Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
Lol you crack me up.More proof that you have nothing to offer this forum besides calling people far left drones.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
More proof that you are a far left drone..
Says the far left drone!
Posting far left religious dogma is not a contribution..
Why are your elected leaders so obsessed with the Keystone Pipeline yet do not at all care about fixing our crumbling infrastructure, which aside from fixing the crisis itself, would also create jobs?
They only care about using imminent-domain against those ranchers, and for the benefit of their corporate cronies.
And another far left drone checks in and posts their religious propaganda!
No faith needed. Just sticking to the facts.
Now that is comedy, the far left does not believe in facts only their far left religious dogma.
Here's from the "far-left" publication Reason.com:
Keystone Pipeline Thwarted by Individual Property Rights For Now - Hit Run Reason.com
Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
Another far right drone with a cucumber pushed into his anus fails to contribute to a forum. Thus proving shoving cucumbers into your anus is dangerous to the planet. Oops I mean to the far right ravaged anus.Lol you crack me up.More proof that you have nothing to offer this forum besides calling people far left drones.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.
More proof that you are a far left drone..
Says the far left drone!
Posting far left religious dogma is not a contribution..
Pushing far left propaganda is not contribution to any forum it is pushing the far left religious agenda.
And thus proving why the far left religion is the most dangerous religion on the planet.
Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
The pipeline would have created a few hundred permanent jobs. That's it. The rest would be temporary. Either way, it doesn't make any sense not to invest in our infrastructure.Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
The Keystone pipeline would create jobs as well, but the far left was against that..
Why does the far left hate job creation?
The far right drone has now managed to fit an entire pineapple into his anus. He pretends to know about what jobs the pipeline would create, but really he's just trying to rub the pineapple onto his prostate. And the word "pipeline" turns him on.Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
The Keystone pipeline would create jobs as well, but the far left was against that..
Why does the far left hate job creation?
They only care about using imminent-domain against those ranchers, and for the benefit of their corporate cronies.
And another far left drone checks in and posts their religious propaganda!
No faith needed. Just sticking to the facts.
Now that is comedy, the far left does not believe in facts only their far left religious dogma.
Here's from the "far-left" publication Reason.com:
Keystone Pipeline Thwarted by Individual Property Rights For Now - Hit Run Reason.com
Well you are right it is a far left blog site, the sad part is you believe every word printed there. Thus, proving you are a far left drone.
The pipeline would have created a few hundred permanent jobs. That's it. The rest would be temporary. Either way, it doesn't make any sense not to invest in our infrastructure.Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
The Keystone pipeline would create jobs as well, but the far left was against that..
Why does the far left hate job creation?
And another far left drone checks in and posts their religious propaganda!
No faith needed. Just sticking to the facts.
Now that is comedy, the far left does not believe in facts only their far left religious dogma.
Here's from the "far-left" publication Reason.com:
Keystone Pipeline Thwarted by Individual Property Rights For Now - Hit Run Reason.com
Well you are right it is a far left blog site, the sad part is you believe every word printed there. Thus, proving you are a far left drone.
Libertarians are far-left?
No faith needed. Just sticking to the facts.
Now that is comedy, the far left does not believe in facts only their far left religious dogma.
Here's from the "far-left" publication Reason.com:
Keystone Pipeline Thwarted by Individual Property Rights For Now - Hit Run Reason.com
Well you are right it is a far left blog site, the sad part is you believe every word printed there. Thus, proving you are a far left drone.
Libertarians are far-left?
Proof of how far to the left you truly are..
Now that is comedy, the far left does not believe in facts only their far left religious dogma.
Here's from the "far-left" publication Reason.com:
Keystone Pipeline Thwarted by Individual Property Rights For Now - Hit Run Reason.com
Well you are right it is a far left blog site, the sad part is you believe every word printed there. Thus, proving you are a far left drone.
Libertarians are far-left?
Proof of how far to the left you truly are..
Reason.com is a libertarian publication.
Here's from the "far-left" publication Reason.com:
Keystone Pipeline Thwarted by Individual Property Rights For Now - Hit Run Reason.com
Well you are right it is a far left blog site, the sad part is you believe every word printed there. Thus, proving you are a far left drone.
Libertarians are far-left?
Proof of how far to the left you truly are..
Reason.com is a libertarian publication.
And you continue to prove how far to the left you truly are..
Well you are right it is a far left blog site, the sad part is you believe every word printed there. Thus, proving you are a far left drone.
Libertarians are far-left?
Proof of how far to the left you truly are..
Reason.com is a libertarian publication.
And you continue to prove how far to the left you truly are..
I get it now. Because I'm stating true facts.
Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
He keeps mentioning "pushing" because the pineapple is only centimeters away from his prostate, and he just has to keep on pushing it.The pipeline would have created a few hundred permanent jobs. That's it. The rest would be temporary. Either way, it doesn't make any sense not to invest in our infrastructure.Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
The Keystone pipeline would create jobs as well, but the far left was against that..
Why does the far left hate job creation?
And thus proving that this whole thread is about pushing the far left religious agenda.
Once the far left understands how the US infrastructure works the better it will become.
Those jobs don't last forever, and the expenditures have to be paid for by taking money from elsewhere in the economy through taxes and borrowing. It is only a short term solution that ends of exacerbating the issue in the long run. It is a diversion of monetary resources from economically efficient and profitable ventures towards those that aren't.Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
Defense spending is constitutional, building other shit, not so much.
Those jobs don't last forever, and the expenditures have to be paid for by taking money from elsewhere in the economy through taxes and borrowing. It is only a short term solution that ends of exacerbating the issue in the long run. It is a diversion of monetary resources from economically efficient and profitable ventures towards those that aren't.Well of course it improves the economy. It creates jobs. How else are we supposed to fix the problem without hiring new people to do it?Cutting defense sounds great, but if the idea rather than deficit reduction is to continue down this road of unsustainable debt by just shifting the cost from one part of the government to another, I can't get behind it.Yeah no shit it will take taxpayer money. The point is investing in our infrastructure would do a hell of a lot more for our economy. Raising taxes on the wealthy is the only way to do it. Either that, or cut our egregious defense spending to pay for it.For starters Billy...we're not paying for the Keystone Pipeline like we are for infrastructure spending. The fact that you don't grasp the difference between government approving permits to let private enterprise build things and government simply taking money out of the taxpayers pockets to pay for infrastructure is why you guys have never been able to create jobs.
As far as raising taxes to fund new federal government expenditures like roads and other infrastructure, there is no evidence that taking money from one group of people and giving it to another improves the economy by any metric.
