House Managers now are asking to call witnesses! They know they got destroyed yesterday

Wow. This is shocking. The House managers got destroyed and they know it.

WHY THE RUSH, DEMS?

Now you want witnesses????? :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg:

So exposed.


The rules of jurisprudence require that they give the defense a chance to interview or investigate these witnesses, if the judge allows it.
With Leaky Leighey as judge and his partisan ability to vote as well, this sham is blowing up in their faces... IF he gives them witnesses and then denies republicans requests they will have a civil war on their hands.. As far as using any jurisprudence that was gone long ago when manufactured evidence was placed into evidence and was then exposed... That alone should have triggered the case being thrown out with prejudice.
 
Last edited:
Wow. This is shocking. The House managers got destroyed and they know it.

WHY THE RUSH, DEMS?

Now you want witnesses????? :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg:

So exposed.

After the not guilty verdict the Senate will next try to ban Trump from office for life which will only take a majority vote. Wait and see. TDS is the new OCD.
 
Wow. This is shocking. The House managers got destroyed and they know it.

WHY THE RUSH, DEMS?

Now you want witnesses????? :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg:

So exposed.

After the not guilty verdict the Senate will next try to ban Trump from office for life which will only take a majority vote. Wait and see. TDS is the new OCD.
They may try... but it will not stand up in court because he will already have been Acquitted of that charge and double jeopardy will have it thrown out, in short order, when and if it ever reaches SCOTUS.
 
Last edited:
Wow. This is shocking. The House managers got destroyed and they know it.

WHY THE RUSH, DEMS?

Now you want witnesses????? :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg:

So exposed.
They want to call Rep. Jamie Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) to testify about what she heard from Kevin McCarthy about what Trump said during a Jan 6th phone call.

That's hearsay.

So even if she "testifies" that Mr. McCarthy told her that Trump said " I guess these people are just more angry about the election and upset than you are," that is not evidence of incitement, and it's obviously true that many of the Capitol rioters were very angry about the election.

thumb_taste-this-delicious-nothing-burger-~-ginger-45902903.png
 
Schumer made an agreement with McConnell on how this trial would go, and I would presume no witnesses would be allowed cuz the Dems didn't believe they had a shot at a conviction and so they want to get it over with and move on to Biden's agenda (orders from Far Left). So, if Leahy allows one or more witnesses then that breaks the deal and from here on out it's total war, and the GOP can tell the world every day that the Dems can't be trusted. Plus, if the Dems get to call a witness then the GOP gets to call witnesses too and then the case drags on and distracts from the other business. I'd call that a win for the Repubs and a self-inflicted wound by the Dems that can only get worse for them if they continue this nonsense.
 
There is an FBI investigation into this whole thing, why didnt these assholes just wait for the investigation to end?
 
Wow. This is shocking. The House managers got destroyed and they know it.

WHY THE RUSH, DEMS?

Now you want witnesses????? :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg:

So exposed.


The rules of jurisprudence require that they give the defense a chance to interview or investigate these witnesses, if the judge allows it.
With Leaky Leighey as judge and his partisan ability to vote as well, this sham is blowing up in their faces... IF he gives them witnesses and then denies republicans requests they will have a civil war on their hands.. As far as using any jurisprudence that was gone long ago when manufactured evidence was placed into evidence and was then exposed... That alone should have triggered the case being thrown out with prejudice.


Only the democrats would consider a witness, and juror as the sitting judge as being legitimate.......talk about a fucking kangaroo court.......
 
There is an FBI investigation into this whole thing, why didnt these assholes just wait for the investigation to end?
Because they knew that the agitators were not Trump supporters and they cant have that known by the general public... Evidence is now coming out that ANTIFA was in fact the lead agitators and that Nancy Pelosi refused National Guard troops to protect the Capitol Hill Complex TWO DAYS PRIOR to January 6, when TRUMP OFFERED THEM TO HER. Now why would ANTIFA loving Nancy refuse protection of the complex unless she was part of the insurrection planning? The FBI told her, in a briefing on January 2nd, that there was a credible threat to the capitol hill complex and gave them specifics. On January 5 a pipe bomb was found on the capitol hill complex steps and she still denied requests.. this whole thing stinks to high heaven..
 
There is an FBI investigation into this whole thing, why didnt these assholes just wait for the investigation to end?
Because they knew that the agitators were not Trump supporters and they cant have that known by the general public... Evidence is now coming out that ANTIFA was in fact the lead agitators and that Nancy Pelosi refused National Guard troops to protect the Capitol Hill Complex TWO DAYS PRIOR to January 6, when TRUMP OFFERED THEM TO HER. Now why would ANTIFA loving Nancy refuse protection of the complex unless she was part of the insurrection planning?


Yep.....the democrat party wanted their brown shirts in the Trump crowd to vandalize the capitol and attack the police......that is why she pulled the police back and refused national guard....
 

Forum List

Back
Top