iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,921
- 1,600
he's refusing to. while you did sensationalize the topic/subject line, if that truly bothered him to the point where he can't discuss the issue itself, he'd discuss nothing because that's what "journalism" is these days a vast majority of the time.great. you sure showed him who's boss.It is no sin to correct someone who is engaging in blatant misrepresentation. He calls the media out for "lies" when that is clearly false and not what Attkisson wrote. First things first. Change the title.so why not address all the media "mistakes" instead of just going on a rampage?The fail is blatantly misrepresenting what Attkisson wrote. LOLFail
I guess the OP forgot we can just click on a little thing that is called "a link" to check the veracity of what he wrote.
now - address the article itself. not a forum subject title a random individual has nothing to do with it. if you continue to hide behind it, you're more or less saying you ain't got shit but like to spit in others cheerios.
They never actually address issues specifically.
115 examples of liberals lies and they can’t address one.