BluesLegend
Diamond Member
We heard Obama say Obamacare...- Would not cost a dime & would pay for itself.
Obamacare fixed the healthcare system remember. Dem's said it was a big F'ing deal. So why do we now need Medicare for all?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We heard Obama say Obamacare...- Would not cost a dime & would pay for itself.
How about broke losers who compete for work with people who don’t speak English pay for the f-omg wall, bigot loser.Can we petition for a Bill for such a thing?
It only makes sense right?
Can we petition for a Bill for such a thing?
It only makes sense right?
If it is "Medicare for all" do all have to pay into Medicare? $1T goes in now? ..add in other health costs ACA! Medicaid? Others......how much more does FED need to dump in to get to $3.4T? Then the real rationing could begin. Win win! The point is consolidate it all into one giant healhcare bucket. Is that the goal? Seems they wont stay out of it, might as well make it one plan, one bureaucracy?
We heard Obama say Obamacare...
- Would not cost a dime & would pay for itself....it cost us an ass-load.
NOW we are being told that this Single payer, which Reid said Obamacare was designed to fail to force the 'herd' / US to go to, will cost $20 - $35 TRILLION over 10 years.
1) There is a HUGE freaking difference between $20 TRILLION and $35 TRILLION in only 10 years...
2) If something they told us would cost nothing ended up costing so much money, I am thinking what they are telling us will cost between $20 and $35 TRILLION is going to cost a helluva lot more.
Hello, 'Venezuela' - here we come!
How about Socialists begin by paying off a large chunk, if not the whole thing, of the Trillions we already owe before wanting to commit the US to sucking up $20 - $35 TRILLION MORE in new debt on top of what we already owe...especially when what they are proposing is guaranteed to end in disaster.
Yes, Guaranteed - as in their historic track record, which is why Democrats demand to be judged based on their INTENT, never on the actual outcome!
If exclude Illegals, $10K*340m = $3.4T
If all other plans eliminated and funds rolled over? I'm asking, are the Dems saying that?
What would be better is a 10 million dollar fine to any company found to have illegals employed...or contracted..
Yea. The courts would live that.Can we petition for a Bill for such a thing?
It only makes sense right?
That's not the issue. Most of those people that are sneaking in aren't wonderful hard working or family oriented. They're criminals looking for free stuff.How about a bigot tax, of course that would cost both Democrats and Republican.
I also don't like the term wetback, very racist and prejudicial. I know lots of Hispanics and most, like any group of people are wonderful, hard working, kind and family oriented.
It figures you tards would address the symptom instead of the disease.What would be better is a 10 million dollar fine to any company found to have illegals employed...or contracted..
First we’d need to stop Mexicrats from writing legislation which prohibits employers from ‘digging too deep’ to confirm citizenship...huh?
Because he lied. Obamacare created most of the problem. Obamacare was designed to fail so they could institute single-payer.We heard Obama say Obamacare...- Would not cost a dime & would pay for itself.
Obamacare fixed the healthcare system remember. Dem's said it was a big F'ing deal. So why do we now need Medicare for all?
Your own link called it a slur.I believe it.How about a Wetback tax that only Democrats pay?
Dem response...you're racist
the rich should pay more
![]()
I believe you are such a fucking moron that you don;t know the term "wetback" is a slur.
Probably from years of inbreeding, lack of education, and poor genetics
“Wetback” is actually a political term...Ike coined the phrase in Operation Wetback...Operation Wetback - Wikipedia
It figures you tards would address the symptom instead of the disease.What would be better is a 10 million dollar fine to any company found to have illegals employed...or contracted..
First we’d need to stop Mexicrats from writing legislation which prohibits employers from ‘digging too deep’ to confirm citizenship...huh?
We need immigration reform. Unfortunately, we have spineless politicians who listen to bigots like you, and they prevent the necessary reforms from ever being voted on.
Your title of this thread.,I believe it.How about a Wetback tax that only Democrats pay?
Dem response...you're racist
the rich should pay more
![]()
I believe you are such a fucking moron that you don;t know the term "wetback" is a slur.
Probably from years of inbreeding, lack of education, and poor genetics
Link to a post where I used that "slur" you stupid moron. lol
If exclude Illegals, $10K*340m = $3.4T
How about a bigot tax, of course that would cost both Democrats and Republican.
I also don't like the term wetback, very racist and prejudicial. I know lots of Hispanics and most, like any group of people are wonderful, hard working, kind and family oriented.
It figures you tards would address the symptom instead of the disease.What would be better is a 10 million dollar fine to any company found to have illegals employed...or contracted..
First we’d need to stop Mexicrats from writing legislation which prohibits employers from ‘digging too deep’ to confirm citizenship...huh?
We need immigration reform. Unfortunately, we have spineless politicians who listen to bigots like you, and they prevent the necessary reforms from ever being voted on.
Just because they have the 'great idea' called 'Single Payer' doesn't mean they actually have the expected $20 - $35 TRILLION over 10 years to pay for it. You can't expect them to come up with brilliant ideas and figure out how to pay for it, too.You're right, just like with Single Payer Healthcare, they want it overwhelmingly, but when asked the question with the details'How about a Wetback tax that only Democrats pay?'
I LOVE the 'You want 'em, you pay for 'em' angle, but it completely ignores the fact that Socialists never pay for things they want with their own money.
on paying for it, the poll numbers reverse....imagine that![]()
If it is "Medicare for all" do all have to pay into Medicare? $1T goes in now? ..add in other health costs ACA! Medicaid? Others......how much more does FED need to dump in to get to $3.4T? Then the real rationing could begin. Win win! The point is consolidate it all into one giant healhcare bucket. Is that the goal? Seems they wont stay out of it, might as well make it one plan, one bureaucracy?
The ACA made improvements. No one said it cured it all.We heard Obama say Obamacare...- Would not cost a dime & would pay for itself.
Obamacare fixed the healthcare system remember. Dem's said it was a big F'ing deal. So why do we now need Medicare for all?
Bullshit.That's not the issue. Most of those people that are sneaking in aren't wonderful hard working or family oriented. They're criminals looking for free stuff.How about a bigot tax, of course that would cost both Democrats and Republican.
I also don't like the term wetback, very racist and prejudicial. I know lots of Hispanics and most, like any group of people are wonderful, hard working, kind and family oriented.
The part that you don't get is the amount we pay now in premiums, co-pays, deductibles,and all the other excuses insurance companies use.
There would be taxes collected to pay for single payer and that would be countered by no longer paying premiums & perhaps fewer of the medical costs we pay now. Look at the money companies spend on providing healthcare benefits.
It comes down o how best to set up the revenue gathering.
How must is being spent now?