Hayden: Impeaching Trump would be viewed as soft coup

[ColonelAngus]

It is a meaningless quotation. "Impeachment" does nothing; the removal comes after a trial in the Senate.

The Republicans have NO CHANCE of losing the Senate this Fall.

But it is noteworthy that the Leftist Media has FIRED UP the political Right to an extent never seen before in this country. If Trump is removed from office nobody has any idea what will happen, but if anyone other than Pence takes over, there will be an armed revolution. Fact, not opinion.

If Trump is removed from office, the only one who CAN take over for him is Pence.

United States presidential line of succession - Wikipedia

The line of succession follows the order of Vice President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, President pro tempore of the Senate, and then the eligible heads of federal executive departments who form the president's Cabinet. The Presidential Succession Act refers specifically to officers beyond the vice president acting as president rather than becoming president when filling a vacancy. The Cabinet currently has 15 members, of which the Secretary of State is first in line; the other Cabinet secretaries follow in the order in which their department (or the department of which their department is the successor) was created. Those heads of department who are constitutionally ineligible to be elected to the presidency are also disqualified from assuming the powers and duties of the presidency through succession. Since 1789, the vice president has succeeded to the presidency intra-term on nine occasions, eight times due to the incumbent's death, and once due to resignation. No one lower in the line of succession has yet been called upon to act as president.

Trump did make a very crucial mistake right at the start of his presidency. He tried to play nice with the Clintons and the Dems at the beginning. He should have known better. He should have put an aggressive AG in place, who would have immediately put a special counsel on the Clintons, DOJ, Uranium One and all the other stuff now being ignored. I am starting to think that Trump should actually fire Mueller and the rest of them right now. Everyone worries about the fall out. This crew is out to impeach him anyway. He should tell Mueller he has 30 days to produce his final report or he is gone, and let history decide if he is right or wrong in the decision.

Sessions refused himself based on bullshit evidence.

There is not a fucking chance in hell that Holder or Lynch would have recused themselves from ANY investigation into Barry, regardless of perceived conflicts.

Sessions is garbage, all I seem to hear about is how he wants to go after weed.

Where are the indictments for leaks of confidential information to the press? He is supposedly investigating 27 leaks, let’s speed this shit up.

Trump made a very bad strategic move by appointing an AG that was going to recuse himself from a special investigation.

 

[Staidhup]

On what grounds? get real.

 

[Erinwltr]

Michael Hayden Warns: Impeachment Would Be Viewed as 'Soft Coup' | Breitbart

Yep and we will take the appropriate action to defend our country and president against it.

"Soft Coup" Silly.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Give us an example

I'm familiar with this type of liberal diversion, you look bad after a post and then pretend you need an explanation to move away from it and then when you look worse you use another liberal diversion [I'll let you know what diversion it is after you read the following and post it.

Aside from things like calling private property "theft" and pretending the words "separation of church and state" are actually in the constitution here just a few liberal rewrites.
"hate speech" laws to get around the first amendment
"gun control" laws to get around the second amendment.
"special prosecutors" to get around elections/re-elections when their party loses
[and while I am pro-choice]..."abortion" to get around the foundation of our constitution the right to "LIFE" liberty and the pursuit of happiness [from the declaration of independence]
and the one that actually proves my claim ...holding up SCOTUS appointments for any judge who wants a strict interpretation of the constitution as it was originally written...I assume even you want that interpretation?
I'm sorry, you only asked for one, right?
Liberals have called the constitution a living breathing document that needs to change and evolve [and I agree with that] but to pretend they do not re-write to achieve what they believe is just a weak attempt to defend the indefensible.

 

[rightwinger]

Give us an example

I'm familiar with this type of liberal diversion, you look bad after a post and then pretend you need an explanation to move away from it and then when you look worse you another liberal diversion [I'll let you know what diversion it is after you read the following and post it.

Aside from things like calling private property "theft" and pretending the words "separation of church and state" are actually in the constitution here just a few liberal rewrites.
"hate speech" laws to get around the first amendment
"gun control" laws to get around the second amendment.
"special prosecutors" to get around elections/re-elections when their party loses
[and while I am pro-choice]..."abortion" to get around the foundation of our constitution the right to "LIFE" liberty and the pursuit of happiness [from the declaration of independence]
and the one that actually proves my claim ...holding up SCOTUS appointments for any judge who wants a strict interpretation of the constitution as it was originally written...I assume even you want that interpretation?
I'm sorry, you only asked for one, right?
Liberals have called the constitution a living breathing document that needs to change and evolve [and I agree with that] but to pretend they do not re-write to achieve what they believe is just a weak attempt to defend the indefensible.

You have no perception of what our courts do. It is their job to interpret the Constitution

 

[Erinwltr]

Give us an example

I'm familiar with this type of liberal diversion, you look bad after a post and then pretend you need an explanation to move away from it and then when you look worse you another liberal diversion [I'll let you know what diversion it is after you read the following and post it.

Aside from things like calling private property "theft" and pretending the words "separation of church and state" are actually in the constitution here just a few liberal rewrites.
"hate speech" laws to get around the first amendment
"gun control" laws to get around the second amendment.
"special prosecutors" to get around elections/re-elections when their party loses
[and while I am pro-choice]..."abortion" to get around the foundation of our constitution the right to "LIFE" liberty and the pursuit of happiness [from the declaration of independence]
and the one that actually proves my claim ...holding up SCOTUS appointments for any judge who wants a strict interpretation of the constitution as it was originally written...I assume even you want that interpretation?
I'm sorry, you only asked for one, right?
Liberals have called the constitution a living breathing document that needs to change and evolve [and I agree with that] but to pretend they do not re-write to achieve what they believe is just a weak attempt to defend the indefensible.

"I'm familiar with this type of liberal diversion." Interesting. Here's a couple of these for ya. ""







'.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You have no perception of what our courts do. It is their job to interpret the Constitution

and here is the diversion I promised you would reply with and I would point out...you answered the point you wish were made and not the one actually made...in other words "non-sequitur" reply once again from you.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You have no perception of what our courts do. It is their job to interpret the Constitution

dude you're not even understanding the conversation you are presently in.

 

[Skylar]

Michael Hayden Warns: Impeachment Would Be Viewed as 'Soft Coup' | Breitbart

Yep and we will take the appropriate action to defend our country and president against it.

If the house votes to impeach and the senate tries and convicts Trump of High Crimes and Misdemenors.......that's completely constitutional.

And you'll lose your challenge to put Trump above the law and the Constitution.

 

[rightwinger]

You have no perception of what our courts do. It is their job to interpret the Constitution

and here is the diversion I promised you would reply with and I would point out...you answered the point you wish were made and not the one actually made...in other words "non-sequitur" reply once again from you.

Not a diversion

You have provided nothing in terms of liberals changing the Constitution. Operating within the broad scope of the document is not changing it

 

[Frankeneinstein]

"I'm familiar with this type of liberal diversion." Interesting. Here's a couple of these for ya. ""

I appreciate your attempt at posting.

 

[rightwinger]

You have no perception of what our courts do. It is their job to interpret the Constitution

dude you're not even understanding the conversation you are presently in.

Doesn’t look like you understand the crap you are selling

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is a meaningless quotation. "Impeachment" does nothing; the removal comes after a trial in the Senate.

The Republicans have NO CHANCE of losing the Senate this Fall.

But it is noteworthy that the Leftist Media has FIRED UP the political Right to an extent never seen before in this country. If Trump is removed from office nobody has any idea what will happen, but if anyone other than Pence takes over, there will be an armed revolution. Fact, not opinion.

If Trump is removed from office, the only one who CAN take over for him is Pence.

United States presidential line of succession - Wikipedia

The line of succession follows the order of Vice President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, President pro tempore of the Senate, and then the eligible heads of federal executive departments who form the president's Cabinet. The Presidential Succession Act refers specifically to officers beyond the vice president acting as president rather than becoming president when filling a vacancy. The Cabinet currently has 15 members, of which the Secretary of State is first in line; the other Cabinet secretaries follow in the order in which their department (or the department of which their department is the successor) was created. Those heads of department who are constitutionally ineligible to be elected to the presidency are also disqualified from assuming the powers and duties of the presidency through succession. Since 1789, the vice president has succeeded to the presidency intra-term on nine occasions, eight times due to the incumbent's death, and once due to resignation. No one lower in the line of succession has yet been called upon to act as president.

Trump did make a very crucial mistake right at the start of his presidency. He tried to play nice with the Clintons and the Dems at the beginning. He should have known better. He should have put an aggressive AG in place, who would have immediately put a special counsel on the Clintons, DOJ, Uranium One and all the other stuff now being ignored. I am starting to think that Trump should actually fire Mueller and the rest of them right now. Everyone worries about the fall out. This crew is out to impeach him anyway. He should tell Mueller he has 30 days to produce his final report or he is gone, and let history decide if he is right or wrong in the decision.

What a bunch of nonsense. Republican congress, trump appointees head the DOJ....but your Clinton fantasies didnt play out not because they are ridiculous fantasy, but because all these Republicans are conspiring against that foolish nonsense....ooooookay....

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Not a diversion

nothing but a diversion

You have provided nothing in terms of liberals changing the Constitution.

I provided exactly what I was claiming and you asked for, your only reason for asking for examples was to get you out that jam and post the sop line above

Operating within the broad scope of the document is not changing it

who said it wasn't?...taking away rights is not in the scope of our constitution on any scale, it is in fact anathema...popular/favorable speech or government approved guns do not need protection, it's the things you and the other liberals do not like that need protection proving it is you who has little or no understanding of the constitution.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Doesn’t look like you understand the crap you are selling

On the bright side you did not copy my post verbatim

 

[Erinwltr]

You have no perception of what our courts do. It is their job to interpret the Constitution

aactually made...in other words "non-sequitur" reply once again from you.you wish were made and not the one actually made...in other words "non-sequitur" reply once again from you.[/

"I'm familiar with this type of liberal diversion." Interesting. Here's a couple of these for ya. ""

I appreciate your attempt at posting.

No you don't. Have a great evening.

 

[JLW]

Michael Hayden Warns: Impeachment Would Be Viewed as 'Soft Coup' | Breitbart

Yep and we will take the appropriate action to defend our country and president against it.

MORON.........This is Hayden's ACTUAL quote:

“If President Trump is somehow forced to leave office before the end of his first term, one-third of America will believe it was a soft coup......."

Notice that the "soft coup" conclusion applies to the CULT made up by you and your fellow idiots.......

All these cultists know how to do is write these misleading and false titles because all they have is shit.

 

[2aguy]

You don’t understand what a coup is

Following the Constitution is not a coup
Holding elected officials accountable for their actions is part of a Democracy

They aren't following the Constitution, numb nuts. He hasn't broken any law, and he didn't break any law while in office. The High crimes and misdemeanors are supposed to be while in government office....which is what clinton did when he lied under oath as President and suborned purjury among his employees...... Trump paying off the hookers was not a crime, in fact, they broke the law by breaking their NDAs, and his paying off the hookers didn't happen while he was in office.... you doofus.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

No you don't. Have a great evening.

sure I do, you keep at it and don't let anyone discourage you. and I will have a nice evening, thank you.

 

[2aguy]

Michael Hayden Warns: Impeachment Would Be Viewed as 'Soft Coup' | Breitbart

Yep and we will take the appropriate action to defend our country and president against it.

Was impeaching Clinton a soft coup? How about Nixon?

Clinton broke the law as the sitting President, he lied under oath and committed perjury in front of a Federal Judge, then moved to get his government employees to also commit perjury......while he was in office you dope. Dittos Nixon. 1) Trump paying off the hookers is not a violation of any law. 2) He paid them off while he wasn't in office.

You have nothing.