He wasn't kidding: Federal agents conduct immigration enforcement raids in at least six states

Where does it say in the American Constitution that Illegal Immigrants have any Constitutional Rights? The American Constitution is for American Citizens not Foreign Nationals or Illegal Immigrants.

Anywhere that a right is given to "the people" and not to "the citizens"
That's right - "the people" (as in U.S. citizens) - not just "people". Sorry, the U.S. Constitution is not an international document.

It applies to U.S. citizens only on U.S. soil only.
 
Where does it say in the American Constitution that Illegal Immigrants have any Constitutional Rights? The American Constitution is for American Citizens not Foreign Nationals or Illegal Immigrants.

Anywhere that a right is given to "the people" and not to "the citizens"

"Anywhere that a right is given to "the people" and not to "the citizens"

Not under the American Constitution, non-American citizens are not protected under the American Constitution.

Maybe under the Moonbat Constitution Illegal Immigrants have rights, but under the American Constitution they don't, that's reserved purely for American citizens, the American Constitution isn't an International Constitution.
 
The chances of dying from someone using an AR 15 are so tiny it does not even matter... people use hammers to kill many more people

Actually we'll never know, since the FBI doesn't collect statistics based on the model of firearm. I'll bet more people are killed by a smith and Wesson, than by a craftsman hammer. Maybe you can dig up some stats on that?

U.S. Murders: All 13,636; Hands and Feet 801; Assault Rifles: less than 348

As I said, the FBI doesn't keep statistics of the type of weapon (aka assault rifle) so any number is meaningless since law enforcement doesn't report it as a category of weapon. Neither do they break down by automatic, semi-automatic, bolt action, lever action, or breech loading.
 
And speaking English must be a requirement for anyone applying for citizenship or extended stay.

Define "speaking English", there are people born and raised here that can't speak above a 5th grade level. But sending them back where they came from would be an exercise in futility.
 
The chances of dying from someone using an AR 15 are so tiny it does not even matter... people use hammers to kill many more people

Actually we'll never know, since the FBI doesn't collect statistics based on the model of firearm. I'll bet more people are killed by a smith and Wesson, than by a craftsman hammer. Maybe you can dig up some stats on that?

U.S. Murders: All 13,636; Hands and Feet 801; Assault Rifles: less than 348

As I said, the FBI doesn't keep statistics of the type of weapon (aka assault rifle) so any number is meaningless since law enforcement doesn't report it as a category of weapon. Neither do they break down by automatic, semi-automatic, bolt action, lever action, or breech loading.
Handguns are used more than the rest in violent crime by criminals by a long shot.
 
That's right - "the people" (as in U.S. citizens) - not just "people". Sorry, the U.S. Constitution is not an international document.

It applies to U.S. citizens only on U.S. soil only.

You're right. It's not international, the people have to be present within the borders, or territories of the United States for the Constitution to apply to them. A US citizen in a foreign country has no constitutional rights. But a foreigner in the USA does. That's how it works. Essentially you live by the laws of the land you're in.
 
Define "speaking English", there are people born and raised here that can't speak above a 5th grade level. But sending them back where they came from would be an exercise in futility.
Well there is some fine liberal "logic". Trying to stop women from being raped is "futile" so I guess we should stop enforcing that law too - uh? :eusa_doh:
 
That's right - "the people" (as in U.S. citizens) - not just "people". Sorry, the U.S. Constitution is not an international document.

It applies to U.S. citizens only on U.S. soil only.

You're right. It's not international, the people have to be present within the borders, or territories of the United States for the Constitution to apply to them. A US citizen in a foreign country has no constitutional rights. But a foreigner in the USA does. That's how it works. Essentially you live by the laws of the land you're in.
Wrong....the U.S. Constitution applies to U.S. citizens only on U.S. soil only. The U.S. government has absolutely no requirement to extend any rights to foreigners.

Just because you wish something were true does not make it true.
 
That's right - "the people" (as in U.S. citizens) - not just "people". Sorry, the U.S. Constitution is not an international document.

It applies to U.S. citizens only on U.S. soil only.

You're right. It's not international, the people have to be present within the borders, or territories of the United States for the Constitution to apply to them. A US citizen in a foreign country has no constitutional rights. But a foreigner in the USA does. That's how it works. Essentially you live by the laws of the land you're in.

"Essentially you live by the laws of the land you're in."

If you are an Illegal Immigrant you are not living by the laws of the land you are in, you are violating the law. Hello? What part of Illegal do you NOT understand?
 
And AR-15's are the criminal weapons most used for the "long shot"
Tell me something my uninformed little snowflake - why would a criminal ever have a need to take a "long shot"?

When they carjack - they need to be up close in order to take control of the automobile.

When they hold up someone - they need to be up close in order to take control of the money.

When they rape women - they need to be up close in order to engage in the act.

When they engage in a drug deal - they need to be up close in order to exchange the narcotics and the money.

The only criminal who would would ever take a "long shot" is an assassin. Which is like one in a billion and they do not use AR-15's for their trade.
 
Enforce the current laws we have, there are no more needed. No one right to drive, its a privilege... The same cannot be said for firearm ownership.
And outlaw any sort of gun registration or even the mention of it...

That's an obvious specious argument, if the premise is that there are places with too many gun murders, and the current laws don't work, then the only logical thing to do is to scrap the laws that don't work, and enact laws that will work. It's not rocket science.

And registration is actually a very effective way of limiting gun violence, because they often can't trace a gun used in a crime, because there is no AFT paper trail except to the original purchaser, or gun store. Once sold on the open market, as is allowed in several states, there is no tracing the gun.

Knowing a gun is untraceable, makes it a very wanted item for the criminal elements. If every gun was registered, there would be an instant inventory of all lost of stolen firearms, and a full accountability of where a gun is, and in whose possession. Add taggants and ballistic samples, and you have a full CSI kit to trace any firearm used in a crime.
 
Enforce the current laws we have, there are no more needed. No one right to drive, its a privilege... The same cannot be said for firearm ownership.
And outlaw any sort of gun registration or even the mention of it...

That's an obvious specious argument, if the premise is that there are places with too many gun murders, and the current laws don't work, then the only logical thing to do is to scrap the laws that don't work, and enact laws that will work. It's not rocket science.

And registration is actually a very effective way of limiting gun violence, because they often can't trace a gun used in a crime, because there is no AFT paper trail except to the original purchaser, or gun store. Once sold on the open market, as is allowed in several states, there is no tracing the gun.

Knowing a gun is untraceable, makes it a very wanted item for the criminal elements. If every gun was registered, there would be an instant inventory of all lost of stolen firearms, and a full accountability of where a gun is, and in whose possession. Add taggants and ballistic samples, and you have a full CSI kit to trace any firearm used in a crime.
Firearm registration is absolutely unacceptable... because the federal government is absolutely untrustable in every single way.
 
And speaking English must be a requirement for anyone applying for citizenship or extended stay.

Define "speaking English", there are people born and raised here that can't speak above a 5th grade level. But sending them back where they came from would be an exercise in futility.

He said "speaking English" not "speaking well."
 
By the way - we don't have a mafia anymore. We have a bunch of buffoons playing "made man" because the F.B.I. obliterated the entire organized crime underworld in the 80's and 90's. But go back to the 1920's and 1930's and our gangsters like Albert Anastasia, Al Capone, and Sam Giancana would make the Russian mafia wet themselves with just a look.

The Jewish and Italian mafia operated under a code of ethics. The East European and Russian mafia are like the drug cartels. Their level of ruthless killings is legendary. While the US mafia refrained from killing law enforcement, the Russia mafia specializes in it.
 
Firearm registration is absolutely unacceptable... because the federal government is absolutely untrustable in every single way.

Yet you trust the federal government with thermonuclear weapons. You must shit yourself every night just thinking about that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top