martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,007
- 34,332
- 2,300
Someone has to defend billionaires. They've been so maligned.
Thank God for Republicans living in trailers.
Ah the old "voting against their class interests" spew from R-Derp.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone has to defend billionaires. They've been so maligned.
Thank God for Republicans living in trailers.
Someone has to defend billionaires. They've been so maligned.
Thank God for Republicans living in trailers.
Post a link that proves his is wrong.
And, uh, you don't get to talk about free speech while defending CU. That's like saying marshmallows put out forest fires.
The very purpose of CU is to restrict free speech and crush our constitution.
How do we remove money from politics?
By restricting politicians to acting within the strictly limited enumerated powers of the Constitution. After all, if politicians could not meddle to the financial benefit of themselves or those that support them, there would be no impetus to inject large amounts of money into the political process...because there would be no expectation of an adequate return. Limit government as was originally intended and you limit the money in politics.
Someone has to defend billionaires. They've been so maligned.
Thank God for Republicans living in trailers.
A liberal cause - education.
A conservative cause - throwing pennies at the poor and expecting to be treated like gods and then being disappointed and angry at those ungrateful poor people who are only poor by choice.
Bill Melinda Gates Foundation
Oh, who do you think made that cute little pamphlet ?
Who cares? Do you deny its accuracy?
I would not depend on it.
I wouldn't either...so I confirmed it's accuracy. Now don't you think too deeply on this. Remember, it's all about what feels right.
Well...your link...not exactly an objective view of the issue. "Overwhelmingly biased" comes to mind, as do the numerous example of extreme hyperbole. That the best you can do?
In any case, let's get to the heart of the matter. Do you believe the government should be able to restrict free speech near to an election? That is what CU was all about...the fact government passed a law banning political speech before an election. They banned a movie...in that case, a movie from Citizen's United. The SC, rightly in my mind, said 'you can't do that'.
So, you cool with government restricting speech or not?
Post a link that proves his is wrong.
And, uh, you don't get to talk about free speech while defending CU. That's like saying marshmallows put out forest fires.
The very purpose of CU is to restrict free speech and crush our constitution.
The very purpose of CU is to restrict free speech and crush our constitution.
Well when you see a post like this ya know they are totally lost.
CU does the very opposite,that's why the court did what it did. Free speech has a long reach.
Post a link that proves his is wrong.
And, uh, you don't get to talk about free speech while defending CU. That's like saying marshmallows put out forest fires.
The very purpose of CU is to restrict free speech and crush our constitution.
good grief, who can take any of you serious anymore?
you don't just support millionaires you ELECT them to be your master IN CONGRESS
you're both a joke and so is BRAD
Stoopid Stuff Speaks from ignorance as usual.
Its the RWs like you who elect those who ONLY support big money.
Who are these subversive donor, Nuttley....Billionairs!!!
Oh, so NOW you're against big money laws the right forced on us.
All of their money together does not even come close to what the Koch's are using to buy YOUR vote.
Well...your link...not exactly an objective view of the issue. "Overwhelmingly biased" comes to mind, as do the numerous example of extreme hyperbole. That the best you can do?
In any case, let's get to the heart of the matter. Do you believe the government should be able to restrict free speech near to an election? That is what CU was all about...the fact government passed a law banning political speech before an election. They banned a movie...in that case, a movie from Citizen's United. The SC, rightly in my mind, said 'you can't do that'.
So, you cool with government restricting speech or not?
Oh, who do you think made that cute little pamphlet ?
Who cares? Do you deny its accuracy?
I would not depend on it.
I wouldn't either...so I confirmed it's accuracy. Now don't you think too deeply on this. Remember, it's all about what feels right.
Provide link, if you can. Never mind. I beat you too it.
What they’re saying about Save Jersey:
“Matt Rooney is one of our State’s most passionate and dedicated YR leaders. His tireless efforts are leading the GOP netroots revolution in New Jersey, conveying our party’s conservative message to a new generation of Republicans. Matt’s hard work is already paying dividends here in the Garden State…”
- Governor Chris Christie (R-New Jersey), endorsing Matt Rooney for Young Republican national office in 2009
Yes its just GOP propaganda.
damn, I need one of those cats forgood grief, who can take any of you serious anymore?
you don't just support millionaires you ELECT them to be your master IN CONGRESS
you're both a joke and so is BRAD
Stoopid Stuff Speaks from ignorance as usual.
Its the RWs like you who elect those who ONLY support big money.
If I am I learned it from you
MEOW
Show me corporate protection and special treatment in the Constitution....not there.
Show me corporate protection and special treatment in the Constitution....not there.
show me where congress was delegated the power to regulate corporate speech
Show me corporate protection and special treatment in the Constitution....not there.