How can this be copacetic?

[Crepitus]

Defense: " Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue..."

Judge Chutkan interjects: "He directed you to do it?"

Defense: " Well.. he didn't direct us to"

Seriously people, how much of this bullshit are we expected to stand for?

 

[BackAgain]

Oh nozies. They took some line from the Thomas opinion as constituting a “direction” to raise an issue — and what??

Why would it matter that they took it in such a way?