Hillary Clinton deleted entire servers and it was no big deal.

The Presidential Records Act actually gives the President five years to urn over records.
Where does it say that?

Also, there is no Trump presidential library so there’s no way for them to send the documents somewhere that doesn’t exist.
 
"Dave's not here."

That's not me. Go play your Casio. :rolleyes:
marcia-sure-jan.gif
 
Where does it say that?

Also, there is no Trump presidential library so there’s no way for them to send the documents somewhere that doesn’t exist.
The Nixon Library was years in the making.
Hugh Hewitt just the last 10 years or so was responsible for some
of the finishing touches.
Obamas Library was way too big.Like his silly display when
he threw a big shindig over his 2008 Presidential Nomination
address.Greek Columns.
 
There was absolutely no reason to think he was entitled to take highly classified government documents.

There definitely wasn’t any legitimate reason for him to do so.

Even if he thinks he gets to keep them, that doesn’t excuse obstructing justice by refusing to comply with a grand jury subpoena.
Time may tell if Trump had the right to take classified documents



PODCAST

The Brief: It Was Okay For Bill Clinton To Keep Presidential Records, But Not Trump?​

A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.
Gregg_Jarrett-48x48.jpg

By
Gregg Jarrett
Published
September 28, 2022
GettyImages-52032054.jpg

PAUL RICHARDS/AFP via Getty Images

A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.
That was the Department of Justice’s legal opinion a decade ago. It was a conclusion shared by both the National Archives and a U.S. District Court in Washington D.C. On that basis, ex-president Bill Clinton was allowed to maintain custody of whatever he wanted, including allegedly classified audio tapes that he stored in his home.


***************

Of course there are now two rules of law in our nation and Trump will likely be ruled guilty of taking classified records and Joe Biden will never get in any trouble for all the classified documents he had including those he stole wihile a Senator.
 
What does Hunter Biden have to do with the 2016 election?

Nothing you moron.

This is how the FBI helped Trump:

But mainly this:
Lol, he kept Hillary out of jail you moron.
 
And then it turned out that Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner used private email to conduct government business.

Should they be prosecuted, Trumpers?
Explain { Conduct Government business }.
That could easily mean just about anything.
Like having a White House kiddie balloon fight or
egg hunt.
But then You know that right.
But yet that doesn't stop you or yer kind from
spreading scuttlebutt.Meaning you get a kick out of
being a petty Nosy Parker.
 
Time may tell if Trump had the right to take classified documents




PODCAST

The Brief: It Was Okay For Bill Clinton To Keep Presidential Records, But Not Trump?

A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.
Gregg_Jarrett-48x48.jpg

By
Gregg Jarrett
Published
September 28, 2022

GettyImages-52032054.jpg

PAUL RICHARDS/AFP via Getty Images

A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.
That was the Department of Justice’s legal opinion a decade ago. It was a conclusion shared by both the National Archives and a U.S. District Court in Washington D.C. On that basis, ex-president Bill Clinton was allowed to maintain custody of whatever he wanted, including allegedly classified audio tapes that he stored in his home.


***************

Of course there are now two rules of law in our nation and Trump will likely be ruled guilty of taking classified records and Joe Biden will never get in any trouble for all the classified documents he had including those he stole wihile a Senator.
I have basically no respect for Gregg Jarrett who seems to be little more than a Trump sychopant who praised anything he does.

The case referenced says nothing like what he claims, but you just need to think for yourself.

You mean to tell me that the US military plans drafted by the Pentagon which is a classified national secret is actually a personal document?

No. It’s not. No one in their right mind would ever accept that.
 
Explain { Conduct Government business }.
That could easily mean just about anything.
Like having a White House kiddie balloon fight or
egg hunt.
But then You know that right.
But yet that doesn't stop you or yer kind from
spreading scuttlebutt.Meaning you get a kick out of
being a petty Nosy Parker.
So, you're exonerating Hillary Clinton?
 
Comey could've suggested her to be tried and convicted. But said she didn't intend to break the law.
Comey made the recommendation consistent with law.

Who kept Clinton from being prosecuted under the Trump administration?
 
I have basically no respect for Gregg Jarrett who seems to be little more than a Trump sychopant who praised anything he does.

The case referenced says nothing like what he claims, but you just need to think for yourself.

You mean to tell me that the US military plans drafted by the Pentagon which is a classified national secret is actually a personal document?

No. It’s not. No one in their right mind would ever accept that.
Gregg Jarrett is a mushroom-sucking hack.
 
The Nixon Library was years in the making.
Hugh Hewitt just the last 10 years or so was responsible for some
of the finishing touches.
Obamas Library was way too big.Like his silly display when
he threw a big shindig over his 2008 Presidential Nomination
address.Greek Columns.
That’s nice.

When Trump ever gets around to even starting to make a library, they will talk with the archives about what to do with the documents.
 
This letter is from earlier this year and is hilarious given what we know since then. Also it comes from Trump’s personal attorneys so consider the source.

Yes. You make it crystal clear you won't even listen to, let alone consider, any evidence or arguments that conflict with your hyperpartisan ideology
 

Forum List

Back
Top