Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
"I want to bleev it, so it must be true!"please dont use the media for proof,, we know they will do anything to protect obama and the dems,,
the facts are cases skyrocketed after his party
I've had it twice and still alive,,Yes, the vaccine is not 100 percent effective at preventing infection. It says that plainly in my post. But you are LESS LIKELY to be infected.
You can't spread it if you are not infected.
As for not knowing you are infected, that's true for unvacinnated people. They are asymptomatic for 2 weeks before showing symptoms, but are still capable of spreading Covid.
There simply is no sound reasoning for not getting the vaccine. You are less likely to get infected, and you are far less likely to die if you do.
Where'd you hear that?please dont use the media for proof,, we know they will do anything to protect obama and the dems,,
the facts are cases skyrocketed after his party
youre right,, a 1000 people suddenly arriving on an island and parading around without masks had nothing to do with it,,,"I want to bleev it, so it must be true!"
You have ZERO proof of a connection to Obama's party. I trust the health officials who are pros at contact tracing over some conspiracy nut on an internet forum.
No, death is not certain if you get it.I've had it twice and still alive,,
and what was it?? a 99.997 survival rate??
doesnt sound like death is an absolute to me,,,
You are just as incapable of being honest as Trump is.youre right,, a 1000 people suddenly arriving on an island and parading around without masks had nothing to do with it,,,
thanks for your opinion,,No, death is not certain if you get it.
But 96 percent of those who die are unvaccinated.
Again, there simply is no sound reasoning not to get the shot.
www.washingtonian.com
and there we have it,, TDS at its finest,,,You are just as incapable of being honest as Trump is.
There were about 200 people at the party. Not 1000.
That's exactly the reason given for being vaccinated.Those who are vaccinated have a reduced risk of infection, and therefore less likely to spread it.
All vaccinated, all with a negative test, and probably masked in the community. So how did they spread it again?youre right,, a 1000 people suddenly arriving on an island and parading around without masks had nothing to do with it,,,
It's sad how you shamelessly manufacture bullshit. Seriously.and there we have it,, TDS at its finest,,,
what about support staff,,
for every rich prick it takes 10 people to take care of them
its sadder that you get angry other people wont do as you and your government gods want them to do,,It's sad how you shamelessly manufacture bullshit. Seriously.
abcnews.go.com
Reported, fuckfacefrom your pimp,,
now get your skanky ass back on the streets, daddy needs a new pair of shoes,,
when do you figure the pre party prep started?? about 2-3 weeks before the party??As you can see from this article, the spike in Covid cases in Massachusetts started BEFORE Obama's party:
Obama to host hundreds at 60th birthday party amid COVID concerns
Former President Barack Obama is set planning to host hundreds of people at his 60th birthday Martha's Vineyard party amid COVID concerns.
Despite the planned effort to ensure a safe event, the party comes after a major breakout of COVID-19 cases abut 100 miles away in Provincetown, Massachusetts, which left more than 800 people infected, resulting in at least 7 hospitalizations.
clearly,,,Obama's party was originally planned to have 475 guests and 200 staff.
675 people. Not even close to 1000.
The party was scaled back to 200 guests. No figures are available for how many staff, but clearly the total was less than 500. Again, not even close to 1000.
This is the problem with liars. It takes two seconds to manufacture bullshit, and a lot of work to expose them as bald-faced liars.
I have no idea why such people throw away their integrity so carelessly. It's as if they don't expect to get caught.
Bullshit. The point is contained in the title of this thread.You are missing the point. A vaccinated person is less likely to get infected in the first place. Since they are less likely to be infected, they are less likely to pass it on.
When vaccinated people become infected, they frequently are not aware that they are. This is why vaccinated people can unknowingly spread Sars so easily. Alleging the likelihood of vaccinated people becoming infected cannot change the fact that vaccinated people often do not know that they are infected, or that they unknowingly spread Sars. The likelihood of vaccinated people becoming infected is not only a red herring on this thread, but it is a completely new topic that should be a new thread.That's true for anyone who is infected, vaccinated or unvaccinated.
But an unvaccinated person is more likely to get infected than a vaccinated one, and therefore more likely to spread it.
