He wasn't kidding: Federal agents conduct immigration enforcement raids in at least six states

Nielson TV
Obama 37.8
Truump 30.6

Good...but that didn't address this issue, did it? What about online viewing?

Now, honestly, I'd expect that Obama's first inauguration would be the most watched since it was so historic, but you need to address all forms of viewing if you expect to prevail.
Trump (sean spicer) specifically said BOTH in person and total viewership. The in person estimate of 1 to 1.5 million was still at least 400,000 short of Obama. Any way you spin it. it was a delusional lie

When you ignore online viewing, you undermine your own argument.

When you dismiss the claim of the crowd size being tthe biiggest in history you show you're nuttier than a squirrel turd

What? "When you dismiss the claim...?" Now, I think you probably meant "When you support the claim...", right? And I might agree, but for the purposes of argument, you must not ignore all forms of viewing. If you leave out one type, you undermine your argument.
 
Finally, a president with balls large enough to have the courage to do the right thing.

Ah, the snowflakes will be siding with the criminals as usual.

Kind of nice having a President that does what he promises. This is something that's strange to us voters.
He had to pander to get elected.

He had to promise us what we wanted to get elected. That's what a representative is supposed to do.
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.

Why do we have a war on drugs? To keep lowlifes from breaking into my home and stealing money to buy drugs, to try and reduce the thousands of overdoses and deaths that take place from recreational narcotics every year, so we can reduce the amount of people going on social programs because they are too Fd up to work. That's why we have a war on drugs.
 
Finally, a president with balls large enough to have the courage to do the right thing.

Ah, the snowflakes will be siding with the criminals as usual.

Kind of nice having a President that does what he promises. This is something that's strange to us voters.
He had to pander to get elected.

He had to promise us what we wanted to get elected. That's what a representative is supposed to do.
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.
.

Perhaps instead of calling for an executive order to end the war on drugs, you should work to get Congress to change the drug laws, which would end the war on drugs immediately.
 
Finally, a president with balls large enough to have the courage to do the right thing.

Ah, the snowflakes will be siding with the criminals as usual.

Kind of nice having a President that does what he promises. This is something that's strange to us voters.
He had to pander to get elected.

He had to promise us what we wanted to get elected. That's what a representative is supposed to do.
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.

Why do we have a war on drugs? To keep lowlifes from breaking into my home and stealing money to buy drugs, to try and reduce the thousands of overdoses and deaths that take place from recreational narcotics every year, so we can reduce the amount of people going on social programs because they are too Fd up to work. That's why we have a war on drugs.
It is easier to, "pick on the poor" than to give us a "mission to Mars"?

Only the national socialist right wing is "brave" enough to "pick on the poorest who don't even have papers"; instead of "tackling the hard policies".
 
Kind of nice having a President that does what he promises. This is something that's strange to us voters.
He had to pander to get elected.

He had to promise us what we wanted to get elected. That's what a representative is supposed to do.
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.

Why do we have a war on drugs? To keep lowlifes from breaking into my home and stealing money to buy drugs, to try and reduce the thousands of overdoses and deaths that take place from recreational narcotics every year, so we can reduce the amount of people going on social programs because they are too Fd up to work. That's why we have a war on drugs.
It is easier to, "pick on the poor" than to give us a "mission to Mars"?

Only the national socialist right wing is "brave" enough to "pick on the poorest who don't even have papers"; instead of "tackling the hard policies".
We don't have the resources to go to Mars yet. We haven't figured out how to sustain a crew for 2 years in space.
 

Thats funny.
thats the video that gave me the idea to pick up a bunch of them and drive them to Virginia thinking they were going to do a yard clean up. I dropped them at the house about 30 miles from where I picked them up, made sure to go across the potomac river bridge since you cant walk back across. Found a house with nobody home, set them to work dragging stuff from the back to the front yard, weeded etc.. and then told the guy I was going back for the rakes and some mulch.
last I saw of them was when I was turning the corner to head home. They were working their little beaner asses off.
Bet the homeowner was surprised when they got back.


Haha...that's awesome.
There was a group of 'vigilantes' here in SoCal who use to pick up a bunch of beaners, drive them out to the orange groves and rob them at gun point for anything and everything they had on them...they'd leave them in the middle of nowhere and drive the takings / 'donations' to a local Salvation Army.


Thats funny.
thats the video that gave me the idea to pick up a bunch of them and drive them to Virginia thinking they were going to do a yard clean up. I dropped them at the house about 30 miles from where I picked them up, made sure to go across the potomac river bridge since you cant walk back across. Found a house with nobody home, set them to work dragging stuff from the back to the front yard, weeded etc.. and then told the guy I was going back for the rakes and some mulch.
last I saw of them was when I was turning the corner to head home. They were working their little beaner asses off.
Bet the homeowner was surprised when they got back.

Just messing with "hard workers"? How lazy of the national socialist right wing.


I bet there are a lot of pimps trafficking teenage hookers who are "hard workers"...we should probably let them be?
 
Kind of nice having a President that does what he promises. This is something that's strange to us voters.
He had to pander to get elected.

He had to promise us what we wanted to get elected. That's what a representative is supposed to do.
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.

Why do we have a war on drugs? To keep lowlifes from breaking into my home and stealing money to buy drugs, to try and reduce the thousands of overdoses and deaths that take place from recreational narcotics every year, so we can reduce the amount of people going on social programs because they are too Fd up to work. That's why we have a war on drugs.
It is easier to, "pick on the poor" than to give us a "mission to Mars"?

Only the national socialist right wing is "brave" enough to "pick on the poorest who don't even have papers"; instead of "tackling the hard policies".

What does that have to do with the question you asked me about drugs?
 

Thats funny.
thats the video that gave me the idea to pick up a bunch of them and drive them to Virginia thinking they were going to do a yard clean up. I dropped them at the house about 30 miles from where I picked them up, made sure to go across the potomac river bridge since you cant walk back across. Found a house with nobody home, set them to work dragging stuff from the back to the front yard, weeded etc.. and then told the guy I was going back for the rakes and some mulch.
last I saw of them was when I was turning the corner to head home. They were working their little beaner asses off.
Bet the homeowner was surprised when they got back.


How did you know they were all illegals?
 
It is easier to, "pick on the poor" than to give us a "mission to Mars"?

Only the national socialist right wing is "brave" enough to "pick on the poorest who don't even have papers"; instead of "tackling the hard policies".
Nobody is "picking on" anyone you nitwit. We are enforcing the law. I know you lawless Dumbocrat thugs hate that - but eat shit. We will be a lawful nation whether you like it or not.
 
Nielson TV
Obama 37.8
Truump 30.6

Good...but that didn't address this issue, did it? What about online viewing?

Now, honestly, I'd expect that Obama's first inauguration would be the most watched since it was so historic, but you need to address all forms of viewing if you expect to prevail.
Trump (sean spicer) specifically said BOTH in person and total viewership. The in person estimate of 1 to 1.5 million was still at least 400,000 short of Obama. Any way you spin it. it was a delusional lie

When you ignore online viewing, you undermine your own argument.

When you dismiss the claim of the crowd size being tthe biiggest in history you show you're nuttier than a squirrel turd

What? "When you dismiss the claim...?" Now, I think you probably meant "When you support the claim...", right? And I might agree, but for the purposes of argument, you must not ignore all forms of viewing. If you leave out one type, you undermine your argument.


Trump said more people showed up in washington. Which shoows total delusion
 
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.
How could you be a "socialist right-wing" when socialism is the polar-opposite of right-wing?!? What a dumb ass...

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
You should file an appeal on her behalf, then. But, the Department of Homeland Security said her case underwent multiple reviews in the immigration system, including the Board of Appeals, "and the judges held she did not have a legal basis to remain in the U.S." so I'm not sure your legal argument will stand up.
I didn't say she should stay. I said it wasn't a felony

Again, her case was reviewed multiple times since 2013. Do you think that if it wasn't a felony, someone wouldn't have caught it?

She was deportable. But nott a felon as you claimed. You can be deported without breaking the law. You just need to overstay your visa.

To be accurate, I didn't claim she was a felon. This CNN story informs us that she was arrested in 2008 during a workplace raid and convicted one year later of felony criminal impersonation.

Mom deported in Arizona immigration case has no regrets - CNN.com

As I said USSC overturned lower couurts in 2009

The number she was using appears to be registered to a man in Tucson. She also had been using the Resident Alien Card number belonging to a second person, a 55-year-old man. So, the SCOTUS ruling seems to only absolve part of her issue.
 
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.
How could you be a "socialist right-wing" when socialism is the polar-opposite of right-wing?!? What a dumb ass...

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

National socialist ring a bell?
 
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.
So Barack Obama is "right-wing" in your limited little mind? Because he vehemently agrees with President Trump's policies on these criminals invading our nation.

 
You don't fuck with The Donald. Don't get mad, get even.



House Dems Ponder Whether ICE Raids Linked to White House Anger Over 9th Circuit

House Dems Ponder Whether ICE Raids Linked to White House Anger Over 9th Circuit


"And somebody cynically suggested, although I'm not suggesting, that perhaps on the heels of a tremendous opinion by the Ninth Circuit -- which I think, you know, upholds the values of this country and makes clear the separation of powers in the system of checks and balances -- that perhaps on the heels of that, that was done intentionally to try and take attention away from a big loss by the Trump administration on what they want to do and what they want to turn America into," Sanchez added.

Crowley said "the timing is interesting, to say the least."
 
Just pander. Why do we still have a war on drugs? He could end it by executive order. Only the national socialist right wing, prefers a War on Illegals to ending our extra-Constitutional, War on Drugs, that affects, mostly US citizens.
How could you be a "socialist right-wing" when socialism is the polar-opposite of right-wing?!? What a dumb ass...

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

National socialist ring a bell?
Yeah...it does. That would be the left-wing fascists of Germany. Fuck'n moron - the right-wing believes in small, limited government. The further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker until it ceases to exist at all - anarchists.

National socialists is a totalitarian form of government. Totalitarianism is exclusively left-wing. Are you really this stupid or just being disingenuous?
 

Forum List

Back
Top