Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're all going to get rocked so hard when the courts rule against Obama --- again.
It's bizarre, this conservative urban legend that courts keep ruling against Obama. Sometimes they make up some fantasy numbers like "13 times" No basis in fact, but boy do they want to believe it.
If you stretch things, you can name 1 case, recess appointments. That would be the sole court case actually involving President Obama.
News nugget for my fellow lybyryls:
Only five Republicans voted against this resolution. One of them was Steve Stockman, of "let's throw Lois Lyrnyr in jail" fame. It appears that Ryprysyntytyve Stockmyn has finally come around and realized that President Obama isn't such a bad benevolent president-for-life after all.
let's see if anybody can spot the "that very simply mathematical fact".:dmore people voted obama the worst than voted for any other president as the worst. Its called a plurality.
Therefore, by virtue of that poll, obama is the worst president since ww2. Like anyone should be surprised by that
you really cannot be that stupid, now can you? Why, yes, you can.
in that one and only poll, it was obama 32, bush 29 and then some others. This means that 78% of respondents did not think that he is the worst president since wwii.
you do understand that very simply mathematical fact, right?
wtf is it these days with righties and simple math?
you pompous and stupid imp!
Democrats need to pound House Republicans on what they have refused to vote on and the impact it has had on the country
Why don't they sue the repubs?
For what?
For what? Because a sleaze thinks so?Why don't they sue the repubs?
For what?
"Sue" was probably the wrong verb ... "commit" is far more appropriate.
Glad to see our nation's system of checks and balances being exercised. Obama certainly needs to be reined in and kept "in his place." He's not a king nor should he be a dictator. He's a servant of the People of the United States and needs to be reminded of that. Hope this entire thing has a happy ending for everyone.
In the real world the built in constitutional check against alleged overreach by a president is Congress passes a law to override the Executive. That power has been exercised many times. Suing the Executive has never been, ever.
I love that Republicans held up their vacation to approve this lawsuit
It reminds voters of the partisan, broken system that is destroying Washington
Democrats need to pound House Republicans on what they have refused to vote on and the impact it has had on the country
Why don't they sue the repubs?
Because they are not idiot Tea Baggers.
Gotta love Republicans
In a House that hasn't had a single accomplishment in four years, they find another angle to try to repeal Obamacare
Can't accomplish too much when they're up against a liberal Prez and a liberal Senate. At least they're trying.
Why don't they sue the repubs?
Because they are not idiot Tea Baggers.
Aren't you the same doedoe brain who attacked your own Demorat candidate trying to use it against Conservatives?? NUNN anyone??
ROFLMAO
Hold the line Conservatives!!
"This isn't about Republicans and Democrats. It's about defending the Constitution that we swore an oath to uphold," Boehner said, according to Talking Points Memo. "Are you willing to let any president choose what laws to execute and what laws to change? Are you willing to let anyone tear apart what our founders have built?"
Other Republicans also framed the vote in terms of Congress constitutional responsibility.
"If there were a Republican president doing the same thing, I would feel just as strongly. This is about the Constitution," said Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) to the Huffington Post. "For too long, this body, under the leadership of both Democrats and Republicans, has ceded parts of our constitutional authority to the executive branch."
I agree with Boehner....and Foxx...
http://rt.com/usa/176868-house-votes-sue-obama/
"This isn't about Republicans and Democrats. It's about defending the Constitution that we swore an oath to uphold," Boehner said, according to Talking Points Memo. "Are you willing to let any president choose what laws to execute and what laws to change? Are you willing to let anyone tear apart what our founders have built?"
Other Republicans also framed the vote in terms of Congress constitutional responsibility.
"If there were a Republican president doing the same thing, I would feel just as strongly. This is about the Constitution," said Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) to the Huffington Post. "For too long, this body, under the leadership of both Democrats and Republicans, has ceded parts of our constitutional authority to the executive branch."
I think it is a risky "political" move. But frankly, I don't care about the politics. I care about the PRINCIPLE. Let the chips fall......
I agree with Boehner....and Foxx...
Speaker Boehner gets Congress approval to sue President Obama ? RT USA
"This isn't about Republicans and Democrats. It's about defending the Constitution that we swore an oath to uphold," Boehner said, according to Talking Points Memo. "Are you willing to let any president choose what laws to execute and what laws to change? Are you willing to let anyone tear apart what our founders have built?"
Other Republicans also framed the vote in terms of Congress constitutional responsibility.
"If there were a Republican president doing the same thing, I would feel just as strongly. This is about the Constitution," said Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) to the Huffington Post. "For too long, this body, under the leadership of both Democrats and Republicans, has ceded parts of our constitutional authority to the executive branch."
I think it is a risky "political" move. But frankly, I don't care about the politics. I care about the PRINCIPLE. Let the chips fall......
Too bad Boehner and the TP faction ignored upholding the Constitution when they threatened to default on the national debt. The stench of hypocrisy overwhelms any of their bogus attempts to justify their actions.
Obama's abuse of power would earn him an impeachment under any other circumstances.
What grounds?
Same ones they were going to impeach Nixon on.
If it at least ties up that man who believes he a king/dictator, then I'm all for it
Libs answer this?, when has any President or any Government agency had the ability or power to change the rules of a LAW over 20 times without going through Congress/
If it at least ties up that man who believes he a king/dictator, then I'm all for it
Libs answer this?, when has any President or any Government agency had the ability or power to change the rules of a LAW over 20 times without going through Congress/
The prior POTUS used "signing statements" to simply ignore aspects of laws that he refused to implement or wanted done differently. In fact he did it 161 times affecting over 1,100 provisions of law in 160 Congressional enactments.
List of Presidential Signing Statements Issued by George W. Bush
If it at least ties up that man who believes he a king/dictator, then I'm all for it
Libs answer this?, when has any President or any Government agency had the ability or power to change the rules of a LAW over 20 times without going through Congress/
The prior POTUS used "signing statements" to simply ignore aspects of laws that he refused to implement or wanted done differently. In fact he did it 161 times affecting over 1,100 provisions of law in 160 Congressional enactments.
List of Presidential Signing Statements Issued by George W. Bush
that isn't the question...When has a President PASSED and SIGNED something into law and then had his DHS UNDER HIS reign change the rules over 20 different times
Libs answer this?, when has any President or any Government agency had the ability or power to change the rules of a LAW over 20 times without going through Congress
When has a President PASSED and SIGNED something into law and then had his DHS UNDER HIS reign change the rules over 20 different times
