Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Typical right winger. Thinks the election of a president involves nothing more than genitals. There is more to it than that idiot.
The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
I don't believe Hillary is all that popular. I have heard some of my lib friends say that if they elect Hillary, they will get Bill back in the WH. Lib men admire the way Bill plays the field and gets away with it, IMO, and women believe they have a chance with the playboy. I remember liberals and the leftwing press acting like it was cute the way Bill fooled around and lied about it. When the ability to lie is considered an asset and the name "Slick Willy" is a source of pride, you know you're dealing with true liberals.
Typical right winger. Thinks the election of a president involves nothing more than genitals. There is more to it than that idiot.
But it is about genitals.
I predict that the only way for Jeb to win is to pull a Bruce Jenner.
Typical right winger. Thinks the election of a president involves nothing more than genitals. There is more to it than that idiot.
Typical right winger. Thinks the election of a president involves nothing more than genitals. There is more to it than that idiot.
It's the left that has declared that this next election should go to a woman. They choose gender/race/ethnicity first, then go with the first person they find that fits.
It's my LIBERAL friends that keep saying they want Bill back in the WH and they will vote for Hillary just because of Bill. I don't get it, but I've heard that so many times.
I don't think the left wants Hillary, at least not Obama and other liberals in Washington. Looks like people in the Obama administration are responsible for leaking info on Hillary's emails. I think they have another woman candidate in mind and Obama still considers Hillary an enemy.
It's the typical leftwingers that will vote for Fauxahontos or Hillary just because they are leftwing women and for no other reason.
That man-and-wife tag-team are the most corrupt politicians of our age.Hillary Clinton apos s popularity remains high outstripping GOP rivals poll finds - LA Times
Gee, I guess the Repubs saw blood in the water with the e-mail fiasco. Well, the water is clearing up and Hillary can still defeat any of the lame contenders from the GOP. It has got to be frustrating.....
Wrong. It was a 95 year record for the GOP.The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
It worked out exactly the way historical precedent predicted. Nobody was surprised. A little disappointed perhaps, but not surprised. 2016 will follow expected patterns as well. The right does have a chance to show they know how to govern, but they haven't shown much effort yet.
Wrong. It was a 95 year record for the GOP.The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
It worked out exactly the way historical precedent predicted. Nobody was surprised. A little disappointed perhaps, but not surprised. 2016 will follow expected patterns as well. The right does have a chance to show they know how to govern, but they haven't shown much effort yet.
Also, what retard thinks any polling that compares one candidate in one party to many in another has any meaning whatsoever? Liberals can't think.
The Dems didn't vote like the Republicans did because they weren't motivated given what's been going on. You can downplay the election results if you need to but most people see it for what is was. More seats=more power. We don't pass laws based on mandates we do them by votes. Liberals love the M word for some odd reason.Wrong. It was a 95 year record for the GOP.The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
It worked out exactly the way historical precedent predicted. Nobody was surprised. A little disappointed perhaps, but not surprised. 2016 will follow expected patterns as well. The right does have a chance to show they know how to govern, but they haven't shown much effort yet.
Also, what retard thinks any polling that compares one candidate in one party to many in another has any meaning whatsoever? Liberals can't think.
The amount of seats they won may have been a record, but the results were not. The GOP has been very good at getting their base to turn out, the Democrats have not.
I know you think Republicans have some sort of mandate from this last election when only 30 percent of the entire country voted and 20 percent of those were Republicans, but that does not a mandate make nor does it signal any desire for the policies of the GOP by the American people.
You have one and only one candidate that can give Hillary a run for the money...and that's because he has the money. Jebbie..and ya'll hate him.
The Dems didn't vote like the Republicans did because they weren't motivated given what's been going on. You can downplay the election results if you need to but most people see it for what is was. More seats=more power. We don't pass laws based on mandates we do them by votes. Liberals love the M word for some odd reason.Wrong. It was a 95 year record for the GOP.The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
It worked out exactly the way historical precedent predicted. Nobody was surprised. A little disappointed perhaps, but not surprised. 2016 will follow expected patterns as well. The right does have a chance to show they know how to govern, but they haven't shown much effort yet.
Also, what retard thinks any polling that compares one candidate in one party to many in another has any meaning whatsoever? Liberals can't think.
The amount of seats they won may have been a record, but the results were not. The GOP has been very good at getting their base to turn out, the Democrats have not.
I know you think Republicans have some sort of mandate from this last election when only 30 percent of the entire country voted and 20 percent of those were Republicans, but that does not a mandate make nor does it signal any desire for the policies of the GOP by the American people.
You have one and only one candidate that can give Hillary a run for the money...and that's because he has the money. Jebbie..and ya'll hate him.
You also missed my point, the GOP doesn't have a pick yet and Hillary apparently doesn't have any competition. Comparing her with a dozen GOP prospects is just stupid.
HillaryMail scandal was not generated by the Republicans. Her own party wants her out and Liz Warren In. Watching you Lefties' futile defense of one of the most corrupt politicians ever is comical.
The Dems didn't vote like the Republicans did because they weren't motivated given what's been going on. You can downplay the election results if you need to but most people see it for what is was. More seats=more power. We don't pass laws based on mandates we do them by votes. Liberals love the M word for some odd reason.Wrong. It was a 95 year record for the GOP.The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
It worked out exactly the way historical precedent predicted. Nobody was surprised. A little disappointed perhaps, but not surprised. 2016 will follow expected patterns as well. The right does have a chance to show they know how to govern, but they haven't shown much effort yet.
Also, what retard thinks any polling that compares one candidate in one party to many in another has any meaning whatsoever? Liberals can't think.
The amount of seats they won may have been a record, but the results were not. The GOP has been very good at getting their base to turn out, the Democrats have not.
I know you think Republicans have some sort of mandate from this last election when only 30 percent of the entire country voted and 20 percent of those were Republicans, but that does not a mandate make nor does it signal any desire for the policies of the GOP by the American people.
You have one and only one candidate that can give Hillary a run for the money...and that's because he has the money. Jebbie..and ya'll hate him.
You also missed my point, the GOP doesn't have a pick yet and Hillary apparently doesn't have any competition. Comparing her with a dozen GOP prospects is just stupid.
I'm not downplaying the last election results, I'm stating the facts. You are up playing the last election's results.
Guess what? I'm not the one who is going to be suffering the dose of reality in 2016 when your GOP tidal wave doesn't materialize.
Aids is very popular with the libs also...Hillary Clinton apos s popularity remains high outstripping GOP rivals poll finds - LA Times
Gee, I guess the Repubs saw blood in the water with the e-mail fiasco. Well, the water is clearing up and Hillary can still defeat any of the lame contenders from the GOP. It has got to be frustrating.....
Incorrect. Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are no longer solid blue. Virginia is going back red. Michigan may tip GOP....Just two states at the end of the day. Ohio and Florida. Those are the deciders.
Wrong. It was a 95 year record for the GOP.The Republican Congress had the lowest approval ratings ever going into the 2014 election. How'd that work out for Dems?
It worked out exactly the way historical precedent predicted. Nobody was surprised. A little disappointed perhaps, but not surprised. 2016 will follow expected patterns as well. The right does have a chance to show they know how to govern, but they haven't shown much effort yet.
Also, what retard thinks any polling that compares one candidate in one party to many in another has any meaning whatsoever? Liberals can't think.
