Holocaust survivers mock AOC

[Ambivalent1]

absolute garbage my friend.

But all I did was state verifiable facts.
The Red Cross report, the World Jewish Almanac entries, and news articles about the reduction in the Auschwitz museum's estimates can all be found online.

Again I will now apply Holocaust Denialism to you

Yeah, we already covered that. I deny the veracity of the accepted Holocaust narrative; no argument.
The only issue I have with the term is that "denial" implies that one is insisting that something they know to be true is false, and that's not what I'm doing.

I can't read your post because you are from Africa and are typing in Zulu

I'm from the USA and am typing in English. If you can't read it, that's you're comprehension problem.

When you say Soviet, American, British governments and rich Jews that is pretty general, I am asking specifically who is behind it? It seems with all the information you claim to have this should really be easy. Name names.

You're request is unreasonable. One suspects you know that. The Rothschilds would be one name. Stalin would be one name. Churchill another. We're talking about governments, though; there's no identifying all the individuals involved.

because WW2 is a WORLD WAR. it would be hard for the US to lie when so many nations were in synch. or are you saying all the other countries did our evil bidding?

All it took was the US, Britain, and the USSR cooperating, as they'd been doing for years. The world financial oligarchy had the first two in it's pocket -- thus, rich jews. It just takes a disinformation campaign, something they all did and still do, and a public that wants to believe.

What you meant to say is that there is no "truth" you'll accept other than your own.

Not at all. I'm open to new information and to revising my position. I'd have to say that you're accusing me of being like you. Are you willing to accept that what you believe could be incorrect?

Hitlers goal was what again?

To free his people from the yoke of the Treaty of Versailles, restore their prosperity, and end the debilitating impact of the world banking system on Germany and ultimately all Europe.

and if someone was attacking all my friends and family, yes; i will declare war on them.

After lengthy and refused negotiation offers with the Polish government, Hitler invaded and occupied those parts of Poland that had been German territory before WWI and which were populated by ethnic Germans, who were being oppressed and slaughtered. England then declared war on Germany, despite Hitler's repeated attempts at peaceful negotiation. After the war, England agreed to give Poland to the USSR. Hitler was defending his extended family; Churchill made war.

The Germans had Jews dig you moron, they dug until they died, they also had Jews welding bombs.
Simpleton

Yes, I knew that and knew you were referring to that. You're intent in the context of the post to which you replied is what I didn't understand fully. I was merely requesting clarification.

All you offer is falsehoods and insults. That you believe the falsehoods is understandable; you were taught them and never questioned them. The insults, on the other hand, betray only the weakness of your position and of your character.

How long have you been with the Mosad

How long have you been off your meds?

(See, anyone can play the insult game. What does it accomplish?

Nah he is with the Mosad, he thinks that he will find Adolph here

She.
And what she hoped to find here was stimulating and civil conversation with thoughtful people. There's been some but they don't seem to be in the majority.

Poles, and Soviets both had non-Aggression pacts with Nazi Germany, and in both cases Nazi Germans attacked them first.

True.
Germany attempted a negotiated settlement with Poland over the German territory and people under Poland's control after WWI. All negotiations were refused by Poland and the oppression of ethnic Germans continued. Hitler felt he had no other choice but to invade in order to protect his people.
Attacking Russia was probably a fatal mistake. The rationale was a desperate need for resources and, some evidence suggests, maybe intelligence that Russia was going to attack Germany.

The numbers of Jews killed might be up for debate, but not the Holocaust which has far too much information.

No one argues that nothing happened. Only the numbers, the causes, and the intent are questioned by Holocaust revisionists.

Holocaust denial being criminalized is ridiculous.

Absolutely!

That it's a crime pretty much throughout the EU raises a significant question:
If everything about the accepted Holocaust narrative is definitely true, why criminalize even questioning it? Wouldn't a truth hold up under scrutiny?

More: Wouldn't someone questioning it publicly be an opportunity to present the facts and remind everyone about the history? Why even risk the bad image that imprisoning an octogenarian grandmother (Ursula Haverbeck) merely for asking questions could produce? If it's all undeniably true, what sense is there in criminalizing questioning it?

They arent secure in this one area for some reason.

Exactly! And what could that reason be? You'd want to suppress questions only if you're hiding something (Julian Assange, anyone?). If evidence is available that could reveal what you're hiding.

Anything is Possible but that reduces us to doing sources

So you believe that 6 million people just mysteriously dissapeared....

Lie down on zi couch anz tell us about your mudder

I suggest you catch up on the conversation.

Let's go shooting, you can get me up to speed

Remain in the dark, I'm fine with that

 

[Frannie]

The rules of evidence were suspended for the Nuremberg trials. Specifically, articles 19 & 21 of the London Charter stated that the Nuremberg Tribunal would not be bound by the standard rules of evidence and that proof of "facts" of "common knowledge" would not be required.
enDOTwikisourceDOTo r gSLASHwikiSLASHLondon_Charter_of_the_International_Militry_Trinunal

Hoess was tortured to get him to testify as he did and sign a written confession that was in English, which he couldn't read.
rudolfhoess DOT wordpress DOT c o m/
ihr DOT o r g SLASH jhr SLASH v07 SLASH v07p389_Faurisson DOT h t m l
uncensoredhistory DOT blogspot DOT c o m SLASH 2012 SLASH 10 SLASH the-british-torture-of-rudolph-hoess DOT h t m l

Not supposition; my conclusions based on the evidence I've seen.
I've also produced documents. Many others are available online; you can see the ones I've mentioned for yourself.

Forgive me but you seem to not quite get the nature of a conspiracy or of a hoax.
As I don't believe you're unintelligent, I still suspect you're being intentionally obtuse. But if your criterion for belief is that specific names be known beyond the heads of the complicit states and the heads of the conspiring financial oligarchs, that's your choice. No one can give what perforce doesn't exist.

You continue to offer nothing. Those who demean others tend generally to have a low opinion of themselves. There may be help for you available; you should consider looking into it.

Your references speak of testimony of the Nuremberg Trial. So, you want me to believe only the testimony given that supports your theory and disregard the evidence and testimony that conflicts with your testimony. Sounds like a closed and not an open mind that you have reached your conclusion.

That's EXACTLY what she wants you to believe. It all boils down to what "sources" she (or anyone on either side that is a hyper partisan) approves of.

The Nuremberg Trials had literally tons both verbal and physical evidence and put weight into testimony. I also reason as to why a person would testify one way or the other.

There was no need for evidence that the holocaust happened, the evidence was as to who did what....

I'm not sure how anyone can come to a different conclusion. They talked about literal tons of evidence from the Germans themselves documenting what happened. Then to claim three governments then collaborated and made tons and tons of paper to prove it? That isn't a stretch that is a Grand Canyon gap that can't be closed.

Some of the people doing this are actually Israeli secret service, or Jews trying to identify where Adolph is living now.

 

[Frannie]

But all I did was state verifiable facts.
The Red Cross report, the World Jewish Almanac entries, and news articles about the reduction in the Auschwitz museum's estimates can all be found online.

Yeah, we already covered that. I deny the veracity of the accepted Holocaust narrative; no argument.
The only issue I have with the term is that "denial" implies that one is insisting that something they know to be true is false, and that's not what I'm doing.

I'm from the USA and am typing in English. If you can't read it, that's you're comprehension problem.

You're request is unreasonable. One suspects you know that. The Rothschilds would be one name. Stalin would be one name. Churchill another. We're talking about governments, though; there's no identifying all the individuals involved.

All it took was the US, Britain, and the USSR cooperating, as they'd been doing for years. The world financial oligarchy had the first two in it's pocket -- thus, rich jews. It just takes a disinformation campaign, something they all did and still do, and a public that wants to believe.

Not at all. I'm open to new information and to revising my position. I'd have to say that you're accusing me of being like you. Are you willing to accept that what you believe could be incorrect?

To free his people from the yoke of the Treaty of Versailles, restore their prosperity, and end the debilitating impact of the world banking system on Germany and ultimately all Europe.

After lengthy and refused negotiation offers with the Polish government, Hitler invaded and occupied those parts of Poland that had been German territory before WWI and which were populated by ethnic Germans, who were being oppressed and slaughtered. England then declared war on Germany, despite Hitler's repeated attempts at peaceful negotiation. After the war, England agreed to give Poland to the USSR. Hitler was defending his extended family; Churchill made war.

Yes, I knew that and knew you were referring to that. You're intent in the context of the post to which you replied is what I didn't understand fully. I was merely requesting clarification.

All you offer is falsehoods and insults. That you believe the falsehoods is understandable; you were taught them and never questioned them. The insults, on the other hand, betray only the weakness of your position and of your character.

How long have you been off your meds?

(See, anyone can play the insult game. What does it accomplish?

She.
And what she hoped to find here was stimulating and civil conversation with thoughtful people. There's been some but they don't seem to be in the majority.

True.
Germany attempted a negotiated settlement with Poland over the German territory and people under Poland's control after WWI. All negotiations were refused by Poland and the oppression of ethnic Germans continued. Hitler felt he had no other choice but to invade in order to protect his people.
Attacking Russia was probably a fatal mistake. The rationale was a desperate need for resources and, some evidence suggests, maybe intelligence that Russia was going to attack Germany.

No one argues that nothing happened. Only the numbers, the causes, and the intent are questioned by Holocaust revisionists.

Absolutely!

That it's a crime pretty much throughout the EU raises a significant question:
If everything about the accepted Holocaust narrative is definitely true, why criminalize even questioning it? Wouldn't a truth hold up under scrutiny?

More: Wouldn't someone questioning it publicly be an opportunity to present the facts and remind everyone about the history? Why even risk the bad image that imprisoning an octogenarian grandmother (Ursula Haverbeck) merely for asking questions could produce? If it's all undeniably true, what sense is there in criminalizing questioning it?

Exactly! And what could that reason be? You'd want to suppress questions only if you're hiding something (Julian Assange, anyone?). If evidence is available that could reveal what you're hiding.

Anything is Possible but that reduces us to doing sources

So you believe that 6 million people just mysteriously dissapeared....

Lie down on zi couch anz tell us about your mudder

I suggest you catch up on the conversation.

Let's go shooting, you can get me up to speed

Remain in the dark, I'm fine with that

You bought Apple Google and Netflix right...………………….

Only one of us is in the dark

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

No, those regions of Poland were majority Polish, and weren't inhabited by a German majority.

For example Poznan was majority Polish in the 20th century, and was so also when Germans had stole it from them in 1793.

Much of the German minority there, were none other than Germans brought in, or Poles even Germanized during the Germanization of Western Poland by German leaders like Von Bismark.

This contradicts information I've seen. Could you direct me to any sources, please?

Here's a map of ethnic minorities in the Second Polish Republic.

Not a single region was majority German that Poland held in Poland proper in the 1930's.

Although the Free City of Gdansk, not really held as part of Poland in the 1930's was majority German.

There might have been a few towns, here, and there in Western Poland with German majorities, but mostly Polish majorities dominated in Western Poland in the 1930's.

 

[Frannie]

No, those regions of Poland were majority Polish, and weren't inhabited by a German majority.

For example Poznan was majority Polish in the 20th century, and was so also when Germans had stole it from them in 1793.

Much of the German minority there, were none other than Germans brought in, or Poles even Germanized during the Germanization of Western Poland by German leaders like Von Bismark.

This contradicts information I've seen. Could you direct me to any sources, please?

Here's a map of ethnic minorities in the Second Polish Republic.

Not a single region was majority German that Poland held in Poland proper in the 1930's.

Although the Free City of Gdansk, not really held as part of Poland in the 1930's was majority German.

There might have been a few towns, here, and there in Western Poland with German majorities, but mostly Polish majorities dominated in Western Poland in the 1930's.

You can not reason with a moron

 

[Indeependent]

No, those regions of Poland were majority Polish, and weren't inhabited by a German majority.

For example Poznan was majority Polish in the 20th century, and was so also when Germans had stole it from them in 1793.

Much of the German minority there, were none other than Germans brought in, or Poles even Germanized during the Germanization of Western Poland by German leaders like Von Bismark.

This contradicts information I've seen. Could you direct me to any sources, please?

Here's a map of ethnic minorities in the Second Polish Republic.

Not a single region was majority German that Poland held in Poland proper in the 1930's.

Although the Free City of Gdansk, not really held as part of Poland in the 1930's was majority German.

There might have been a few towns, here, and there in Western Poland with German majorities, but mostly Polish majorities dominated in Western Poland in the 1930's.

You can not reason with a moron

Don’t insult morons.

 

[Frannie]

No, those regions of Poland were majority Polish, and weren't inhabited by a German majority.

For example Poznan was majority Polish in the 20th century, and was so also when Germans had stole it from them in 1793.

Much of the German minority there, were none other than Germans brought in, or Poles even Germanized during the Germanization of Western Poland by German leaders like Von Bismark.

This contradicts information I've seen. Could you direct me to any sources, please?

Here's a map of ethnic minorities in the Second Polish Republic.

Not a single region was majority German that Poland held in Poland proper in the 1930's.

Although the Free City of Gdansk, not really held as part of Poland in the 1930's was majority German.

There might have been a few towns, here, and there in Western Poland with German majorities, but mostly Polish majorities dominated in Western Poland in the 1930's.

You can not reason with a moron

Don’t insult morons.

OK

 

[Capri]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

 

[Indeependent]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

Who made the video?

 

[Ambivalent1]

Anything is Possible but that reduces us to doing sources

So you believe that 6 million people just mysteriously dissapeared....

Lie down on zi couch anz tell us about your mudder

I suggest you catch up on the conversation.

Let's go shooting, you can get me up to speed

Remain in the dark, I'm fine with that

You bought Apple Google and Netflix right...………………….

Only one of us is in the dark

You're quite the loon, what are you talking about?

 

[Capri]

Here's a map of ethnic minorities in the Second Polish Republic.

Not a single region was majority German that Poland held in Poland proper in the 1930's.

Although the Free City of Gdansk, not really held as part of Poland in the 1930's was majority German.

There might have been a few towns, here, and there in Western Poland with German majorities, but mostly Polish majorities dominated in Western Poland in the 1930's.

Thanks. That's very informative. So there were ethnic German minorities in the parts of Poland that were German before WWI. Those people were definitely being oppressed. Germany attempted to negotiate with Poland regarding those formerly German territories, Poland refused all the offers, and Germany invaded to reclaim it's territory. There's a lot of detail at ww2truthDOTcomSLASH2019SLASH03SLASH10SLASHwhy-germany-invaded-polandSLASH

 

[iceberg]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

talking to yourself again?

 

[Frannie]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

See Adolph you can still learn after all these years

 

[Capri]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

See Adolph you can still learn after all these years

mm hmm. One of us can.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Here's a map of ethnic minorities in the Second Polish Republic.

Not a single region was majority German that Poland held in Poland proper in the 1930's.

Although the Free City of Gdansk, not really held as part of Poland in the 1930's was majority German.

There might have been a few towns, here, and there in Western Poland with German majorities, but mostly Polish majorities dominated in Western Poland in the 1930's.

Thanks. That's very informative. So there were ethnic German minorities in the parts of Poland that were German before WWI. Those people were definitely being oppressed. Germany attempted to negotiate with Poland regarding those formerly German territories, Poland refused all the offers, and Germany invaded to reclaim it's territory. There's a lot of detail at ww2truthDOTcomSLASH2019SLASH03SLASH10SLASHwhy-germany-invaded-polandSLASH

The map clearly shows a Polish majority in Western Poland in the 1930's.

Gdansk was majority German, but Gdansk was a free state not really part of Poland, or Germany in the 1930's.

 

[Frannie]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

See Adolph you can still learn after all these years

mm hmm. One of us can.

You pop off any Jews today Adolph

 

[Capri]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

See Adolph you can still learn after all these years

mm hmm. One of us can.

You pop off any Jews today Adolph

That would be illegal, Eva.

As was your threat to commit violence against me.

 

[BlueGin]

Holocaust survivors respond to AOC's 'concentration camp' comments in new video

She also has an invite to Auschwitz to learn how the Jews medical care compares to the children in border camps...

You don’t care about AOC or Jews so no one cares

AOC needs care?

AOC (like most politicians) is all about self promotion...hense her retarded staged photo op with the fake tears.

 

[Frannie]

You can not reason with a moron

Yes, I'm finding that out.

See Adolph you can still learn after all these years

mm hmm. One of us can.

You pop off any Jews today Adolph

That would be illegal, Eva.

As was your threat to commit violence against me.

Yes Adolph, if you say so

 

[Frannie]

Holocaust survivors respond to AOC's 'concentration camp' comments in new video

She also has an invite to Auschwitz to learn how the Jews medical care compares to the children in border camps...

You don’t care about AOC or Jews so no one cares

AOC needs care?

AOC (like most politicians) is all about self promotion...hense her retarded staged photo op with the fake tears.

Her tears may be real as the governor of her state a Democrat just ripped her to pieces