Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YOU are right about long involved posts because obviously you being part of the group that makes up the "stupidity of American voters" can't grasp anything unless it is less then 30 words or 30 seconds. It's called attention deficit disorder and it is what people that Gruber called "stupidity of American voters" represent. Obviously they made the Benghazi issue political! Why else would they come out less the 3 days after it happened to explain it to theHM is writing big, long posts, why? Because there is nothing left to say and when that happens, people will invariably start rambling in an effort to try and convince people, that there is.
voting community that you make up, i.e. "stupidity American voter" bloc!
That's why this stupid idiotic group of people that support Obama and his obfuscation efforts be it Obamacare, Benghazi, IRS, you name it they have counted on fooling people like you and the first time it is "shame on Obama" ...but the 2nd time YOU people that voted for Obama... yes you definitely make up the crowd Gruber describes as "stupid American voter"... totally uninformed. Totally incapable of simply asking questions rather then blindly follow
Obama who sincerely believes what he said about himself..." This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal."
You people are truly fools and Obama, Gruber, Rice they are ALL laughing at you because you never read for example this from Obama's book:
"Dreams of My Father"
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied. They were revealed. Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered
young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."
And you stupid American voters bought it! HOOK LINE and Sinker!
The report: Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the publichealthmyths, all you do is spin conspiracy with stats and analysis that leads to false conclusions.
Wow what a deep meaningful comment. I bet your Mom is the only one impressed with your IQ.Dude! Get a grip.
"Cognitive abilities are brain-based skills we need to carry out any task from the simplest to the most complex."hm, your cognitive ability continues to slip, slip sliding away.
The report is correct and those like healthymyths matter not.
Rice has been roundly criticized for those comments. The new report says the performance wasn’t her fault, however, because her talking points came from bad intelligence from multiple agencies — not from a politically motivated directive from higher-ups to mislead the public.
The House panel found that analysts received 21 reports saying a protest had occurred, including 14 from public reports and others from the CIA, the Defense Department and the National Security Agency.
The CIA changed its initial assessment nearly a week after Rice appeared on the Sunday shows.
Report No Cover-Up Intelligence Failure in Benghazi Attacks
Seems fairly straightforward to me- Rice was given bad information- according to the report by Republicans and Democrats of the House.
Everyone knows she was given bad information.
And she spouted it long and hard.
All the while the administration is sending out this woman to flavor the conversation all the while saying we needed "more time" to get the facts.
It wasn't the information as much as it was the evidence of another white wash by the white house.
That was the issue at hand.
And of course the House Report finds no evidence of that either.
A House report on the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, concludes that the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. military responded properly and that Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the public.
Never said she tried to mislead......on purpose.
Someone gave her bad information. And the White House sent her out to tell us what they thought they knew all the while saying we need more time to get the facts.
I realize the disconnect is lost on you.
yeah- I have no idea what your point is supposed to be
.
A House report on the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, concludes that the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. military responded properly and that Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the public
Yes...you really do have no idea.
"Cognitive abilities are brain-based skills we need to carry out any task from the simplest to the most complex."hm, your cognitive ability continues to slip, slip sliding away.
The report is correct and those like healthymyths matter not.
As you have once again proven... when cornered ignorant people lash out at the messenger.
I pointed out the report WAS flawed in not going far enough...i.e.
"Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the public."
http://online.wsj.com/articles/hous...acted-properly-in-benghazi-attacks-1416616698
Proof that the GOP report is flawed?
The report said the "talking points" were flawed.
The GOP didn't though admonish the ineptness of the administration for presenting "FLAWED" talking points!
"Flawed" meaning in error. By MAKING using "flawed" talking points" prematurely the administration WAS attempting to mold the public opinion!
NOTHING done prior to the re-election as evidenced by the massive campaigning by Obama was done without political calculations including sending
RICE out with "flawed talking points" to defuse the growing awareness of the Obama false claiming that a bumper sticker USED by Obama's campaign
to influence the "stupidity of the american voter"!
Biden said a bumper sticker capturing the essence of Obama’s record would read, “Osama bin Laden is dead, and General Motors is alive.”
View attachment 34263
NOW how embarrassing to any Obama supporter with this bumper sticker to have it known on 9/11/2012 terrorism was still alive in Benghazi!
Hence the need for Rice to get out ahead before the questions regarding the efforts to claim terrorism / Osama being dead were refuted!
"Cognitive abilities are brain-based skills we need to carry out any task from the simplest to the most complex."hm, your cognitive ability continues to slip, slip sliding away.
The report is correct and those like healthymyths matter not.
As you have once again proven... when cornered ignorant people lash out at the messenger.
I pointed out the report WAS flawed in not going far enough...i.e.
"Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the public."
http://online.wsj.com/articles/hous...acted-properly-in-benghazi-attacks-1416616698
Proof that the GOP report is flawed?
The report said the "talking points" were flawed.
The GOP didn't though admonish the ineptness of the administration for presenting "FLAWED" talking points!
"Flawed" meaning in error. By MAKING using "flawed" talking points" prematurely the administration WAS attempting to mold the public opinion!
NOTHING done prior to the re-election as evidenced by the massive campaigning by Obama was done without political calculations including sending
RICE out with "flawed talking points" to defuse the growing awareness of the Obama false claiming that a bumper sticker USED by Obama's campaign
to influence the "stupidity of the american voter"!
Biden said a bumper sticker capturing the essence of Obama’s record would read, “Osama bin Laden is dead, and General Motors is alive.”
View attachment 34263
NOW how embarrassing to any Obama supporter with this bumper sticker to have it known on 9/11/2012 terrorism was still alive in Benghazi!
Hence the need for Rice to get out ahead before the questions regarding the efforts to claim terrorism / Osama being dead were refuted!
So in other words- you have your theory- and you disagree with the Republicans and Democrats who actually did the investigation and talked with the principles??? and read the reports.
So you prefer to believe a conspiracy theory than the facts.
Few people other than left wing shills are buying what's in this "report".A House report on the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, concludes that the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. military responded properly and that Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the public.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/hous...acted-properly-in-benghazi-attacks-1416616698
Yes I am strongly suggesting that the GOP Benghazi report badly flawed for the following reason:
The Republican-led House intelligence committee flaw is NOT taking the TIMING of the below statements.
Mrs. Clinton, as well as on Susan Rice , then the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and now the White House national security adviser. Ms. Rice, appearing on television news programs a week after the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks, described the events in ways later found to be inaccurate.
The committee didn't seem to put the TIMING of the QUICK to judgement assessments by Obama's people which were made strictly for political considerations, i.e. re-election campaign was in full swing.
Rather then being above the political fray, Rice,et.al. including Obama wanted DESPERATELY to cast this as the fault of a video and not a fault of the administration.
And that is where the flaw is with the GOP Benghazi report.
EVERYTHING EVERYTHING done by Obama administration is what is best politically FIRST, then anything else afterwards. For example Obamacare... NEVER done for what was best for the country.. BUT totally oriented towards a political benefit. Obama's latest thumb to democracy his immigration plan. Totally designed for securing Democrat voters! NO consideration for the country first but what is good politically!
That is the flaw of the GOP overall. They think like most rational Americans that the country comes first, then the political equation. NOT Democrats and especially not this administration!
Whatever is GOOD POLITICALLY is what drives EVERYTHING!
And so Rice came out and to present the Benghazi event as caused by a video was totally politics driven!
Blaming the video shifted at the pre-election time frame the focus from the ineptness of the administration
which WAS pointed out in the GOP flawed Benghazi study.
"A bipartisan Senate intelligence committee report released in January sharply criticized American diplomats and intelligence officials, and found that the assault in Benghazi was “likely preventable” through improved security and intelligence operations."
The HoR committee is buying what is in this report
.
The mainstream of the GOP is buying what is in this report.
Centrists and leftists are buying what is in this report.
Only the far right is not, and, just like I told them, no one cares what they think. They have no power.
The report: Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the publichealthmyths, all you do is spin conspiracy with stats and analysis that leads to false conclusions.
Let's accept the report's finding the "talking points” were flawed" we are flawed means made mistakes.
Now we are talking about ineptness that cause 4 Americans lives!
So Democrats value "national security" you say? What about our military? Do you think they value and are circumspect whenever a discussion of the US Military comes up?The report: Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the publichealthmyths, all you do is spin conspiracy with stats and analysis that leads to false conclusions.
Let's accept the report's finding the "talking points” were flawed" we are flawed means made mistakes.
Now we are talking about ineptness that cause 4 Americans lives!
I think most Americans would agree that what happened in Benghazi should have been investigated in order to understand what mistakes led to those 4 Americans dying.
Certainly that is what was done after almost 300 U.S. Marines died in the bombing of their barracks in Lebanon.
But like yourself- the immediate Republican response this time was to figure out how to blame President Obama- and of course also future possible candidate Hilary.
Why wasn't Lebanon handled like Republicans have handled Benghazi?
Because Democrats valued national security over political partisanship.
So Democrats value "national security" you say? What about our military? Do you think they value and are circumspect whenever a discussion of the US Military comes up?The report: Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the publichealthmyths, all you do is spin conspiracy with stats and analysis that leads to false conclusions.
Let's accept the report's finding the "talking points” were flawed" we are flawed means made mistakes.
Now we are talking about ineptness that cause 4 Americans lives!
I think most Americans would agree that what happened in Benghazi should have been investigated in order to understand what mistakes led to those 4 Americans dying.
Certainly that is what was done after almost 300 U.S. Marines died in the bombing of their barracks in Lebanon.
But like yourself- the immediate Republican response this time was to figure out how to blame President Obama- and of course also future possible candidate Hilary.
Why wasn't Lebanon handled like Republicans have handled Benghazi?
Because Democrats valued national security over political partisanship.
Please give me some concrete examples BECAUSE I'm going to if you aren't aware of how Democrat leaders' statements were responsible for US soldiers' deaths.
So Democrats value "national security" you say? What about our military? Do you think they value and are circumspect whenever a discussion of the US Military comes up?The report: Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the publichealthmyths, all you do is spin conspiracy with stats and analysis that leads to false conclusions.
Let's accept the report's finding the "talking points” were flawed" we are flawed means made mistakes.
Now we are talking about ineptness that cause 4 Americans lives!
I think most Americans would agree that what happened in Benghazi should have been investigated in order to understand what mistakes led to those 4 Americans dying.
Certainly that is what was done after almost 300 U.S. Marines died in the bombing of their barracks in Lebanon.
But like yourself- the immediate Republican response this time was to figure out how to blame President Obama- and of course also future possible candidate Hilary.
Why wasn't Lebanon handled like Republicans have handled Benghazi?
Because Democrats valued national security over political partisanship.
Please give me some concrete examples BECAUSE I'm going to if you aren't aware of how Democrat leaders' statements were responsible for US soldiers' deaths.
Feel free to show me how Democrat leaders statements lead to U.S. soldiers deaths more than the signature of Ronald Reagan sending almost 300 marines to their deaths in Lebanon.
For those of you with little memory of history-
October 23, 1983 - 241 U.S. service personnel, 220 Marines and 21 other service personnel, are killed by a truck bomb at a Marine compound in Beirut, Lebanon.
300 service members had been living at the four-story building at the airport in Beirut. There were 1,800 Marines stationed in Beirut at the time.
A multi-national force with units from France, Italy and the United Kingdom is also on peacekeeping duty in Lebanon at the same time.
Timeline:
1982 - President Ronald Reagan sends Marines to Lebanon on a peacekeeping mission.
October 23, 1983 - At 6:22 am, a truck carrying 2000 pounds of explosives drives into the Marine compound in Beirut, Lebanon and crashes into the 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regimental Battalion Landing Team barracks.
February 1984 - U.S. troops withdraw from Lebanon.
Instead of attempting to blame Reagan for the loss of American lives, Democrats and Republicans pulled together.
So Democrats value "national security" you say? What about our military? Do you think they value and are circumspect whenever a discussion of the US Military comes up?The report: Obama administration “talking points” were flawed, but didn’t find that administration officials attempted to mislead the publichealthmyths, all you do is spin conspiracy with stats and analysis that leads to false conclusions.
Let's accept the report's finding the "talking points” were flawed" we are flawed means made mistakes.
Now we are talking about ineptness that cause 4 Americans lives!
I think most Americans would agree that what happened in Benghazi should have been investigated in order to understand what mistakes led to those 4 Americans dying.
Certainly that is what was done after almost 300 U.S. Marines died in the bombing of their barracks in Lebanon.
But like yourself- the immediate Republican response this time was to figure out how to blame President Obama- and of course also future possible candidate Hilary.
Why wasn't Lebanon handled like Republicans have handled Benghazi?
Because Democrats valued national security over political partisanship.
Please give me some concrete examples BECAUSE I'm going to if you aren't aware of how Democrat leaders' statements were responsible for US soldiers' deaths.
Feel free to show me how Democrat leaders statements lead to U.S. soldiers deaths more than the signature of Ronald Reagan sending almost 300 marines to their deaths in Lebanon.
For those of you with little memory of history-
October 23, 1983 - 241 U.S. service personnel, 220 Marines and 21 other service personnel, are killed by a truck bomb at a Marine compound in Beirut, Lebanon.
300 service members had been living at the four-story building at the airport in Beirut. There were 1,800 Marines stationed in Beirut at the time.
A multi-national force with units from France, Italy and the United Kingdom is also on peacekeeping duty in Lebanon at the same time.
Timeline:
1982 - President Ronald Reagan sends Marines to Lebanon on a peacekeeping mission.
October 23, 1983 - At 6:22 am, a truck carrying 2000 pounds of explosives drives into the Marine compound in Beirut, Lebanon and crashes into the 1st Battalion, 8th Marine Regimental Battalion Landing Team barracks.
February 1984 - U.S. troops withdraw from Lebanon.
Instead of attempting to blame Reagan for the loss of American lives, Democrats and Republicans pulled together.
Proof?
THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!!
according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war."
