Hottest Minute in the last 37 Minutes!

[skookerasbil]

Natural cycles get the AGW k00ks all riled up some years..........some years not!! ( like the bitterly cold last 2 winters here in the US......record breaking btw ). They get all giddy when one of the years it is a trite warmer!!

Natural cycles s0ns!!! Its called "climate" and its been doing it forever!!

 

[elektra]

How many minutes, go un-recorded, so much data, lost, not utilizied, for a hypothesis that struggles to be a theory.

 

[Crick]

You're babbling. More data is always good, but there is far more than enough data to support the conclusions on which better than 97% of all the world's climate scientists agree. The world is getting warmer and the dominant cause is the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions and the loss of CO2 sink from deforestation. That warming presents several threats to human culture in sea level rise, crop failures and water supply shortages. Your choice to reject those findings is based on political bias and overt anit-intellectualism.

 

[elektra]

You're babbling. More data is always good, but there is far more than enough data to support the conclusions on which better than 97% of all the world's climate scientists agree. The world is getting warmer and the dominant cause is the greenhouse effect acting on human GHG emissions and the loss of CO2 sink from deforestation. That warming presents several threats to human culture in sea level rise, crop failures and water supply shortages. Your choice to reject those findings is based on political bias and overt anit-intellectualism.

97%? How many scientists, is that exactly?

Further, it is a hypothesis, not a theory.

 

[Crick]

97% is 97%. If you have trouble understanding what that means, ask your fifth grade teacher to repeat that lesson for you.

AGW is a theory. With greater than 97% acceptance, it is a "widely-accepted theory".

 

[elektra]

97% is 97%. If you have trouble understanding what that means, ask your fifth grade teacher to repeat that lesson for you.

AGW is a theory. With greater than 97% acceptance, it is a "widely-accepted theory".

So your saying out of the 10 climate scientists, 9.7 of them accept the hypothesis.

 

[Old Rocks]

More importantly, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Just the rightwing idiots in this nation that are trying to ignore reality that are stating otherwise.

 

[elektra]

More importantly, all the Scientific Societies, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities state that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Just the rightwing idiots in this nation that are trying to ignore reality that are stating otherwise.

no proof, no experiments, your hypothesis is just that, which has until about January to live, after the election, it is over.

 

[Crick]

97% is 97%. If you have trouble understanding what that means, ask your fifth grade teacher to repeat that lesson for you.

AGW is a theory. With greater than 97% acceptance, it is a "widely-accepted theory".

So your saying out of the 10 climate scientists, 9.7 of them accept the hypothesis.

No. I am saying out of each 100 climate scientists, more than 97 of them accept AGW theory as a valid description of the behavior of the Earth's climate.

 

[elektra]

97% is 97%. If you have trouble understanding what that means, ask your fifth grade teacher to repeat that lesson for you.

AGW is a theory. With greater than 97% acceptance, it is a "widely-accepted theory".

So your saying out of the 10 climate scientists, 9.7 of them accept the hypothesis.

No. I am saying out of each 100 climate scientists, more than 97 of them accept AGW theory as a valid description of the behavior of the Earth's climate.

Okay, 97 climate scientists, got it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Got to love it..

Bring out the 97% lie again...

And then rant with an appeal to alarmist authorities instead of real people doing real science..

 

[Crick]

Scientific opinion on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Show us where these articles lie asshole... or withdraw your charge.

 

[elektra]

Scientific opinion on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Show us where these articles lie asshole... or withdraw your charge.

I do not debate the fool who can only link to wikipedia. Crick you are not even smart enough to quote and offer your commentary. It is wikipedia, wikipedia is not a source.

Post something, quote something, but if your only source is wikipedia you are to be laughed at.

 

[Crick]

You're a fucking idiot who has no facts to back up your unsupportable claims. If you think 97% is a lie, tell us why. If you can't, be fucking man and admit it.

 

[Crick]

The 132 references used by the first linked Wikipedia article:

References
^ Jump up to:a b Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?". In DiMento, Joseph F. C.; Doughman, Pamela M. Climate Change: What it means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. MIT Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-0-262-54193-0.

1. Jump up^ "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level." IPCC, Synthesis Report, Section 1.1: Observations of climate change, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
2. Jump up^ IPCC, "Summary for Policymakers", Detection and Attribution of Climate Change, «It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century» (page 15) and «In this Summary for Policymakers, the following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: (...) extremely likely: 95–100%» (page 2)., in IPCC AR5 WG1 2013.
3. Jump up^ IPCC, Synthesis Report, Section 2.4: Attribution of climate change, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007."It is likely that increases in GHG concentrations alone would have caused more warming than observed because volcanic and anthropogenic aerosols have offset some warming that would otherwise have taken place."
4. Jump up^ [Notes-SciPanel] America's Climate Choices: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change; National Research Council (2010). Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. ISBN 0-309-14588-0. (p1) ... there is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that climate is changing and that these changes are in large part caused by human activities. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations. * * * (p21-22) Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.
5. Jump up^ "Summary for Policymakers", 1. Observed changes in climate and their effects, inIPCC AR4 SYR 2007
6. Jump up^ "Summary for Policymakers", 2. Causes of change, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
7. ^ Jump up to:a b c Parry, M.L.; et al., "Technical summary", Industry, settlement and society, in: Box TS.5. The main projected impacts for systems and sectors, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
8. Jump up^ IPCC, "Summary for Policymakers", Magnitudes of impact, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
9. Jump up^ "Synthesis report", Ecosystems, in: Sec 3.3.1 Impacts on systems and sectors, inIPCC AR4 SYR 2007
10. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Question 1", 1.1, in IPCC TAR SYR 2001, p. 38
11. ^ Jump up to:a b Summary, in US NRC 2001, p. 4
12. ^ Jump up to:a b c Julie Brigham-Grette; et al. (September 2006). "Petroleum Geologists' Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate" (PDF). Eos 87 (36): 364.Bibcode:2006EOSTr..87..364B. doi:10.1029/2006EO360008. Retrieved 2007-01-23.The AAPG stands alone among scientific societies in its denial of human-induced effects on global warming.
13. ^ Jump up to:a b AAPG Climate Change June 2007
14. ^ Jump up to:a b Oreskes 2007, p. 68
15. Jump up^ Ogden, Aynslie and Cohen, Stewart (2002). "Integration and Synthesis: Assessing Climate Change Impacts in Northern Canada" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-04-12.
16. ^ Jump up to:a b "Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
17. Jump up^ Nuccitelli, Dana (31 March 2014). "IPCC report warns of future climate change risks, but is spun by contrarians". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
18. ^ Jump up to:a b "U.N. Climate Panel Endorses Ceiling on Global Emissions". The New York Times. 27 September 2013. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
19. Jump up^ "Warming 'very likely' human-made". BBC News (BBC). 2007-02-01. Retrieved2007-02-01.
20. Jump up^ Rosenthal, Elisabeth; Revkin, Andrew C. (2007-02-03). "Science Panel Calls Global Warming ‘Unequivocal’". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-08-28. the leading international network of climate scientists has concluded for the first time that global warming is 'unequivocal' and that human activity is the main driver, 'very likely' causing most of the rise in temperatures since 1950
21. Jump up^ Stevens, William K. (2007-02-06). "On the Climate Change Beat, Doubt Gives Way to Certainty". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-08-28. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the likelihood was 90 percent to 99 percent that emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, spewed from tailpipes and smokestacks, were the dominant cause of the observed warming of the last 50 years. In the panel’s parlance, this level of certainty is labeled “very likely.” Only rarely does scientific odds-making provide a more definite answer than that, at least in this branch of science, and it describes the endpoint, so far, of a progression.
22. Jump up^ "U.N. Report: Global Warming Man-Made, Basically Unstoppable". Fox News. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
23. Jump up^ Downloads.globalchange.gov
24. Jump up^ "Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment New Scientific Consensus: Arctic Is Warming Rapidly". UNEP/GRID-Arendal. 2004-11-08. Retrieved2010-01-20.
25. Jump up^ "ACIA Display". Amap.no. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
26. ^ Jump up to:a b c The literature has been assessed by the IPCC, e.g., see:
    • Adger, W.N.; et al., Ch 17: Assessment of Adaptation Practices, Options, Constraints and Capacity, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
    • Barker, T.; et al., Technical summary, in IPCC AR4 WG3 2007
27. ^ Jump up to:a b 2009 Joint Science Academies’ Statement
28. Jump up^ Doha Declaration on Climate, Health and Wellbeing. This statement has been signed by numerous medical organizations, including the World Medical Association.
29. Jump up^ Arnold, D.G., ed. (March 2011), The Ethics of Global Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781107000698
30. Jump up^ "Editorial: The Science of Climate Change". Science 292 (5520): 1261. May 18, 2001.doi:10.1126/science.292.5520.1261.
31. ^ Jump up to:a b The Science of Climate Change, The Royal Society
32. Jump up^ Joint science academies’ statement: Global response to climate change, 2005
33. Jump up^ 2007 Joint Science Academies' Statement
34. ^ Jump up to:a b "Joint statement by the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC) to the G8 on sustainability, energy efficiency and climate change" (PDF). Network of African Science Academies. 2007. Retrieved 2012-08-28.
35. Jump up^ 2008 Joint Science Academies’ Statement
36. Jump up^ "Stanowisko Zgromadzenia Ogólnego PAN z dnia 13 grudnia 2007 r" (PDF) (in Polish). Polish Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 2009-06-16. Note: As of 16 June 2009, PAS has not issued this statement in English, all citations have been translated from Polish.
37. ^ Jump up to:a b AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change www.aaas.org December 2006
38. Jump up^ FASTS Statement on Climate Change (PDF), 2008 "Global climate change is real and measurable. Since the start of the 20th century, the global mean surface temperature of the Earth has increased by more than 0.7°C and the rate of warming has been largest in the last 30 years. Key vulnerabilities arising from climate change include water resources, food supply, health, coastal settlements, biodiversity and some key ecosystems such as coral reefs and alpine regions. As the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases increases, impacts become more severe and widespread. To reduce the global net economic, environmental and social losses in the face of these impacts, the policy objective must remain squarely focused on returning greenhouse gas concentrations to near pre-industrial levels through the reduction of emissions. The spatial and temporal fingerprint of warming can be traced to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, which are a direct result of burning fossil fuels, broad-scale deforestation and other human activity."
39. ^ Jump up to:a b Committee on the Science of Climate Change, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council (2001). Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions. Washington DC: National Academy Press. ISBN 0-309-07574-2.
40. Jump up^ Wratt, David; Renwick, James (2008-07-10). "Climate change statement from the Royal Society of New Zealand". The Royal Society of New Zealand. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
41. Jump up^ Gray, Louise (May 29, 2010). "Royal Society to publish guide on climate change to counter claims of 'exaggeration'". The Daily Telegraph (London).
42. ^ Jump up to:a b "New guide to science of climate change". The Royal Society. Retrieved 9 June2010.
43. Jump up^ Harrabin, Roger (27 May 2010). "Society to review climate message". BBC News. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
44. Jump up^ Gardner, Dan (8 June 2010). "Some excitable climate-change deniers just don't understand what science is". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on 11 June 2010. Retrieved 9 June 2010.
45. Jump up^ "Joint statement by the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC) to the G8 on sustainability, energy efficiency and climate change". 2007. Retrieved 22 May 2015. A consensus, based on current evidence, now exists within the global scientific community that human activities are the main source of climate change and that the burning of fossil fuels is largely responsible for driving this change... Although we recognize that this nexus poses daunting challenges for the developed world, we firmly believe that these challenges are even more daunting for the most impoverished, science-poor regions of the developing world, especially in Africa.
46. Jump up^ European Academy of Sciences and Arts Let's Be Honest
47. Jump up^ European Science Foundation Position Paper Impacts of Climate Change on the European Marine and Coastal Environment — Ecosystems Approach, 2007, pp. 7–10"There is now convincing evidence that since the industrial revolution, human activities, resulting in increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases have become a major agent of climate change. These greenhouse gases affect the global climate by retaining heat in the troposphere, thus raising the average temperature of the planet and altering global atmospheric circulation and precipitation patterns. While on-going national and international actions to curtail and reduce greenhouse gas emissions are essential, the levels of greenhouse gases currently in the atmosphere, and their impact, are likely to persist for several decades. On-going and increased efforts to mitigate climate change through reduction in greenhouse gases are therefore crucial."
48. Jump up^ Panel Urges Global Shift on Sources of Energy
49. Jump up^ "InterAcademy Council". InterAcademy Council. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
50. Jump up^ "InterAcademy Council". InterAcademy Council. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
51. Jump up^ "InterAcademy Council". InterAcademy Council. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
52. Jump up^ http://www.caets.org/nae/naecaets.nsf/(weblinks)/WSAN-78QL9A?OpenDocument
53. Jump up^ American Chemical Society Global Climte Change "Careful and comprehensive scientific assessments have clearly demonstrated that the Earth’s climate system is changing rapidly in response to growing atmospheric burdens of greenhouse gases and absorbing aerosol particles (IPCC, 2007). There is very little room for doubt that observed climate trends are due to human activities. The threats are serious and action is urgently needed to mitigate the risks of climate change. The reality of global warming, its current serious and potentially disastrous impacts on Earth system properties, and the key role emissions from human activities play in driving these phenomena have been recognized by earlier versions of this ACS policy statement (ACS, 2004), by other major scientific societies, including the American Geophysical Union (AGU, 2003), the American Meteorological Society (AMS, 2007) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, 2007), and by the U. S. National Academies and ten other leading national academies of science (NA, 2005)."
54. Jump up^ American Institute of Physics Statement supporting AGU statement on human-induced climate change, 2003 "The Governing Board of the American Institute of Physics has endorsed a position statement on climate change adopted by the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Council in December 2003."
55. Jump up^ American Physical Society Climate Change Policy Statement, November 2007"Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth's climate. Greenhouse gases include carbon dioxide as well as methane, nitrous oxide and other gases. They are emitted from fossil fuel combustion and a range of industrial and agricultural processes. The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now. Because the complexity of the climate makes accurate prediction difficult, the APS urges an enhanced effort to understand the effects of human activity on the Earth’s climate, and to provide the technological options for meeting the climate challenge in the near and longer terms. The APS also urges governments, universities, national laboratories and its membership to support policies and actions that will reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
56. Jump up^ AIP science policy document. (PDF), 2005 "Policy: The AIP supports a reduction of the green house gas emissions that are leading to increased global temperatures, and encourages research that works towards this goal. Reason: Research in Australia and overseas shows that an increase in global temperature will adversely affect the Earth’s climate patterns. The melting of the polar ice caps, combined with thermal expansion, will lead to rises in sea levels that may impact adversely on our coastal cities. The impact of these changes on biodiversity will fundamentally change the ecology of Earth."
57. Jump up^ EPS Position Paper Energy for the future: The Nuclear Option (PDF), 2007 "The emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, among which carbon dioxide is the main contributor, has amplified the natural greenhouse effect and led to global warming. The main contribution stems from burning fossil fuels. A further increase will have decisive effects on life on earth. An energy cycle with the lowest possible CO2 emission is called for wherever possible to combat climate change."
58. Jump up^ "AGU Position Statement: Human Impacts on Climate". Agu.org. Retrieved2012-07-30.
59. Jump up^ "Human-induced Climate Change Requires Urgent Action". Position Statement. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 14 August 2013.
60. Jump up^ ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Position Statement on Climate Change
61. Jump up^ "EFG Website | Home". Eurogeologists.de. 2011-08-10. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
62. Jump up^ EFG Carbon Capture and geological Storage
63. Jump up^ http://www.egu.eu/statements/positi...spheric-and-climate-sciences-7-july-2005.html
64. Jump up^ http://www.egu.eu/statements/egu-position-statement-on-ocean-acidification.html
65. Jump up^ "The Geological Society of America - Position Statement on Global Climate Change". Geosociety.org. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
66. Jump up^ "Geological Society - Climate change: evidence from the geological record". Geolsoc.org.uk. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
67. Jump up^ IUGG Resolution 6
68. Jump up^ NAGT
69. Jump up^ http://nagt.org/nagt/organization/ps-climate.html
70. Jump up^ "AMS Information Statement on Climate Change". Ametsoc.org. 2012-08-20. Retrieved2012-08-27.
71. Jump up^ "Statement". AMOS. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
72. Jump up^ CFCAS Letter to PM, November 25, 2005
73. Jump up^ Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Letter to Stephen Harper(Updated, 2007)
74. Jump up^ News | Royal Meteorological Society
75. Jump up^ WMO’s Statement at the Twelfth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.
76. Jump up^ AMQUA "Petroleum Geologists’ Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate"
77. ^ Jump up to:a b INQUA Statement On Climate Change.
78. Jump up^ AAWV Position Statement on Climate Change, Wildlife Diseases, and Wildlife Health"There is widespread scientific agreement that the world’s climate is changing and that the weight of evidence demonstrates that anthropogenic factors have and will continue to contribute significantly to global warming and climate change. It is anticipated that continuing changes to the climate will have serious negative impacts on public, animal and ecosystem health due to extreme weather events, changing disease transmissiondynamics, emerging and re-emerging diseases, and alterations to habitat and ecological systems that are essential to wildlife conservation. Furthermore, there is increasing recognition of the inter-relationships of human, domestic animal, wildlife, and ecosystem health as illustrated by the fact the majority of recent emerging diseases have a wildlife origin."
79. Jump up^ AIBS Position Statements "Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver."
80. Jump up^ Scientific societies warn Senate: climate change is real, Ars Technica, October 22, 2009
81. Jump up^ Letter to US Senators (PDF), October 2009
82. Jump up^ Global Environmental Change — Microbial Contributions, Microbial Solutions (PDF),American Society For Microbiology, May 2006 They recommended "reducing net anthropogenic CO2 emissions to the atmosphere” and “minimizing anthropogenic disturbances of” atmospheric gases. Carbon dioxide concentrations were relatively stable for the past 10,000 years but then began to increase rapidly about 150 years ago…as a result of fossil fuel consumption and land use change. Of course, changes in atmospheric composition are but one component of global change, which also includes disturbances in the physical and chemical conditions of the oceans and land surface. Although global change has been a natural process throughout Earth’s history, humans are responsible for substantially accelerating present-day changes. These changes may adversely affect human health and the biosphere on which we depend. Outbreaks of a number of diseases, including Lyme disease, hantavirus infections, dengue fever, bubonic plague, and cholera, have been linked to climate change."
83. Jump up^ Australian Coral Reef Society official letter (PDF), 2006, archived from the original(PDF) on 22 March 2006 Official communique regarding the Great Barrier Reef and the "world-wide decline in coral reefs through processes such as overfishing, runoff of nutrients from the land, coral bleaching, global climate change, ocean acidification, pollution", etc.: There is almost total consensus among experts that the earth’s climate is changing as a result of the build-up of greenhouse gases. The IPCC (involving over 3,000 of the world’s experts) has come out with clear conclusions as to the reality of this phenomenon. One does not have to look further than the collective academy of scientists worldwide to see the string (of) statements on this worrying change to the earth’s atmosphere. There is broad scientific consensus that coral reefs are heavily affected by the activities of man and there are significant global influences that can make reefs more vulnerable such as global warming....It is highly likely that coral bleaching has been exacerbated by global warming."
84. Jump up^ Institute of Biology policy page ‘Climate Change’ "there is scientific agreement that the rapid global warming that has occurred in recent years is mostly anthropogenic, ie due to human activity.” As a consequence of global warming, they warn that a “rise in sea levels due to melting of ice caps is expected to occur. Rises in temperature will have complex and frequently localised effects on weather, but an overall increase in extreme weather conditions and changes in precipitation patterns are probable, resulting in flooding and drought. The spread of tropical diseases is also expected.” Subsequently, the Institute of Biology advocates policies to reduce “greenhouse gas emissions, as we feel that the consequences of climate change are likely to be severe."
85. Jump up^ SAF Forest Management and Climate Change (PDF), 2008 "Forests are shaped by climate....Changes in temperature and precipitation regimes therefore have the potential to dramatically affect forests nationwide. There is growing evidence that our climate is changing. The changes in temperature have been associated with increasing concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and other GHGs in the atmosphere."
86. Jump up^ SAF Forest Offset Projects in a Carbon Trading System (PDF), 2008 "Forests play a significant role in offsetting CO2 emissions, the primary anthropogenic GHG."
87. Jump up^ Wildlife Society Global Climate Change and Wildlife (PDF) "Scientists throughout the world have concluded that climate research conducted in the past two decades definitively shows that rapid worldwide climate change occurred in the 20th century, and will likely continue to occur for decades to come. Although climates have varied dramatically since the Earth was formed, few scientists question the role of humans in exacerbating recent climate change through the emission of greenhouse gases. The critical issue is no longer “if” climate change is occurring, but rather how to address its effects on wildlife and wildlife habitats." The statement goes on to assert that “evidence is accumulating that wildlife and wildlife habitats have been and will continue to be significantly affected by ongoing large-scale rapid climate change.” The statement concludes with a call for “reduction in anthropogenic (human-caused) sources of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions contributing to global climate change and the conservation of CO2- consumingphotosynthesizers (i.e., plants).”
88. Jump up^ AAP Global Climate Change and Children's Health, 2007 "There is broad scientific consensus that Earth's climate is warming rapidly and at an accelerating rate. Human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, are very likely (>90% probability) to be the main cause of this warming. Climate-sensitive changes in ecosystems are already being observed, and fundamental, potentially irreversible, ecological changes may occur in the coming decades. Conservative environmental estimates of the impact of climate changes that are already in process indicate that they will result in numerous health effects to children. Anticipated direct health consequences of climate change include injury and death from extreme weather events and natural disasters, increases in climate-sensitiveinfectious diseases, increases in air pollution–related illness, and more heat-related, potentially fatal, illness. Within all of these categories, children have increased vulnerability compared with other groups."
89. Jump up^ ACPM Policy Statement Abrupt Climate Change and Public Health Implications, 2006"The American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) accept the position that global warming and climate change is occurring, that there is potential for abrupt climate change, and that human practices that increase greenhouse gases exacerbate the problem, and that the public health consequences may be severe."
90. Jump up^ American Medical Association Policy Statement, 2008 "Support the findings of the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, which states that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that these changes will negatively affect public health. Support educating the medical community on the potential adverse public health effects of global climate change, including topics such as population displacement, flooding, infectious and vector-borne diseases, and healthy water supplies."
91. Jump up^ American Public Health Association Policy Statement ‘’Addressing the Urgent Threat of Global Climate Change to Public Health and the Environment’’, 2007 "The long-term threat of global climate change to global health is extremely serious and the fourth IPCC report and other scientific literature demonstrate convincingly that anthropogenic GHG emissions are primarily responsible for this threat….US policy makers should immediately take necessary steps to reduce US emissions of GHGs, including carbon dioxide, to avert dangerous climate change."
92. Jump up^ AMA Climate Change and Human Health — 2004, 2004 They recommend policies "to mitigate the possible consequential health effects of climate change through improved energy efficiency, clean energy production and other emission reduction steps."
93. Jump up^ AMA Climate Change and Human Health — 2004. Revised 2008., 2008 "The world’s climate – our life-support system – is being altered in ways that are likely to pose significant direct and indirect challenges to health. While ‘climate change’ can be due to natural forces or human activity, there is now substantial evidence to indicate that human activity – and specifically increased greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions – is a key factor in the pace and extent of global temperature increases. Health impacts of climate change include the direct impacts of extreme events such as storms, floods, heatwaves and fires and the indirect effects of longer-term changes, such as drought, changes to the food andwater supply, resource conflicts and population shifts. Increases in average temperatures mean that alterations in the geographic range and seasonality of certain infections and diseases (including vector-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue fever, Ross River virusand food-borne infections such as Salmonellosis) may be among the first detectable impacts of climate change on human health. Human health is ultimately dependent on the health of the planet and its ecosystem. The AMA believes that measures which mitigate climate change will also benefit public health. Reducing GHGs should therefore be seen as a public health priority."
94. Jump up^ World Federation of Public Health Associations resolution "Global Climate Change"(PDF), 2001 "Noting the conclusions of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other climatologists that anthropogenic greenhouse gases, which contribute to global climate change, have substantially increased in atmospheric concentration beyond natural processes and have increased by 28 percent since the industrial revolution….Realizing that subsequent health effects from such perturbations in the climate system would likely include an increase in: heat-related mortality and morbidity; vector-borne infectious diseases,… water-borne diseases…(and) malnutrition from threatened agriculture….the World Federation of Public Health Associations…recommends precautionary primary preventive measures to avert climate change, including reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and preservation of greenhouse gas sinks through appropriate energy and land use policies, in view of the scale of potential health impacts...."
95. Jump up^ WHO Protecting health from climate change (PDF), 2008, p. 2, retrieved 2009-04-18
96. Jump up^ Statement supporting AGU statement on human-induced climate change, American Astronomical Society, 2004 "In endorsing the "Human Impacts on Climate" statement [issued by the American Geophysical Union], the AAS recognizes the collective expertise of the AGU in scientific subfields central to assessing and understanding global change, and acknowledges the strength of agreement among our AGU colleagues that the global climate is changing and human activities are contributing to that change."
97. Jump up^ ASA Statement on Climate Change, November 30, 2007 "The ASA endorses the IPCC conclusions.... Over the course of four assessment reports, a small number of statisticians have served as authors or reviewers. Although this involvement is encouraging, it does not represent the full range of statistical expertise available. ASA recommends that more statisticians should become part of the IPCC process. Such participation would be mutually beneficial to the assessment of climate change and its impacts and also to the statistical community."
98. Jump up^ Lapp, David. "What Is Climate Change". Canadian Council of Professional Engineers. Retrieved 18 August 2015.
99. Jump up^ Policy Statement, Climate Change and Energy, February 2007 "Engineers Australia believes that Australia must act swiftly and proactively in line with global expectations to address climate change as an economic, social and environmental risk... We believe that addressing the costs of atmospheric emissions will lead to increasing our competitive advantage by minimising risks and creating new economic opportunities. Engineers Australia believes the Australian Government should ratify the Kyoto Protocol."
100. Jump up^ IAGLR Fact Sheet The Great Lakes at a Crossroads: Preparing for a Changing Climate (PDF), February 2009 "While the Earth’s climate has changed many times during the planet’s history because of natural factors, including volcanic eruptions and changes in the Earth’s orbit, never before have we observed the present rapid rise in temperature and carbon dioxide (CO2). Human activities resulting from the industrial revolution have changed the chemical composition of the atmosphere....Deforestation is now the second largest contributor to global warming, after the burning of fossil fuels. These human activities have significantly increased the concentration of “greenhouse gases” in the atmosphere. As the Earth’s climate warms, we are seeing many changes: stronger, more destructive hurricanes; heavier rainfall; more disastrous flooding; more areas of the world experiencing severe drought; and more heat waves."
101. Jump up^ IPENZ Informatory Note, Climate Change and the greenhouse effect (PDF), October 2001 "Human activities have increased the concentration of these atmospheric greenhouse gases, and although the changes are relatively small, the equilibrium maintained by the atmosphere is delicate, and so the effect of these changes is significant. The world’s most important greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide, a by-product of the burning of fossil fuels. Since the time of the Industrial Revolution about 200 years ago, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased from about 280 parts per million to 370 parts per million, an increase of around 30%. On the basis of available data, climate scientists are now projecting an average global temperature rise over this century of 2.0 to 4.5°C. This compared with 0.6°C over the previous century – about a 500% increase... This could lead to changing, and for all emissions scenarios more unpredictable, weather patterns around the world, less frost days, more extreme events (droughts and storm or flood disasters), and warmer sea temperatures and melting glaciers causing sea levels to rise. ... Professional engineers commonly deal with risk, and frequently have to make judgments based on incomplete data. The available evidence suggests very strongly that human activities have already begun to make significant changes to the earth’s climate, and that the long-term risk of delaying action is greater than the cost of avoiding/minimising the risk."
102. Jump up^ AAPG Position Statement: Climate Change from dpa.aapg.org
103. Jump up^ "Climate :03:2007 EXPLORER". Aapg.org. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
104. Jump up^ Sunsetting the Global Climate Change Committee, The Professional Geologist, March/April 2010, p. 28
105. Jump up^ "American Geological Institute Climate Statement". 12 Feb 1999. Archived from the original on July 2012. Retrieved July 2012.
106. Jump up^ AIPG Climate Change Letters sent to U.S. Government Officials
107. Jump up^ "AIPG Climate Change and Domestic Energy Statement", The Professional Geologist, January/February 2010, p. 42
108. Jump up^ "The Professional Geologist publications". Archived from the original on July 2012. Retrieved July 2012.
109. Jump up^ "Climate Change and Society Governance", The Professional Geologist, March/April 2010, p. 33
110. Jump up^ billobrien.coml. "Canadian Federation of Earth Sciences (CFES)". Geoscience.ca. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
111. Jump up^ Graham Lloyd (June 4, 2014). "Earth scientists split on climate change statement". The Australian. Retrieved June 4, 2014.(subscription required)
112. Jump up^ Anderegg, William R L; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010)."Expert credibility in climate change". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (27): 12107–9.Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107. PMC 2901439.PMID 20566872. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
113. Jump up^ Doran consensus article 2009 Archived November 4, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
114. Jump up^ John Cook, Dana Nuccitelli, Sarah A Green, Mark Richardson, Bärbel Winkler, Rob Painting, Robert Way, Peter Jacobs. Andrew Skuce (15 May 2013). "Expert credibility in climate change". Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2): 024024. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
115. Jump up^ Naomi Oreskes (December 3, 2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). Science 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618.PMID 15576594. (see also for an exchange of letters to Science)
116. Jump up^ Lavelle, Marianne (2008-04-23). "Survey Tracks Scientists' Growing Climate Concern". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
117. Jump up^ Lichter, S. Robert (2008-04-24). "Climate Scientists Agree on Warming, Disagree on Dangers, and Don't Trust the Media's Coverage of Climate Change". Statistical Assessment Service, George Mason University. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
118. Jump up^ ""Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change" at Journalist's Resource.org".
119. Jump up^ Stephen J. Farnsworth, S. Robert Lichter (October 27, 2011). "The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change". International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Retrieved December 2, 2011.
120. Jump up^ Bray, Dennis; von Storch, Hans (2009). "A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change" (PDF).
121. Jump up^ Bray, D.; von Storch H. (2009). "Prediction' or 'Projection; The nomenclature of climate science". Science Communication 30 (4): 534–543. doi:10.1177/1075547009333698.
122. Jump up^ Doran, Peter T.; Maggie Kendall Zimmerman (January 20, 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). EOS 90 (3): 22–23.Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22D. doi:10.1029/2009EO030002.
123. Jump up^ Anderegg, William R L; Prall, James W.; Harold, Jacob; Schneider, Stephen H. (2010)."Expert credibility in climate change" (PDF). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (27): 12107–9. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10712107A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003187107.PMC 2901439. PMID 20566872.
124. Jump up^ Cook, J.; Nuccitelli, D.; Green, S.A.; Richardson, M.; Winkler, B.; Painting, R.; Way, R.; Jacobs, P.; Skuc, A. (2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2): 024024.Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
125. Jump up^ Plait, P. (11 December 2012). "Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air". Slate. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
126. Jump up^ Plait, P. (14 January 2014). "The Very, Very Thin Wedge of Denial". Slate. Retrieved14 February 2014.
127. Jump up^ US NRC (2008). Understanding and Responding to Climate Change. A brochure prepared by the US National Research Council (US NRC) (PDF). Washington DC, USA: US National Academy of Sciences.
128. Jump up^ Joint Science Academies' Statement
129. Jump up^ "Climate Change Research: Issues for the Atmospheric and Related Sciences Adopted by the AMS Council 9 February 2003". Ametsoc.org. 2003-02-09. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
130. Jump up^ "Australian Coral Reef Society". Australian Coral Reef Society. Retrieved 2012-07-30.
131. Jump up^ Australian Coral Reef Society official letter, June 16, 2006

 

[Crick]

The 33 references cited by the second linked Wikipedia article:

References

1. Jump up^ T. R. Stewart, J. L. Mumpower, P. Reagan-Cirincione, "Scientists' Agreement and Disagreement about Global Climate Change: Evidence from Surveys", 15.
2. Jump up^ Albandy.edu
3. Jump up^ R. Nixon, "Limbaughesque Science", citing a press release by Gallup in the San Francisco Chronicle, 9/27/92.
4. Jump up^ Steve Rendall, "The Hypocrisy of George Will", FAIR report, citing the San Francisco Chronicle, 9/27/92.
5. Jump up^ Bray, Dennis; Hans von Storch (1999). "Climate Science: An Empirical Example of Postnormal Science" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80 (3): 439–455. Bibcode:1999BAMS...80..439B. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0439:CSAEEO>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1520-0477. Retrieved 2007-09-04.
6. Jump up^ Citizens For a Sound Economy Foundation
7. Jump up^ "Climate Scientists’ Perceptions of Climate Change Science.".
8. Jump up^ Climate scientists’ views on climate change: a survey
9. Jump up^ Naomi Oreskes (January 21, 2005) [December 3, 2004]. "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). Science 306 (5702): 1686.doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594. (see also for an exchange of letters to Science)
10. Jump up^ Lavelle, Marianne (2008-04-23). "Survey Tracks Scientists' Growing Climate Concern". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
11. Jump up^ Lichter, S. Robert (2008-04-24). "Climate Scientists Agree on Warming, Disagree on Dangers, and Don't Trust the Media's Coverage of Climate Change". Statistical Assessment Service, George Mason University. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
12. ^ Jump up to:a b c Bray, Dennis; von Storch, Hans (2010). "A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change" (PDF).
13. Jump up^ Bray, Dennis (August 2010). "The scientific consensus of climate change revisited".Environmental Science & Policy 13 (5). doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.001. RetrievedDecember 1, 2014., copy online at [1]
14. Jump up^ Bray, D.; von Storch H. (2009). "Prediction' or 'Projection; The nomenclature of climate science". Science Communication 30 (4): 534–543. doi:10.1177/1075547009333698.Copy available online at [2], retrieved Nov. 30, 2014
15. Jump up^ Doran and Zimmerman. "Consensus on Climate Change (Note: the misspelling is only in the URL)". Prof. Peter Doran: My Soapbox/Public Outreach. Retrieved 21 June 2015.
16. ^ Jump up to:a b Doran, Peter T.; Maggie Kendall Zimmerman (January 20, 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). EOS 90 (3): 22–23.Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22D. doi:10.1029/2009EO030002.
17. ^ Jump up to:a b c William R. L. Anderegg, James W. Prall, Jacob Harold, and Stephen H. Schneider (April 9, 2010). "Expert credibility in climate change" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of S ciences of the United States of America. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
18. ^ Jump up to:a b Scientists 'Convinced' of Climate Consensus More Prominent Than Opponents, Says Paper by Eli Kintisch, "Science Insider", Science (journal), 21 June 2010
19. Jump up^ Bodenstein, Lawrence (December 28, 2010). "Regarding Anderegg et al. and climate change credibility". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (52): E188.Bibcode:2010PNAS..107E.188B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1013268108.
20. Jump up^ Anderegg, William R. L.; coauthors (December 28, 2010). "Reply to Bodenstein: Contextual data about the relative scale of opposing scientific communities". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (52): E189. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107E.189A.doi:10.1073/pnas.1015419108.
21. Jump up^ ""Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change" at Journalist's Resource.org".
22. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stephen J. Farnsworth, S. Robert Lichter (October 27, 2011). "The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change". International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Retrieved December 2, 2011. Paywalled; full test online here, retrieved Nov. 30, 2014. From Table I, "Q: In your opinion, is human-induced greenhouse warming now occurring?" Yes, 84%. No, 5%. Don't Know, 12%
23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Lefsrud, L. M.; Meyer, R. E. (2012). "Science or Science Fiction? Professionals' Discursive Construction of Climate Change". Organization Studies 33 (11): 1477.doi:10.1177/0170840612463317.
24. ^ Jump up to:a b "Risk Management Approach Could Motivate Climate Change Action", Lianne Lefsrud and Renate Meyer, Social Science Space, March 19, 2013
25. ^ Jump up to:a b Cook, John; Dana Nuccitelli; Sarah A Green; Mark Richardson; Bärbel Winkler; Rob Painting; Robert Way; Peter Jacobs; Andrew Skuce (May 2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters (IOP Publishing) 8 (2). Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
26. Jump up^ Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The scientific consensus on climate change: how do we know we're not wrong?". Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren (PDF). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 72. Retrieved 9 August 2013. [Scientists] generally focus their discussions on questions that are still disputed or unanswered rather than on matters about which everyone agrees
27. Jump up^ Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change, Science & Education2015, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 299-318.
28. Jump up^ The Myth of the Climate Change '97%', By Joseph Bast And Roy Spencer. Wall Street Journal, May 26, 2014
29. Jump up^ The Climate Wars’ Damage to Science by Matt Ridley, Quadrant magazine, June 19th 2015. Ridley credits Joanne Nova for this summary of Tol's views.
30. Jump up^ The Cook et al. (2013) 97% consensus result is robust, reply posted at Skeptical Science, last updated 5 May 2014
31. Jump up^ Learning from mistakes in climate research
32. Jump up^ Plait, P. (11 December 2012). "Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air". Slate. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
33. Jump up^ Plait, P. (14 January 2014). "The Very, Very Thin Wedge of Denial". Slate. Retrieved12 June 2014.

 

[elektra]

The 33 references cited by the second linked Wikipedia article:

References

1. Jump up^ T. R. Stewart, J. L. Mumpower, P. Reagan-Cirincione, "Scientists' Agreement and Disagreement about Global Climate Change: Evidence from Surveys", 15.
2. Jump up^ Albandy.edu
3. Jump up^ R. Nixon, "Limbaughesque Science", citing a press release by Gallup in the San Francisco Chronicle, 9/27/92.
4. Jump up^ Steve Rendall, "The Hypocrisy of George Will", FAIR report, citing the San Francisco Chronicle, 9/27/92.
5. Jump up^ Bray, Dennis; Hans von Storch (1999). "Climate Science: An Empirical Example of Postnormal Science" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80 (3): 439–455. Bibcode:1999BAMS...80..439B. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0439:CSAEEO>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1520-0477. Retrieved 2007-09-04.
6. Jump up^ Citizens For a Sound Economy Foundation
7. Jump up^ "Climate Scientists’ Perceptions of Climate Change Science.".
8. Jump up^ Climate scientists’ views on climate change: a survey
9. Jump up^ Naomi Oreskes (January 21, 2005) [December 3, 2004]. "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). Science 306 (5702): 1686.doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594. (see also for an exchange of letters to Science)
10. Jump up^ Lavelle, Marianne (2008-04-23). "Survey Tracks Scientists' Growing Climate Concern". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
11. Jump up^ Lichter, S. Robert (2008-04-24). "Climate Scientists Agree on Warming, Disagree on Dangers, and Don't Trust the Media's Coverage of Climate Change". Statistical Assessment Service, George Mason University. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
12. ^ Jump up to:a b c Bray, Dennis; von Storch, Hans (2010). "A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change" (PDF).
13. Jump up^ Bray, Dennis (August 2010). "The scientific consensus of climate change revisited".Environmental Science & Policy 13 (5). doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.001. RetrievedDecember 1, 2014., copy online at [1]
14. Jump up^ Bray, D.; von Storch H. (2009). "Prediction' or 'Projection; The nomenclature of climate science". Science Communication 30 (4): 534–543. doi:10.1177/1075547009333698.Copy available online at [2], retrieved Nov. 30, 2014
15. Jump up^ Doran and Zimmerman. "Consensus on Climate Change (Note: the misspelling is only in the URL)". Prof. Peter Doran: My Soapbox/Public Outreach. Retrieved 21 June 2015.
16. ^ Jump up to:a b Doran, Peter T.; Maggie Kendall Zimmerman (January 20, 2009). "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). EOS 90 (3): 22–23.Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90...22D. doi:10.1029/2009EO030002.
17. ^ Jump up to:a b c William R. L. Anderegg, James W. Prall, Jacob Harold, and Stephen H. Schneider (April 9, 2010). "Expert credibility in climate change" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of S ciences of the United States of America. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
18. ^ Jump up to:a b Scientists 'Convinced' of Climate Consensus More Prominent Than Opponents, Says Paper by Eli Kintisch, "Science Insider", Science (journal), 21 June 2010
19. Jump up^ Bodenstein, Lawrence (December 28, 2010). "Regarding Anderegg et al. and climate change credibility". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (52): E188.Bibcode:2010PNAS..107E.188B. doi:10.1073/pnas.1013268108.
20. Jump up^ Anderegg, William R. L.; coauthors (December 28, 2010). "Reply to Bodenstein: Contextual data about the relative scale of opposing scientific communities". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (52): E189. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107E.189A.doi:10.1073/pnas.1015419108.
21. Jump up^ ""Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change" at Journalist's Resource.org".
22. ^ Jump up to:a b c Stephen J. Farnsworth, S. Robert Lichter (October 27, 2011). "The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change". International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Retrieved December 2, 2011. Paywalled; full test online here, retrieved Nov. 30, 2014. From Table I, "Q: In your opinion, is human-induced greenhouse warming now occurring?" Yes, 84%. No, 5%. Don't Know, 12%
23. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Lefsrud, L. M.; Meyer, R. E. (2012). "Science or Science Fiction? Professionals' Discursive Construction of Climate Change". Organization Studies 33 (11): 1477.doi:10.1177/0170840612463317.
24. ^ Jump up to:a b "Risk Management Approach Could Motivate Climate Change Action", Lianne Lefsrud and Renate Meyer, Social Science Space, March 19, 2013
25. ^ Jump up to:a b Cook, John; Dana Nuccitelli; Sarah A Green; Mark Richardson; Bärbel Winkler; Rob Painting; Robert Way; Peter Jacobs; Andrew Skuce (May 2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters (IOP Publishing) 8 (2). Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C.doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
26. Jump up^ Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The scientific consensus on climate change: how do we know we're not wrong?". Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren (PDF). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 72. Retrieved 9 August 2013. [Scientists] generally focus their discussions on questions that are still disputed or unanswered rather than on matters about which everyone agrees
27. Jump up^ Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change, Science & Education2015, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 299-318.
28. Jump up^ The Myth of the Climate Change '97%', By Joseph Bast And Roy Spencer. Wall Street Journal, May 26, 2014
29. Jump up^ The Climate Wars’ Damage to Science by Matt Ridley, Quadrant magazine, June 19th 2015. Ridley credits Joanne Nova for this summary of Tol's views.
30. Jump up^ The Cook et al. (2013) 97% consensus result is robust, reply posted at Skeptical Science, last updated 5 May 2014
31. Jump up^ Learning from mistakes in climate research
32. Jump up^ Plait, P. (11 December 2012). "Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air". Slate. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
33. Jump up^ Plait, P. (14 January 2014). "The Very, Very Thin Wedge of Denial". Slate. Retrieved12 June 2014.

These last two references, are to SLATE! Grow up, Slate is an extreme Leftist website!

Seriously, Wikipedia can not be your source, crick must no that using wikipedia and links to Slate is pure propaganda.

 

[Crick]

"These last two"? I gave you 164 references.

So, not man enough.

 

[elektra]

"These last two"? I gave you 164 references.

So, not man enough.

You cut and copy 164 references? The 1st two are from slate, and you think I must answer to a list of 164 things you cut/paste?

No, Crick, if you read the rules of this forum, and if they were enforced, it says you must quote from your link as well as offer your own commentary.

I have addressed 2 of your links with my commentary, which is more than you have done. You are a fool, nothing more. If you care to play the idiot, lets play by the forum rules, link, quote, and comment.

Tell me why those last two links made the case you claim they do? Do you even remember what your point was, how did those two links support your assertions.

 

[Crick]

You haven't addressed SHIT. Telling us that 2 links went to Slate does not tell us why you think those two Wikipedia articles and, apparently, the 164 references they use, are conveying a lie. And last I checked, you had provided ZERO links I might address.

Once again, tell us why you believe 97% is a lie or be fucking man enough to admit that you cannot.