How dangerous are liberal social policies?

[ding]

Demoralization is the first step in brainwashing a nation.

 

[peach174]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

Yes and the people of England and America has done the right thing and voted against it.
Lets hear it for freedom from harmful Socialist Democracy for both nations !!

 

[mgh80]

Our culture and society are not going backward, eddy.

Your culture and society just got handed a massive rejection by the American people.

While I would like to believe this...it's not the case. Hillary won the popular vote, and barely lost the electoral college (most of the swing states were VERY close).

While Trump won fair and square, I wouldn't ever call it a "massive rejection".

I'd call it massive. Trump's electorial win is at 306. The Dems pushed their agenda too hard and lost a lot of voters over it. Most parents do not want to see a grown man in their daughter's restroom. Most white men and white women are against late term abortion. Most white men and women actually do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. Most white men and women do not want to see the Hyde Act repealed forcing taxpayers to fund abortion. Most white men and women do not want the federal government forcing the Nuns to hand out contraceptaives against their religios views.

White men and white women, both the undereducated and the college educated overwhelmingly rejected the Democratic Party's stance on social issues. The Democrats ignored and lost the white working class vote.

The only concrete fact that you posted is Trump winning 306 electoral votes, and you cited that as being a "massive rejection" of Clinton. 306 is actually a pretty small win. Here are the last 10 presidential elections and how many electoral votes they received:

2016: 306 (Trump)
2012: 332 (Obama)
2008: 356 (Obama)
2004: 286 (Bush)
2000: 271 (Bush)
1996: 379 (Clinton)
1992: 370 (Clinton)
1988: 426 (Bush)
1984: 525 (Reagan)
1980: 480 (Reagan)

8th most out of 10 elections is not a "massive rejection" of the other person.

Would you say that the country "massively rejected" Obama's opponents?

But the fact still remains that you lost. Suck it up.

I didn't vote for Hillary...I would say nice attempt, but honestly you had zero basis to think that I voted for her, so really it's a lazy attempt.

Your response is pathetic because it only highlights your lack of reading comprehension and your inability to put forth a decent argument.

 

[rdean]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

Republicans caring about blacks? Is this satire?
Republicans care about gays the most. They want gays dead.
Then they care about Muslims.
Then blacks, then Hispanics, then women's rights.

And we know what we mean by "care".

 

[Correll]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

What's the danger of allowing gays to marry?

Consider the death toll of the yearly high black homicide rate. Very dangerous.

 

[Correll]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

Republicans caring about blacks? Is this satire?
Republicans care about gays the most. They want gays dead.
Then they care about Muslims.
Then blacks, then Hispanics, then women's rights.

And we know what we mean by "care".

YOu are raving about things you know nothing about.

 

[jknowgood]

Our culture and society are not going backward, eddy.

We have people burning and looting towns because their presidential candidate lost. College students need coloring books and are told they don't need to take exams, because their presidential candidate didn't win. College students need safe spaces because free speech offends them. With liberalism to blame. Yes we are going backwards in today's society.

 

[Moonglow]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

So you are saying that the govt. controls what individuals do?

 

[peach174]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

Republicans caring about blacks? Is this satire?
Republicans care about gays the most. They want gays dead.
Then they care about Muslims.
Then blacks, then Hispanics, then women's rights.

And we know what we mean by "care".

Under the Republican run States - school vouchers for the black kids are helping to keep them stayng in high school and are not droping out and then go on to college, but you refuse to look at that. You think it's lies when it's. Fact.
All Dems did was add more money which does nothing.

 

[Moonglow]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

Yes and the people of England and America has done the right thing and voted against it.
Lets hear it for freedom from harmful Socialist Democracy for both nations !!

You mean we are going to privatize the military, police, fire departments, libraries, schools and sewage treatment plants?

 

[the_human_being]

Your culture and society just got handed a massive rejection by the American people.

While I would like to believe this...it's not the case. Hillary won the popular vote, and barely lost the electoral college (most of the swing states were VERY close).

While Trump won fair and square, I wouldn't ever call it a "massive rejection".

I'd call it massive. Trump's electorial win is at 306. The Dems pushed their agenda too hard and lost a lot of voters over it. Most parents do not want to see a grown man in their daughter's restroom. Most white men and white women are against late term abortion. Most white men and women actually do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. Most white men and women do not want to see the Hyde Act repealed forcing taxpayers to fund abortion. Most white men and women do not want the federal government forcing the Nuns to hand out contraceptaives against their religios views.

White men and white women, both the undereducated and the college educated overwhelmingly rejected the Democratic Party's stance on social issues. The Democrats ignored and lost the white working class vote.

The only concrete fact that you posted is Trump winning 306 electoral votes, and you cited that as being a "massive rejection" of Clinton. 306 is actually a pretty small win. Here are the last 10 presidential elections and how many electoral votes they received:

2016: 306 (Trump)
2012: 332 (Obama)
2008: 356 (Obama)
2004: 286 (Bush)
2000: 271 (Bush)
1996: 379 (Clinton)
1992: 370 (Clinton)
1988: 426 (Bush)
1984: 525 (Reagan)
1980: 480 (Reagan)

8th most out of 10 elections is not a "massive rejection" of the other person.

Would you say that the country "massively rejected" Obama's opponents?

But the fact still remains that you lost. Suck it up.

I didn't vote for Hillary...I would say nice attempt, but honestly you had zero basis to think that I voted for her, so really it's a lazy attempt.

Your response is pathetic because it only highlights your lack of reading comprehension and your inability to put forth a decent argument.

Your response has no merit since Trump won. Get over it.

 

[TheDude]

This is what a GREAT leader thought about it. Imagine what he'd think today:

 

[NYcarbineer]

[ Children need a male and a female role model in their lives. .

Then why isn't divorce outlawed?

 

[the_human_being]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

What's the danger of allowing gays to marry?

I have followed Trump's speeches fairly closely. I don't recall his saying anything at all about gay marriage much less his desire to do away with gay marriage. If ypou have a link as to where he made such a statement, would you please post that link?

 

[Moonglow]

This is what a GREAT leader thought about it. Imagine what he'd think today:

A great leader whom violated the rights on asset forfeiture..

 

[NYcarbineer]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

What's the danger of allowing gays to marry?

Consider the death toll of the yearly high black homicide rate. Very dangerous.

I have a shiny new quarter for anyone who can explain what his answer has to do with my question.

 

[Correll]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

What's the danger of allowing gays to marry?

Consider the death toll of the yearly high black homicide rate. Very dangerous.

I have a shiny new quarter for anyone who can explain what his answer has to do with my question.

YOur answer had nothing to do with the post you replied to.

My answer was to help lead you to the point that you missed from that post.

 

[ding]

[ Children need a male and a female role model in their lives. .

Then why isn't divorce outlawed?

You are making fringe argument to try to define the rule by exception, just as I predicted you would do. Thank you for proving my point BTW.

Ok, to answer your fringe argument, because you can't make people stay together that don't want to stay together.

 

[OldLady]

Our culture and society are not going backward, eddy.

Your culture and society just got handed a massive rejection by the American people.

While I would like to believe this...it's not the case. Hillary won the popular vote, and barely lost the electoral college (most of the swing states were VERY close).

While Trump won fair and square, I wouldn't ever call it a "massive rejection".

Republicans control White House, Senate, SCOTUS, more state legislatures then ever in history and 35 governors. That's a massive rejection hopefully because liberalism is based in pure ignorance, and will soon be illegal as our Founders intended.

ILLEGAL? When that day comes, you'll be hearing from a lot of folks. You are getting your turn. Don't go overboard. That's a warning.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Very dangerous, with the liberal war on the American family being the best example. It has progressed to the point where 75% of black kids are born into broken or never formed homes.

What's the danger of allowing gays to marry?

I have followed Trump's speeches fairly closely. I don't recall his saying anything at all about gay marriage much less his desire to do away with gay marriage. If ypou have a link as to where he made such a statement, would you please post that link?

Post a link that you'll then dispute? lol

It appears you're admitting that same sex marriage equality has won.