High School Physics solve 9/11

[Fizz]

first you say:

Lol. Is that why even the Commission Report says it had no live tracking for 36 minutes? Idiot.

then it becomes......

The part you quoted does not cancel out the fact the report says it traveled UNDETECTED FOR THIRTY SIX MINUTES. There are no words for people as fucked up as you are.

see how fucking clueless you are!! there WAS live tracking and you just got caught lying again. the flight was on radar THE ENTIRE TIME. flight info was not displayed to indianapolis controllers for 8 minutes for technical reasons. controllers not knowing or recongnizing which radar blip was flight 77 is in no way "no live radar tracking for 36 minutes" you lying asshole!!

 

[CurveLight]

The failure to find a primary radar return for American 77 led us to investigate this issue further. Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56. But for 8 minutes and 13 seconds, between 8:56 and 9:05, this primary radar information on American 77 was not displayed to controllers at Indianapolis Center.142 The reasons are technical, arising from the way the software processed radar information, as well as from poor primary radar coverage where American 77 was flying.

see????
you are a fucking liar

Its coming up on 5:00 PM. I'm guessing his break was over.

Do you need to upgrade your dildo from thermos to tire size so you don't keep losing it when you try to use it?

 

[eots]

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.
Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:

"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned.

They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.

Thus far, however, there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or, for that matter, in other capitals around the world. Our organization, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, has been formed to help bring about such a response.

We believe that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administration’s interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed.

We are, therefore, calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 that takes account of evidence that has been documented by independent researchers but thus far ignored by governments and the mainstream media."


Video 9/11/04: "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible.…

Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.

I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.go

This would be the same LTC who was a critic of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI, also aka "Star Wars"), active with Veterans for Peace and Vietnam Veterans Against the War. He also once ran for President of the United States as a Reform Part Candidate. Dreams of grandeur?


Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air DefenseTactical Director? I thought he was the BTRY Commander, I spent 2 years in a Nike site the BTRY Commander is a administrative position.) and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could! Wasn't NORADs mission to track or intercept planes within the US or Canada. Their mission was to intercept planes or missiles coming towards us.

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State."

Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see General Stubblebine, Colonel Nelson, Commander Muga, Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. Latas, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, Barbara Honegger, April Gallop, Colonel Bunel, and Steve DeChiaro.


Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"The government conspiracy theory does not hold up to scrutiny. As a professional with over 30 years experience working with gas turbines (jet engines) and fuels - kerosene (jet fuel) does not burn in any open flame hot enough to effect steel - well under 1000 deg F. Also bogus are the explanations regarding why no planes were intercepted. SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] is they are always, always intercepted if they stray off course and/or turn off the transponder like these flights all did. No command decision needed. Has our government ever been untruthful to us?" AE911Truth



Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth

What is this guys expertise in explosives again? I seem to miss that.

Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

I don't know, there's just always something..............

what a weak pile of bullshit...a man of his experience runs as an independent and that is illusion of grandure.. or being opposed to star wars or the Vietnam war ?? and engineer given presidential honors and the who's who of science and engineering and you ask where is his expertise in explosives ??..fuck you are an idiot

 

[Fizz]

eots feels so much better when a few people also agree with his crazy delusions.

 

[CurveLight]

first you say:

Lol. Is that why even the Commission Report says it had no live tracking for 36 minutes? Idiot.

then it becomes......

The part you quoted does not cancel out the fact the report says it traveled UNDETECTED FOR THIRTY SIX MINUTES. There are no words for people as fucked up as you are.

see how fucking clueless you are!! there WAS live tracking and you just got caught lying again. the flight was on radar THE ENTIRE TIME. flight info was not displayed to indianapolis controllers for 8 minutes for technical reasons. controllers not knowing or recongnizing which radar blip was flight 77 is in no way "no live radar tracking for 36 minutes" you lying asshole!!

You stupid fuck. If there was live tracking why were they looking for flight 77?

"The Command Center kept looking for American 77. At 9:21, it advised the Dulles terminal control facility, and Dulles urged its controllers to look for primary targets. At 9:32, they found one."

That quote comes after:

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

That quote comes after:

"In sum, Indianapolis Center never saw Flight 77 turn around. By the time it reappeared in primary radar coverage, controllers had either stopped looking for the aircraft because they thought it had crashed or were looking toward the west. Although the Command Center learned Flight 77 was missing, neither it nor FAA headquarters issued an all points bulletin to surrounding centers to search for primary radar targets."

Only you stupid fucks could actually read:

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

And still somehow say that it was detected. ROTFL. Maybe if you call me a liar it will make this sentence disappear?

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

Damn you guys are fucking pathetic! Do you want me to link your posts from an older thread where you admitted there was no live tracking for 36 minutes? You are one sad little punk.

 

[eots]

fizz feels better when candywhore and little Ollie follow behind him with their nose up his ass ..he thinks it means ...everyone agrees with him

 

[Baruch Menachem]

Has anyone here actually seen the inside of a control tower but me?

What all four sets of highjackers did when they got control of the craft was to turn off the transponders. It is the transponder which tells ATC which aircraft is where & what its altitude is. Otherwise it is just an anonymous blip on the screen. Most private craft operate with transponders set at 1200, which is anonymous.
Aircraft at altitudes over 30K are supposed to be in positive control. That means transponders reporting altitude.

Flight 77 being off the scope for 36 minutes just means the high jackers were semi on the ball. Without the mode C on, all the tower controller knew about was there was one more anonymous blip among dozens. Since the position dosn't refresh until each turn of the radar, he wouldn't have reason to notice its speed either. All aircraft hop a bit from turn to turn.

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7U22m9xLrQ]YouTube - EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)[/ame]

 

[SFC Ollie]

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.
Member: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Association Statement:

"Scholars and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers, medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11 attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned.

They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” have really been cover-up operations.

Thus far, however, there has been no response from political leaders in Washington or, for that matter, in other capitals around the world. Our organization, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, has been formed to help bring about such a response.

We believe that the truth about 9/11 needs to be exposed now---not in 50 years as a footnote in the history books---so the policies that have been based on the Bush-Cheney administration’s interpretation of the 9/11 attacks can be changed.

We are, therefore, calling for a new, independent investigation of 9/11 that takes account of evidence that has been documented by independent researchers but thus far ignored by governments and the mainstream media."


Video 9/11/04: "A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible.…

Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.

I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder." http://video.go

This would be the same LTC who was a critic of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI, also aka "Star Wars"), active with Veterans for Peace and Vietnam Veterans Against the War. He also once ran for President of the United States as a Reform Part Candidate. Dreams of grandeur?


Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.

Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air DefenseTactical Director? I thought he was the BTRY Commander, I spent 2 years in a Nike site the BTRY Commander is a administrative position.) and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could! Wasn't NORADs mission to track or intercept planes within the US or Canada. Their mission was to intercept planes or missiles coming towards us.

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State."

Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see General Stubblebine, Colonel Nelson, Commander Muga, Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. Latas, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, Barbara Honegger, April Gallop, Colonel Bunel, and Steve DeChiaro.


Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"The government conspiracy theory does not hold up to scrutiny. As a professional with over 30 years experience working with gas turbines (jet engines) and fuels - kerosene (jet fuel) does not burn in any open flame hot enough to effect steel - well under 1000 deg F. Also bogus are the explanations regarding why no planes were intercepted. SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] is they are always, always intercepted if they stray off course and/or turn off the transponder like these flights all did. No command decision needed. Has our government ever been untruthful to us?" AE911Truth



Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth

What is this guys expertise in explosives again? I seem to miss that.

Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

I don't know, there's just always something..............

what a weak pile of bullshit...a man of his experience runs as an independent and that is illusion of grandure.. or being opposed to star wars or the Vietnam war ?? and engineer given presidential honors and the who's who of science and engineering and you ask where is his expertise in explosives ??..fuck you are an idiot

Just adding to the resumes and asking a few questions, did I say something that wasn't true?

 

[CurveLight]

Is it just me or does that say "signed plans?" What you fail to grasp is it doesn't matter if you try to hide behind your bullshit "preliminary" garbage. The Joint Chiefs all approved the plans as I stated and have proven. The fact is they tried to get the plans approved by the Kennedy admin so let's watch you embarrass yourself some more and preach about ignoring facts.

SO FUCKING WHAT?!!!!

did the operation ever get implemented?

no. it didnt. end of story.

You don't see the importance of the fact the Joint Chiefs of Staff all drew up and approved plans to fake an attack on Americans to justify invading a country that didn't attack us? But of course you don't. You're a stupid fuck.

 

[DiveCon]

Is it just me or does that say "signed plans?" What you fail to grasp is it doesn't matter if you try to hide behind your bullshit "preliminary" garbage. The Joint Chiefs all approved the plans as I stated and have proven. The fact is they tried to get the plans approved by the Kennedy admin so let's watch you embarrass yourself some more and preach about ignoring facts.

SO FUCKING WHAT?!!!!

did the operation ever get implemented?

no. it didnt. end of story.

You don't see the importance of the fact the Joint Chiefs of Staff all drew up and approved plans to fake an attack on Americans to justify invading a country that didn't attack us? But of course you don't. You're a stupid fuck.

you are the stupid fuck
and a liar too

 

[CurveLight]

Has anyone here actually seen the inside of a control tower but me?

What all four sets of highjackers did when they got control of the craft was to turn off the transponders. It is the transponder which tells ATC which aircraft is where & what its altitude is. Otherwise it is just an anonymous blip on the screen. Most private craft operate with transponders set at 1200, which is anonymous.
Aircraft at altitudes over 30K are supposed to be in positive control. That means transponders reporting altitude.

Flight 77 being off the scope for 36 minutes just means the high jackers were semi on the ball. Without the mode C on, all the tower controller knew about was there was one more anonymous blip among dozens. Since the position dosn't refresh until each turn of the radar, he wouldn't have reason to notice its speed either. All aircraft hop a bit from turn to turn.

Nobody was tracking 77 for 36 minutes....while it was flying towards the most heavily guarded airspace in the world. Turning off a xponder doesn't make an airplane turn into a stealth airplane. That's why we spend billions creating stealth aircraft. Your little rant is useless. Btw, it was Fizz who had to be schooled on radar coverage. That dumb fuck thought Primary meant the xponder signal and he didn't know they feed the secondary.

 

[DiveCon]

Has anyone here actually seen the inside of a control tower but me?

What all four sets of highjackers did when they got control of the craft was to turn off the transponders. It is the transponder which tells ATC which aircraft is where & what its altitude is. Otherwise it is just an anonymous blip on the screen. Most private craft operate with transponders set at 1200, which is anonymous.
Aircraft at altitudes over 30K are supposed to be in positive control. That means transponders reporting altitude.

Flight 77 being off the scope for 36 minutes just means the high jackers were semi on the ball. Without the mode C on, all the tower controller knew about was there was one more anonymous blip among dozens. Since the position dosn't refresh until each turn of the radar, he wouldn't have reason to notice its speed either. All aircraft hop a bit from turn to turn.

facts mean nothing to these moronic troofers

 

[DiveCon]

Has anyone here actually seen the inside of a control tower but me?

What all four sets of highjackers did when they got control of the craft was to turn off the transponders. It is the transponder which tells ATC which aircraft is where & what its altitude is. Otherwise it is just an anonymous blip on the screen. Most private craft operate with transponders set at 1200, which is anonymous.
Aircraft at altitudes over 30K are supposed to be in positive control. That means transponders reporting altitude.

Flight 77 being off the scope for 36 minutes just means the high jackers were semi on the ball. Without the mode C on, all the tower controller knew about was there was one more anonymous blip among dozens. Since the position dosn't refresh until each turn of the radar, he wouldn't have reason to notice its speed either. All aircraft hop a bit from turn to turn.

Nobody was tracking 77 for 36 minutes....while it was flying towards the most heavily guarded airspace in the world. Turning off a xponder doesn't make an airplane turn into a stealth airplane. That's why we spend billions creating stealth aircraft. Your little rant is useless. Btw, it was Fizz who had to be schooled on radar coverage. That dumb fuck thought Primary meant the xponder signal and he didn't know they feed the secondary.

again you lie
the radar was tracking it, they just didnt know it was flight 77 because the transponder had been turned off

 

[CurveLight]

SO FUCKING WHAT?!!!!

did the operation ever get implemented?

no. it didnt. end of story.

You don't see the importance of the fact the Joint Chiefs of Staff all drew up and approved plans to fake an attack on Americans to justify invading a country that didn't attack us? But of course you don't. You're a stupid fuck.

you are the stupid fuck
and a liar too

"American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C."

 

[Fizz]

first you say:

Lol. Is that why even the Commission Report says it had no live tracking for 36 minutes? Idiot.

then it becomes......

The part you quoted does not cancel out the fact the report says it traveled UNDETECTED FOR THIRTY SIX MINUTES. There are no words for people as fucked up as you are.

see how fucking clueless you are!! there WAS live tracking and you just got caught lying again. the flight was on radar THE ENTIRE TIME. flight info was not displayed to indianapolis controllers for 8 minutes for technical reasons. controllers not knowing or recongnizing which radar blip was flight 77 is in no way "no live radar tracking for 36 minutes" you lying asshole!!

You stupid fuck. If there was live tracking why were they looking for flight 77?

FLIGHT 77 WAS TRACKED BY RADAR THE ENTIRE TIME. radar only works "live". you cant flip a switch and see where planes were before you turned the radar on.

no matter how many times you keep repeating shit trying to change your original claim the fact remains that you were caught lying.

...again

 

[CurveLight]

Has anyone here actually seen the inside of a control tower but me?

What all four sets of highjackers did when they got control of the craft was to turn off the transponders. It is the transponder which tells ATC which aircraft is where & what its altitude is. Otherwise it is just an anonymous blip on the screen. Most private craft operate with transponders set at 1200, which is anonymous.
Aircraft at altitudes over 30K are supposed to be in positive control. That means transponders reporting altitude.

Flight 77 being off the scope for 36 minutes just means the high jackers were semi on the ball. Without the mode C on, all the tower controller knew about was there was one more anonymous blip among dozens. Since the position dosn't refresh until each turn of the radar, he wouldn't have reason to notice its speed either. All aircraft hop a bit from turn to turn.

Nobody was tracking 77 for 36 minutes....while it was flying towards the most heavily guarded airspace in the world. Turning off a xponder doesn't make an airplane turn into a stealth airplane. That's why we spend billions creating stealth aircraft. Your little rant is useless. Btw, it was Fizz who had to be schooled on radar coverage. That dumb fuck thought Primary meant the xponder signal and he didn't know they feed the secondary.

again you lie
the radar was tracking it, they just didnt know it was flight 77 because the transponder had been turned off

You seem to keep ignoring facts from the Report. It points out a Primary target wasn't seen until 9:32

"The Command Center kept looking for American 77. At 9:21, it advised the Dulles terminal control facility, and Dulles urged its controllers to look for primary targets. At 9:32, they found one."

If they didn't find a Primary target until 9:32 that means they weren't tracking any Primary targets you idiot fuck turd. Holy shit how can you be this fucking dumb?

 

[DiveCon]

Nobody was tracking 77 for 36 minutes....while it was flying towards the most heavily guarded airspace in the world. Turning off a xponder doesn't make an airplane turn into a stealth airplane. That's why we spend billions creating stealth aircraft. Your little rant is useless. Btw, it was Fizz who had to be schooled on radar coverage. That dumb fuck thought Primary meant the xponder signal and he didn't know they feed the secondary.

again you lie
the radar was tracking it, they just didnt know it was flight 77 because the transponder had been turned off

You seem to keep ignoring facts from the Report. It points out a Primary target wasn't seen until 9:32

"The Command Center kept looking for American 77. At 9:21, it advised the Dulles terminal control facility, and Dulles urged its controllers to look for primary targets. At 9:32, they found one."

If they didn't find a Primary target until 9:32 that means they weren't tracking any Primary targets you idiot fuck turd. Holy shit how can you be this fucking dumb?

you keep using false info as if it was real

"the command center" was the Indy air traffic controllers
they didnt know what the blip was
you are too fucking stupid to understand what you read

 

[eots]

divemoroncon is such a one trick pony ..he just types liar in all caps and calls it evidence

 

[CurveLight]

first you say:


then it becomes......


see how fucking clueless you are!! there WAS live tracking and you just got caught lying again. the flight was on radar THE ENTIRE TIME. flight info was not displayed to indianapolis controllers for 8 minutes for technical reasons. controllers not knowing or recongnizing which radar blip was flight 77 is in no way "no live radar tracking for 36 minutes" you lying asshole!!

You stupid fuck. If there was live tracking why were they looking for flight 77?

FLIGHT 77 WAS TRACKED BY RADAR THE ENTIRE TIME. radar only works "live". you cant flip a switch and see where planes were before you turned the radar on.

no matter how many times you keep repeating shit trying to change your original claim the fact remains that you were caught lying.

...again

You fucking divecon. It wasn't tracked live because no controller was tracking it. That is why the report said it traveled UNDETECTED FOR 36 MINUTES. You fucking little worm. Explain to us what the report meant by saying it TRAVELED UNDETECTED FOR 36 MINUTES. Let's see how you explain that.