Guns making you safer - at least 20 shot in Texas Uni party

Mostly Negroes at the event.

The sheriff thinks it was a typical ghetto type violence.


NEW: Hunt County Sheriff Randy Meeks said shooter entered back door, killed one man and then opened fire on crowd. Sheriff said he believes this might have been targeted event. Shooter was not a partygoer. He is not identified yet either. pic.twitter.com/cIl9xNecH3

Jason Whitely (@JasonWhitely) October 27, 2019
 
If lefties are serious about prosecution for gun violence they need to start by indicting Obama and/or A.G. Holder and members of the ATF for the death of a U.S. Border Patrol Officer who was killed by one of the weapons the Obama administration shipped to Mexican drug cartels. God knows how many innocent Mexicans were killed with those weapons and nobody in the administration was even fired much less arrested for the thoroughly botched "Operation Fast/Furious". The most notorious school shooting in history ( Va. Tech Blacksburg )happened because democrats decided that the right of an insane man to conceal his condition trumped the rights of citizens and court ordered psychiatric counseling as a result of an arresting for stalking didn't turn up in the instant name check.

Then we would have to had locked up Reagan as well along with most of his Cabinet. And then Bush Sr, Bush Jr, hell we would have had to lock up every President we ever had starting with GW.
Did Reagan and Bush ship guns to Mexico? George Washington? What the hell are you talking about? No president in the history of this great Nation has ever intentionally pulled an insane stunt like "Op. Fast/Furious". This wasn't a military operation or even a CIA clandestine mission. It defies explanation how a federal law enforcement agency could get permission for such a stunt and nobody was even fired much arrested when one of the weapons was used to murder a U.S. Law Enforcement Officer.
 
Last edited:
Texas shooting - Two dead and 10 injured as gunman opens fire at university homecoming party

Chief Deputy Buddy Oxford told reporters they believe the shooter used a semi-automatic rifle and he is still at large.

Mr Oxford said his identity is unknown and there is not clear motive at this time.

Americas teens deserve better than being used for target practice.
Aren't you glad you don't live here?

Fuck off.
Ive always enjoyed my visits to the US. But it isnt somewhere we would bring up kids. Its far too dangerous.
Lol
Stay out of progressive controlled urban America and you have no worries you fat sack of shit
 
It was not a university sanctioned event. It was put on private individuals. Here is the flyer for it-

View attachment 286588

View attachment 286595

It appears gang related

and no witness so far can or will describe the shooter
Of course they have a description. It would be politically incorrect to provide you with that information though. It puts some people in a bad light
Reminds me of an incident once where police warned women to be on the lookout for a rapist about 30 wearing a tobaggan cap and driving a green pontiac station wagon who cruises apartment complexes

with that much info if might help to know if he was white or black or chinese

but the cops were too racially constipated to say
 
Texas shooting - Two dead and 10 injured as gunman opens fire at university homecoming party

Chief Deputy Buddy Oxford told reporters they believe the shooter used a semi-automatic rifle and he is still at large.

Mr Oxford said his identity is unknown and there is not clear motive at this time.

Americas teens deserve better than being used for target practice.

That is almost every weekend in Chi-town...
...very pro-gun St Louis has a much higher murder rate than Chicago--and higher than LA and New York


And the reason St. Louis has such a high gun murder rate is the democrat policy of releasing violent gun offenders.......you know this and hide it because you are an asshat....

Mayor of St. Louis - Wikipedia

Soros-Funded St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner Refuses to Charge Killer of 7-Year-Old Child Despite Suspect's Confession

Last week a suspect was arrested in the fatal shooting of 7-year-old Xavier Usanga in north St. Louis last Monday evening.

According to KSDK Usanga was shot and killed while playing outside of his Hyde Park home Monday, according to St. Louis Metro Police Cheif John Hayden. An 18-year-old man standing nearby was injured in the backyard of the Usangas’ home, in the 3500 block of North 14th Street, just after 5 p.m. Monday evening.

The suspect confessed to the shooting that killed 7-year-old Usanga.


But when they brought this confession and evidence to the St. Louis City’s circuit attorney’s office Kim Gardner threw it out.

Gardner said based on current evidence she was not able to determine who was responsible for the child’s death.

Again… The suspect confessed to the crime but that was not enough for this radical lunatic in the Circuit Attorney’s Office.
Democrats in charge since 1949

Mayor of St. Louis - Wikipedia


Rise in Murders Has St. Louis Debating Why

Jennifer M. Joyce, the city’s circuit attorney, or prosecutor, an elected position, complains that in St. Louis, the illegal possession of a gun is too often “a crime without a consequence,” making it difficult to stop confrontation from turning lethal.

At the same time, deeper social roots of violence such as addiction and unemployment continue unchecked. And city officials also cite what they call a “Ferguson effect,” an increase in crime last year as police officers were diverted to control protests after a white officer shot and killed Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager in the nearby suburb on Aug. 9.

-----------

Now, an overstretched department is forced to pick one neighborhood at a time to flood with officers. Last month, Chief Dotson even asked the state highway patrol if it could lend a dozen men to help watch downtown streets; the agency declined.
----
When the police discover a gun in a car with several passengers, including some with felony records, but no one admits to owning the gun, criminal charges are often impossible, Mr. Rosenfeld said.

In addition, according to a 2014 study by Mr. Rosenfeld and his colleagues, a majority of those who are convicted of illegally possessing a gun but not caught using it in a crime receive probation rather than jail time. Gun laws and enforcement are stiffer in many other cities.
your favorite quote: '''how can this happen''???
hahahahahahhaahahaha
Texes is a very pro-firearm state!!
'''how can this happen?'''
Lol
It always happens in progressive controlled urban America… All progressives are fucked in the head
 
Yes indeed, folks looking to make hay before all the facts are known... keep up the good work children.
A shooting happened at a party and 20 people got shot. Does it matter who the gunman was ?


Yes....it does.....because if you know why the shooting took place you can work to stop the next one.....

There is a good chance the shooter has a criminal record, possibly with gun crimes in the past....we'll see. If that is the case, it will be another example of a prior gun criminal being set free instead of being in jail. If it is a disturbed individual with no previous history, then we look at mental illness as the cause....and need to tell people to report people like this for their previous suspicious behavior....

That's why it matters...
You all know the reason. Too many guns.
Lol
Socialists like yourselves, Have no idea what should be done and not be done in this country.
 
They are absurd, period. Anyone who wishes to implement a gun-free zone should be required to do 18 months in a county lockup.
1. they don't care if it's firearm '''free'' or not--they will shoot up the place anyway
2. if not, they will go somewhere else
3. the ''gun free'' zones are so petty arguments don't turn into shootouts/etc
It isn't. If people are encouraged to shoot back at the first sign of a bad guy going crazy, you'll see a lot less of this, and that only happens when there are no gun-free zones.

You mean like the guy that had a CCW that actually stopped a bad guy. Then the cops shows up and shoots the guy with the gun in his hand? They shot the ccw "Good Guy". The Bad Guy was scared off and the one that scared him off died. And don't give me that "Cite, Cite" routine. We all know it happened.


Mistakes happen, DH.

But the point isn't that all crime will be eliminated by allowing Law Abiders to be armed, but that the law abiders will at least stand a chance.

If I walk outside my door and a street criminal (or a terrorist for that matter) pulls a gun on me, at least I stand a chance if I am armed myself. I will be lying on slab that evening if I am defenseless.

I am only pointing out that having too many guns is not a good thing. I wonder how many guns were possessed in the Walmart Shooting in El Paso. It appears that the gunnutters assume that no one was armed. A busy Walmart in "Texas" where no one is armed except for one nut with an AR? There is a better chance of being hit by a meteor. In the El Paso case, it was probably for the better that those guns stayed holstered. It took law enforcement under a minute to handle things. Had some Rexall Rangers opened fire, imagine just how high the body count would have been. And the confusion when the LEOs got there. The El Paso Shooting was actually a win overall.

Another thing El Paso exhibited was why CCW works. The proper CCW training means that the CCW carrier is less likely to go Rambo in a situation like that. I won't go into why but it does delay his reaction. Yes, the Rexall Rangers all believe they would automatically grab that hogleg and go merrily blasting the bad guy but they probably wouldn't. It's not an every day happening. It's a Military Combat Action and it's something that a Soldier spends days, months and years training to react to. It's something that a Professional spends hours each month in Stress Training to react to. The Bad Cop shootings aren't because some cop decided he just wanted to shoot a __________________(insert race here) guy. He lacked the training especially the stress training to handle the situation.


Lol
Buy more guns and ammo... Because there’s no such thing as too many
 
If lefties are serious about prosecution for gun violence they need to start by indicting Obama and/or A.G. Holder and members of the ATF for the death of a U.S. Border Patrol Officer who was killed by one of the weapons the Obama administration shipped to Mexican drug cartels. God knows how many innocent Mexicans were killed with those weapons and nobody in the administration was even fired much less arrested for the thoroughly botched "Operation Fast/Furious". The most notorious school shooting in history ( Va. Tech Blacksburg )happened because democrats decided that the right of an insane man to conceal his condition trumped the rights of citizens and court ordered psychiatric counseling as a result of an arresting for stalking didn't turn up in the instant name check.

Then we would have to had locked up Reagan as well along with most of his Cabinet. And then Bush Sr, Bush Jr, hell we would have had to lock up every President we ever had starting with GW.
Did Reagan and Bush ship guns to Mexico? George Washington? What the hell are you talking about? No president in the history of this great Nation has ever intentionally pulled an insane stunt like "Op. Fast/Furious". This wasn't a military operation or even a CIA clandestine mission. It defies explanation how a federal law enforcement agency could get permission for such a stunt and nobody was even fired much arrested when one of the weapons was used to murder a U.S. Law Enforcement Officer.

Did you sleep through Reagan's entire 8 years? You must have.
 
A gun-free zone, no doubt.
in Texas???!!!
Yes, in Texas. In case you missed it, Texas is a very large state with lots of differing ideas. It isn't homogenous.
Gun free zones seem to be an absurd idea when they arent backed up by meaningful sanctions.
They are absurd, period. Anyone who wishes to implement a gun-free zone should be required to do 18 months in a county lockup.
What’s absurd is the wrongheaded notion that ‘gun free’ zones in any manner contribute to gun crime and violence; indeed, there’s no evidence citizens carrying concealed firearms decreases crime – or prevents mass shootings, for that matter.

And private property owners who designate their venues to be ‘gun free’ have no idea patrons are carrying concealed firearms – because they’re concealed.

‘Gun free’ zone is a myth.
 
in Texas???!!!
Yes, in Texas. In case you missed it, Texas is a very large state with lots of differing ideas. It isn't homogenous.
Gun free zones seem to be an absurd idea when they arent backed up by meaningful sanctions.
They are absurd, period. Anyone who wishes to implement a gun-free zone should be required to do 18 months in a county lockup.
1. they don't care if it's firearm '''free'' or not--they will shoot up the place anyway
2. if not, they will go somewhere else
3. the ''gun free'' zones are so petty arguments don't turn into shootouts/etc
It isn't. If people are encouraged to shoot back at the first sign of a bad guy going crazy, you'll see a lot less of this, and that only happens when there are no gun-free zones.
Again: conservatives aren’t smart.
 
Texas shooting - Two dead and 10 injured as gunman opens fire at university homecoming party
Chief Deputy Buddy Oxford told reporters they believe the shooter used a semi-automatic rifle and he is still at large.
Mr Oxford said his identity is unknown and there is not clear motive at this time.

Americas teens deserve better than being used for target practice.
Oh look - an anti-gun loon, striking before the bodies get cold.

Thai is called Friday, 2300-2315 in Chicago, and no one notices.
 
They are absurd, period. Anyone who wishes to implement a gun-free zone should be required to do 18 months in a county lockup.
1. they don't care if it's firearm '''free'' or not--they will shoot up the place anyway
2. if not, they will go somewhere else
3. the ''gun free'' zones are so petty arguments don't turn into shootouts/etc
It isn't. If people are encouraged to shoot back at the first sign of a bad guy going crazy, you'll see a lot less of this, and that only happens when there are no gun-free zones.

You mean like the guy that had a CCW that actually stopped a bad guy. Then the cops shows up and shoots the guy with the gun in his hand? They shot the ccw "Good Guy". The Bad Guy was scared off and the one that scared him off died. And don't give me that "Cite, Cite" routine. We all know it happened.


Mistakes happen, DH.

But the point isn't that all crime will be eliminated by allowing Law Abiders to be armed, but that the law abiders will at least stand a chance.

If I walk outside my door and a street criminal (or a terrorist for that matter) pulls a gun on me, at least I stand a chance if I am armed myself. I will be lying on slab that evening if I am defenseless.

I am only pointing out that having too many guns is not a good thing. I wonder how many guns were possessed in the Walmart Shooting in El Paso. It appears that the gunnutters assume that no one was armed. A busy Walmart in "Texas" where no one is armed except for one nut with an AR? There is a better chance of being hit by a meteor. In the El Paso case, it was probably for the better that those guns stayed holstered. It took law enforcement under a minute to handle things. Had some Rexall Rangers opened fire, imagine just how high the body count would have been. And the confusion when the LEOs got there. The El Paso Shooting was actually a win overall.

Another thing El Paso exhibited was why CCW works. The proper CCW training means that the CCW carrier is less likely to go Rambo in a situation like that. I won't go into why but it does delay his reaction. Yes, the Rexall Rangers all believe they would automatically grab that hogleg and go merrily blasting the bad guy but they probably wouldn't. It's not an every day happening. It's a Military Combat Action and it's something that a Soldier spends days, months and years training to react to. It's something that a Professional spends hours each month in Stress Training to react to. The Bad Cop shootings aren't because some cop decided he just wanted to shoot a __________________(insert race here) guy. He lacked the training especially the stress training to handle the situation.


“In the El Paso case, it was probably for the better that those guns stayed holstered. It took law enforcement under a minute to handle things.”

Correct.

Citizens have the right to carry concealed firearms for personal self-defense – not to act in the capacity of law enforcement or to ‘fight crime.’
 
If lefties are serious about prosecution for gun violence they need to start by indicting Obama and/or A.G. Holder and members of the ATF for the death of a U.S. Border Patrol Officer who was killed by one of the weapons the Obama administration shipped to Mexican drug cartels. God knows how many innocent Mexicans were killed with those weapons and nobody in the administration was even fired much less arrested for the thoroughly botched "Operation Fast/Furious". The most notorious school shooting in history ( Va. Tech Blacksburg )happened because democrats decided that the right of an insane man to conceal his condition trumped the rights of citizens and court ordered psychiatric counseling as a result of an arresting for stalking didn't turn up in the instant name check.

Then we would have to had locked up Reagan as well along with most of his Cabinet. And then Bush Sr, Bush Jr, hell we would have had to lock up every President we ever had starting with GW.
Did Reagan and Bush ship guns to Mexico? George Washington? What the hell are you talking about? No president in the history of this great Nation has ever intentionally pulled an insane stunt like "Op. Fast/Furious". This wasn't a military operation or even a CIA clandestine mission. It defies explanation how a federal law enforcement agency could get permission for such a stunt and nobody was even fired much arrested when one of the weapons was used to murder a U.S. Law Enforcement Officer.

Did you sleep through Reagan's entire 8 years? You must have.
Reagan certainly did.
 
They are absurd, period. Anyone who wishes to implement a gun-free zone should be required to do 18 months in a county lockup.
1. they don't care if it's firearm '''free'' or not--they will shoot up the place anyway
2. if not, they will go somewhere else
3. the ''gun free'' zones are so petty arguments don't turn into shootouts/etc
It isn't. If people are encouraged to shoot back at the first sign of a bad guy going crazy, you'll see a lot less of this, and that only happens when there are no gun-free zones.

You mean like the guy that had a CCW that actually stopped a bad guy. Then the cops shows up and shoots the guy with the gun in his hand? They shot the ccw "Good Guy". The Bad Guy was scared off and the one that scared him off died. And don't give me that "Cite, Cite" routine. We all know it happened.








I could list hundreds of times armed citizens stop crime and killing.

Enough said.


Not hundreds of times. Otherwise, USMB would have to start an area just for these. Do you work this company? Their real objective isn't the 2nd A, their real objective is to sell guns and accessories.

Yes, hundreds of times. And if you look really carefully, you can find a CDC study that says that there are over 20+ million defensive gun uses every year. The number is actually closer to 100 million, but the point is made regardless of the number.

I don't know who runs this site, but I doubt they create forums on the basis of statistics that are well known.
 
A gun-free zone, no doubt.
in Texas???!!!
Yes, in Texas. In case you missed it, Texas is a very large state with lots of differing ideas. It isn't homogenous.
Gun free zones seem to be an absurd idea when they arent backed up by meaningful sanctions.
They are absurd, period. Anyone who wishes to implement a gun-free zone should be required to do 18 months in a county lockup.
What’s absurd is the wrongheaded notion that ‘gun free’ zones in any manner contribute to gun crime and violence; indeed, there’s no evidence citizens carrying concealed firearms decreases crime – or prevents mass shootings, for that matter.

And private property owners who designate their venues to be ‘gun free’ have no idea patrons are carrying concealed firearms – because they’re concealed.

‘Gun free’ zone is a myth.
No evidence? May I suggest you look into the CDC study which details the amount of evidence in which citizens use firearms over 20+ million times a year.

What we DO KNOW is that in a gun-free zone, it is ONLY the criminal who possesses a gun. There is an old saying about fish and barrels.
 

Forum List

Back
Top