GOP Representative Darrell Issa "Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings?

[Sallow]

GOP Representative Darrell Issa "Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings? ::: Said with a straight face on NBC's Meet The Press



can the Republican party ever be taken seriously when this is what their leadership has the balls to say in public? Do they think the rest of America is as gullible and moronic as their base is?

Not that I don't doubt that Issa said this, because he has made Obama his target, but do you have a link?

But over all, the GOP's aim is not process improvement or saving lives.

It's to bring down people they don't like.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

.

former Secretary Bill Gates: Only knows what was in media. Gates said he would have made same decisions as Panetta and others when reality of force structure...comments on absurd notion of scrambling planes over Benghazi? Crazy idea because of all the loose missiles in are.

Dante,

I am sure that you have a link to back up this claim.... Right?

Oh.. And just who was Gates Secretary of Defense under again?

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, a Republican who was appointed to the position by George W. Bush and later kept on by President Obama?

Robert Gates - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Sallow]

Yeah and the I.R.S. said there looking into the tax exempt status of conservative groups wasn't politically motivated.LMAO

deflection alert!!!

You mean deflection like this thread we all know political motivation plays a part in this just like political motivation played a part in the original spin and cover up. You may now deny this and continue with your partisan silliness.

What was covered up?

We new exactly what happened in Benghazi almost the day after it happened.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

GOP Representative Darrell Issa "Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings? ::: Said with a straight face on NBC's Meet The Press



can the Republican party ever be taken seriously when this is what their leadership has the balls to say in public? Do they think the rest of America is as gullible and moronic as their base is?

Not that I don't doubt that Issa said this, because he has made Obama his target, but do you have a link?

But over all, the GOP's aim is not process improvement or saving lives.

It's to bring down people they don't like.

Link? Ravi, is that really you?

The link will be all over the place ... it's a great statement. and it is not so easy to link to something that is just coming over the tv, but buy into the usmb right wing fruitiness that Dante and others are liars and spinners of truth. It's how right wing world battles facts./...personal attacks without refutation

 

[velvtacheeze]

The Benghazi mouth frothing is just the GOP trying to get back their credibility on foreign policy. The GOP rightly lost all credibility during their buffoonish handling of the Iraq War, and then really lost it when a liberal Democrat was the one who (finally!) got Osama bin Laden. They're just trying to get payback for all the bashing they justifiably got during the failed Bush Presidency.

The so-called scandal is a joke, and that it's only catching on among people who voted for the detestable Mitt Romney anyway should surprise no one.

 

[Sallow]

This may be hard for brain-dead liberals like you to understand, but the point of the hearings is to find out the truth of what happened and why Americans died, not just to attack Obama for the sake of attacking Obama.


.

Holy crap that's the funniest line I've heard all week, and this was quite a week for funny lines from the inmates already!!!

No partisan motivation for the hearings, eh??

What sort of hearings do you imagine Darrell Issa would want to hold if all of this were the same except for a Republican being in the whitehouse?

The only reason its "partisan" is because Democrats are being partisan in ignoring the truth. They know Hillary and the Hussein fucked up big time, but they cannot admit it. Hillary must be the next Preisdent, at any cost.

Party over country every time, the Democrat way.

What was fucked up?

Are attacks on diplomatic missions unique?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

deflection alert!!!

You mean deflection like this thread we all know political motivation plays a part in this just like political motivation played a part in the original spin and cover up. You may now deny this and continue with your partisan silliness.

What was covered up?

We new exactly what happened in Benghazi almost the day after it happened.

Even if there were a -- gulp -- cover up. it would be political and not criminal.

The hearings are bullshit. Other hearings have been held, especially in Senate, where they are dealing with facts and will soon issue reports. Hopefully the GOP will not muddle the reports...but there is always hope for wingnuts that they will

 

[Sallow]

GOP Representative Darrell Issa "Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings? ::: Said with a straight face on NBC's Meet The Press



can the Republican party ever be taken seriously when this is what their leadership has the balls to say in public? Do they think the rest of America is as gullible and moronic as their base is?

Not that I don't doubt that Issa said this, because he has made Obama his target, but do you have a link?

But over all, the GOP's aim is not process improvement or saving lives.

It's to bring down people they don't like.

Link? Ravi, is that really you?

The link will be all over the place ... it's a great statement. and it is not so easy to link to something that is just coming over the tv, but buy into the usmb right wing fruitiness that Dante and others are liars and spinners of truth. It's how right wing world battles facts./...personal attacks without refutation

I just saw it Dante..cool your jets.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

GOP Representative Darrell Issa ""Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings"

USMB Right Wingers "Fuck Darrell Issa, this is about "Hillary and Obama""

 

[Sallow]

You mean deflection like this thread we all know political motivation plays a part in this just like political motivation played a part in the original spin and cover up. You may now deny this and continue with your partisan silliness.

What was covered up?

We new exactly what happened in Benghazi almost the day after it happened.

Even if there were a -- gulp -- cover up. it would be political and not criminal.

The hearings are bullshit. Other hearings have been held, especially in Senate, where they are dealing with facts and will soon issue reports. Hopefully the GOP will not muddle the reports...but there is always hope for wingnuts that they will

They are talking about secret arms shipments to Turkey..

Of course they are going to "Muddle" the reports.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Not that I don't doubt that Issa said this, because he has made Obama his target, but do you have a link?

But over all, the GOP's aim is not process improvement or saving lives.

It's to bring down people they don't like.

Link? Ravi, is that really you?

The link will be all over the place ... it's a great statement. and it is not so easy to link to something that is just coming over the tv, but buy into the usmb right wing fruitiness that Dante and others are liars and spinners of truth. It's how right wing world battles facts./...personal attacks without refutation

I just saw it Dante..cool your jets.

cool my jets? who do you think you are speaking to?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

What was covered up?

We new exactly what happened in Benghazi almost the day after it happened.

Even if there were a -- gulp -- cover up. it would be political and not criminal.

The hearings are bullshit. Other hearings have been held, especially in Senate, where they are dealing with facts and will soon issue reports. Hopefully the GOP will not muddle the reports...but there is always hope for wingnuts that they will

They are talking about secret arms shipments to Turkey..

Of course they are going to "Muddle" the reports.

GOP Representative Darrell Issa ""Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings"

Even if there were a -- gulp -- cover up. it would be political and not criminal.

The hearings are bullshit. Other hearings have been held, especially in Senate, where they are dealing with facts and will soon issue reports. Hopefully the GOP will not muddle the reports...but there is always hope for wingnuts that they will

Keeping HOPE alive!!!

 

[chikenwing]

GOP Representative Darrell Issa "Hillary and Obama" not targets of Benghazi Hearings? ::: Said with a straight face on NBC's Meet The Press



can the Republican party ever be taken seriously when this is what their leadership has the balls to say in public? Do they think the rest of America is as gullible and moronic as their base is?

Issa isn't known for being a truthful person.

Notice a Right Wing World talking point is Ambassador said we are under 'attack'

what is missing? maybe the word 'terrorist'?

what???!!! so to get help and maybe live he needed to say terrorist???!!!,under attack is under attack you pinhead butt fucker what the hell is wrong with you people.!!

It was know that it WAS a terrorist attack from the moment RPGs started flying,you people are disgusting.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This may be hard for brain-dead liberals like you to understand, but the point of the hearings is to find out the truth of what happened and why Americans died, not just to attack Obama for the sake of attacking Obama.


.

Holy crap that's the funniest line I've heard all week, and this was quite a week for funny lines from the inmates already!!!

No partisan motivation for the hearings, eh??

What sort of hearings do you imagine Darrell Issa would want to hold if all of this were the same except for a Republican being in the whitehouse?

If Obama were a republican there’d be no ‘hearings’ at all.

 

[NYcarbineer]

This may be hard for brain-dead liberals like you to understand, but the point of the hearings is to find out the truth of what happened and why Americans died, not just to attack Obama for the sake of attacking Obama.


.

Holy crap that's the funniest line I've heard all week, and this was quite a week for funny lines from the inmates already!!!

No partisan motivation for the hearings, eh??

What sort of hearings do you imagine Darrell Issa would want to hold if all of this were the same except for a Republican being in the whitehouse?

The only reason its "partisan" is because Democrats are being partisan in ignoring the truth. They know Hillary and the Hussein fucked up big time, but they cannot admit it. Hillary must be the next Preisdent, at any cost.

Party over country every time, the Democrat way.

Why do you need an investigation then if you already know the 'truth'??

lol

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Not a bad description and commentary on what went on:
Notes on the May 12, 2013 Broadcast of Meet The Press
May 12, 2013


The format broke down when Rep. Issa had finally said enough dubious things that Ambassador Pickering uttered the phrase, “That’s not true.”

At that point, the camera had to pull back to reveal that Ambassador Pickering had been sitting there the whole time. It was a weird moment, but it led to a real conversation.

(Note for readers who may be unaware, Ambassador Pickering, a career diplomat, may not be well-known outside Washington, DC, but he is almost universally considered one of the most credible, fair-minded people in the capital. He was chosen to lead the official investigation into the Benghazi attacks, an excellent choice.)

Ambassador Pickering then calmly walked through the findings of his report, answering all of the most serious questions Congressman Issa says he is investigating. The tension in the studio was apparent, even through the TV screen.

If It's Sunday | Looking over the shoulder of "Meet The Press"

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Issa isn't known for being a truthful person.

Notice a Right Wing World talking point is Ambassador said we are under 'attack'

what is missing? maybe the word 'terrorist'?

what???!!! so to get help and maybe live he needed to say terrorist???!!!,under attack is under attack you pinhead butt fucker what the hell is wrong with you people.!!

It was know that it WAS a terrorist attack from the moment RPGs started flying,you people are disgusting.

former Secretary Bill Gates: Only knows what was in media. Gates said he would have made same decisions as Panetta and others with reality of force structure...comments on absurd notion of scrambling planes over Benghazi? Crazy idea because of all the loose missiles in are.

Sending in special forces idea for rescue "cartoonish' image of US Forces.. US Forces known for 'planning and preparation' not cartoonish notions.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

David Brooks of the New York Times had an interesting take on all of this. He reminded us that the attacked facility in Benghazi was actually run by the CIA. Brooks says the fight revealed in the relevant emails after the attack tells him that the CIA was trying to push blame from themselves onto the State Department. And the State Department pushed back. Hardly the Watergate level scandal alleged by some. If It's Sunday | Looking over the shoulder of "Meet The Press"

 

[NYcarbineer]

This may be hard for brain-dead liberals like you to understand, but the point of the hearings is to find out the truth of what happened and why Americans died, not just to attack Obama for the sake of attacking Obama.


.

Holy crap that's the funniest line I've heard all week, and this was quite a week for funny lines from the inmates already!!!

No partisan motivation for the hearings, eh??

What sort of hearings do you imagine Darrell Issa would want to hold if all of this were the same except for a Republican being in the whitehouse?

If Obama were a republican there’d be no ‘hearings’ at all.

Of course not.

 

[NYcarbineer]

David Brooks of the New York Times had an interesting take on all of this. He reminded us that the attacked facility in Benghazi was actually run by the CIA. Brooks says the fight revealed in the relevant emails after the attack tells him that the CIA was trying to push blame from themselves onto the State Department. And the State Department pushed back. Hardly the Watergate level scandal alleged by some. If It's Sunday | Looking over the shoulder of "Meet The Press"

Well, 99.9% of Bush supporters let him get away with blaming 'bad intelligence', aka the CIA, for not knowing the WMD's were non-existent,

maybe Obama supporters should simply be content to use that defense of the President in the Benghazi matter...

...after all, the Bushies certainly can't object to the use of a defense they themselves heartily endorsed, can they?