R
rdean
Guest
- Thread starter
- #241
Uh, yes it is. I've had it done (I had uterine polyps). A small clump of cells doesn't show up in an external sonogram, so they use "the wand" instead and it's VERY intrusive and it's awful. Just awful, if you must know.
Someone who has been through the procedure and all they can do is joke or yell "liar".
Right wingers complain about the "stories" I come up with. Just like this "story", I didn't make it up. It's what their party does. And they refuse to believe what their own party does. Why is that? Then when it's rubbed in their noses, they "spin" it into a direction that makes sense in their little minds. Well, sometimes, you just can't spin it that much. It is what it is.
I didn't joke or call anybody a liar.
You, on the other hand, just falsely portrayed my post as such and then you claim other people "make it up".
Of course, I won't claim that your party does that, just that you do.
Nice ad hominem with the "little minds" comment.
You were responding to this post: An ultrasound is not invasive, but an abortion is.
My comment was about that post: Someone who has been through the procedure and all they can do is joke or yell "liar".
Transvaginal ultra sound is most certainly "invasive". Someone just told you it wasn't. That wasn't right.
It's OK. I understand you're sensitive about the subject. If I had been through it, I would be too.
Last edited by a moderator: