How come there are over 40,000 christian denominations and more invented daily

[Weatherman2020]

For starters there was no flip flop, and I didn't blame you for anything. I just told you my observations about you. I believe you are a militant atheist. Passive aggressive, but still militant. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. You are the textbook example of someone who has elevated to a religion. You attack Christians because Christianity is the dominant rival religion.

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Eating your young is prevalent in nature.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I believe in the God of Abraham. I believe that He sent His Son to pay the price for our disobedience to God. I have accepted Jesus as my personal Lord and Savior. I would die before I would renounce Him. Now, don't you look silly? I just proved that you're a clueless troll.

Abraham who? You believe in God , but no one knows who Abraham was or if he was even real. The bible was wrote by man, stories handed down and mish mashed.

Pene doesn't like Abraham because he was the first Jew. She still has weird justifications when asked about Jesus being a Jew.

Abraham was not a jew according to scripture. They didn't even have jews way back then. He was not even a Hebrew. Heck he was probably not even real. Jesus was not a jew, Kind David did not have a jewish mom, so he was not a jew. Can you read. I assume you believe in the virgin birth, so that means Father God is jewish as well , well the HS, as the HS is the spouse of Mary according to the RCC.

I wouldn't expect you to know the Bible being Catholic. The Torah calls him "Avraham Ha-Ivri" – Abraham the Hebrew. He initiated the knowledge of monotheism showing people who the true God was. And please don't embarrass yourself by saying the Torah and Bible are not related.

And of course you deny the fact Jesus was a Jew. You're Catholic.

How in the world could he be a Hebrew , they didn't learn the Canaanite language when first entering Canaan.

You're a fine example of the Catholic Church, you don't think Abraham was Hebrew nor Jesus a Jew,

 

[Weatherman2020]

Only one person in history was perfect.
And they tortured and nailed him up on a cross.

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

 

[ding]

I like to keep up with the latest discoveries in the life sciences. The more we learn, the more it looks really bad for a naturalistic origin of life. In fact, information theory proves that information, such as that contained in human languages and DNA, are the result of intelligent minds. It cannot evolve on it's own. It is the sole province of intelligent agents.

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

Where did aliens come from?
Let me guess. Aliens.

Is this a feeble attempt to say that god made aliens?

It is turtles all the way down, right?

It's my Friday off, so except for rig call and a round of golf, I'll be able to play with you all day long.... while you are at work, lol. Wouldn't it be horrible if you got fired because you were blogging instead of what they were paying you to do. He who has the last laugh, laughs the longest.

I'm mostly retired, have been since me 30s.

First you said you owned a company and then you said you are mostly retired? Which is it? What kind of company DID you own?

 

[ding]

What's YOUR evidence?

The story of Genesis is allegorical. God did not magically create the universe in one step. He set the rules of nature and let nature take its course. You cannot dispute that the laws of nature are such that at the moment space and time came into existence, beings that know and create were pre-destined to eventually arise. Here is the proof you have been looking for. Maybe one day, you will realize that the exact moment you lost this argument was when you admitted that tangible items could be used as evidence. The reality is that the Bible correctly explains that the universe had a beginning and was created in steps. Science tells us that the universe did have a beginning and what we see today is a result of the evolution of matter and was a process that was done in steps. Subatomic particles evolved into hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen and helium formed cosmic structures. Supernovas created the other elements. Chemical evolution created all the compounds. Life mad the leap from inorganic matter to organic matter. Life made the leap from single cells to multi cells and to eventually beings that know and create. All along the way the laws of nature controlled this process. The same laws of nature that came into existence at the time space and time were created. Those laws predestined that beings that know and create would eventually arise. Check mate.

 

[Mudda]

You claimed that all atheists were against families, among other nonsense, and then took it back. That's called a flip-flop. Now you know.

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

 

[Mudda]

Only one person in history was perfect.
And they tortured and nailed him up on a cross.

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

I already believe we are all equal and that helping the needy is cool, and don't need guidance from an invisible being to do so, like you appear to?

 

[ding]

That's not what I wrote at all. That is what you chose to hear. You are so used to arguing dishonestly that it is ingrained in the fabric of your being. You don't condone respect for anyone who believes in God and it shows. That should be obvious to everyone except maybe you, but I bet you know it. Thus proving, "They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure."

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

 

[Mudda]

Man didn't evolve on his own, aliens likely intervened about 50,000 years ago.

Where did aliens come from?
Let me guess. Aliens.

Is this a feeble attempt to say that god made aliens?

It is turtles all the way down, right?

It's my Friday off, so except for rig call and a round of golf, I'll be able to play with you all day long.... while you are at work, lol. Wouldn't it be horrible if you got fired because you were blogging instead of what they were paying you to do. He who has the last laugh, laughs the longest.

I'm mostly retired, have been since me 30s.

First you said you owned a company and then you said you are mostly retired? Which is it? What kind of company DID you own?

I still own it but have others who do the actual work.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Only one person in history was perfect.
And they tortured and nailed him up on a cross.

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

I already believe we are all equal and that helping the needy is cool, and don't need guidance from an invisible being to do so, like you appear to?

Your beliefs are based upon feelings.
People's feelings vary all of the time, and rationalized easily no matter what the feelings are.

 

[Mudda]

What's YOUR evidence?

The story of Genesis is allegorical. God did not magically create the universe in one step. He set the rules of nature and let nature take its course. You cannot dispute that the laws of nature are such that at the moment space and time came into existence, beings that know and create were pre-destined to eventually arise. Here is the proof you have been looking for. Maybe one day, you will realize that the exact moment you lost this argument was when you admitted that tangible items could be used as evidence. The reality is that the Bible correctly explains that the universe had a beginning and was created in steps. Science tells us that the universe did have a beginning and what we see today is a result of the evolution of matter and was a process that was done in steps. Subatomic particles evolved into hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen and helium formed cosmic structures. Supernovas created the other elements. Chemical evolution created all the compounds. Life mad the leap from inorganic matter to organic matter. Life made the leap from single cells to multi cells and to eventually beings that know and create. All along the way the laws of nature controlled this process. The same laws of nature that came into existence at the time space and time were created. Those laws predestined that beings that know and create would eventually arise. Check mate.

So you don't believe that the bible is true either. Good for you.
But at the beginning of this universe, it was not possible to know that intelligent beings were going to exist, and you can't prove that it is.

 

[ding]

Where did aliens come from?
Let me guess. Aliens.

Is this a feeble attempt to say that god made aliens?

It is turtles all the way down, right?

It's my Friday off, so except for rig call and a round of golf, I'll be able to play with you all day long.... while you are at work, lol. Wouldn't it be horrible if you got fired because you were blogging instead of what they were paying you to do. He who has the last laugh, laughs the longest.

I'm mostly retired, have been since me 30s.

First you said you owned a company and then you said you are mostly retired? Which is it? What kind of company DID you own?

I still own it but have others who do the actual work.

I see. What kind of business is it?

 

[ding]

What's YOUR evidence?

The story of Genesis is allegorical. God did not magically create the universe in one step. He set the rules of nature and let nature take its course. You cannot dispute that the laws of nature are such that at the moment space and time came into existence, beings that know and create were pre-destined to eventually arise. Here is the proof you have been looking for. Maybe one day, you will realize that the exact moment you lost this argument was when you admitted that tangible items could be used as evidence. The reality is that the Bible correctly explains that the universe had a beginning and was created in steps. Science tells us that the universe did have a beginning and what we see today is a result of the evolution of matter and was a process that was done in steps. Subatomic particles evolved into hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen and helium formed cosmic structures. Supernovas created the other elements. Chemical evolution created all the compounds. Life mad the leap from inorganic matter to organic matter. Life made the leap from single cells to multi cells and to eventually beings that know and create. All along the way the laws of nature controlled this process. The same laws of nature that came into existence at the time space and time were created. Those laws predestined that beings that know and create would eventually arise. Check mate.

So you don't believe that the bible is true either. Good for you.
But at the beginning of this universe, it was not possible to know that intelligent beings were going to exist, and you can't prove that it is.

No. That's not what I wrote. It is true but it is allegorical. God did not magically create the universe in one step. He set the rules of nature and let nature take its course. You cannot dispute that the laws of nature are such that at the moment space and time came into existence, beings that know and create were pre-destined to eventually arise. Here is the proof you have been looking for. Maybe one day, you will realize that the exact moment you lost this argument was when you admitted that tangible items could be used as evidence. The reality is that the Bible correctly explains that the universe had a beginning and was created in steps. Science tells us that the universe did have a beginning and what we see today is a result of the evolution of matter and was a process that was done in steps. Subatomic particles evolved into hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen and helium formed cosmic structures. Supernovas created the other elements. Chemical evolution created all the compounds. Life mad the leap from inorganic matter to organic matter. Life made the leap from single cells to multi cells and to eventually beings that know and create. All along the way the laws of nature controlled this process. The same laws of nature that came into existence at the time space and time were created. Those laws predestined that beings that know and create would eventually arise. Check mate.

 

[Mudda]

"Here's why it is a religion.

1. Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy
2. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
3. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.
4. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.
5. Its doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality.
6. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements.
7. They condemn respect for any who believes in Christianity.
8. It's hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion
9. It worships science but are the first to argue against it.
10. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance.
11. They can be identified by an external locus of control. It's like an invisible cross" It's on page 26.

Don't you just hate it when I'm right?

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

 

[Mudda]

Only one person in history was perfect.
And they tortured and nailed him up on a cross.

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

I already believe we are all equal and that helping the needy is cool, and don't need guidance from an invisible being to do so, like you appear to?

Your beliefs are based upon feelings.
People's feelings vary all of the time, and rationalized easily no matter what the feelings are.

No, those are some of my core beliefs. Please try again.

 

[ding]

Yes, that is what I wrote, but your interpretation and assumption is incorrect. How do they accomplish the abolition of family? By pushing the policies of free love such as homosexuality, trans-sexuality, bestiality, pedophilia, and polygamy. Now you know.

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

 

[ding]

Only one person in history was perfect.
And they tortured and nailed him up on a cross.

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

I already believe we are all equal and that helping the needy is cool, and don't need guidance from an invisible being to do so, like you appear to?

Your beliefs are based upon feelings.
People's feelings vary all of the time, and rationalized easily no matter what the feelings are.

No, those are some of my core beliefs. Please try again.

These are your core beliefs.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

 

[Mudda]

Homosexuality is prevalent in nature, so god's law, not atheists'.
Trans-sexuality is also prevalent in nature, ex: some fish are all born male and change sex only when the female dies, to replace her.
Bestiality and pedophilia were practised in the Holy Land thousands of years before atheists ever came along.
Polygamy is the domain of the religious, like Mormons.
Glad I already knew.

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

 

[Mudda]

Being nailed to wood in a diaper, how embarrassing.

That was the point.
Why won't you answer the question?
What's the downside to being a Christian and thinking we are all created equal and are to help those in need?

I already believe we are all equal and that helping the needy is cool, and don't need guidance from an invisible being to do so, like you appear to?

Your beliefs are based upon feelings.
People's feelings vary all of the time, and rationalized easily no matter what the feelings are.

No, those are some of my core beliefs. Please try again.

These are your core beliefs.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Simply more proof that you live in a fantasy world. I'm here to help you, just relax and open your mind.

 

[ding]

Sure it is. So what? Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

I love the sound of a squirming concession. Good for you.

Is that the best you can offer? Would you like to try again?

Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.

What standard? The one set by the book you agree isn't true?

No. Don't be silly. The standard set by nature. Nature has decided that male and female unions are how natural selection is passed down to the next generation.

Thank you for proving my point that atheists worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Nature created homosexuality and trans... as well. They are a standard of nature as well.

I thought I already explained this to you. Let me add emphasis so you can see where you erred.
Technically everything that has occurred or exists since the beginning of space and time is part of nature. So what? It isn't a question of nature, it is a question of deviance from a standard. Diversity is great. I love diversity. Diversity serves a vital purpose. But just because diversity is great and serves a purpose, that doesn't mean we should define the rule through exception.