How do those on the left defend this?

[bodecea]

Woman Outraged At Spa For Letting Trans In Women's Room: Are You OK With A Man Showing His Penis Around Girls?

A woman at Los Angeles-area spa Wi Spa yelled at employees after suffering a traumatic event of a man (unclear if the person was a trans woman) walking through the women's locker room with "his penis hanging out." The video showed another woman asking for a refund from the spa with the woman...

www.realclearpolitics.com

A woman at Los Angeles-area spa Wi Spa yelled at employees after suffering a traumatic event of a man (unclear if the person was a trans woman) walking through the women's locker room with "his penis hanging out." The video showed another woman asking for a refund from the spa with the woman behind the camera supporting her.


#1) 100% political --- biological male using a women's locker room and walking around with their junk for little girls to see? Don't care how they identify, this is not OK

#2) How is that not spitting in the face of women's rights?

#3) Yet another reason people are fleeing California.


Let's see Leftists defend this. The country is falling apart. This lady is 100% right! Yet another reason why the Democratic Party has gone utterly insane.

Thank you....

Trust the Science
Truth over Facts

Where’s your solution? WTF!!!

The solution is you don’t change the entire country for .000001% of the country because they’re feelings might be hurt. It’s common sense you leftist idiots.

I have same reaction to maga infested fuckups.

Stick to the topic or get lost

What’s the original source of this incident?

Video from the lady who complained. It’s embedded in the OP.

Project vertitas bullshit

A Karen....apparently.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I think the left defines "utopia" the way a lot of people do: a world in which I get everything exactly the way I want it. Mature, rational people realize that that can't happen, and that it shouldn't, because other human beings exist as well.

Perhaps related to the Libertine movement of a few centuries ago.

The Libertine ideal is one of total liberty, in which one is free to do whatever pleases one, without any concern legal or moral constraints, or adverse consequences to one's self.

Of course, Libertinism necessarily disregards the effects of one's own behavior on others.

 

[jc456]

A Karen....apparently.

the only Karen's I know are the ones who object to individual rights.

 

[Slade3200]

Woman Outraged At Spa For Letting Trans In Women's Room: Are You OK With A Man Showing His Penis Around Girls?

A woman at Los Angeles-area spa Wi Spa yelled at employees after suffering a traumatic event of a man (unclear if the person was a trans woman) walking through the women's locker room with "his penis hanging out." The video showed another woman asking for a refund from the spa with the woman...

www.realclearpolitics.com

A woman at Los Angeles-area spa Wi Spa yelled at employees after suffering a traumatic event of a man (unclear if the person was a trans woman) walking through the women's locker room with "his penis hanging out." The video showed another woman asking for a refund from the spa with the woman behind the camera supporting her.


#1) 100% political --- biological male using a women's locker room and walking around with their junk for little girls to see? Don't care how they identify, this is not OK

#2) How is that not spitting in the face of women's rights?

#3) Yet another reason people are fleeing California.


Let's see Leftists defend this. The country is falling apart. This lady is 100% right! Yet another reason why the Democratic Party has gone utterly insane.

Thank you....

Trust the Science
Truth over Facts

You posted an incomplete story. I don’t see any statement from the spa or any information about who this person was or even if they even had permission to be in the women’s locker room.

Did you view and listen to the exchange between the woman and the employee? The woman at one point responded to something the employee said and she then says: “There is no sexual orientation. He’s a man.”

So apparently the employee was defending the incident by citing the offending person’s sexual orientation. This suggests to me that the guy informed the spa when he arrived that he was transgender or identified as a woman.

If nothing else, you have to wonder why, if there’s a guy walking through the women’s locker room where he clearly doesn’t belong with his genitalia hanging out, the employee did not act immedietely to find the “guy” and kick him out. If that were the case, why the fuck is he standing there debating the issue with the offended customer?

Because he's afraid to go against the PC dogma. To put it bluntly, he cares more about offending some pervert and getting cancelled than he does about the well-being of women.

Why do you think I’m afraid to go against the PC dogma?! Have you read my other posts about this situation? Doesn’t sound like you have

 

[jc456]

Why do you think I’m afraid to go against the PC dogma?! Have you read my other posts about this situation? Doesn’t sound like you have

he wasn't talking about you. I will say, you demofks sure have a bad habit of not using the english language in here, or following the flow of a conversation.

 

[Slade3200]

AzogtheDefiler this is part of why i think America just isn't ready for certain things regarding trans people. All moral judgments aside, public opinion is what it is. And if we delineate a "war front" now, then people on both sides are going to cross that line intentionally for effect. It is past time for protections against discrimination in the market, but things like this expecting open locker rooms and bathrooms is just a wee bit ahead of its time.

To me, either we trust science or we don’t. Science says those with a penis are male and those with a vagina are female. Locker rooms should be based on that. Pretty simple. Why overcomplicate it? As a father of two young girls, to me women’s rights matter.

You arent trusting science. You are cherry-picking science to retrofit it to your preferences . Psychology is also science.

But psychology and biology are separate branches of science and I’m afraid that, biology being one of the hard sciences based on observation, this person was a male, regardless of his psychology.

I just think it should be outlawed for anybody to be walking around any locker room with their Dong flopping around. I see old men do it all the time in locker rooms and I’m like dude, nobody wants to see that mess!

You're deflecting. Nice try though.

Deflecting from what?

Deflecting from the fact that trans people should not be allowed to use locker rooms outside their biological gender. Period.

Well let me ask this… Do you think that lady or you would take issue with these “girls” being in the locker room with your little girls around?

 

[Slade3200]

I consider myself fairly liberal but my thought is that I wouldn't want the guy in the men's locker room either. Guess that might toss my liberal credentials out the window.

Liberal would be supporting people to act, appear, and express themselves in an authentic way and not try and force them to conform to they way you think they should look and act. That’s step one.

 

[Slade3200]

Make all the laws you want.

Nothing short of armed guards is going to prevent some flasher from walking thru a locker room flipping his junk

.

Not even if he thinks he is a woman ...

.​

You have to really admire the honest hatred of women it takes for these leftists to shrug and say, "Well, they wouldn't have been perfectly safe, therefore they don't need any attempt at safety at all." One wonders if they're willing to take that philosophy to its conclusion and say, "Well, we will never perfectly stop women from being raped, therefore they don't need us to even try to stop rapes" or "We can't perfectly stop serial killers from targeting women, therefore we should make no effort to try to stop serial killers at all."

You just gotta take the cheap shots huh? That’s akin to the Left using the race card. You can do better than that

 

[OldFlame]

I consider myself fairly liberal but my thought is that I wouldn't want the guy in the men's locker room either. Guess that might toss my liberal credentials out the window.

Liberal would be supporting people to act, appear, and express themselves in an authentic way and not try and force them to conform to they way you think they should look and act. That’s step one.

A 'liberal' may do that, but not a leftist, and anyone who proclaims to be a 'd' is a leftist. How you can talk about 'force' with a straight face is laughable, your party forces everyone to follow their beliefs or else.

 

[Mr Natural]

She suffered a traumatic event?

I’ll bet she’s a fun date

 

[Slade3200]

I consider myself fairly liberal but my thought is that I wouldn't want the guy in the men's locker room either. Guess that might toss my liberal credentials out the window.

Liberal would be supporting people to act, appear, and express themselves in an authentic way and not try and force them to conform to they way you think they should look and act. That’s step one.

A 'liberal' may do that, but not a leftist, and anyone who proclaims to be a 'd' is a leftist. How you can talk about 'force' with a straight face is laughable, your party forces everyone to follow their beliefs or else.

You think I’m a democrat?! Haha. Way to be presumptive and wrong. Do better

 

[Sandy Shanks]

You know, it suddenly occurred to me. What are today's Republicans for? What do they support? They only tell us what they are against.

They are against our President. They say he is senile. I am being polite. They have other characterizations of our President which I just as soon not repeat. They use vicious labels and name calling to show their feelings about President Biden.

For weeks, today's Republicans labored on the trivial matter of our vice-president going to the southern border. They acted as if Harris going to the southern border would solve the decades old problems, and her failure to do so was unconscionable. They have names and labels for our our vice-president, too, which I just as soon not mention.

When they aren't targeting Biden and Harris, they bring up the most trivial of matters. They enjoy talking about the past because, I suspect, the present and future are disagreeable ... as my thread attests.

They also enjoy discussing theoretical issues, but avoid reality. Theoretically, Trump was a great President for several reasons, they say, but they never mention the reasons. That's because the reasons would be reality, and, after all, Trump was a great President, theoretically.

That is, if they talk about Trump at all. Today's Republicans avoid Trump, just as they avoid their own party. They can't tell us what issues they support because Republican leaders in Congress do not tell us what they support. Their only objective is to stop our President from accomplishing anything. Don't believe me? Give a listen to Mitch McConnell.

The traditional Republican Party is gone, replaced by the Trump Republican Party which is completely negative and believes in fantasies. Several members of Congress believe Trump's "Big Lie" and over 50% of Republicans believe the election was stolen from Trump.

"On Jan. 6, right after the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, 147 Republican lawmakers voted to overturn [Trump's] election loss," (Reuters).

Today's Republicans do not want talk about what they support because they don't want to look like idiots.

 

[OldFlame]

I consider myself fairly liberal but my thought is that I wouldn't want the guy in the men's locker room either. Guess that might toss my liberal credentials out the window.

Liberal would be supporting people to act, appear, and express themselves in an authentic way and not try and force them to conform to they way you think they should look and act. That’s step one.

A 'liberal' may do that, but not a leftist, and anyone who proclaims to be a 'd' is a leftist. How you can talk about 'force' with a straight face is laughable, your party forces everyone to follow their beliefs or else.

You think I’m a democrat?! Haha. Way to be presumptive and wrong. Do better

Notice the small 'd' I used, that indicates a 'leftist', which is what you are, whether you affiliate with the Democrat party or not. Although, tbh, I don't believe that you don't vote D.

 

[Slade3200]

I consider myself fairly liberal but my thought is that I wouldn't want the guy in the men's locker room either. Guess that might toss my liberal credentials out the window.

Liberal would be supporting people to act, appear, and express themselves in an authentic way and not try and force them to conform to they way you think they should look and act. That’s step one.

A 'liberal' may do that, but not a leftist, and anyone who proclaims to be a 'd' is a leftist. How you can talk about 'force' with a straight face is laughable, your party forces everyone to follow their beliefs or else.

You think I’m a democrat?! Haha. Way to be presumptive and wrong. Do better

Notice the small 'd' I used, that indicates a 'leftist', which is what you are, whether you affiliate with the Democrat party or not. Although, tbh, I don't believe that you don't vote D.

You said in the previous post “your party” I was correcting you as I don’t have a party. You were being presumptive and wrong

 

[BlackSand]

You said in the previous post “your party” I was correcting you as I don’t have a party. You were being presumptive and wrong

.

The United Unicorns Anti-Defamation Party could use your support ...

.​

 

[Slade3200]

You said in the previous post “your party” I was correcting you as I don’t have a party. You were being presumptive and wrong

.

The United Unicorns Anti-Defamation Party could use your support ...

.​

 

[jc456]

Liberal would be supporting people to act, appear, and express themselves in an authentic way and not try and force them to conform to they way you think they should look and act. That’s step one.

we don't care if they declare anything. Just doesn't make it so. I'm a fking fairy godfather, come get your wishes.

 

[Colin norris]

Cecilie1200
I can't recall saying that but if it's your interpretation, God bless my son.

The world has moved on. Godbotherers no longer rule the world.

 

[jc456]

She suffered a traumatic event?

I’ll bet she’s a fun date

says the bigot.

 

[jc456]

Cecilie1200
I can't recall saying that but if it's your interpretation, God bless my son.

The world has moved on. Godbotherers no longer rule the world.

God!!!