Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Until it happens. Your type causes momentous change through violent, bloody revolutions and the complete takeover of one party, imprisoning or killing everyone who opposes. C[ During the upcoming Constitutional convention, the states may decide to get rid of the Supreme Court altogether along with their legacy of perverting the Constitution.
LOL.....oh thats funny.
They're out there, they're sucking cocks and putting cocks in their butts, they're trolling for more cocks to suck and more cocks to put in their butts, all that.
You jellyThey're out there, they're sucking cocks and putting cocks in their butts, they're trolling for more cocks to suck and more cocks to put in their butts, all that.
Well I can't argue with that when you are telling us your personal experiences.
The homo agenda is only a threat because it is a small part of the Libtard agenda. The lib agenda is the fundamental threat....that the U.S. has ever seen, Bryan Fischer claims.
On his "Focal Point" radio show, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer recently claimed that the "active, aggressive homosexual lobby" represented a threat to U.S. democracy.
As Right Wing Watch first reported, Fischer, who is no stranger to anti-gay declarations, told listeners, "I firmly believe the homosexual agenda represents the greatest single threat to religious liberty we have ever seen in the history of our existence as a nation."
Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty That The U.S. Has Ever Seen Bryan Fischer Claims
I also believe homosexuality is wrong. I have good reasons for opposing homosexuality as a normative lifestyle based on science, medicine, and faith. Normal people do not define themselves solely on the basis of who they are sexually attracted to.
They've always been out there, sucking cocks and putting cocks in their butts, trolling for more cocks to suck and more cocks to put in their butts, all that.Gay sex is neither evil nor abnormal. Homosexuals have existed in every race and culture throughout history. In some cultures, gays are celebrated as a blessing to the tribe. There is some evidence that being gay is genetic.
I believe that God made gays, and that God doesn't make mistakes. Otherwise, why would they exist at every time in history, and throughout the world?
Gay sex is neither evil nor abnormal.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married. Adhering to such a strict standard smacks of totalitarianism. People past child-bearing age or physically unable to preform sex acts are still allowed to get married, despite their pairing not being "standard" according to your definition.Now... the reader probably already understands that human physiology provided that the male and female genders are designed for sexual interaction. And it is that design which establishes the human physiological standard.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
There's no "marriage" in nature.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
There's no "marriage" in nature.
But there is homosexuality...
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
There's no "marriage" in nature.
You're playing with words. Why MUST we define marriage as one man and one woman? Seems to me you just want to monitor other's personal lives.No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
There's no "marriage" in nature.
No?
That's going to come to a major surprise to my Mrs... who I happen to know for a FACT is a human being, and the last time I checked, human beings are a function of 'nature'.
So... Sorry for the incontestable refutation... but if it helps... I agree with you that "THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!" That was pure genius!
That isn't a reason to disallow people from getting married.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
There's no "marriage" in nature.
But there is homosexuality...
You're playing with words again . Obviously what was meant was nature vs human civilization.No?There's no "marriage" in nature.
That's going to come to a major surprise to my Mrs... who I happen to know for a FACT is a human being, and the last time I checked, human beings are a function of 'nature'.
No one is disallowing anyone from getting married, as long as those people meet the standards that define marriage: Marriage is the joining of one man and one woman.
Who defines "marriage"?
The same authority that designed you. Nature.
There's no "marriage" in nature.
No?
That's going to come to a major surprise to my Mrs... who I happen to know for a FACT is a human being, and the last time I checked, human beings are a function of 'nature'.
So... Sorry for the incontestable refutation... but if it helps... I agree with you that "THERE ARE NO LEFTIST AMERICANS!" That was pure genius!
That doesn't come close to making sense. But whatever floats your boat, pubes.
