- Thread starter
- Banned
- #241
NFW…lolThose are biological females which you just said belong in the lady’s locker room. Now you say no. So which is it?100%....why do you ask? I would not be happy if they were. Is this from your dating site?Well let me ask this… Do you think that lady or you would take issue with these “girls” being in the locker room with your little girls around?Deflecting from the fact that trans people should not be allowed to use locker rooms outside their biological gender. Period.Deflecting from what?You're deflecting. Nice try though.I just think it should be outlawed for anybody to be walking around any locker room with their Dong flopping around. I see old men do it all the time in locker rooms and I’m like dude, nobody wants to see that mess!You arent trusting science. You are cherry-picking science to retrofit it to your preferences . Psychology is also science.To me, either we trust science or we don’t. Science says those with a penis are male and those with a vagina are female. Locker rooms should be based on that. Pretty simple. Why overcomplicate it? As a father of two young girls, to me women’s rights matter.AzogtheDefiler this is part of why i think America just isn't ready for certain things regarding trans people. All moral judgments aside, public opinion is what it is. And if we delineate a "war front" now, then people on both sides are going to cross that line intentionally for effect. It is past time for protections against discrimination in the market, but things like this expecting open locker rooms and bathrooms is just a wee bit ahead of its time.
But psychology and biology are separate branches of science and I’m afraid that, biology being one of the hard sciences based on observation, this person was a male, regardless of his psychology.
View attachment 507348
link