How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

You zipped right by "commonly regarded as correct". Obviously, AGW is well beyond "commonly regarded as correct".

The Scientific Method is not as hard and fast as you would believe. How, for instance, would one conduct experiments in astronomy or cosmology? In cases in which laboratory experiments are not practical or even possible, observations can be used to test falsification.

From Scientific method - Wikipedia
Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, they are frequently the same from one to another. The process of the scientific method involves making conjectures (hypotheses), deriving predictions from them as logical consequences, and then carrying out experiments or empirical observations based on those predictions.[1][2] A hypothesis is a conjecture, based on knowledge obtained while seeking answers to the question. The hypothesis might be very specific, or it might be broad. Scientists then test hypotheses by conducting experiments or studies. A scientific hypothesis must be falsifiable, implying that it is possible to identify a possible outcome of an experiment or observation that conflicts with predictions deduced from the hypothesis; otherwise, the hypothesis cannot be meaningfully tested.[3]

...
..
.
Scientific methodology often directs that hypotheses be tested in controlled conditions wherever possible. This is frequently possible in certain areas, such as in the biological sciences, and more difficult in other areas, such as in astronomy.

References
  1. Peirce, Charles Sanders (1908). "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God" . Hibbert Journal. 7: 90–112 – via Wikisource. with added notes. Reprinted with previously unpublished part, Collected Papers v. 6, paragraphs 452–85, The Essential Peirce v. 2, pp. 434–50, and elsewhere.
  2. ^ See, for example, Galileo 1638. His thought experiments disprove Aristotle's physics of falling bodies, in Two New Sciences.
  3. ^ Popper 1959, p. 273
Commonly regarded is not observed data. When is that information coming?
 
"The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch has single paragraphs with more empirical evidence than your "science" has accumulated in the last 30 years.

The money that has been spent on reducing our CO2 emissions, every penny of it, has been wisely invested. Doing nothing, as is ALWAYS the case with unpleasant problems, is the WORST and most COSTLY possible choice.
Still nothing forward from the link. Therefore, the only conclusion is it isn’t in the link! So you lied
 
"The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch has single paragraphs with more empirical evidence than your "science" has accumulated in the last 30 years.

The money that has been spent on reducing our CO2 emissions, every penny of it, has been wisely invested. Doing nothing, as is ALWAYS the case with unpleasant problems, is the WORST and most COSTLY possible choice.

Yeah...you keep posting that...but don't seem to be able to bring a single piece of data that demonstrates that the present climate is any different from natural variability...When I make a claim, I provide the actual paper...author, publication, title, and a link...you are full of BS and because of that, the best you can do is send people off to a steaming pile of excrement hoping that they might find something there that you couldn't...
 
"The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch has single paragraphs with more empirical evidence than your "science" has accumulated in the last 30 years.

The money that has been spent on reducing our CO2 emissions, every penny of it, has been wisely invested. Doing nothing, as is ALWAYS the case with unpleasant problems, is the WORST and most COSTLY possible choice.
Still nothing forward from the link. Therefore, the only conclusion is it isn’t in the link! So you lied

Of course he lies...he may as well give you a link to www. and tell you to go find it...
 
When I make a claim, I provide the actual paper...author, publication, title, and a link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha

So lets see the published paper from your IPCC steaming pile where the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and ascribe to so called greenhouse gasses.....or lets see a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural vairiability...

What's that laughing boy? Can't provide any because there is none there? That's what I thought.
 
The trick here, folks, is that SSDD specifies what he wants to see. He wants you to think that that precise evidence is the only way to actually support AGW. He assumes you are doing no critical thinking whatsoever. The reference listing from individual chapters of TPSB are pages long and I have been criticized by management here for posting them. However, I will give it another go.

I ask management to take into account that I will only be posting one fourth of the reference section from one chapter of TPSB and I only do so due to SSDD's unending and unsubstantiated claim that the TPSB link provides no evidence. I know it is a bit much, but parce mihi pro peccatis meis

Below is a list of 154 published scientific studies, one-fourth (alphabetically) of the studies referenced in ONE of the 14 chapters and 6 annexes of "The Physical Science Basis"; the work that SSDD claims contains zero empirical evidence of AGW.

References for Chapter 8 of "The Physical Science Basis"
'Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing'

A - G

  1. Aaheim, A., J. Fuglestvedt, and O. Godal, 2006: Costs savings of a flexible multi-gas climate policy. Energy J. (Special Issue No. 3), 485–501.
  2. Abreu, J., J. Beer, F. Steinhilber, S. Tobias, and N. Weiss, 2008: For how long will the current grand maximum of solar activity persist? Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20109.
  3. Ackerley, D., B. B. B. Booth, S. H. E. Knight, E. J. Highwood, D. J. Frame, M. R. Allen, and D. P. Rowell, 2011: Sensitivity of twentieth-century Sahel rainfall to sulfate aerosol and CO2 forcing. J. Clim., 24, 4999–5014.
  4. Allan, W., H. Struthers, and D. C. Lowe, 2007: Methane carbon isotope effects caused by atomic chlorine in the marine boundary layer: Global model results compared with Southern Hemisphere measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, D04306.
  5. Ammann, C. M., and P. Naveau, 2003: Statistical analysis of tropical explosive volcanism occurrences over the last 6 centuries. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1210.
  6. Ammann, C. M., and P. Naveau, 2010: A statistical volcanic forcing scenario generator for climate simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115, D05107.
  7. Anchukaitis, K. J., B. M. Buckley, E. R. Cook, B. I. Cook, R. D. D’Arrigo, and C. M. Ammann, 2010: Influence of volcanic eruptions on the climate of the Asian monsoon region. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22703.
  8. Andersen, M., D. Blake, F. Rowland, M. Hurley, and T. Wallington, 2009: Atmospheric chemistry of sulfuryl fluoride: Reaction with OH radicals, CI atoms and O3, atmospheric lifetime, IR spectrum, and global warming potential. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1067–1070.
  9. Andersen, M., V. Andersen, O. Nielsen, S. Sander, and T. Wallington, 2010: Atmospheric chemistry of HCF2O(CF2CF2O)(x)CF2H (x=2–4): Kinetics and mechanisms of the chlorine-atom-initiated oxidation. Chemphyschem, 11, 4035–4041.
  10. Andrews, T., and P. M. Forster, 2008: CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L04802.
  11. Andrews, T., M. Doutriaux-Boucher, O. Boucher, and P. M. Forster, 2011: A regional and global analysis of carbon dioxide physiological forcing and its impact on climate. Clim. Dyn., 36, 783–792.
  12. Andrews, T., J. Gregory, M. Webb, and K. Taylor, 2012a: Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09712.
  13. Andrews, T., P. Forster, O. Boucher, N. Bellouin, and A. Jones, 2010: Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, doi:10.1029/2010GL043991, L14701.
  14. Andrews, T., M. Ringer, M. Doutriaux-Boucher, M. Webb, and W. Collins, 2012b: Sensitivity of an Earth system climate model to idealized radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L10702.
  15. Antuña, J. C., A. Robock, G. Stenchikov, J. Zhou, C. David, J. Barnes, and L. Thomason, 2003: Spatial and temporal variability of the stratospheric aerosol cloud produced by the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 4624.
  16. Archibald, A. T., M. E. Jenkin, and D. E. Shallcross, 2010: An isoprene mechanism intercomparison. Atmos. Environ., 44, 5356–5364.
  17. Archibald, A. T., et al., 2011: Impacts of HO(x) regeneration and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene: Consequences for the composition of past, present and future atmospheres. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05804.
  18. Arnold, T., et al., 2013: Nitrogen trifluoride global emissions estimated from updated atmospheric measurements, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 110, 2029-2034.
  19. Arora, V. K., and A. Montenegro, 2011: Small temperature benefits provided by realistic afforestation efforts. Nature Geosci., 4, 514–518. Arora, V. K., et al., 2013: Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth system models. J. Clim., 26, 5289-5314.
  20. Ashmore, M. R., 2005: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell Environ., 28, 949–964.
  21. Azar, C., and D. J. A. Johansson, 2012: On the relationship between metrics to compare greenhouse gases—the case of IGTP, GWP and SGTP. Earth Syst. Dynam., 3, 139–147.
  22. Baasandorj, M., A. R. Ravishankara, and J. B. Burkholder, 2011: Atmospheric chemistry of (Z)-CF3CH=CHCF3: OH radical reaction rate coefficient and global warming potential. J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 10539–10549.
  23. Baasandorj, M., G. Knight, V. Papadimitriou, R. Talukdar, A. Ravishankara, and J. Burkholder, 2010: Rate coefficients for the gas-phase reaction of the hydroxyl radical with CH2 = CHF and CH2 = CF2. J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 4619–4633.
  24. Bala, G., K. Caldeira, M. Wickett, T. J. Phillips, D. B. Lobell, C. Delire, and A. Mirin, 2007: Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 6550–6555.
  25. Baliunas, S., and R. Jastrow, 1990: Evidence for long-term brightness changes of solar-type stars. Nature, 348, 520–523.
  26. Ball, W., Y. Unruh, N. Krivova, S. Solanki, T. Wenzler, D. Mortlock, and A. Jaffe, 2012: Reconstruction of total solar irradiance 1974–2009. Astron. Astrophys., 541, A27.
  27. Ban-Weiss, G., L. Cao, G. Bala, and K. Caldeira, 2012: Dependence of climate forcing and response on the altitude of black carbon aerosols. Clim. Dyn., 38, 897–911.
  28. Barnes, C. A., and D. P. Roy, 2008: Radiative forcing over the conterminous United States due to contemporary land cover land use albedo change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L09706.
  29. Bathiany, S., M. Claussen, V. Brovkin, T. Raddatz, and V. Gayler, 2010: Combined biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects of large-scale forest cover changes in the MPI earth system model. Biogeosciences, 7, 1383–1399.
  30. Bauer, S., D. Koch, N. Unger, S. Metzger, D. Shindell, and D. Streets, 2007: Nitrate aerosols today and in 2030: A global simulation including aerosols and tropospheric ozone. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5043–5059.
  31. Bekki, S., J. A. Pyle, W. Zhong, R. Toumi, J. D. Haigh, and D. M. Pyle, 1996: The role of microphysical and chemical processes in prolonging the climate forcing of the Toba eruption. Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2669–2672.
  32. Bellouin, N., J. Rae, A. Jones, C. Johnson, J. Haywood, and O. Boucher, 2011: Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2–ES and the role of ammonium nitrate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D20206.
  33. Bernier, P. Y., R. L. Desjardins, Y. Karimi-Zindashty, D. Worth, A. Beaudoin, Y. Luo, and S. Wang, 2011: Boreal lichen woodlands: A possible negative feedback to climate change in eastern North America. Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 521–528.
  34. Berntsen, T., and J. Fuglestvedt, 2008: Global temperature responses to current emissions from the transport sectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105, 19154– 19159.
  35. Berntsen, T. K., et al., 1997: Effects of anthropogenic emissions on tropospheric ozone and its radiative forcing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 102, 28101–28126.
  36. Betts, R., 2000: Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo. Nature, 408, 187–190.
  37. Betts, R. A., P. D. Falloon, K. K. Goldewijk, and N. Ramankutty, 2007: Biogeophysical effects of land use on climate: Model simulations of radiative forcing and largescale temperature change. Agr. Forest Meteorol., 142, 216–233.
  38. Biasutti, M., and A. Giannini, 2006: Robust Sahel drying in response to late 20th century forcings. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L11706.
  39. Blowers, P., K. F. Tetrault, and Y. Trujillo-Morehead, 2008: Global warming potential predictions for hydrofluoroethers with two carbon atoms. Theor. Chem. Acc., 119, 369–381.
  40. Blowers, P., D. Moline, K. Tetrault, R. Wheeler, and S. Tuchawena, 2007: Prediction of radiative forcing values for hydrofluoroethers using density functional theory methods. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, D15108.
  41. Boer, G. J., and B. Yu, 2003: Climate sensitivity and response. Clim. Dyn., 20, 415–429.
  42. Bollasina, M. A., Y. Ming, and V. Ramaswamy, 2011: Anthropogenic aerosols and the weakening of the South Asian summer monsoon. Science, 334, 502–505.
  43. Bond, T., C. Zarzycki, M. Flanner, and D. Koch, 2011: Quantifying immediate radiative forcing by black carbon and organic matter with the Specific Forcing Pulse. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1505–1525.
  44. Bond, T. C., et al., 2007: Historical emissions of black and organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion, 1850–2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 21, Gb2018.
  45. Bond, T. C., et al., 2013: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50171, 5380-5552.
  46. Bonfils, C., and D. Lobell, 2007: Empirical evidence for a recent slowdown in irrigation-induced cooling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 104, 13582–13587.
  47. Bonfils, C. J. W., T. J. Phillips, D. M. Lawrence, P. Cameron-Smith, W. J. Riley, and Z. M. Subin, 2012: On the influence of shrub height and expansion on northern high latitude climate. Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 015503.
  48. Booth, B., N. Dunstone, P. Halloran, T. Andrews, and N. Bellouin, 2012: Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability. Nature, 485, 534–534.
  49. Boucher, O., 2012: Comparison of physically- and economically-based CO2– equivalences for methane. Earth Syst. Dyn., 3, 49–61.
  50. Boucher, O., and J. Haywood, 2001: On summing the components of radiative forcing of climate change. Clim. Dyn., 18, 297–302.
  51. Boucher, O., and M. Reddy, 2008: Climate trade-off between black carbon and carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy, 36, 193–200.
  52. Boucher, O., P. Friedlingstein, B. Collins, and K. P. Shine, 2009: The indirect global warming potential and global temperature change potential due to methane oxidation. Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 044007.
  53. Bourassa, A. E., et al., 2012: Large volcanic aerosol load in the stratosphere linked to Asian monsoon transport. Science, 337, 78–81.
  54. Bourassa, A. E., et al., 2013: Response to Comments on “Large Volcanic Aerosol Load in the Stratosphere Linked to Asian Monsoon Transport”. Science, 339, 6120.
  55. Bowman, D., et al., 2009: Fire in the Earth System. Science, 324, 481–484. Bowman, K. W., et al., 2013: Evaluation of ACCMIP outgoing longwave radiation from tropospheric ozone using TES satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4057–4072. Bradford, D., 2001: Global change – Time, money and tradeoffs. Nature, 410, 649– 650.
  56. Bravo, I., et al., 2010: Infrared absorption spectra, radiative efficiencies, and global warming potentials of perfluorocarbons: Comparison between experiment and theory. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115, D24317.
  57. Brovkin, V., et al., 2010: Sensitivity of a coupled climate-carbon cycle model to large volcanic eruptions during the last millennium. Tellus B, 62, 674–681. Calvin, K., et al., 2012: The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: Results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energ. Econ., 34, S251–S260.
  58. Campra, P., M. Garcia, Y. Canton, and A. Palacios-Orueta, 2008: Surface temperature cooling trends and negative radiative forcing due to land use change toward greenhouse farming in southeastern Spain. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113, D18109.
  59. Carlton, A. G., R. W. Pinder, P. V. Bhave, and G. A. Pouliot, 2010: To what extent can biogenic SOA be controlled? Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3376–3380.
  60. Carslaw, K. S., O. Boucher, D. V. Spracklen, G. W. Mann, J. G. L. Rae, S. Woodward, and M. Kulmala, 2010: A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1701–1737.
  61. Chang, W. Y., H. Liao, and H. J. Wang, 2009: Climate responses to direct radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols, tropospheric ozone, and long-lived greenhouse gases in Eastern China over 1951–2000. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 748– 762.
  62. Chen, W. T., A. Nenes, H. Liao, P. J. Adams, J. L. F. Li, and J. H. Seinfeld, 2010: Global climate response to anthropogenic aerosol indirect effects: Present day and year 2100. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115, D12207.
  63. Cherubini, F., G. Guest, and A. Strømman, 2012: Application of probablity distributions to the modelleing of biogenic CO2 fluxes in life cycle assessment. Global Change Biol. , 4, doi:10.1111/j.1757–1707.2011.01156.x, 784-798.
  64. Cherubini, F., G. Peters, T. Berntsen, A. Stromman, and E. Hertwich, 2011: CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: Atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. Global Change Biol. Bioenerg., 3, 413–426.
  65. Chung, C. E., and V. Ramanathan, 2006: Weakening of North Indian SST gradients and the monsoon rainfall in India and the Sahel. J. Clim., 19, 2036–2045.
  66. Clark, H. L., M. L. Cathala, H. Teyssedre, J. P. Cammas, and V. H. Peuch, 2007: Crosstropopause fluxes of ozone using assimilation of MOZAIC observations in a global CTM. Tellus B, 59, 39–49.
  67. Clarke, A. D., and K. J. Noone, 1985: Soot in the Arctic Snowpack—A cause for peturbations in radiative-transfer. Atmos. Environ., 19, 2045–2053.
  68. Claussen, M., V. Brovkin, and A. Ganopolski, 2001: Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks of large-scale land cover change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1011–1014.
  69. Cofala, J., M. Amann, Z. Klimont, K. Kupiainen, and L. Hoglund-Isaksson, 2007: Scenarios of global anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants and methane until 2030. Atmos. Environ., 41, 8486–8499.
  70. Collins, W., R. Derwent, C. Johnson, and D. Stevenson, 2002: The oxidation of organic compounds in the troposphere and their global warming potentials. Clim. Change, 52, 453–479.
  71. Collins, W. D., et al., 2006: Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: Estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 111, D14317.
  72. Collins, W. J., S. Sitch, and O. Boucher, 2010: How vegetation impacts affect climate metrics for ozone precursors. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115, D23308.
  73. Collins, W. J., M. M. Fry, H. Yu, J. S. Fuglestvedt, D. T. Shindell, and J. J. West, 2013: Global and regional temperature-change potentials for near-term climate forcers. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2471–2485.
  74. Conley, A. J., J. F. Lamarque, F. Vitt, W. D. Collins, and J. Kiehl, 2013: PORT, a CESM tool for the diagnosis of radiative forcing. Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 469–476.
  75. Cooper, O. R., et al., 2010: Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America. Nature, 463, 344–348.
  76. Cox, P. M., et al., 2008: Increasing risk of Amazonian drought due to decreasing aerosol pollution. Nature, 453, 212–215.
  77. Crook, J., and P. Forster, 2011: A balance between radiative forcing and climate feedback in the modeled 20th century temperature response. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D17108.
  78. Crowley, T. J., and M. B. Unterman, 2013: Technical details concerning development of a 1200 yr proxy index for global volcanism. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 187-197.
  79. Crutzen, P., 1973: Discussion of chemistry of some minor constituents in stratosphere and troposhere. Pure Appl. Geophys., 106, 1385–1399.
  80. Dahlmann, K., V. Grewe, M. Ponater, and S. Matthes, 2011: Quantifying the contributions of individual NOx sources to the trend in ozone radiative forcing. Atmos. Environ., 45, 2860–2868.
  81. Daniel, J., and S. Solomon, 1998: On the climate forcing of carbon monoxide. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 13249–13260.
  82. Daniel, J., S. Solomon, and D. Abritton, 1995: On the evaluation of halocarbon radiative forcing and global warming potentials. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 100, 1271–1285.
  83. Daniel, J., E. Fleming, R. Portmann, G. Velders, C. Jackman, and A. Ravishankara, 2010: Options to accelerate ozone recovery: Ozone and climate benefits. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7697–7707.
  84. Daniel, J., S. Solomon, T. Sanford, M. McFarland, J. Fuglestvedt, and P. Friedlingstein, 2012: Limitations of single-basket trading: Lessons from the Montreal Protocol for climate policy. Clim. Change, 111, 241–248.
  85. Davin, E., N. de Noblet-Ducoudre, and P. Friedlingstein, 2007: Impact of land cover change on surface climate: Relevance of the radiative forcing concept. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L13702.
  86. Davin, E. L., and N. de Noblet-Ducoudre, 2010: Climatic impact of global-scale deforestation: Radiative versus nonradiative orocesses. J. Clim., 23, 97–112.
  87. De Cara, S., E. Galko, and P. Jayet, 2008: The global warming potential paradox: Implications for the design of climate policy. In: Design of Climate Policy [R. Guesnerie and H. Tulkens (eds.)]. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 359– 384.
  88. de la Torre, L., et al., 2006: Solar influence on Northern Annular Mode spatial structure and QBO modulation. Part. Accel. Space Plasma Phys. Sol. Radiat. Earth. Atmos. Clim., 37, 1635–1639.
  89. de Noblet-Ducoudre, N., et al., 2012: Determining robust impacts of land-useinduced land cover changes on surface climate over North America and Eurasia: Results from the first set of LUCID experiments. J. Clim., 25, 3261–3281.
  90. DeAngelis, A., F. Dominguez, Y. Fan, A. Robock, M. D. Kustu, and D. Robinson, 2010: Evidence of enhanced precipitation due to irrigation over the Great Plains of the United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115, D15115.
  91. DeLand, M., and R. Cebula, 2012: Solar UV variations during the decline of Cycle 23. J. Atmos. Sol. Terres. Phys., 77, 225–234. Delaygue, G., and E. Bard, 2011: An Antarctic view of Beryllium-10 and solar activity for the past millennium. Clim. Dyn., 36, 2201–2218.
  92. Deligne, N. I., S. G. Coles, and R. S. J. Sparks, 2010: Recurrence rates of large explosive volcanic eruptions. J. Geophys. Res. Sol. Earth, 115, B06203.
  93. den Elzen, M., et al., 2005: Analysing countries’ contribution to climate change: Scientific and policy-related choices. Environ. Sci. Policy, 8, 614–636.
  94. Denman, K. L., et al., 2007: Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller (eds.)] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 499-587.
  95. Dentener, F., et al., 2006: The global atmospheric environment for the next generation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3586–3594.
  96. Derwent, R., W. Collins, C. Johnson, and D. Stevenson, 2001: Transient behaviour of tropospheric ozone precursors in a global 3-D CTM and their indirect greenhouse effects. Clim. Change, 49, 463–487.
  97. Deuber, O., G. Luderer, and O. Edenhofer, 2013: Physico-economic evaluation of climate metrics: A conceptual framework. Environ. Sci. Policy, 29, 37–45.
  98. Dewitte, S., D. Crommelynck, S. Mekaoui, and A. Joukoff, 2004: Measurement and uncertainty of the long-term total solar irradiance trend. Solar Phys., 224, 209– 216. Dickinson, R., 1975: Solar variability and lower atmosphere. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 56, 1240–1248.
  99. Doherty, S. J., S. G. Warren, T. C. Grenfell, A. D. Clarke, and R. E. Brandt, 2010: Lightabsorbing impurities in Arctic snow. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11647–11680.
  100. Doutriaux-Boucher, M., M. Webb, J. Gregory, and O. Boucher, 2009: Carbon dioxide induced stomatal closure increases radiative forcing via a rapid reduction in low cloud. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, doi:10.1029/2008GL036273, L02703.
  101. Ehhalt, D. H., and L. E. Heidt, 1973: Vertical profiles of CH4 in troposphere and stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 5265–5271.
  102. Eliseev, A. V., and I.I. Mokhov, 2011: Effect of including land-use driven radiative forcing of the surface albedo of land on climate response in the 16th-21st centuries. Izvestiya Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 47, 15–30.
  103. Engel, A., et al., 2009: Age of stratospheric air unchanged within uncertainties over the past 30 years. Nature Geosci., 2, 28–31.
  104. Erlykin, A., and A. Wolfendale, 2011: Cosmic ray effects on cloud cover and their relevance to climate change. J. Atmos. Sol. Terres. Phys., 73, 1681–1686.
  105. Ermolli, I., K. Matthes, T. Dudok de Wit, N. A. Krivova, K. Tourpali, M. Weber, Y. C. Unruh, L. Gray, U. Langematz, P. Pilewskie, E. Rozanov, W. Schmutz, A. Shapiro, S. K. Solanki, and T. N. Woods, 2013: Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 3945-3977.
  106. Esper, J., and F. H. Schweingruber, 2004: Large-scale treeline changes recorded in Siberia. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06202. Eyring, V., et al., 2010a: Sensitivity of 21st century stratospheric ozone to greenhouse gas scenarios. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L16807.
  107. Eyring, V., et al., 2010b: Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9451–9472.
  108. Fan, F. X., M. E. Mann, and C. M. Ammann, 2009: Understanding changes in the Asian summer monsoon over the past millennium: Insights from a long-term coupled model simulation. J. Clim., 22, 1736–1748. FAO, 2012: State of the world’s forests. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 60 pp.
  109. Feng, X., and F. Zhao, 2009: Effect of changes of the HITRAN database on transmittance calculations in the near-infrared region. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 110, 247–255.
  110. Feng, X., F. Zhao, and W. Gao, 2007: Effect of the improvement of the HITIRAN database on the radiative transfer calculation. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 108, 308–318.
  111. Findell, K. L., E. Shevliakova, P. C. D. Milly, and R. J. Stouffer, 2007: Modeled impact of anthropogenic land cover change on climate. J. Clim., 20, 3621–3634.
  112. Fioletov, V. E., G. E. Bodeker, A. J. Miller, R. D. McPeters, and R. Stolarski, 2002: Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground-based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 107, 4647.
  113. Fiore, A. M., et al., 2009: Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 114, D04301.
  114. Fischer, E. M., J. Luterbacher, E. Zorita, S. F. B. Tett, C. Casty, and H. Wanner, 2007: European climate response to tropical volcanic eruptions over the last half millennium. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L05707.
  115. Fishman, J., et al., 2010: An investigation of widespread ozone damage to the soybean crop in the upper Midwest determined from ground-based and satellite measurements. Atmos. Environ., 44, 2248–2256.
  116. Flanner, M. G., C. S. Zender, J. T. Randerson, and P. J. Rasch, 2007: Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, D11202.
  117. Fletcher, C. G., P. J. Kushner, A. Hall, and X. Qu, 2009: Circulation responses to snow albedo feedback in climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L09702.
  118. Fomin, B. A., and V. A. Falaleeva, 2009: Recent progress in spectroscopy and its effect on line-by-line calculations for the validation of radiation codes for climate models. Atmos. Oceanic Opt., 22, 626–629.
  119. Forster, P., and K. Shine, 1997: Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 102, 10841–10855.
  120. Forster, P., et al., 2005: Resolution of the uncertainties in the radiative forcing of HFC-134a. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 93, 447–460.
  121. Forster, P., et al., 2007: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller (eds.)] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 129-234.
  122. Forster, P., et al., 2011a: Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, D10302.
  123. Forster, P. M., T. Andrews, P. Good, J. M. Gregory, L. S. Jackson, and M. Zelinka, 2013: Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1139– 1150.
  124. Forster, P. M., et al., 2011b: Stratospheric changes and climate. In: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project–Report No. 52, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 516 pp.
  125. Fortuin, J. P. F., and H. Kelder, 1998: An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 103, 31709–31734.
  126. Foukal, P., and J. Lean, 1988: Magnetic modulation of solar luminosity by phtospheric activity. Astrophys. J., 328, 347–357.
  127. Fowler, D., et al., 2009: Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems-atmosphere interactions. Atmos. Environ., 43, 5193–5267.
  128. Frame, T., and L. Gray, 2010: The 11-yr solar cycle in ERA-40 data: An update to 2008. J. Clim., 23, 2213–2222.
  129. Freckleton, R., E. Highwood, K. Shine, O. Wild, K. Law, and M. Sanderson, 1998: Greenhouse gas radiative forcing: Effects of averaging and inhomogeneities in trace gas distribution. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 124, 2099–2127.
  130. Friedlingstein, P., et al., 2006: Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C(4)MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim., 19, 3337–3353.
  131. Frohlich, C., 2006: Solar irradiance variability since 1978—Revision of the PMOD composite during solar cycle 21. Space Sci. Rev., 125, 53–65.
  132. Frohlich, C., 2009: Evidence of a long-term trend in total solar irradiance. Astron. Astrophys., 501, L27–L30.
  133. Frolicher, T. L., F. Joos, and C. C. Raible, 2011: Sensitivity of atmospheric CO2 and climate to explosive volcanic eruptions. Biogeosciences, 8, 2317–2339.
  134. Fromm, M., G. Nedoluha, and Z. Charvat, 2013: Comment on “Large Volcanic Aerosol Load in the Stratosphere Linked to Asian Monsoon Transport”. Science, 339, 647–c.
  135. Fry, M., et al., 2012: The influence of ozone precursor emissions from four world regions on tropospheric composition and radiative climate forcing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 117, D07306.
  136. Fuglestvedt, J., T. Berntsen, O. Godal, and T. Skodvin, 2000: Climate implications of GWP-based reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 409–412.
  137. Fuglestvedt, J., T. Berntsen, O. Godal, R. Sausen, K. Shine, and T. Skodvin, 2003: Metrics of climate change: Assessing radiative forcing and emission indices. Clim. Change, 58, 267–331.
  138. Fuglestvedt, J. S., et al., 2010: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics. Atmos. Environ., 44, 4648–4677.
  139. Fung, I., J. John, J. Lerner, E. Matthews, M. Prather, L. P. Steele, and P. J. Fraser, 1991: 3-Dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 96, 13033–13065.
  140. Gaillard, M. J., et al., 2010: Holocene land-cover reconstructions for studies on land cover-climate feedbacks. Clim. Past, 6, 483–499.
  141. Gao, C. C., A. Robock, and C. Ammann, 2008: Volcanic forcing of climate over the past 1500 years: An improved ice core-based index for climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113, D23111.
  142. Garcia, R. R., W. J. Randel, and D. E. Kinnison, 2011: On the determination of age of air trends from atmospheric trace species. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 139–154.
  143. Gerlach, T., 2011: Volcanic versus anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Eos, 92, 201–202.
  144. Gettelman, A., J. Holton, and K. Rosenlof, 1997: Mass fluxes of O3, CH4, N2O and CF2Cl2 in the lower stratosphere calculated from observational data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 102, 19149–19159.
  145. Gillett, N., and H. Matthews, 2010: Accounting for carbon cycle feedbacks in a comparison of the global warming effects of greenhouse gases. Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 034011.
  146. Ginoux, P., D. Garbuzov, and N. C. Hsu, 2010: Identification of anthropogenic and natural dust sources using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue level 2 data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115, D05204.
  147. Godal, O., and J. Fuglestvedt, 2002: Testing 100-year global warming potentials: Impacts on compliance costs and abatement profile. Clim. Change, 52, 93–127.
  148. Goosse, H., et al., 2006: The origin of the European “Medieval Warm Period”. Clim. Past, 2, 99–113.
  149. Granier, C., et al., 2011: Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period. Clim. Change, 109, 163–190.
  150. Gray, L., S. Rumbold, and K. Shine, 2009: Stratospheric temperature and radiative forcing response to 11-year solar cycle changes in irradiance and ozone. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2402–2417.
  151. Gray, L., et al., 2010: Solar influences on climate. Rev. Geophys., 48, RG4001. Gregory, J., and M. Webb, 2008: Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J. Clim., 21, 58–71.
  152. Gregory, J., et al., 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L03205.
  153. Gregory, J. M., 2010: Long-term effect of volcanic forcing on ocean heat content. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22701.
  154. Grewe, V., 2007: Impact of climate variability on tropospheric ozone. Sci. Tot. Environ., 374, 167–181. Gusev, A. A., 2008: Temporal structure of the global sequence of volcanic eruptions: Order clustering and intermittent discharge rate. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 166, 203–218.
you still don't get it. it is truly amazing how fking stupid you really are. A piece of advice you fking idiot, take one of those papers/ books and post the material from it that backs your idiotic claim. that's how we do it in the forum here. I wish the mods would bust your fking sorry ass for this kind of trollish crap.
 
so to keep on topic, I've asked for you to forward out of one document of your post the language, or start of the report that backs your claim. It's what each of us has asked you and you have failed. no other reason for me to lie about it since the evidence is a plenty in here. You don't post any quoted reference from a link you provide because the references aren't there. There is no need to open up a link for a wild goose chase like you are inferring.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When I make a claim, I provide the actual paper...author, publication, title, and a link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha

So lets see the published paper from your IPCC steaming pile where the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and ascribe to so called greenhouse gasses.....or lets see a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural vairiability...

What's that laughing boy? Can't provide any because there is none there? That's what I thought.


Let's see a paper supporting ANYTHING you've ever claimed. Can anyone out there recall a single paper to which SSDD has ever linked? Anyone?

As for me, let's see if this strikes a familiar chord "The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch.
 
When I make a claim, I provide the actual paper...author, publication, title, and a link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha

So lets see the published paper from your IPCC steaming pile where the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and ascribe to so called greenhouse gasses.....or lets see a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural vairiability...

What's that laughing boy? Can't provide any because there is none there? That's what I thought.


Let's see a paper supporting ANYTHING you've ever claimed. Can anyone out there recall a single paper to which SSDD has ever linked? Anyone?

As for me, let's see if this strikes a familiar chord "The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch.

He used to link to lots of things.
He stopped, because his links always refuted his claims.
 
Let's see a paper supporting ANYTHING you've ever claimed. Can anyone out there recall a single paper to which SSDD has ever linked? Anyone?

You really aren't very bright are you? My claim is that there has never been a paper published in which the so called warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified and blamed on so called greenhouse gasses...You want me to post a link to a paper that has never been published? Ok..here it is...

As for me, let's see if this strikes a familiar chord "The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch.

Sorry skidmark.....when I do post papers to support my position, I provide the title of the paper..the author...and a link to the specific paper...not some vague link to somewhere in hopes that you might find something....If I did that, I would be as dishonest as you.

And you are a bald faced, abject liar...the claim that I have never linked to a single paper is one of the largest lies you have ever told...Here...within the past few days, you lying piece of excrement......

CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"

And those are just from one thread....what some more liar?

The "OZONE HOLE" scam was the pre-curser to the Global Warmists movement.
The "OZONE HOLE" scam was the pre-curser to the Global Warmists movement.
The "OZONE HOLE" scam was the pre-curser to the Global Warmists movement.

Tell me skidmark....what's it like to be the biggest liar on the board?
 
When I make a claim, I provide the actual paper...author, publication, title, and a link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha

So lets see the published paper from your IPCC steaming pile where the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and ascribe to so called greenhouse gasses.....or lets see a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural vairiability...

What's that laughing boy? Can't provide any because there is none there? That's what I thought.


Let's see a paper supporting ANYTHING you've ever claimed. Can anyone out there recall a single paper to which SSDD has ever linked? Anyone?

As for me, let's see if this strikes a familiar chord "The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch.
what does this have to do with humans supposedly causing global warming? I didn't see anything in the link. go another?
 
When I make a claim, I provide the actual paper...author, publication, title, and a link

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha

So lets see the published paper from your IPCC steaming pile where the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified, and ascribe to so called greenhouse gasses.....or lets see a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural vairiability...

What's that laughing boy? Can't provide any because there is none there? That's what I thought.


Let's see a paper supporting ANYTHING you've ever claimed. Can anyone out there recall a single paper to which SSDD has ever linked? Anyone?

As for me, let's see if this strikes a familiar chord "The Physical Science Basis" at www.ipcc.ch.
what does this have to do with humans supposedly causing global warming? I didn't see anything in the link. go another?

He likes to call other people trolls, but he has become one of the biggest trolls on the board...
 
And you are a bald faced, abject liar...the claim that I have never linked to a single paper is one of the largest lies you have ever told...Here...within the past few days, you lying piece of excrement......

CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"

None of which are in this forum. They are in a forum I had NEVER entered before you put up these links. So, bullshit.


How many times did I say that everything you were claiming to know about natural factors that depleted ozone came from research you later claimed did not exist?

And how many times did I say that the data on natural ozone depleting mechanisms - that you yourself had posted - showed NO CORRELATION with the growth of the holes in the ozone layer? These links prove exactly that.

You come here for no other reason than to entertain yourself by finding people stupid enough to believe your crapola and pissing off people who know it for what it is.

You are NOTHING but a

TROLL
 
And you are a bald faced, abject liar...the claim that I have never linked to a single paper is one of the largest lies you have ever told...Here...within the past few days, you lying piece of excrement......

CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"
CDZ - Questions regarding "Climate Change"

None of which are in this forum. They are in a forum I had NEVER entered before you put up these links. So, bullshit.


How many times did I say that everything you were claiming to know about natural factors that depleted ozone came from research you later claimed did not exist?

And how many times did I say that the data on natural ozone depleting mechanisms - that you yourself had posted - showed NO CORRELATION with the growth of the holes in the ozone layer? These links prove exactly that.

You come here for no other reason than to entertain yourself by finding people stupid enough to believe your crapola and pissing off people who know it for what it is.

You are NOTHING but a

TROLL

Got your panties in a twist over being proven to be a big fat liar skidmark? Like I said, when I reference information, I give you everything you need to go directly to the specific paper...unlike you who gives a vague address simply hoping that people might find something...we both know that there is nothing there that would satisfy my request for evidence but you just keep telling the lie over and over...
 
PS: Researchgate does not require peer review

We know humans are causing global warming because GHGs are the primary cause of the warming observed for the past 150 years and, in particular, the last 50. Isotopic analysis and simple bookkeeping tells us that humans are the source of virtually every molecule of GHGs above pre-industrial levels.
 
PS: Researchgate does not require peer review

We know humans are causing global warming because GHGs are the primary cause of the warming observed for the past 150 years and, in particular, the last 50. Isotopic analysis and simple bookkeeping tells us that humans are the source of virtually every molecule of GHGs above pre-industrial levels.


And yet there hasn't been a single paper published in which the claimed warming due to our activities has been empirically measured, quantified and blamed on so called greenhouse gasses...so exactly how do we "know" any such thing...and there isn't the first piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the claim that the present climate is in any way different from natural variability...

Just more unsupportable bullshit claims from the biggest liar on the board...
 
I demand you provide a study that proves through verified, certified, guaranteed, double-blind, secret-handshake, empircal observations with eyes and noses and tongues and ears that CO2 does not grow warmer when it absorbs IR radiation and that it cannot transfer thermal energy to other molecules via conduction and that photons refuse to travel from warm to cold and that our atmosphere is held in place by the Earth's magnetic field.

If you can't do that, then you must be a fucking

TROLL
 
I demand you provide a study that proves through verified, certified, guaranteed, double-blind, secret-handshake, empircal observations with eyes and noses and tongues and ears that CO2 does not grow warmer when it absorbs IR radiation and that it cannot transfer thermal energy to other molecules via conduction and that photons refuse to travel from warm to cold and that our atmosphere is held in place by the Earth's magnetic field.

If you can't do that, then you must be a fucking

TROLL

You are the one claiming that it does...the burden of evidence is on you...and children's experiments that are good enough to fool you aren't evidence..You asked for a study that proves through verified, certified, guaranteed, double-blind, secret-handshake, empircal observations with eyes and noses and tongues and ears that CO2 does not grow warmer when it absorbs IR radiation...adhere to your own standards and provide such a study that says that it does, and provides the actual empirical evidence to support the claim..

And when did I ever say that a CO2 molecule doesn't lose energy to other molecules...it is, in fact, my argument that it does...which is why there can be no radiative greenhouse effect as described by climate science....do you ever stop lying? Do you even know that you are lying when you do it?

You continue to make my point by not providing any actual evidence to support your claims...
 
Last edited:
You've dug your well here when you decided to claim you were smarter than all the world's scientists put together. To do that clearly, you had to put out something different than their conclusions. That required you put out crap that, as has been shown, violates all manner of fundamental physical laws. You stick to it because you're a troll and that's what trolls do.

A good first step would be for you to admit all that. A good second step would be one in a direction away from this forum.
 

Forum List

Back
Top