Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Voter fraud, illegals, syrian refugees, the DNC party apparatus, the Establishment, and the mainstream media were all in Hillary's corner. All you can name are a few people. Demoralizing? You're silly, Hillary has no morals, she's practically a robot. She never even showed emotion until she lost.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Bannon, Kelly Anne Conway, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Gen Flynn, Giuliano, and I can name a few more,
helped him, by demoralizing Clinton and also Trump won by the skin of his teeth.
I was unable to edit my post , no my but does not hurt at all. The last time the Pubs had all 3 was in the 20's and in 1929 we got the depression. His exp in stiffing small companies and suing everyone, no thanks. Bankruptcy exp, no thanks. Not impressed.OP Trump is a billionaire businessman who does business all over the world. When you have gained even 1/10th of his experience then you can talk shit.
So he says, he does have a loan from China. Most of his stuff overseas just has his name on it. Also his history as a good businessman is not good.
You're butthurt is noted lib, tissue?
No I asked for specific, detailed policy proposals. I want an analysis on at least one of them that says the policy reflects their ignorance of the subject. You simply saying all of them is just lame and disingenuous.Literally all of them. Their general economic stance is the exact opposite of anything that would help small businesses and by extension, the economy. The fact that they refuse to admit that Obamacare is a failure and is imploding goes to show that, as Hillary was still talking about building off of it. The fact that Hillary also was claiming the economy would improve if you taxed business even further, despite history showing that only damages it more also shows that, not to mention Obama's approach to the economy from the very start. There's also the fact that her and the party as a whole want to grant amnesty, which will only encourage yet more illegal immigration, and apparently hate the idea of attempting to discourage it in any way. Sure, deporting them is the hard way, but they advocate doing nothing.Okay and what specific policies of theirs do you think reflects being disqualified?You shouldn't, and to believe such would only cause my respect for you to slip even further into the negatives.Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe Trump even has basic understanding of the following issues:
1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Yet their actions and policies directly contradict what they would have learned. Both are even less qualified than Trump because they either know absolutely nothing about law, economics, government structure, and the constitution, OR they simply don't care.Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
There's also the fact that Obama promised to uphold the constitution, the proceeded to violate it 64 times, and Hillary made promises to continue violating it. Obama also has done his best to bypass all of the other branches of government numerous times. However, I think they don't care rather than not knowing. Though, that makes them worse.
Who decided Obama violated the constitution 64 times?She's defending Obama's unconstitutional AMNESTY, and thinks it's within the rights of the president to BREAK THE LAW. I already explained how amnesty is an absolutely stupid idea, and she's defending using executive orders to bypass the different branches of government, the Constitution, and law. The fact that you seem to think this is okay to ANY degree only shows that you're in the same boat as them.Okay my mistake. I missed that you said this earlier in another context. Okay this is what Hillary wanted. Overall I don't see it as something that says anything about his or her judgement on the issue. Presidents challenge the Supreme Court all the time and lose. There's always been precedence for that for presidents. It doesn't necessarily mean they have overall ignorance of constructional law. How can any one person?Oh my goodness, you have just proven you didn't click my links. It's directly from her web site, you fopdoodle.Um no. You've provided no connection to Hillary whatsoever on this case. What exactly does Hillary want in regards to this case?It's rather awkward to have to spoonfeed what's supposedly a grown man the data from links I've handed him on a silver platter, and explained to him for five pages straight.Ok finally some specifics!
Okay you explained the Supreme Court ruling. You still havent given me specifics on anything else.
Directly from the website I linked you. She wants to defend what the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional and claims it's completely within the president's power. This in and of itself proves the points I made on the first page, all at once.
Defending this is also defending Obama's 64 Constitutional violations by extension.
A List of Obama’s Constitutional ViolationsWho decided Obama violated the constitution 64 times?She's defending Obama's unconstitutional AMNESTY, and thinks it's within the rights of the president to BREAK THE LAW. I already explained how amnesty is an absolutely stupid idea, and she's defending using executive orders to bypass the different branches of government, the Constitution, and law. The fact that you seem to think this is okay to ANY degree only shows that you're in the same boat as them.Okay my mistake. I missed that you said this earlier in another context. Okay this is what Hillary wanted. Overall I don't see it as something that says anything about his or her judgement on the issue. Presidents challenge the Supreme Court all the time and lose. There's always been precedence for that for presidents. It doesn't necessarily mean they have overall ignorance of constructional law. How can any one person?Oh my goodness, you have just proven you didn't click my links. It's directly from her web site, you fopdoodle.Um no. You've provided no connection to Hillary whatsoever on this case. What exactly does Hillary want in regards to this case?It's rather awkward to have to spoonfeed what's supposedly a grown man the data from links I've handed him on a silver platter, and explained to him for five pages straight.
Directly from the website I linked you. She wants to defend what the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional and claims it's completely within the president's power. This in and of itself proves the points I made on the first page, all at once.
Defending this is also defending Obama's 64 Constitutional violations by extension.
1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
obama still has no clue on any of that so Trump cannot do worse.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Your link is rightwing bullshit. The RW will bitch about Obama no matter what he does. I want independent sources. Had it been valid, Obama wouldn't have been able to achieve as much as he has. Plus it's just lazy of you to post some list you had nothing to do with analyzing personally. Don't you think some leftwing site could easily say the same thing about Bush and other republicans? Afterall he was guilty of more executive orders.A List of Obama’s Constitutional ViolationsWho decided Obama violated the constitution 64 times?She's defending Obama's unconstitutional AMNESTY, and thinks it's within the rights of the president to BREAK THE LAW. I already explained how amnesty is an absolutely stupid idea, and she's defending using executive orders to bypass the different branches of government, the Constitution, and law. The fact that you seem to think this is okay to ANY degree only shows that you're in the same boat as them.Okay my mistake. I missed that you said this earlier in another context. Okay this is what Hillary wanted. Overall I don't see it as something that says anything about his or her judgement on the issue. Presidents challenge the Supreme Court all the time and lose. There's always been precedence for that for presidents. It doesn't necessarily mean they have overall ignorance of constructional law. How can any one person?Oh my goodness, you have just proven you didn't click my links. It's directly from her web site, you fopdoodle.Um no. You've provided no connection to Hillary whatsoever on this case. What exactly does Hillary want in regards to this case?
Defending this is also defending Obama's 64 Constitutional violations by extension.
Highly doubt you'll read the link, but here it is.
It must feel good to finally win at something huh?Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Check out who control what in the country. The right has been winning for a while.It must feel good to finally win at something huh?Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Voter fraud, illegals, syrian refugees, the DNC party apparatus, the Establishment, and the mainstream media were all in Hillary's corner. All you can name are a few people. Demoralizing? You're silly, Hillary has no morals, she's practically a robot. She never even showed emotion until she lost.Looking at everything Hillary has done justifies Trump's win pretty easily.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Bannon, Kelly Anne Conway, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Gen Flynn, Giuliano, and I can name a few more,
helped him, by demoralizing Clinton and also Trump won by the skin of his teeth.
It must feel good to finally win at something huh?Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe Trump even has a basic understanding of the following issues:
Hey little billy: Why should anyone care what you believe?
Poor little liberals. Crying and squalling after receiving the most resounding electoral defeat in living memory.
Why should anyone pay attention to you? Normal people know you'll just keep complaining and whining no matter what we say. Since you're no longer in a position to do harm to the country, there's no point in paying attention to you. You're just not worth the trouble.
It must feel good to finally win at something huh?Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.1) Foreign policy; specifically the complex nature of the Middle East
2) Economics (not the same as business although the argument could easily be made he doesn't understand business either)
3) How the US government even works
4) Immigration. Him coming up with the mentally lazy solution of deporting all illegals says nothing about his knowledge of statistics or the current law of it in this country.
Now keep in mind that regardless of what you think of the character of Obama or Hillary, nothing changes the fact that their education backgrounds are in law and public policy. That gives us evidence of their knowledge of these subjects.
Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
We've won 3 of the last 4 elections, even in 2012 you lost some seats in congress. In total you lost 14 senators, 64 congressmen, 18 governorships, and 30+ State houses. I guess you haven't been paying attention.
Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe Trump even has a basic understanding of the following issues:
Hey little billy: Why should anyone care what you believe?
Poor little liberals. Crying and squalling after receiving the most resounding electoral defeat in living memory.
Why should anyone pay attention to you? Normal people know you'll just keep complaining and whining no matter what we say. Since you're no longer in a position to do harm to the country, there's no point in paying attention to you. You're just not worth the trouble.
It must feel good to finally win at something huh?Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.Quite honestly I don't give a fuck what you believe or not. You lost asshole, deal with it.
We've won 3 of the last 4 elections, even in 2012 you lost some seats in congress. In total you lost 14 senators, 64 congressmen, 18 governorships, and 30+ State houses. I guess you haven't been paying attention.
In my state a lot of gerrymandering going on, Dems had more votes and still lost seats.
Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe Trump even has a basic understanding of the following issues:
Hey little billy: Why should anyone care what you believe?
Poor little liberals. Crying and squalling after receiving the most resounding electoral defeat in living memory.
Why should anyone pay attention to you? Normal people know you'll just keep complaining and whining no matter what we say. Since you're no longer in a position to do harm to the country, there's no point in paying attention to you. You're just not worth the trouble.
It must feel good to finally win at something huh?Winners don't need any justification, they won. All the soiled libtard diapers is icing on the cake.Lol you're just butthurt you can't justify winning.
We've won 3 of the last 4 elections, even in 2012 you lost some seats in congress. In total you lost 14 senators, 64 congressmen, 18 governorships, and 30+ State houses. I guess you haven't been paying attention.
In my state a lot of gerrymandering going on, Dems had more votes and still lost seats.
Welcome to a republican form of government idiot.
Hey, Leftwinger, you just lost the White House, the Senate, the House, and the Supreme Court.Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe...
It matters if you can't explain it yourself lol. That's what.Hey, Leftwinger, you just lost the White House, the Senate, the House, and the Supreme Court.Hey Rightwingers: why should I believe...
Whatever-in-the-world makes you think that the Right gives the smallest rat's ass what you believe?
