Roudy
Diamond Member
- Mar 16, 2012
- 59,512
- 17,818
- 2,180
There were a lot of failures by the British which are the root of many of today's conflicts. One of them would be to encourage mass Arab migration into a land they designated for Jews, after they encouraged the Jews to migrate there. Those same hoards of Arab invaders are the the same ones that call themselves "Palestinians" today. True story. LOL.That map is comedy in action and so is the cable. Ahmed doesn't get to divide the area according to the Nazi Mufti's desires. LOLCABLEGRAM DATED 28 SEPTEMBER 1948 FROM THE PREMIER AND
ACTING FOREIGN SECRETARY OF ALL-PALESTINE GOVERNMENT
TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL CONCERNING
CONSTITUTION OF ALL-PALESTINE GOVERNMENT
28 September 1948
I HAVE THE HONOR TO INFORM YOUR EXCELLENCY THAT IN VIRTUE OF THE NATURAL RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE OF PALESTINE FOR SELF-DETERMINATION WHICH PRINCIPLE IS SUPPORTED BY THE CHARTERS OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS, THE UNITED NATIONS AND OTHERS AND IN VIEW OF THE TERMINATION OF THE BRITISH MANDATE OVER PALESTINE WHICH HAD PREVENTED THE ARABS FROM EXERCISING THEIR INDEPENDENCE, THE ARABS OF PALESTINE WHO ARE THE OWNERS OF THE COUNTRY AND ITS INDIGENOUS INHABITANTS AND WHO CONSTITUTE THE GREAT MAJORITY OF ITS LEGAL POPULATION HAVE SOLEMNLY RESOLVED TO DECLARE PALESTINE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES AS ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE TERMINATION OF THE BRITISH MANDATE AN INDEPENDENT STATE AND CONSTITUTED A GOVERNMENT UNDER THE NAME OF THE ALL-PALESTINE GOVERNMENT DERIVING ITS AUTHORITY FROM A REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL BASED ON DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES AND AIMING TO SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS OF MINORITIES AND FOREIGNERS PROTECT THE HOLY PLACES AND GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF WORSHIP TO ALL COMMUNITIES
AHMED HILMI PASHA
PREMIER AND ACTING FOREIGN SECRETARY
A/C.1/330 of 14 October 1948
This is the way the area was supposed to be divided, AFTER they gave all of Jordan to the "ARAB PALESTNIANS".
![]()
Too bad that stupid plan flopped.
Both imperial powers tried to rule through established elites, although the British were much more willing than the French to move their mandates forward towards a qualified form of independence. At the specific, local level, though, Fieldhouse finds no parallel in his wide knowledge of imperial practice elsewhere to compare to the disastrous experiment in social and political engineering undertaken by the British in Palestine. Here, he pulls no punches in his criticisms. The Palestine mandate was, probably the most ignominious failure of its kind in British imperial history, the first time that Britain had ended its rule without leaving an established government behind it (pp. 3445).
Western Imperialism in the Middle East, 1914?1958 | Reviews in History