Mac1958
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2011
- 117,203
- 110,007
.
I'm still trying to work through the post pointing out that if I continue to support gay marriage I'll lose my house and car.
.
Let me know what you're getting hung up on.
Okay.
Let's take the gay couple across the street. Great guys, excellent neighbors, snappy dressers, moved into the neighborhood a little after us about 15 years ago.
Walk me through how their marriage would result in me losing my house and car.
.
That's the problem, you're not looking far enough down the future, which is how most mistakes are made. When states no longer have any powers and the federal government presumes preeminence in all matters whether it be an enumerated power granted by the Constitution or not, then no refuge avails against unbridled federal power. Marriage is a state prerogative by default. Every federal court decision finding a "right" that doesn't exist in the Constitution aggrandizes federal power and makes states rights more irrelevant. This may go swimmingly for you when it's an issue you agree with, but a government big enough to grant rights is also big enough to take them away.
So the issue isn't about who moves into your neighborhood, the issue is whether or not your vote means anything on a state level because its in the states that our founders, in all their wisdom, invested reprieve from federal tyranny.
The states rights issue and the gay marriage issue are mutually exclusive, unless and until the people vote in folks who would make it so.
Would some people want to see far more power concentrated in DC, more of a central planning approach? Yeah, I'm afraid so. I'm more of a federalist, but going from where we are now to a central authority which would take away property rights like that is one helluva stretch.
.