so fatty's beggings will be completely ignored.
 
What part of "this is the Democrats OWN WITNESS" do you not understand you illiterate fuckwit?

A witness calling them out doesn't mean it hasn't happened you Moronic Buffoon..
That's like saying everything that Trump tweets is a fact, when 99.9 % of it is Fake News.

But, you're a dumbarse Deplorable. What would you know?

So Trump has committed impeachable offenses based upon the testimony of a Harvard Law professor called up by the Democrats, but when the same fucking guy says that they haven't actually impeached him until they transmit the articles - suddenly he doesn't count anymore?

That's some level 10 mental gymnastics right there. What a fucking kook you are... :rolleyes:
 
Apparently Trumpettes only recognize wag the dog, when it’s done by D presidents.

Apparently Obozos only care about wag the dog when it's done by R presidents.

But since Trump isn't impeached then wag the dog doesn't apply.

Thanks for playing!
Why do fools do this? I never supported O. Never voted for a D.

Stop thinking in a binary fashion. It’s dumb.
 
Er, he has been impeached by the House...

No he hasn't, and even one of the Dims star witnesses says so: Democrat witness says Trump not impeached until articles sent to Senate

Fuck off, Idiot.

Donald Trump impeached after historic vote

Impeachment is a 2 step process, idiot.

1) The vote.
2) The transmission of the articles of impeachment to the Senate. THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED.

And as has already been stated, the Democrats OWN WITNESS is calling them out on this:

“Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial,” Mr. Feldman wrote in an editorial. “Both parts are necessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.”

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all,” Mr. Feldman wrote for Bloomberg.

Should the House indefinitely delay sending its findings to the
Senate, “then Trump could say with strong justification that he was never actually impeached,” Mr. Feldman added.

Deal with it, snowflake.

Since when has an editorial become law? Deal with it, Petal...

What part of "this is the Democrats OWN WITNESS" do you not understand you illiterate fuckwit?
Dr Grump should be re-named Dr. DIM. Thank you.
 
I supported Trump because he claimed to be a noninterventionist. It’s clear now he isn’t. Whether he got duped by all the neocons in his administration, who advised him to murder the general, matters not.

Can a devoted Trump supporter refute any of the following?

The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser
The US Government Lies Constantly, And The Burden Of Proof Is On The Accuser

In reality there’s no evidence for any of the reasons we’ve been offered for why Iran needed to be provoked into an almost inevitable retaliation that Trump is currently tweeting will result in all-out war:

  • The claim that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” is completely without evidence, rumored to be “razor thin“, and entirely debunked in this excellent essay by Craig Murray.
  • Mike Pence’s claim that Soleimani assisted 9/11 terrorists is so ridiculous that even the war-loving Washington Post dismissed it.
  • There’s no proof that Soleimani directed the strike that allegedly killed a US contractor, or that that contractor even existed.
  • There’s no proof that Soleimani was involved in any “attack” on any US embassy, leaving aside the obvious fact that a little graffiti on the walls wouldn’t justify his assassination if he did.
  • The “hundreds of American deaths” line you hear regurgitated by everyone from Trump to Elizabeth Warren actually refers to Iraqis defending themselves from an illegal US invasion with some training from Iran. The claim that Iran was behind Iraqi bombs is withoutevidence and wouldn’t matter if it were true; claiming the inhabitants of an invaded nation don’t have the right to defend themselves is absurd, regardless of where they got their weaponry.
  • The claim that Soleimani was “a terrorist” is only made because the branch of the Iranian military he commanded was arbitrarily designated a terrorist organization by the US government last year, a designation that any foreign government could just as easily make for any branch of the US military. He was actually a fearsome enemy of ISIS and al-Qaeda and played a massive role in halting the spread of ISIS.

To me it's not much of a surprise that he changed his tune, since I think most presidents are puppets these days. IMO, the PTSB would never allow a true noninterventionist, constitutionalist decent person of integrity get to the highest office of the land. And even if I'm wrong and that is possible, he would end up like JFK. I know that probably sounds crazy or blasphemous to the TV-watching mainstream types here, but I've been researching this stuff since the 90's, and the corruption/subversion is far worse than most here realize.

The saddest part of all is to see how many people are cheerleading for the empire and foreign policy, but it's because they have bought the government/MSM narrative hook line and sinker.
 
It’s clear that Democrats are doing to the killing of Soleimani, who has the blood of thousands of Americans on his hands, what they did to Russia Collusion and every other anti-Trumpism that motivates their throbbing Trump-hating base.

If Iran is successful in attacking a U.S. target or targets, Democrats and the media will blame Trump, not the regime that has been chanting for our death since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. It’s not unreasonable to believe based on their behavior that Democrats and the media are hoping Iran gives us a bloody nose or worse so that it can be used against Trump in the 2020 election.

As with the attempt to remove Trump from office even before he was in office, this goes beyond mere disagreement with Trump’s policies. There is and will be an active attempt to freeze and disrupt the administration in a confrontation with Iran. It won’t work in the short run, but it will be something Trump will have to deal with as some congressional Republicans succumb to the pressure and the media goes all in.

American Trump Derangement Syndrome is an Iranian strategic asset, and one which may cause the Iranians to misjudge American resolve.

American Trump Derangement Syndrome Is An Iranian Strategic Asset
Your post brought out some good things, Zorro, but it came to some conclusions that fall short of what is going on in the halls of Congress that is different from any other Congress heretofore in that it has determined to destabilize the Constitutional laws of the separation of powers. The players in this Congress used the FBI to stall and obstruct the ability of the Executive Branch to function, but it failed. So it continued the use of the FBI to surreptitiously expand and augment the disablement of the Executive Branch to do its duties by making obnoxious demands to stop the progress of each and every cabinet and staff member in the Executive Branch by using Maxine Waters' militia of trouble-making bullies to bully each and every member of the Presidential staff and those of specific Cabinet members' employes to make their need for basic food at mealtime disrupted with unpleasantries including screaming, false accusations, hateful yelling, in-your-face insults, to the point of getting suspicions raised against Trump's people from the vast audience of lunch-goers who wondered why these poor pathetic people were angry at politician helpers, and hurting Washington D. C. restaurants.

All of these mean things were done to acquire the total power they had counted on if Hillary Clinton had won the Presidency. The powermongers who were the angriest were those in big states--namely, California and New York, plus congressional districts in large populated areas that are areas of conquests by Democrats in the past because of the propensity of ganging up on minorities to drive them out of their areas and take them over, establishing multi-family dwelling units to increase the population and acquire more House members who control the money in big government, which the Democrats came to worship as "real power," since money can be used to empty some pockets and fill others at their pleasure.

That was not the intent of the founders who wrote a Constitution for reasonable people to share power in government who had similar aims, which was to improve the condition of the people of the United States of America throughout the land, and not in just populated areas.

The Democrats do not seem to be able to abide any competition whatsoever, and all of their activities are directed not just at limitation of other people's power, but the decimation of anybody who stands in the way of their constantly changing and therefore unstable goal posts, to get power away from everyone else. I think you will be able to define your thoughts better by watching this somewhat long, but very thorough understanding of what our country is all about, and it may help you put an understanding of cause and effect and result stated so clearly it could result in a hearty agreement that the founders had it right, but that we need to do some refining of goals without putting only one political party in charge of every single thing that goes down the pike. That is a step backward and will place us first in an oligarchical situation that punishes without trial all offenders since it must first eliminate the leadership of the country, and then also the fairness of the court to people who may not agree with the control freak Democrats whose sole and only goal is to get power by changing goals until everyone else is confused and/or fighting with each other.
Here is William Barr explaining the beauty of the fairness and equality and freedom of speaking freely to all, not just the enthusiasts of one party, be it Republican, Democrat, or Independent:

I can't emphasize how close you are to this, but part of our system includes ideas on how to improve it without removing other people's freedom of speech or without demonizing good people through public humiliation with character assassinationm which has been the relish of leftists who cannot seem to live in a state of granting other people the fairness they want for only themselves from their sundry tendency to engage in power-grabbing maneuvers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top