Looking at your numbers...I would say that having a firearms has paid off for the civilians. I sure am glad that we have the 2nd Amendment to protect our rights. The criminals will always have the guns.
FYI...The second Amendment was set up for civilians to defend themselves from no other than our own government. Our founding Fathers were far smarter than anyone in government today. They had the insight to foresee what the capablities of what our government could do in the future.
I would not come to that conclusion about those numbers. Out of all of the shootings that occured in 2004, only 170 of them were justifiable homocides (The 229 reflects all justifiable homicides by any means). I don't think that number supports the notion that guns will keep you safe.
I did not include the number of accidental shootings or suicides. Which can be found with a little work. There are many people who have guns who do not know what to do with them or how to handle them, or how to secure them. Those people should either learn what to do with those guns or get rid of them. People bent on committing suicide will do it one way or the other. They need professional mental health assistance to deal with their depression.
As a crime prevention specialist, I do not buy the argument that guns make good crime prevention. It is better to look towards things like Crime Prevention therough Environmental Design and Risk and protective factors that lead to crime. Getting old is also a good way of preventing crime. As people get older they are less likely to commit a crime.
However, I do not buy the notion that we should ban guns, either. It's in the Constitution. Parts of the Constitution should not be ignored. I do not think that there is support for repealing the 2nd amendment.
I grew up in a home with guns in it. My father is a charter member of the NRA. My brother is a lifetime member of the NRA. I don't understand their fascination with guns. But it doesn't frighten me either.
I really could care less what your conclusion is with those numbers, Pagen. I really don't care what you think of my conclusion is either. There were 170 civilians saved by the gun.
I just wonder how many crimes were diverted because of the possiblity have a civilian having a gun??? Hard to put a number on it. But, the NRA magazine used to show numbers that reflected that specific topic.
The NRA is not an objective source, anymore than the Anti-gun violence folks are. They both have axes to grind.