How come there are over 40,000 christian denominations and more invented daily

[ding]

Prove what? That the bible is made up? LOL! Really?
There's no proof of any of the big things that take place in the bible. Science is at least looking for real answers and keep an open mind about what they find.
But if you think the bible is true then prove to me that a woman was made from a man's rib. And we'll go from there.

Yes, prove the Bible is wrong.

I'm not surprised you have not heard of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Unbelievers tend to not have much knowledge of science.

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

You are just full of interesting beliefs, lol. Reincarnation and aliens. What's next?

I don't live my life by this, just some things I notice there is evidence for. Unlike you who lives his life according to an invisible friend he can't prove AT ALL.

It is easier for you to construct straw men arguments than it is to face reality, brother. You have a nasty habit of making assumptions about what I believe and do. It just isn't so, but if that is what you need to do to justify your beliefs, go right a head.

 

[ding]

No. Not all. Just the ones I come into contact here on these boards anyway. If you don't believe you are an atheist, then you are in denial. I am married to an agnostic. Probably the only true agnostic in the world. She knows there is more, but has no idea what that more is and has no desire to figure it out.

So you're taking back everything you just said about atheists because you realize that you were wrong? Good for you.

No. See that's how I know you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows.

Don't blame me for your flip-flop on your answer about atheists because you realized the first one was nonsense.

For starters there was no flip flop, and I didn't blame you for anything. I just told you my observations about you. I believe you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. You are the textbook example of someone who has elevated to a religion. You attack Christians because Christianity is the dominant rival religion.

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

 

[ding]

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Right before WWI the marxists - who are nothing more than filthy militant atheists - believed they were on the cusp of their long awaited workers revolution. They were so giddy with self pleasure that they were peeing in their pants like a dog who sees his master return after a long absence. Anyway, the worker revolution did not materialize because people reverted to love of country (not to be confused with love of state). So they developed the philosophy of cultural marxist for the express purpose of breaking the bond of love of country, God and family and replacing it with love of state. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

 

[ding]

His Spirit is inside of you

Prove it. Or is that too hard for you to do? Again.

You want me to prove to YOU what is inside of YOU? You will know it when He withdraws it. Some people don't appreciate what they have until it is taken from them. You may be one of those people.

 

[ding]

No. That is not correct. I have proof that I accept. I don't have proof that you will accept. There is no proof that you will accept. I thought we went through this already. You are at work early today. You don't usually get to work until around 7 am. Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work.

What proof? You've put forward exactly nothing. "Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work" Don't burn the Happy Meals.

lol, I've been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. Do you have any idea what a 30+ year engineer makes in a year? More than likely I pay more taxes in a year than you make and quite possibly more than you make in two or three years. What do you do for a living, skippy?

 

[ding]

Prove what? That the bible is made up? LOL! Really?
There's no proof of any of the big things that take place in the bible. Science is at least looking for real answers and keep an open mind about what they find.
But if you think the bible is true then prove to me that a woman was made from a man's rib. And we'll go from there.

Yes, prove the Bible is wrong.

I'm not surprised you have not heard of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Unbelievers tend to not have much knowledge of science.

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

Where did aliens come from?
Let me guess. Aliens.

Is this a feeble attempt to say that god made aliens?

It is turtles all the way down, right?

It's my Friday off, so except for rig call and a round of golf, I'll be able to play with you all day long.... while you are at work, lol. Wouldn't it be horrible if you got fired because you were blogging instead of what they were paying you to do. He who has the last laugh, laughs the longest.

 

[Mudda]

Only one person in history was perfect.
And they tortured and nailed him up on a cross.

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

 

[Mudda]

Yes, prove the Bible is wrong.

I'm not surprised you have not heard of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Unbelievers tend to not have much knowledge of science.

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

You are just full of interesting beliefs, lol. Reincarnation and aliens. What's next?

I don't live my life by this, just some things I notice there is evidence for. Unlike you who lives his life according to an invisible friend he can't prove AT ALL.

It is easier for you to construct straw men arguments than it is to face reality, brother. You have a nasty habit of making assumptions about what I believe and do. It just isn't so, but if that is what you need to do to justify your beliefs, go right a head.

"Face reality", lol, pretty funny coming from the guy with the invisible friend for which he's put forward zero proof.

 

[Penelope]

Not one person on earth has ever believed in a god, they all pretend to believe because it suits their lives at the time. the church is just a big social cult. the purpose of religion is to gain political power, control over people and to make money. the reason why there are so many denominations is because if there was only one then there would be a limited number of leaders. therefore if you want instant power and money all you have to do is change a few things in your own version of the bible and you have it.

I believe in the God of Abraham. I believe that He sent His Son to pay the price for our disobedience to God. I have accepted Jesus as my personal Lord and Savior. I would die before I would renounce Him. Now, don't you look silly? I just proved that you're a clueless troll.

Abraham who? You believe in God , but no one knows who Abraham was or if he was even real. The bible was wrote by man, stories handed down and mish mashed.

Pene doesn't like Abraham because he was the first Jew. She still has weird justifications when asked about Jesus being a Jew.

Abraham was not a jew according to scripture. They didn't even have jews way back then. He was not even a Hebrew. Heck he was probably not even real. Jesus was not a jew, Kind David did not have a jewish mom, so he was not a jew. Can you read. I assume you believe in the virgin birth, so that means Father God is jewish as well , well the HS, as the HS is the spouse of Mary according to the RCC.

I wouldn't expect you to know the Bible being Catholic. The Torah calls him "Avraham Ha-Ivri" – Abraham the Hebrew. He initiated the knowledge of monotheism showing people who the true God was. And please don't embarrass yourself by saying the Torah and Bible are not related.

And of course you deny the fact Jesus was a Jew. You're Catholic.

How in the world could he be a Hebrew , they didn't learn the Canaanite language when first entering Canaan.

 

[ding]

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

You are just full of interesting beliefs, lol. Reincarnation and aliens. What's next?

I don't live my life by this, just some things I notice there is evidence for. Unlike you who lives his life according to an invisible friend he can't prove AT ALL.

It is easier for you to construct straw men arguments than it is to face reality, brother. You have a nasty habit of making assumptions about what I believe and do. It just isn't so, but if that is what you need to do to justify your beliefs, go right a head.

"Face reality", lol, pretty funny coming from the guy with the invisible friend for which he's put forward zero proof.

Bu I do have evidence. I have evidence that I accept. There is no evidence that you will accept.

 

[Mudda]

So you're taking back everything you just said about atheists because you realize that you were wrong? Good for you.

No. See that's how I know you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows.

Don't blame me for your flip-flop on your answer about atheists because you realized the first one was nonsense.

For starters there was no flip flop, and I didn't blame you for anything. I just told you my observations about you. I believe you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. You are the textbook example of someone who has elevated to a religion. You attack Christians because Christianity is the dominant rival religion.

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

 

[Mudda]

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Right before WWI the marxists - who are nothing more than filthy militant atheists - believed they were on the cusp of their long awaited workers revolution. They were so giddy with self pleasure that they were peeing in their pants like a dog who sees his master return after a long absence. Anyway, the worker revolution did not materialize because people reverted to love of country (not to be confused with love of state). So they developed the philosophy of cultural marxist for the express purpose of breaking the bond of love of country, God and family and replacing it with love of state. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

So you recognize your flip-flop, good for you.

PS You may be insane, get checked.

 

[ding]

No. See that's how I know you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows.

Don't blame me for your flip-flop on your answer about atheists because you realized the first one was nonsense.

For starters there was no flip flop, and I didn't blame you for anything. I just told you my observations about you. I believe you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. You are the textbook example of someone who has elevated to a religion. You attack Christians because Christianity is the dominant rival religion.

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

 

[ding]

No. That is not correct. I have proof that I accept. I don't have proof that you will accept. There is no proof that you will accept. I thought we went through this already. You are at work early today. You don't usually get to work until around 7 am. Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work.

What proof? You've put forward exactly nothing. "Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work" Don't burn the Happy Meals.

lol, I've been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. Do you have any idea what a 30+ year engineer makes in a year? More than likely I pay more taxes in a year than you make and quite possibly more than you make in two or three years. What do you do for a living, skippy?

I own a company. I've made more on just one deal then you make in 5 years.

Sure you do. Tell me about this company.

 

[Mudda]

No. That is not correct. I have proof that I accept. I don't have proof that you will accept. There is no proof that you will accept. I thought we went through this already. You are at work early today. You don't usually get to work until around 7 am. Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work.

What proof? You've put forward exactly nothing. "Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work" Don't burn the Happy Meals.

lol, I've been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. Do you have any idea what a 30+ year engineer makes in a year? More than likely I pay more taxes in a year than you make and quite possibly more than you make in two or three years. What do you do for a living, skippy?

I own a company. I've made more on just one deal then you make in 5 years.

Sure you do. Tell me about this company.

I have engineers working for me, lol. Maybe you're one of them, where are you? I'd like to fire you.

 

[Mudda]

Yes, prove the Bible is wrong.

I'm not surprised you have not heard of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Unbelievers tend to not have much knowledge of science.

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

Where did aliens come from?
Let me guess. Aliens.

Is this a feeble attempt to say that god made aliens?

It is turtles all the way down, right?

It's my Friday off, so except for rig call and a round of golf, I'll be able to play with you all day long.... while you are at work, lol. Wouldn't it be horrible if you got fired because you were blogging instead of what they were paying you to do. He who has the last laugh, laughs the longest.

I'm mostly retired, have been since me 30s.

 

[ding]

No. That is not correct. I have proof that I accept. I don't have proof that you will accept. There is no proof that you will accept. I thought we went through this already. You are at work early today. You don't usually get to work until around 7 am. Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work.

What proof? You've put forward exactly nothing. "Any way , gotta run. Gotta go to my work" Don't burn the Happy Meals.

lol, I've been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. Do you have any idea what a 30+ year engineer makes in a year? More than likely I pay more taxes in a year than you make and quite possibly more than you make in two or three years. What do you do for a living, skippy?

I own a company. I've made more on just one deal then you make in 5 years.

Sure you do. Tell me about this company.

I have engineers working for me, lol. Maybe you're one of them, where are you? I'd like to fire you.

I see. What does your company do exactly?

 

[Mudda]

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

You are just full of interesting beliefs, lol. Reincarnation and aliens. What's next?

I don't live my life by this, just some things I notice there is evidence for. Unlike you who lives his life according to an invisible friend he can't prove AT ALL.

It is easier for you to construct straw men arguments than it is to face reality, brother. You have a nasty habit of making assumptions about what I believe and do. It just isn't so, but if that is what you need to do to justify your beliefs, go right a head.

"Face reality", lol, pretty funny coming from the guy with the invisible friend for which he's put forward zero proof.

Bu I do have evidence. I have evidence that I accept. There is no evidence that you will accept.

What's YOUR evidence?

 

[Mudda]

Don't blame me for your flip-flop on your answer about atheists because you realized the first one was nonsense.

For starters there was no flip flop, and I didn't blame you for anything. I just told you my observations about you. I believe you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. You are the textbook example of someone who has elevated to a religion. You attack Christians because Christianity is the dominant rival religion.

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

 

[ding]

For starters there was no flip flop, and I didn't blame you for anything. I just told you my observations about you. I believe you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. You are the textbook example of someone who has elevated to a religion. You attack Christians because Christianity is the dominant rival religion.

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.