GOP jobs agenda

[Dad2three]

With Republicans taking over Congress today, prepare to be dazzled with their jobs agenda. It is what we have been waiting six years for

In the new Congress, Republicans will have the majority in both the Senate and the House for the first time in eight years. As they get ready to take power, their rhetorical focus is clear: jobs, the economy, and more jobs.
So far, there are two main proposals on deck for the GOP. First, the Hire More Heroes Act, which would make it easier for small businesses that hire veterans to deny health care to their employees. Second, they want to immediately build the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that would transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
On their own, these are both extremely small-bore policies. But as a jobs agenda, this doesn't even rise to the level of pitiful. It's the latest evidence that Republicans continue to struggle with basic macroeconomics — and it does not bode well for the nation should they win the White House in 2016.

Sorry Republicans The Keystone XL pipeline is not a jobs agenda - The Week

The Republicans are for stopping illegal immigration, and deporting illegals here now. No proposal is more job creating than that, and none is more job-killing than Obama's executive order amnesty.

Sure, THAT'S why when the GOP had control of Congress (mostly) from 1995-2007, it was HIGH on their lists of things to do right???? lol

I could spend time researching that, but I'm not interested in the past. Let's talk about right now. Besides from 1995-2007, they knew they had a pro-illegal alien president to veto their stuff.

Yeah NOT like they have ANY history of passing bills a Prez wouldn't sign (OBAMACARES 55+ TIMES), lol

Apples and oranges. Getting back on topic, Obama's pro-immigration policies are killing jobs for Americans, all while he brags about creating them (for foreigners).

Apples and oranges? lol

OK, Dubya had a loss of 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years with his and the GOP's 'job creator' policies., Even stopping Dec 2007, it was a miserable 4 million in 7 years

That socialist Obama has 11+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing the 'job killer' Obamacares in Feb 2010, that's a NET of 7 million PRIVATE sector jobs since Obama came into office (since Dubya/.GOP policy lost 4 million in 2009)!

Besides you Bircher bullshit, do you have ANYTHING???

 

[rdean]

Why are Republicans screaming about jobs they aren't qualified for anyway? That's what happens when you think education is for snobs.

Education?

LMAO!

Are you an educated woman?

Please enlighten us with your credentials.

(FYI: The reader should know I have already called, double Ph.D, with several Masters from Ivy League Universities and all before the age of 14... )

You said: FYI: The reader should know I have already called, double Ph.D, with several Masters from Ivy League Universities and all before the age of 14...

Did you write that? Because the sentence is very strangely structured. Not sure what it means.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Why are Republicans screaming about jobs they aren't qualified for anyway? That's what happens when you think education is for snobs.

Education?

LMAO!

Are you an educated woman?

Please enlighten us with your credentials.

(FYI: The reader should know I have already called, double Ph.D, with several Masters from Ivy League Universities and all before the age of 14... )

You said: FYI: The reader should know I have already called, double Ph.D, with several Masters from Ivy League Universities and all before the age of 14...

Did you write that? Because the sentence is very strangely structured. Not sure what it means.

Yes, that was me berating you, for projecting ignorance upon your opposition, querying you for clarification of your education bona fides, then I projected that you're response would attempt to establish your otherwise ignorant ass, as genius intellect and highly educated.

All of which was done to demonstrate that you're a dumbass.

So... "Mission Accomplished".

Anything else?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

(FYI: The reader should know I have already called, double Ph.D, with several Masters from Ivy League Universities and all before the age of 14... )

That is the funniest, craziest thing I have seen you write whursmykeys. If you are talking of yourself that is. If not your fantasy, then who's fantasy education are you talking about?

I thought you sold vacuum cleaners?

You 'thought'?

LOL! And without leaving a TRACE of evidence. Impressive...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

C'mon, go easy on oldstyle. The economy is in full swing under Obama and like many righties, it's killing him. All he can do now is swing wildly like a blindfolded kid at a piñata.

If you've been paying attention ... here's a summation of the conservative viewpoint over the last 40 years

Carter was the worst president in history. Reagan was the greatest. Bush Sr. was a Liberal who raised taxes. Clinton failed to help the economy, it was Reagan's policies which fueled the economy until Clinton wrecked it in 2001. Bush Jr. was a Liberal like his father. Obama is the worst president in history. The economy is only improving now despite him; once again, thanks to Reagan's policies which just took a "time out" for a decade.

ROFL full swing... ROFL...

5% GDP, 5.6% unemployment (0.1 point away from full employment), 1.3% inflation....

Yup, full swing.

WTF does 5% GDP mean? Are you mentally handicapped?

ROFL full employment... ROFL yeah with a massive increase in illegals that are not counted and a massive increase in people of "working age" leaving the workplace because they got on disability or unemployment insurance ran out. ROFL your making me laugh so hard I'm getting a stomach cramp.

1.3% inflation... ROFL just wait till the oil guy's quit fracking.

WTF does 5% GDP mean?

U.S. Economy Posts Strongest Growth in More Than a Decade - WSJ

GDP Grows at 5% Rate, Supported by Consumer Spending, Business Investment

The U.S. economy is rounding out 2014 in a sweet spot of robust growth, sustained hiring and falling unemployment, stirring optimism that a postrecession breakout has arrived

Does it really surprise you that jobs are starting to be created now, Siete? People in the Private Sector have been sitting on trillions of dollars trying to figure out what legislation Barack Obama and Progressives in the Congress were going to pass that would affect their bottom line. They no longer have that worry. They are now able to estimate what their costs will be and how much of their profits they will be allowed to keep.

And I'm still waiting to hear what Obama policy has created jobs in the oil and natural gas production industries!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL

This section provides information relating to employment in oil and gas extraction.




Employment, all employees (seasonally adjusted)

216,100 (NOT A TOTAL OF EVEN 1.7 MILLION IN THE INDUSTRY, BUT THEY'LL CREATE 3.5 MILLION MORE JOBS IN 20 YEARS RIGHT???LOL)

Industries at a Glance Oil and Gas Extraction NAICS 211


Since 2008, the oil and gas sector has added 61,500 jobs

The Oil Job Boom Is Over

Do you not understand English? I ask what Obama policy has created jobs in the oil and natural gas production industries and you spam that same stupid shit? It's a simple question, Sparky...WHAT OBAMA POLICY HAS CREATED JOBS IN THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES?

DUH?

OK, Bubba you got me, NONE of Obama's policies created the ENTIRE 61,500 jobs in the oil and gas fields since 2008.

So instead of his policies creating 11.2+ million jobs since hitting the Bush bottom, he only has 11.1+ million to his crewdit!!

Now we're getting somewhere! You've finally admitted that Barack Obama had ZERO to do with any jobs created in natural gas and oil production! Congrats, Dad...it's your first honest statement in this string.

Of course you're still going with the totally incorrect number of jobs created in the natural gas and oil production industries...a number that you got from one of your so biased it's laughable liberal web sites but with you that's a given!

Jobs are not being created.

More than 50% of the spike in GDP was the result of consumers buying health insurance, per the recent legal requirement to do so.

This month Macy's declared that it was shutting down 50% of it's retail outlets and consequently cutting nearly 1500 jobs.

JC Penny is doing the same thing, except their shutting down 2300 jobs.

Here's the thing... massive layoffs do not come in thriving, or otherwise expanding markets.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

With Republicans taking over Congress today, prepare to be dazzled with their jobs agenda. It is what we have been waiting six years for

In the new Congress, Republicans will have the majority in both the Senate and the House for the first time in eight years. As they get ready to take power, their rhetorical focus is clear: jobs, the economy, and more jobs.
So far, there are two main proposals on deck for the GOP. First, the Hire More Heroes Act, which would make it easier for small businesses that hire veterans to deny health care to their employees. Second, they want to immediately build the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that would transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
On their own, these are both extremely small-bore policies. But as a jobs agenda, this doesn't even rise to the level of pitiful. It's the latest evidence that Republicans continue to struggle with basic macroeconomics — and it does not bode well for the nation should they win the White House in 2016.

Sorry Republicans The Keystone XL pipeline is not a jobs agenda - The Week

Your forgetting all the jobs bills passed by the House that are sitting in the Senate that needs to be passed now that they have the majority.

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

 

[BULLDOG]

With Republicans taking over Congress today, prepare to be dazzled with their jobs agenda. It is what we have been waiting six years for

In the new Congress, Republicans will have the majority in both the Senate and the House for the first time in eight years. As they get ready to take power, their rhetorical focus is clear: jobs, the economy, and more jobs.
So far, there are two main proposals on deck for the GOP. First, the Hire More Heroes Act, which would make it easier for small businesses that hire veterans to deny health care to their employees. Second, they want to immediately build the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that would transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
On their own, these are both extremely small-bore policies. But as a jobs agenda, this doesn't even rise to the level of pitiful. It's the latest evidence that Republicans continue to struggle with basic macroeconomics — and it does not bode well for the nation should they win the White House in 2016.

Sorry Republicans The Keystone XL pipeline is not a jobs agenda - The Week

Your forgetting all the jobs bills passed by the House that are sitting in the Senate that needs to be passed now that they have the majority.

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

At least you're consistent. Still seeing things that aren't there.

 

[Dad2three]

ROFL full swing... ROFL...

5% GDP, 5.6% unemployment (0.1 point away from full employment), 1.3% inflation....

Yup, full swing.

WTF does 5% GDP mean? Are you mentally handicapped?

ROFL full employment... ROFL yeah with a massive increase in illegals that are not counted and a massive increase in people of "working age" leaving the workplace because they got on disability or unemployment insurance ran out. ROFL your making me laugh so hard I'm getting a stomach cramp.

1.3% inflation... ROFL just wait till the oil guy's quit fracking.

WTF does 5% GDP mean?

U.S. Economy Posts Strongest Growth in More Than a Decade - WSJ

GDP Grows at 5% Rate, Supported by Consumer Spending, Business Investment

The U.S. economy is rounding out 2014 in a sweet spot of robust growth, sustained hiring and falling unemployment, stirring optimism that a postrecession breakout has arrived

Does it really surprise you that jobs are starting to be created now, Siete? People in the Private Sector have been sitting on trillions of dollars trying to figure out what legislation Barack Obama and Progressives in the Congress were going to pass that would affect their bottom line. They no longer have that worry. They are now able to estimate what their costs will be and how much of their profits they will be allowed to keep.

And I'm still waiting to hear what Obama policy has created jobs in the oil and natural gas production industries!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL

This section provides information relating to employment in oil and gas extraction.




Employment, all employees (seasonally adjusted)

216,100 (NOT A TOTAL OF EVEN 1.7 MILLION IN THE INDUSTRY, BUT THEY'LL CREATE 3.5 MILLION MORE JOBS IN 20 YEARS RIGHT???LOL)

Industries at a Glance Oil and Gas Extraction NAICS 211


Since 2008, the oil and gas sector has added 61,500 jobs

The Oil Job Boom Is Over

Do you not understand English? I ask what Obama policy has created jobs in the oil and natural gas production industries and you spam that same stupid shit? It's a simple question, Sparky...WHAT OBAMA POLICY HAS CREATED JOBS IN THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES?

DUH?

OK, Bubba you got me, NONE of Obama's policies created the ENTIRE 61,500 jobs in the oil and gas fields since 2008.

So instead of his policies creating 11.2+ million jobs since hitting the Bush bottom, he only has 11.1+ million to his crewdit!!

Now we're getting somewhere! You've finally admitted that Barack Obama had ZERO to do with any jobs created in natural gas and oil production! Congrats, Dad...it's your first honest statement in this string.

Of course you're still going with the totally incorrect number of jobs created in the natural gas and oil production industries...a number that you got from one of your so biased it's laughable liberal web sites but with you that's a given!

Jobs are not being created.

More than 50% of the spike in GDP was the result of consumers buying health insurance, per the recent legal requirement to do so.

This month Macy's declared that it was shutting down 50% of it's retail outlets and consequently cutting nearly 1500 jobs.

JC Penny is doing the same thing, except their shutting down 2300 jobs.

Here's the thing... massive layoffs do not come in thriving, or otherwise expanding markets.

More bullshit OPINIONS without context. 50% of GDP spike was health insurance???? lol

Yeah, NOT like people are shopping from home right? Or the JCP, Macy's, etc models need tweaking? lol

;

 

[Dad2three]

ROFL full swing... ROFL...

5% GDP, 5.6% unemployment (0.1 point away from full employment), 1.3% inflation....

Yup, full swing.

WTF does 5% GDP mean? Are you mentally handicapped?

ROFL full employment... ROFL yeah with a massive increase in illegals that are not counted and a massive increase in people of "working age" leaving the workplace because they got on disability or unemployment insurance ran out. ROFL your making me laugh so hard I'm getting a stomach cramp.

1.3% inflation... ROFL just wait till the oil guy's quit fracking.

WTF does 5% GDP mean?

U.S. Economy Posts Strongest Growth in More Than a Decade - WSJ

GDP Grows at 5% Rate, Supported by Consumer Spending, Business Investment

The U.S. economy is rounding out 2014 in a sweet spot of robust growth, sustained hiring and falling unemployment, stirring optimism that a postrecession breakout has arrived

Does it really surprise you that jobs are starting to be created now, Siete? People in the Private Sector have been sitting on trillions of dollars trying to figure out what legislation Barack Obama and Progressives in the Congress were going to pass that would affect their bottom line. They no longer have that worry. They are now able to estimate what their costs will be and how much of their profits they will be allowed to keep.

And I'm still waiting to hear what Obama policy has created jobs in the oil and natural gas production industries!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL

This section provides information relating to employment in oil and gas extraction.




Employment, all employees (seasonally adjusted)

216,100 (NOT A TOTAL OF EVEN 1.7 MILLION IN THE INDUSTRY, BUT THEY'LL CREATE 3.5 MILLION MORE JOBS IN 20 YEARS RIGHT???LOL)

Industries at a Glance Oil and Gas Extraction NAICS 211


Since 2008, the oil and gas sector has added 61,500 jobs

The Oil Job Boom Is Over

Do you not understand English? I ask what Obama policy has created jobs in the oil and natural gas production industries and you spam that same stupid shit? It's a simple question, Sparky...WHAT OBAMA POLICY HAS CREATED JOBS IN THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES?

DUH?

OK, Bubba you got me, NONE of Obama's policies created the ENTIRE 61,500 jobs in the oil and gas fields since 2008.

So instead of his policies creating 11.2+ million jobs since hitting the Bush bottom, he only has 11.1+ million to his crewdit!!

Now we're getting somewhere! You've finally admitted that Barack Obama had ZERO to do with any jobs created in natural gas and oil production! Congrats, Dad...it's your first honest statement in this string.

Of course you're still going with the totally incorrect number of jobs created in the natural gas and oil production industries...a number that you got from one of your so biased it's laughable liberal web sites but with you that's a given!

Jobs are not being created.

More than 50% of the spike in GDP was the result of consumers buying health insurance, per the recent legal requirement to do so.

This month Macy's declared that it was shutting down 50% of it's retail outlets and consequently cutting nearly 1500 jobs.

JC Penny is doing the same thing, except their shutting down 2300 jobs.

Here's the thing... massive layoffs do not come in thriving, or otherwise expanding markets.

NOTHING on your bullshot premise of the 'left' crashing the Banksters economy huh? lol

"I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organisations, specifically banks and others, were such that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms," said Allan Greenspan.
Greenspan - I was wrong about the economy. Sort of Business The Guardian

 

[Listening]

The Republicans are for stopping illegal immigration, and deporting illegals here now. No proposal is more job creating than that, and none is more job-killing than Obama's executive order amnesty.

Sure, THAT'S why when the GOP had control of Congress (mostly) from 1995-2007, it was HIGH on their lists of things to do right???? lol

I could spend time researching that, but I'm not interested in the past. Let's talk about right now. Besides from 1995-2007, they knew they had a pro-illegal alien president to veto their stuff.

Yeah NOT like they have ANY history of passing bills a Prez wouldn't sign (OBAMACARES 55+ TIMES), lol

Apples and oranges. Getting back on topic, Obama's pro-immigration policies are killing jobs for Americans, all while he brags about creating them (for foreigners).

Apples and oranges? lol

OK, Dubya had a loss of 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years with his and the GOP's 'job creator' policies., Even stopping Dec 2007, it was a miserable 4 million in 7 years

That socialist Obama has 11+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing the 'job killer' Obamacares in Feb 2010, that's a NET of 7 million PRIVATE sector jobs since Obama came into office (since Dubya/.GOP policy lost 4 million in 2009)!

Besides you Bircher bullshit, do you have ANYTHING???

You are worried about other people's bullshit.

ROTFLMAO

 

[Dad2three]

With Republicans taking over Congress today, prepare to be dazzled with their jobs agenda. It is what we have been waiting six years for

In the new Congress, Republicans will have the majority in both the Senate and the House for the first time in eight years. As they get ready to take power, their rhetorical focus is clear: jobs, the economy, and more jobs.
So far, there are two main proposals on deck for the GOP. First, the Hire More Heroes Act, which would make it easier for small businesses that hire veterans to deny health care to their employees. Second, they want to immediately build the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that would transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
On their own, these are both extremely small-bore policies. But as a jobs agenda, this doesn't even rise to the level of pitiful. It's the latest evidence that Republicans continue to struggle with basic macroeconomics — and it does not bode well for the nation should they win the White House in 2016.

Sorry Republicans The Keystone XL pipeline is not a jobs agenda - The Week

Your forgetting all the jobs bills passed by the House that are sitting in the Senate that needs to be passed now that they have the majority.

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

 

[Dad2three]

Sure, THAT'S why when the GOP had control of Congress (mostly) from 1995-2007, it was HIGH on their lists of things to do right???? lol

I could spend time researching that, but I'm not interested in the past. Let's talk about right now. Besides from 1995-2007, they knew they had a pro-illegal alien president to veto their stuff.

Yeah NOT like they have ANY history of passing bills a Prez wouldn't sign (OBAMACARES 55+ TIMES), lol

Apples and oranges. Getting back on topic, Obama's pro-immigration policies are killing jobs for Americans, all while he brags about creating them (for foreigners).

Apples and oranges? lol

OK, Dubya had a loss of 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years with his and the GOP's 'job creator' policies., Even stopping Dec 2007, it was a miserable 4 million in 7 years

That socialist Obama has 11+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing the 'job killer' Obamacares in Feb 2010, that's a NET of 7 million PRIVATE sector jobs since Obama came into office (since Dubya/.GOP policy lost 4 million in 2009)!

Besides you Bircher bullshit, do you have ANYTHING???

You are worried about other people's bullshit.

ROTFLMAO

So NO you aren't a man of your word, and will just keep popping in and ONLY answer the posit's you want.. lol

 

[Listening]

I could spend time researching that, but I'm not interested in the past. Let's talk about right now. Besides from 1995-2007, they knew they had a pro-illegal alien president to veto their stuff.

Yeah NOT like they have ANY history of passing bills a Prez wouldn't sign (OBAMACARES 55+ TIMES), lol

Apples and oranges. Getting back on topic, Obama's pro-immigration policies are killing jobs for Americans, all while he brags about creating them (for foreigners).

Apples and oranges? lol

OK, Dubya had a loss of 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years with his and the GOP's 'job creator' policies., Even stopping Dec 2007, it was a miserable 4 million in 7 years

That socialist Obama has 11+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing the 'job killer' Obamacares in Feb 2010, that's a NET of 7 million PRIVATE sector jobs since Obama came into office (since Dubya/.GOP policy lost 4 million in 2009)!

Besides you Bircher bullshit, do you have ANYTHING???

You are worried about other people's bullshit.

ROTFLMAO

So NO you aren't a man of your word, and will just keep popping in and ONLY answer the posit's you want.. lol

You are on ignore because I can get through a thread page 4 times faster if I don't have scroll through your worthless spamshit.

You don't like it....Fuck Off.

 

[Listening]

With Republicans taking over Congress today, prepare to be dazzled with their jobs agenda. It is what we have been waiting six years for

In the new Congress, Republicans will have the majority in both the Senate and the House for the first time in eight years. As they get ready to take power, their rhetorical focus is clear: jobs, the economy, and more jobs.
So far, there are two main proposals on deck for the GOP. First, the Hire More Heroes Act, which would make it easier for small businesses that hire veterans to deny health care to their employees. Second, they want to immediately build the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that would transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
On their own, these are both extremely small-bore policies. But as a jobs agenda, this doesn't even rise to the level of pitiful. It's the latest evidence that Republicans continue to struggle with basic macroeconomics — and it does not bode well for the nation should they win the White House in 2016.

Sorry Republicans The Keystone XL pipeline is not a jobs agenda - The Week

Your forgetting all the jobs bills passed by the House that are sitting in the Senate that needs to be passed now that they have the majority.

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

Franklin also said:

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

 

[Dad2three]

With Republicans taking over Congress today, prepare to be dazzled with their jobs agenda. It is what we have been waiting six years for

In the new Congress, Republicans will have the majority in both the Senate and the House for the first time in eight years. As they get ready to take power, their rhetorical focus is clear: jobs, the economy, and more jobs.
So far, there are two main proposals on deck for the GOP. First, the Hire More Heroes Act, which would make it easier for small businesses that hire veterans to deny health care to their employees. Second, they want to immediately build the Keystone XL pipeline, a project that would transport oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
On their own, these are both extremely small-bore policies. But as a jobs agenda, this doesn't even rise to the level of pitiful. It's the latest evidence that Republicans continue to struggle with basic macroeconomics — and it does not bode well for the nation should they win the White House in 2016.

Sorry Republicans The Keystone XL pipeline is not a jobs agenda - The Week

Your forgetting all the jobs bills passed by the House that are sitting in the Senate that needs to be passed now that they have the majority.

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

Franklin also said:

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

Oh his quote on stopping EXPORTS of corn? lol



On the Price of Corn and Management of the Poor, 1766



Founding.com A Project of the Claremont Institute

 

[Faun]

Yeah NOT like they have ANY history of passing bills a Prez wouldn't sign (OBAMACARES 55+ TIMES), lol

Apples and oranges. Getting back on topic, Obama's pro-immigration policies are killing jobs for Americans, all while he brags about creating them (for foreigners).

Apples and oranges? lol

OK, Dubya had a loss of 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years with his and the GOP's 'job creator' policies., Even stopping Dec 2007, it was a miserable 4 million in 7 years

That socialist Obama has 11+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing the 'job killer' Obamacares in Feb 2010, that's a NET of 7 million PRIVATE sector jobs since Obama came into office (since Dubya/.GOP policy lost 4 million in 2009)!

Besides you Bircher bullshit, do you have ANYTHING???

You are worried about other people's bullshit.

ROTFLMAO

So NO you aren't a man of your word, and will just keep popping in and ONLY answer the posit's you want.. lol

You are on ignore because I can get through a thread page 4 times faster if I don't have scroll through your worthless spamshit.

You don't like it....Fuck Off.

If he's on ignore, how do you see his posts?

 

[Listening]

Your forgetting all the jobs bills passed by the House that are sitting in the Senate that needs to be passed now that they have the majority.

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

Franklin also said:

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

Oh his quote on stopping EXPORTS of corn? lol



On the Price of Corn and Management of the Poor, 1766



Founding.com A Project of the Claremont Institute

You are one stupid fucking asswipe.

The quote itself says nothing about corn and has no context in that regard. Except that he is arguing against not being able to export because the government thinks we need it here.

Extending his quote:

There is no country in the world where so many provisions are established for them; so many hospitals to receive them when they are sick or lame, founded and maintained by voluntary charities; so many alms-houses for the aged of both sexes, together with a solemn general law made by the rich to subject their estates to a heavy tax for the support of the poor. Under all these obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use their best endeavors to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of this burthen? On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving them a dependence on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty.

************************

You are one sad sorry moron.

You'll argue anything that goes against your head-up-the-ass vision of the liberal world.

 

[Listening]

Apples and oranges. Getting back on topic, Obama's pro-immigration policies are killing jobs for Americans, all while he brags about creating them (for foreigners).

Apples and oranges? lol

OK, Dubya had a loss of 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years with his and the GOP's 'job creator' policies., Even stopping Dec 2007, it was a miserable 4 million in 7 years

That socialist Obama has 11+ million PRIVATE sector jobs since passing the 'job killer' Obamacares in Feb 2010, that's a NET of 7 million PRIVATE sector jobs since Obama came into office (since Dubya/.GOP policy lost 4 million in 2009)!

Besides you Bircher bullshit, do you have ANYTHING???

You are worried about other people's bullshit.

ROTFLMAO

So NO you aren't a man of your word, and will just keep popping in and ONLY answer the posit's you want.. lol

You are on ignore because I can get through a thread page 4 times faster if I don't have scroll through your worthless spamshit.

You don't like it....Fuck Off.

If he's on ignore, how do you see his posts?

There is a button that allows me to see ignored content.

I check up on it from time to time to see if the spam shit has changed much from the last 100 times it was posted.

 

[Dad2three]

Tax giveaways to corporations is not a jobs bill, no matter what you call it.

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

Franklin also said:

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

Oh his quote on stopping EXPORTS of corn? lol



On the Price of Corn and Management of the Poor, 1766



Founding.com A Project of the Claremont Institute

You are one stupid fucking asswipe.

The quote itself says nothing about corn and has no context in that regard. Except that he is arguing against not being able to export because the government thinks we need it here.

Extending his quote:

There is no country in the world where so many provisions are established for them; so many hospitals to receive them when they are sick or lame, founded and maintained by voluntary charities; so many alms-houses for the aged of both sexes, together with a solemn general law made by the rich to subject their estates to a heavy tax for the support of the poor. Under all these obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use their best endeavors to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of this burthen? On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving them a dependence on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty.

************************

You are one sad sorry moron.

You'll argue anything that goes against your head-up-the-ass vision of the liberal world.

Extending the quote? Read the entire fucking newspaper post, I linked it, it's pretty self explanatory, DOESN'T refute Ben's original quote I posted, lol


Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

 

[Listening]

Tax give aways?

ROFLMNAO!

The reader should recognize there, that what she's claiming is that Government is entitled to the product of the labor of its citizens. To which, in truth, it is not entitled, because it did not EARN IT, by PRODUCING IT. What's more, that product was created DESPITE GOVERNMENT'S FORCING THE COST OF PRODUCT UP.

Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

Franklin also said:

I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.

Oh his quote on stopping EXPORTS of corn? lol



On the Price of Corn and Management of the Poor, 1766



Founding.com A Project of the Claremont Institute

You are one stupid fucking asswipe.

The quote itself says nothing about corn and has no context in that regard. Except that he is arguing against not being able to export because the government thinks we need it here.

Extending his quote:

There is no country in the world where so many provisions are established for them; so many hospitals to receive them when they are sick or lame, founded and maintained by voluntary charities; so many alms-houses for the aged of both sexes, together with a solemn general law made by the rich to subject their estates to a heavy tax for the support of the poor. Under all these obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use their best endeavors to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of this burthen? On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving them a dependence on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty.

************************

You are one sad sorry moron.

You'll argue anything that goes against your head-up-the-ass vision of the liberal world.

Extending the quote? Read the entire fucking newspaper post, I linked it, it's pretty self explanatory, DOESN'T refute Ben's original quote I posted, lol


Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist; letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."

Oh, I read it, shit for brains....Franklin, in context, was quite clear on his positions.

There is no country in the world where so many provisions are established for them; so many hospitals to receive them when they are sick or lame, founded and maintained by voluntary charities; so many alms-houses for the aged of both sexes, together with a solemn general law made by the rich to subject their estates to a heavy tax for the support of the poor. Under all these obligations, are our poor modest, humble, and thankful; and do they use their best endeavors to maintain themselves, and lighten our shoulders of this burthen? On the contrary, I affirm that there is no country in the world in which the poor are more idle, dissolute, drunken, and insolent. The day you passed that act, you took away from before their eyes the greatest of all inducements to industry, frugality, and sobriety, by giving them a dependence on somewhat else than a careful accumulation during youth and health, for support in age or sickness. In short, you offered a premium for the encouragement of idleness, and you should not now wonder that it has had its effect in the increase of poverty.