PoliticalTorch
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Dearest, come back and post when you finish grade school at least.their screen name shouldn't be torch. it should political HACK
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dearest, come back and post when you finish grade school at least.their screen name shouldn't be torch. it should political HACK
Oh more Republican Violence! Violence!I can't speak for Chess, but I know they are false because I actually understand the law.
Would you like me to shove that law down your throat to demonstrate?
Don't be so sure. But what will actually make great campaign commercial fodder in 2016 will be Perry's fingerprints and his mug shot, no doubt.I think this is going to backfire on the Dems. The video of the drunk DA will make great campaign commercial fodder.
I can't!
I can't! I'm from Texass, and Perry will enjoy being tucked in at jail...
Actually he was fingerprinted just today around five o'clock Central Time at Travis County in Austin, Texas.Why no finger prints? Is the gov above the due process of alleged and charged felon?
Actually he was fingerprinted just today around five o'clock Central Time at Travis County in Austin, Texas.
From your avatar you would be an expert on the subject, you appear to always assuming the position.
Doesn't look like that's going to happen for Republicans. The White House will remain Democratic.
Although he maintains that the charges were politically motivated one just has to wonder if there was true political motivation by the Republican judge that handled his case and the Republican Special Prosecutor who brought the charges against him.
Talk by some in the media and elsewhere have indicated that he's a Republican though I don't know if he has actually come out to say that himself.The Special Prosecutor McCrum's party affiliation isn't known but he seems to be a Democrat. There are some reports that make the case look shaky, and the burden of proof for the prosecution seems difficult to make because the prosecution's case hinges on the Gov.'s intent. Could be a political move to knock Perry out of the Presidential race (though not timed well if that is the case). I guess we'll see when the case goes to trial...
Talk by some in the media and elsewhere have indicated that he's a Republican though I don't know if he has actually come out to say that himself.
Here's a clue about that.
Perry: Just the Facts | Texas Democratic Party
I love the quote in the article that says, "It was illegal for the governor to use his legal power?"people should be up in arms about this new DIRTY political weapon used by the left/Democrats/progressives/commies
lawsuits to tie them up and cost THEM and US TAXPAYERS millions of dollars while in office
Good article on that:
The Lynching of Rick Perry
Democratic criminalization of political disagreement.
By William Murchison – 8.18.14
![]()
All across America, it seems, we have been hearing about the militarization of law enforcement. To the growing list of 21st century social and cultural disorders it seems timely to add the criminalization of political disagreement.
What else could the Rick Perry case be about? A governor, and sometime presidential candidate, indicted by a grand jury for a particular use of his constitutional veto power? Such are the dismaying dimensions of the matter.
No such thing, replies the special prosecutor who procured the indictment of Texas’ longest-serving governor. Michael McCrum finds “absolutely no basis” for the accusation that politics motivated the indictment, on account of his case’s grounding in “the facts and the law, and nothing else.”
The prosecutor, if I may be permitted, is full of a commodity long recommended for agricultural enrichment. We may imagine if we like that a grand jury in one of America’s most liberal counties concluded, without bias or rancor, that one of America’s best-known conservative politicians illegally vetoed funding for that same county’s “public integrity” unit, presided over by a DA convicted of drunk driving. It was illegal for the governor to use his legal power? That seems essentially the narrative the jury bought from McCrum.
Austin, where conservatives feel like Southern Baptist missionaries in western Iraq, doesn’t cotton to a Republican governor who doesn’t cotton to the hand-tooled, leather-bound liberal agenda. Nor can the capital city be described as grateful to Perry for his part over the last decade in keeping Texas safe from liberal policies. Democrats hold not one single statewide office in Texas. You can see from any political perspective how the very mention of Perry’s name in Austin might bring on dyspepsia, if not angina.
The governor is right to call the indictment “nothing more than an abuse of power.” Legal experts appear largely to agree with his claim that “we will ultimately prevail” — in terms, that is to say, of winning either acquittal or prompt dismissal of a case that holds no air. “One of the laws [cited by the grand jury] is hopelessly vague, the other really doesn’t appear to fit,” says Prof. Jonathan Turley of George Washington University. A Rice University professor, Mark Jones, says, “I can’t imagine a jury convicting him on this.”
all of it:
The Lynching of Rick Perry | The American Spectator
Excuse me stoopid.. Since when have you paid AMERICAN taxes??? You don't even fucking live in this country so shove it..No way should the taxpayers be expected to foot the bill for his legal defense. He needs to use his OWN money to fund his lawyers. He screwed up, he should suffer the consequences, and if that means losing financially, so be it.
I'm glad you asked that. Actually, he has appointed more Republicans to his Cabinet and that has not been matched', fyi!Is President Obama in the habit of nominating Republicans to be his US Attorneys? Well, is he?
Excuse me stoopid.. Since when have you paid AMERICAN taxes??? You don't even fucking live in this country so shove it..
I'm glad you asked that. Actually, he has appointed more Republicans to his Cabinet and that has not been matched', fyi!
Here's the story from a very prestigious source and winner of the Pulitzer Prize.
Three Cabinet appointees from opposing party is unmatched | PolitiFact
I can't believe you're giving me this opening again but .....
You're in North Carolina.
As they say in baseball, "you hang 'em, we bang 'em".
I don't get it Pogo so spell it out for me. What does my being in NC have to do with Moonie living in Australia???
Excuse me stoopid.. Since when have you paid AMERICAN taxes??? You don't even fucking live in this country so shove it..