g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,228
- 68,948
- 2,605
Every OECD nation which has strict gun control has a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of the gun homicide rate we do.And Columbine Massacre still happened. San Bernardino which bans weapons, had a massacre. You idiots think that banning guns will solve the problem, but you wont close the border where drugs and guns come freely across. Until all the illegal guns are out of the hands of the criminals, I will continue to have mine. There are a few million others who feel the same. You lose.We've had a federal AWB before.Yeah, it does.An AWB does not violate the 2nd Amendment, asshole.2nd amendment asshole.
Common use. See Heller.
.
So there you go.
Not unconstitutional.
Heller was not about an AWB. It was about handguns.
The first time an automatic weapon was banned was in the 1930s. To ban the fully automatic weapon.
It has sort of come back. If you have a ton of money to pay for the permits to have one but other than that, who has seen a full automatic weapon outside a museum or movie?
Bans work.
If we can ban fully automatic weapons we can ban the semi automatic weapons. There was a ban on the semi automatic ones and limits on how many bullets a magazine can hold for 10 years from the Clinton administration. The republicans of the bush boy administration let the law expire.
Face it, retard. Nationwide gun control works.
We've never tried it in earnest. Ever.
And we suffer at least 12,000 gun homicides a year because of it.