I disagree. I think abortions need a $4000 fee. It can be used to cover the production of anti-abortion propaganda that women have to watch before having an abortion.The fee pays for background checks
Not needed for abortion
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree. I think abortions need a $4000 fee. It can be used to cover the production of anti-abortion propaganda that women have to watch before having an abortion.The fee pays for background checks
Not needed for abortion
I pay a fee to register my car
Stop being so cheap and either cough up the $400 or stop complaining
Our nation has never needed privately held guns to assure freedom
EVER
That's pretty dismissive of the efforts of the Allies. America was critical to winning the War but America didn't win everything by itself.
Radar was jointly developed in the US and UK.
And if it weren't for a gay British dude inventing "computers" but also breaking the Enigma code, a lot (a lot a lot a lot) of Americans would have died. Even the atomic bomb which ended the war was originally predicated on work done in Europe by Europeans.
So let's not get TOO full of ourselves.
I'm afraid you seem to have the view of history that O'Brien had in 1984 : "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- for ever.'" You realize that the choice ISN'T just rampant murders in schools and grocery stores OR vicious murderous genocidal dictators.
THERE'S SPACE IN BETWEEN THERE.
You realize that the choice ISN'T just rampant murders in schools and grocery stores OR vicious murderous genocidal dictators.
No...it isn't...but guns are the way you prevent them....the Europeans forgot that ....
So they are, and easy to spot, don't know how I missed it/them...my badThe numbers are all in the link.
The FBI collects data on “active shooter incidents,” which it defines as “one or more individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area.” Using the FBI’s definition, 38 people – excluding the shooters – died in such incidents in 2020.
The Gun Violence Archive, an online database of gun violence incidents in the U.S., defines mass shootings as incidents in which four or more people are shot, even if no one was killed (again excluding the shooters). Using this definition, 513 people died in these incidents in 2020.
The above means "mass shootings" are small and rare and are being used to sensationalize gun deaths while the real problem is a 60's mentality that now infects the culture...Regardless of the definition being used, fatalities in mass shooting incidents in the U.S. account for a small fraction of all gun murders that occur nationwide each year.
Utter rubbish. Privately held guns did not win your war for Independence, your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America, the wars you fought against Mexico and Spain and certainly not in the world wars that followed, the war in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.Except at the founding.......and every day after that.
Utter rubbish. Privately held guns did not win your war for Independence, your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America, the wars you fought against Mexico and Spain and certainly not in the world wars that followed, the war in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
Well bless your heart. That's so Sweet. Attacking the man like that instead of addressing his point here in the CDZ. Is he right? Is he wrong? Who cares! Smear Europeans. You so win!Since your opinion is common to Europeans, I say we withdraw all support for Europe and see how you do with your armies and your "guns" on your own, including Ukraine. Good luck with China and Russia. I'm sure your militaries are up to the task.
Well bless your heart. That's so Sweet. Attacking the man like that instead of addressing his point here in the CDZ. Is he right? Is he wrong? Who cares! Smear Europeans. You so win!
Your position failed to address his point. You know, the Founders wanted no standing army and Eisenhower warned us about the MIC. Our colonialist militarism is not Europe's problem. But none of that even touches upon private gun ownership.That is not a personal attack; it's a statement of my position. Europe has prospered because we are their defacto military. Like many Americans, I am fed up with that. Let's see how they do with their abundant social programs if they had to actually fund militaries that function in anything but name only.
Finland seems to think that privately held guns can help protect them from Russian aggression.Utter rubbish. Privately held guns did not win your war for Independence, your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America, the wars you fought against Mexico and Spain and certainly not in the world wars that followed, the war in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
The right of individuals to privately own guns means that militiamen can be provided with arms even if if the government declines to arm them.But none of that even touches upon private gun ownership.
Utter rubbish. Privately held guns did not win your war for Independence, your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America, the wars you fought against Mexico and Spain and certainly not in the world wars that followed, the war in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
Utter rubbish....., your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America,...
Oh, so you are saying that your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America were carried out by private gun owners... OKUtter rubbish.
Yes, keep telling yourself that, anything that stops you confronting your past honestly. Off you go and watch a John Wayne film instead.There was no genocide against the indians...
Do they? Is that why they want to join NATO. You do know that Finland has very strict gun control laws?Finland seems to think that privately held guns can help protect them from Russian aggression.
If it wasn't for the French, the colonies would still be British.There was no genocide against the indians......
There was a genocide in your neck of the woods, stopped by Americans with guns......and without American guns in your countries, you'd be slaughtering each other again...or speaking Russian.
Given the part of your post that I quoted - obviously notOh, so you are saying that your wars and genocides against the indigenous peoples of America