Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There aren't 20 pages and that story differs from the police report already posted a few times on this board. In any case, it doesn't provide evidence that Gates did anything more than provoke a police officer into losing his sense of good judgment and making an unnecessary arrest.I didn't go through all 20 pages so if this is a reprint sorry.
Here is a copy of the poiice report. From this it sounds like the guy was out for a fight from the very beginning.
He admits that his house has been broken into before and instead of being greatfull for a quick response time starts bitching to the officer.
Obama should not have commented since he didnt' have all the facts. If he did maybe he would have realized that one of those oppressed minorities backed up the first officers report. Guess that latino didn't get the memmo that whitey is always wrong.
Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Police Report - July 23, 2009
Hot off the press...
Officer Crowley says, and I paraphrase, Fuck you. I didn't do anything wrong so I ain't apologizing for shit!
And I say good for him.
He said that the other day. Old news. Maybe not the Fuck you part.Hot off the press...
Officer Crowley says, and I paraphrase, Fuck you. I didn't do anything wrong so I ain't apologizing for shit!
And I say good for him.
Hot off the press...
Officer Crowley says, and I paraphrase, Fuck you. I didn't do anything wrong so I ain't apologizing for shit!
And I say good for him.
does theeeese mean he will not go for "education" doyathink? oh my!
The Cambridge police officer did act stupidly. Regardless, I agree that Obama ought not to have cast any aspersions on the Cambridge Police Dept's conduct. I don't think it's going to cause race riots or anything that he did so.
Fine if YOU want to shoot your mouth off with an opinion even though you weren't there and don't know all the facts either, but NOT fine for the president to do.
As for causing racial tension, we'll see just how well his foolish and inflammatory remarks go over.
Once Obama was asked the question, he was dammed if he answered it and dammed if he didn't.
I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
bullshit
out of one side of his mouth he said "I don't know the facts... then out of the biased side of his mouth he said "The Cambridge police acted stupidly." now explain to us how he could rationally follow the first statement with the second! We will wait!
It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
bullshit
out of one side of his mouth he said "I don't know the facts... then out of the biased side of his mouth he said "The Cambridge police acted stupidly." now explain to us how he could rationally follow the first statement with the second! We will wait!
It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
bullshit
out of one side of his mouth he said "I don't know the facts... then out of the biased side of his mouth he said "The Cambridge police acted stupidly." now explain to us how he could rationally follow the first statement with the second! We will wait!
so you cannot rationally explain how the first statement could rationally be followed by the second?? is that right? oh! and btw,, after what we saw and heard last night don't ever tell us he represents "all the people".
It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.
so you cannot rationally explain how the first statement could rationally be followed by the second?? is that right? oh! and btw,, after what we saw and heard last night don't ever tell us he represents "all the people".
Did you read my previous comments on Obama's actions? I thought not. I criticized his actions. But keep patting yourself on the back if it makes you feel important.so you cannot rationally explain how the first statement could rationally be followed by the second?? is that right? oh! and btw,, after what we saw and heard last night don't ever tell us he represents "all the people".
I didn't think you could do it.. take two of those and call somebody who cares in the morning! Nice try though!
Did you read my previous comments on Obama's actions? I thought not. I criticized his actions. But keep patting yourself on the back if it makes you feel important.
I didn't think you could do it.. take two of those and call somebody who cares in the morning! Nice try though!
It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
bullshit
out of one side of his mouth he said "I don't know the facts... then out of the biased side of his mouth he said "The Cambridge police acted stupidly." now explain to us how he could rationally follow the first statement with the second! We will wait!
It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
bullshit
out of one side of his mouth he said "I don't know the facts... then out of the biased side of his mouth he said "The Cambridge police acted stupidly." now explain to us how he could rationally follow the first statement with the second! We will wait!
It sure as heck seemed inflamatory to me, ya want to tell me what my "agenda" is?
So what has it exactly got you up in arms about? That the president pointed out that this issue shows us that despite lots of progress in racial equality there still remains work to be done?It's only inflammatory to people with agendas like yourself.I don't think saying the police acted stupidly, (which they did) is inflammatory. Especially considering what he said afterwards. Obama should remain neutral at this point, seeing as he is president.
bullshit
out of one side of his mouth he said "I don't know the facts... then out of the biased side of his mouth he said "The Cambridge police acted stupidly." now explain to us how he could rationally follow the first statement with the second! We will wait!
It sure as heck seemed inflamatory to me, ya want to tell me what my "agenda" is?
Are those remarks intended to be inflammatory ?I wonder if Obama's inappropriate remarks may have been influenced by recent allegations by blacks that he's an Uncle Tom (following his speech to the NAACP).
