GOP Platform Identifies Pornography As A National Public Health Crisis

5783ef2c1a00002600dd0b6d.jpeg


This week, Republican delegates are meeting in committee to lay out the 2016 version of their party’s platform document ― a non-binding declaration of #squadgoals that will generate a few days of stories like this one before being largely forgotten. This year’s platform committee has taken dead aim at one of the few successful industries left in America, besides drone warfare and hot takes about Kevin Durant’s free agency decisions. I refer, of course, to pornography.

Yahoo News’ Liz Goodwin reports:

Republican delegates unanimously adopted an amendment to their draft platform Monday morning that called pornography “a public health crisis” and a “public menace” that is destroying lives.

[...]

“Pornography, with his harmful effects, especially on children, has become a public health crisis that is destroying the life of millions. We encourage states to continue to fight this public menace and pledge our commitment to children’s safety and well being,” the amendment stated.

According to Goodwin, the stronger language, identifying porn as a “public health crisis,” was pushed by a North Carolina delegate named Mary Forrester at the behest of the conservative Christian group Concerned Women for America. This quite a step beyond what the 2012 GOP platform document had to say about pornography, which I can quote in its entirety:

We urge active prosecution against child pornography, which is closely linked to the horrors of human trafficking. Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced.

Whether or not pornography can be considered an “insidious epidemic,” as Forrester argues, I’d wager that it hasn’t really been the most pressing concern for most Americans lately ― nor has it made many headlines. Of course, one public health crisis that has made headlines, and that does have a lot of Americans feeling sick and scared and helpless, is gun violence ― especially in the form of mass shootings,which have surged even as overall gun violence has declined.

How do we reconcile the rise in mass shootings with the larger, more encouraging downturn in gun violence? And would it be possible, perhaps, to address mass shootings from a health policy perspective? Might that possibly be an avenue worth exploring if it means we could prevent even one more life from being brutally abbreviated?

That would seem like an area ripe for public health research. Unfortunately, government agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are legally barred from doing it, thanks to this thing called the Dickey Amendment.

Back in 1993, research funded by the CDC found its way into the public consciousness in the form of a New England Journal of Medicine article titled “Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home.” As the American Psychological Association’s Christine Jamieson notes, “The study found that keeping a gun in the home was strongly and independently associated with an increased risk of homicide.” It also “concluded that rather than confer protection, guns kept in the home are associated with an increase in the risk of homicide by a family member or intimate acquaintance.”

You’ll never guess what happened next! Unless you’ve already guessed that the National Rifle Association aggressively lobbied to shut down this kind of research, in which case, congratulations.

More: GOP Platform Identifies Pornography As A National Public Health Crisis

Wow, GOP considers pornography a greater “public health crisis" than gun violence. Apparently I've been missing all the riots over pornography.
People kill not guns. Dumbass
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.
Some right wing wives may find it a relief not to "bothered".

9417482-Foto-einer-fat-Couch-Kartoffel-Essen-einen-gro-en-Hamburger-und-Fernsehen-Harte-Beleuchtung-aus-dem--Lizenzfreie-Bilder.jpg
 
Yep, total faux outrage by the GOP once again. They could have focused on real public health issues like alcohol or opioids, but oh no, pornography. They have to kiss ass to the evangelicals out of desperation because their party is dying.

God forbid they focus on issues that actually matter.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.
Some right wing wives may find it a relief not to "bothered".

9417482-Foto-einer-fat-Couch-Kartoffel-Essen-einen-gro-en-Hamburger-und-Fernsehen-Harte-Beleuchtung-aus-dem--Lizenzfreie-Bilder.jpg
EBT is dangerous to democrats....:lol:
 
‘According to Goodwin, the stronger language, identifying porn as a “public health crisis,” was pushed by a North Carolina delegate named Mary Forrester at the behest of the conservative Christian group Concerned Women for America.’

The bane of the social right is killing the GOP.
 
5783ef2c1a00002600dd0b6d.jpeg


This week, Republican delegates are meeting in committee to lay out the 2016 version of their party’s platform document ― a non-binding declaration of #squadgoals that will generate a few days of stories like this one before being largely forgotten. This year’s platform committee has taken dead aim at one of the few successful industries left in America, besides drone warfare and hot takes about Kevin Durant’s free agency decisions. I refer, of course, to pornography.

Yahoo News’ Liz Goodwin reports:

Republican delegates unanimously adopted an amendment to their draft platform Monday morning that called pornography “a public health crisis” and a “public menace” that is destroying lives.

[...]

“Pornography, with his harmful effects, especially on children, has become a public health crisis that is destroying the life of millions. We encourage states to continue to fight this public menace and pledge our commitment to children’s safety and well being,” the amendment stated.

According to Goodwin, the stronger language, identifying porn as a “public health crisis,” was pushed by a North Carolina delegate named Mary Forrester at the behest of the conservative Christian group Concerned Women for America. This quite a step beyond what the 2012 GOP platform document had to say about pornography, which I can quote in its entirety:

We urge active prosecution against child pornography, which is closely linked to the horrors of human trafficking. Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced.

Whether or not pornography can be considered an “insidious epidemic,” as Forrester argues, I’d wager that it hasn’t really been the most pressing concern for most Americans lately ― nor has it made many headlines. Of course, one public health crisis that has made headlines, and that does have a lot of Americans feeling sick and scared and helpless, is gun violence ― especially in the form of mass shootings,which have surged even as overall gun violence has declined.

How do we reconcile the rise in mass shootings with the larger, more encouraging downturn in gun violence? And would it be possible, perhaps, to address mass shootings from a health policy perspective? Might that possibly be an avenue worth exploring if it means we could prevent even one more life from being brutally abbreviated?

That would seem like an area ripe for public health research. Unfortunately, government agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are legally barred from doing it, thanks to this thing called the Dickey Amendment.

Back in 1993, research funded by the CDC found its way into the public consciousness in the form of a New England Journal of Medicine article titled “Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home.” As the American Psychological Association’s Christine Jamieson notes, “The study found that keeping a gun in the home was strongly and independently associated with an increased risk of homicide.” It also “concluded that rather than confer protection, guns kept in the home are associated with an increase in the risk of homicide by a family member or intimate acquaintance.”

You’ll never guess what happened next! Unless you’ve already guessed that the National Rifle Association aggressively lobbied to shut down this kind of research, in which case, congratulations.

More: GOP Platform Identifies Pornography As A National Public Health Crisis

Wow, GOP considers pornography a greater “public health crisis" than gun violence. Apparently I've been missing all the riots over pornography.
Well they do like jerking their gherkin for their jesus
 
Who the fuck said kiddie porn and human trafficking. This is about grown ups having the freedom to do as they damn well please in the comfort of their homes with videos of adults.
You didn't read the article did you?

I personally have nothing against porn. It's boring. The language in the Republican proposal was against kiddie porn and sex trafficking.

Although, if they had child replica robots that would be okay.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.
No a wife should not have to deal with such garbage. Divorce him and throw his ass out.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.

Maybe the wife isn't slutty enough for her husband.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.

Maybe the wife isn't slutty enough for her husband.
He can divorce her too.

We really need sex bots. Porn will be a thing of the past as pervs get kiddie sex, sadistic sex, even snuff sex. Recharge the bot and do it all again tomorrow.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.

Maybe the wife isn't slutty enough for her husband.
He can divorce her too.

We really need sex bots. Porn will be a thing of the past as pervs get kiddie sex, sadistic sex, even snuff sex. Recharge the bot and do it all again tomorrow.

Why doesn't the NRA do something about the GOP porn epidemic? Maybe more guns would help...
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.

Maybe the wife isn't slutty enough for her husband.
He can divorce her too.

We really need sex bots. Porn will be a thing of the past as pervs get kiddie sex, sadistic sex, even snuff sex. Recharge the bot and do it all again tomorrow.
Kiddie sex, sadistic sex and snuff sex? Those are your "thing"? You need to be investigated and probably arrested.
 
It's a plank in the platform I would heartily support. I listen to numerous church sermon podcasts during the week and more then once the mention of porn's affect on the family has been compared to that of alcohol. A wife shouldn't have to deal with a husband that's hooked on such garbage.

Maybe the wife isn't slutty enough for her husband.
He can divorce her too.

We really need sex bots. Porn will be a thing of the past as pervs get kiddie sex, sadistic sex, even snuff sex. Recharge the bot and do it all again tomorrow.
Kiddie sex, sadistic sex and snuff sex? Those are your "thing"? You need to be investigated and probably arrested.
My thing is no sex. It's boring. I do recognize that other adults may make different decisions. Why do you want to tell adults what they can do in their own homes?
 
Who the fuck said kiddie porn and human trafficking. This is about grown ups having the freedom to do as they damn well please in the comfort of their homes with videos of adults.
You didn't read the article did you?

I personally have nothing against porn. It's boring. The language in the Republican proposal was against kiddie porn and sex trafficking.

Although, if they had child replica robots that would be okay.
That means no more orgy island for Billy Clinton and senator Melendez.....they will be sad they don't get to pork the young clean little girls now....:lol:
 
Liberals are going to end porn the same way they closed it down in Los Angeles. Regulate it to death.
 

Forum List

Back
Top