Thank you Muslim Brotherhood. I knew you were good for something. Thanks to you the lady who called for an Internet gatekeeper is now defending free speech sort of:
By Staff Reporter: Subscribe to Staff's RSS feed
September 13, 2012 2:08 PM EDT
Hillary Clinton Condemns Anti-Islam Film (FULL TEXT) - International Business Times
Hillarys love affair with the royal we began when she was first lady.
It sounds like Hillary communicates with Queen Victoria when shes not chatting with Eleanor Roosevelt. But I digress.
Shock of all shocks, Hillary Clinton now deplores senseless violence! Presumably, senseless violence is much worse than calculated violence like infanticide. I believe it qualifies as senseless when it is done to government officials. No matter. I accept Hillarys conversion as a blessing.
After all, who would have believed a conversion was possible after the Branch Davidian Compound slaughter when she was co-president? I might be wrong on this, but she never used the word violence after more than 80 American men, women, and children were burned to death by her half of the administration, or maybe it was Bubbas half; which half was never made clear.
Better late than never does show there is some good in everybody when its politically expedient. Hillary Clintons heart might have moved over to the right place, but in this instance her definition of violence is wrong:
Gingrich opinion: Act of war, not 'senseless violence'
By NEWT GINGRICH | 9/13/12 3:54 PM EDT
Opinion: Gingrich opinion: Act of war, not 'senseless violence' - Newt Gingrich - POLITICO.com
Mr. Newt is correct. Every Muslim attack is an act of war. Hussein and Clinton are playing the same theme Democrats sang after 9-11-2001: Terrorists are criminals not soldiers.
Finally, Id like to ask every one of those Democrats if their conduct was senseless violence when they gave the enemy hope for a political victory in Vietnam, Iraq, and now Afghanistan. Their aid and comfort given to the enemy while our military was fighting on battlefields resulted in thousands of unnecessary deaths. Were those deaths nothing more than the result of senseless violence?
Now, the hypocrites whine that everyone should get behind the president because Muslims are attacking again. Democrats sang a different tune when Bush the Younger was president.
Bottom line: Mitt Romneys remarks did not get any Americans killed the way top Democrasts did when they went on talk shows to undermine Bush and our military during the Iraq war.
. . . our country does have a long tradition of free expression, which is enshrined in our Constitution and our law, and we do not stop individual citizens from expressing their views no matter how distasteful they may be.
There are, of course, different views around the world about the outer limits of free speech and free expression, but there should be no debate about the simple proposition that violence in response to speech is not acceptable.
By Staff Reporter: Subscribe to Staff's RSS feed
September 13, 2012 2:08 PM EDT
Hillary Clinton Condemns Anti-Islam Film (FULL TEXT) - International Business Times
Hillarys love affair with the royal we began when she was first lady.
. . . we do not stop individual citizens from expressing their views no matter how distasteful they may be.
It sounds like Hillary communicates with Queen Victoria when shes not chatting with Eleanor Roosevelt. But I digress.
Shock of all shocks, Hillary Clinton now deplores senseless violence! Presumably, senseless violence is much worse than calculated violence like infanticide. I believe it qualifies as senseless when it is done to government officials. No matter. I accept Hillarys conversion as a blessing.
After all, who would have believed a conversion was possible after the Branch Davidian Compound slaughter when she was co-president? I might be wrong on this, but she never used the word violence after more than 80 American men, women, and children were burned to death by her half of the administration, or maybe it was Bubbas half; which half was never made clear.
Better late than never does show there is some good in everybody when its politically expedient. Hillary Clintons heart might have moved over to the right place, but in this instance her definition of violence is wrong:
President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton again perpetuated the kind of intellectual dishonesty that cripples the U.S. response to radical Islamists.
The president asserted we have to oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants.
Clinton reinforced his analysis when she said, We condemn in the strongest terms this senseless act of violence.
This concept of senseless violence is at the heart of the lefts refusal to confront the reality of radical Islamists.
These are not acts of senseless violence.
These are acts of war.
Gingrich opinion: Act of war, not 'senseless violence'
By NEWT GINGRICH | 9/13/12 3:54 PM EDT
Opinion: Gingrich opinion: Act of war, not 'senseless violence' - Newt Gingrich - POLITICO.com
Mr. Newt is correct. Every Muslim attack is an act of war. Hussein and Clinton are playing the same theme Democrats sang after 9-11-2001: Terrorists are criminals not soldiers.
Finally, Id like to ask every one of those Democrats if their conduct was senseless violence when they gave the enemy hope for a political victory in Vietnam, Iraq, and now Afghanistan. Their aid and comfort given to the enemy while our military was fighting on battlefields resulted in thousands of unnecessary deaths. Were those deaths nothing more than the result of senseless violence?
Now, the hypocrites whine that everyone should get behind the president because Muslims are attacking again. Democrats sang a different tune when Bush the Younger was president.
Bottom line: Mitt Romneys remarks did not get any Americans killed the way top Democrasts did when they went on talk shows to undermine Bush and our military during the Iraq war.