Edgetho
Platinum Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 16,448
- 7,724
- 390
I dont have to present anything. All I have to do is point out that your idea is an obvious failure for a very simple reason: Criminals by definition do not obey laws. Ergo any law you pass will not affect criminals, but it will affect law abiding people.
My solution is to make guns the equivalent of big screen TVs.
Here's what most people don't understand.
A reading of the Federalist Papers will tell you that the 2nd Amendment exists for one reason....... Not for self defense, not so settlers could hunt wabbits and not for the purpose of forming of a Militia....
The 2nd Amendment exists to intimidate government.
Had Germany had a 2nd Amendment........
Had Russia had a 2nd Amendment,
In fact, if you read about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, after the war the US was debriefing General Matsushita and asked him why the Japanese didn't go on and invade the West Coast of the US after the successful attack on Pearl Harbor.
The General looked at him in amazement and said they had never really given it much thought.
They were scared to death of having to face an armed Citizenry. Millions of Citizens with Millions of guns.
He said he had no illusions of attacking and watching as his men were picked off from over a mile away by Hunting Rifles by the thousand.
Too bad China didn't have a 2nd Amendment, huh?
"Uneasy rests the head that wears the Crown"
That is the whole idea behind the 2nd Amendment and dimocrap FILTH know it.
They know they can never achieve total domination over an armed populace.
Think I'm kidding? Then you're mistaken.
Every single dedicated communist dimocrap scum is aware of it. It is why they HATE the 2nd amendment.
Their goal is to disarm The People and impose a totalitarian government on us.
Period