How EVIL is liberalism anyway?

Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism

Here is the problem - being the typical, uneducated, high school drop-out liberal that you are, you truly have no idea what "Stalinism" is. I guarantee you don't even know who it was (except you're going to Google it right now and pretend). I've yet to meet a liberal who had the slightest clue about history, which is why you moron's are doomed to repeat it. It's why you dummies keep employing the same failed policies and then sit around scratching your heads trying to figure out why you keep getting the same failed results.

WooooOooooo, brave words from an asshat who doesn't know what "Liberal" means. The same clown who tried to tell this board that the difference between right and left is how big the government is... :
rofl.gif

Today "liberalism" means Stalinism. In the 18th century it meant capitalism and the market economy.
 
No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)

Ohhh...so now you want an education on climate change? Ok. Here you go junior. This is packed full of more indisputable and undeniable facts than you could ever be capable of absorbing (but hey, it's a good start for you anyway)...

England Court PROVES "climate change" is a FARCE

It's not possible to "prove" that, stupid. Nobody exists who's old enough.

What a maroon.

So then, all your claims that AGW is true are bogus?
 
I agree with you. Nobody (including government functionaries) has a right to initiate violence. Violence is ONLY justified when/if someone trespasses against someone's person or property.

The Democrat Party has been completely and totally hijacked by communists/socialists/marxists. Hell, they even have someone running for president now who admits he is running as a socialist.

And like all communists, the freak out at the thought of the American people hearing any idea or policy that doesn't align with communism. So they turn to violence to prevent people from hearing Trump and to prevent Trump from speaking. I was truly amazed at the restraint Trump fans showed at his rally in (Arizona?) when they not only blocked the roads but jumped on the hood of people's vehicles. The first unemployed, parasite, a-hole liberal that jumps on my hood, I gun it and mow every one of those dirt-bags down. The fact is, they are were completely justified because those a-hole parasite liberals surrounded the vehicles with aggression - any rational person would have been concerned for their own life and safety.

Kudos to all of those Trump supporters. The restraint they showed was amazing. I refuse to hesitate like that - it could cost you your life (not to mention the damage to their vehicles).
 
I agree with you. Nobody (including government functionaries) has a right to initiate violence. Violence is ONLY justified when/if someone trespasses against someone's person or property.

The Democrat Party has been completely and totally hijacked by communists/socialists/marxists. Hell, they even have someone running for president now who admits he is running as a socialist.

And like all communists, the freak out at the thought of the American people hearing any idea or policy that doesn't align with communism. So they turn to violence to prevent people from hearing Trump and to prevent Trump from speaking. I was truly amazed at the restraint Trump fans showed at his rally in (Arizona?) when they not only blocked the roads but jumped on the hood of people's vehicles. The first unemployed, parasite, a-hole liberal that jumps on my hood, I gun it and mow every one of those dirt-bags down. The fact is, they are were completely justified because those a-hole parasite liberals surrounded the vehicles with aggression - any rational person would have been concerned for their own life and safety.

Kudos to all of those Trump supporters. The restraint they showed was amazing. I refuse to hesitate like that - it could cost you your life (not to mention the damage to their vehicles).

Yep, the authoritarians need to win, so they can take the property of their fellow man. All they know is steal and enslave. It's like dealing with Ghengis Khan. All they know is violence.
 
Moving the goal posts are we?

No, not a bit. Did I post an example of Stalinism or not?
No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)
Calling it a con.

Whether it's a con or not is irrelevant to my point.

Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism.
All your shit fails the credibility test.
Quit while you're behind.
Asshole.

The fines incurred? What the hell does that mean? State AGs are trying to prosecute people merely for stating an opinion. That is the essence of Stalinism. Anyone who supports it, as you obviously do, is a Stalinist piece of shit.

When I get behind, I'll let you know. I've been watching you in my rear view mirror for miles and miles, Stalin.
Your whole point is its a con job.
If you are conceding it's not a con job then all your whining is meaningless, making the prosecution of offenders legal.
None of what you claim to be Stalinism is .
You lost before you started.

No, my point is that left wingers are Stalinists because they always try to criminalize any dispute with their idiocies.

What law did the "offenders" break? When did disputing scientific theories become a crime? Only a Stalinist would believe people should be prosecuted for expressing an opinion. There isn't the slightest thing legal about the government pissing on the First Amendment.

You're a Stalinist left wing douche bag who enjoys pissing on the Bill of Rights.
your argument is also based on willfully misrepresentation
As this link proves

http://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652

The 1st Amendment is in no way being pissed on .
 
No, not a bit. Did I post an example of Stalinism or not?
No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)
Calling it a con.

Whether it's a con or not is irrelevant to my point.

Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism.
All your shit fails the credibility test.
Quit while you're behind.
Asshole.

The fines incurred? What the hell does that mean? State AGs are trying to prosecute people merely for stating an opinion. That is the essence of Stalinism. Anyone who supports it, as you obviously do, is a Stalinist piece of shit.

When I get behind, I'll let you know. I've been watching you in my rear view mirror for miles and miles, Stalin.
Your whole point is its a con job.
If you are conceding it's not a con job then all your whining is meaningless, making the prosecution of offenders legal.
None of what you claim to be Stalinism is .
You lost before you started.

No, my point is that left wingers are Stalinists because they always try to criminalize any dispute with their idiocies.

What law did the "offenders" break? When did disputing scientific theories become a crime? Only a Stalinist would believe people should be prosecuted for expressing an opinion. There isn't the slightest thing legal about the government pissing on the First Amendment.

You're a Stalinist left wing douche bag who enjoys pissing on the Bill of Rights.
your argument is also based on willfully misrepresentation
As this link proves

http://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652

The 1st Amendment is in no way being pissed on .

ROFL! Your article doesn't support your position, moron. It supports mine. You should try reading stuff before you post links to it.

Of course the 1st Amendment is being pissed on. Criticism of scientific theories is clearly protected by the First Amendment. Any attempt by government to prosecute people for doing so is a fucking douche bag Stalinist piece of shit. No one is surprised that you support such behavior.
 
Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism

Here is the problem - being the typical, uneducated, high school drop-out liberal that you are, you truly have no idea what "Stalinism" is. I guarantee you don't even know who it was (except you're going to Google it right now and pretend). I've yet to meet a liberal who had the slightest clue about history, which is why you moron's are doomed to repeat it. It's why you dummies keep employing the same failed policies and then sit around scratching your heads trying to figure out why you keep getting the same failed results.
You couldn't be more wrong every assumption/ accusations you've made about me and liberals in general is false.
I've forgotten more about history .
Politcs, and just about everything than you could ever know.
 
No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)

Ohhh...so now you want an education on climate change? Ok. Here you go junior. This is packed full of more indisputable and undeniable facts than you could ever be capable of absorbing (but hey, it's a good start for you anyway)...

England Court PROVES "climate change" is a FARCE
None of the sources you linked are scientifically credible, in the three years since you posted that bullshit nothing changed.
 
No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)

Ohhh...so now you want an education on climate change? Ok. Here you go junior. This is packed full of more indisputable and undeniable facts than you could ever be capable of absorbing (but hey, it's a good start for you anyway)...

England Court PROVES "climate change" is a FARCE

It's not possible to "prove" that, stupid. Nobody exists who's old enough.

What a maroon.

So then, all your claims that AGW is true are bogus?
Could you be any less ignorant?
 
No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)
Calling it a con.

Whether it's a con or not is irrelevant to my point.

Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism.
All your shit fails the credibility test.
Quit while you're behind.
Asshole.

The fines incurred? What the hell does that mean? State AGs are trying to prosecute people merely for stating an opinion. That is the essence of Stalinism. Anyone who supports it, as you obviously do, is a Stalinist piece of shit.

When I get behind, I'll let you know. I've been watching you in my rear view mirror for miles and miles, Stalin.
Your whole point is its a con job.
If you are conceding it's not a con job then all your whining is meaningless, making the prosecution of offenders legal.
None of what you claim to be Stalinism is .
You lost before you started.

No, my point is that left wingers are Stalinists because they always try to criminalize any dispute with their idiocies.

What law did the "offenders" break? When did disputing scientific theories become a crime? Only a Stalinist would believe people should be prosecuted for expressing an opinion. There isn't the slightest thing legal about the government pissing on the First Amendment.

You're a Stalinist left wing douche bag who enjoys pissing on the Bill of Rights.
your argument is also based on willfully misrepresentation
As this link proves

http://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652

The 1st Amendment is in no way being pissed on .

ROFL! Your article doesn't support your position, moron. It supports mine. You should try reading stuff before you post links to it.

Of course the 1st Amendment is being pissed on. Criticism of scientific theories is clearly protected by the First Amendment. Any attempt by government to prosecute people for doing so is a fucking douche bag Stalinist piece of shit. No one is surprised that you support such behavior.
It does? post where in the article it does .
Who is no one?
 
When is the last time conservatives won a major victory in advancing the conservative agenda?

You mean other than the rise of the Tea Party (the first true conservatism since the Ronald Reagan administration). You mean other than the House of Representatives going from a liberal super-majority to a conservative majority? You mean other than Nancy Pelosi being forced to hand the gavel over, and then getting such monumental conservative victory that even RINO John Boehner was forced out by the right and replaced with true conservative Paul Ryan? You mean other than the liberals being forced out of the Senate and being handed over to the Tea Party? You mean other than the biggest political beat down in U.S. history in 2010 when governors, mayors, city councils, etc. were turned over to Tea Party candidates (even radical left wing states like Wisconsin - turned over to Walker - and Michigan, being turned over to conservatives)? You mean other than people like Rand Paul (Tea Party) leaving private practice to run for office the first time ever and not only winning, but being appointed to major positions like the Senate? You mean other than North Carolina and South Dakota passing legislation preventing the type of sexual predators and crimes against children that you support and which arouse you? Gee....I don't know NY....if only I could think of a "major victory" advancing the "conservative agenda" :lmao:

I'm referring to actual legislation advancing the actual conservative agenda.
 
This is how evil liberalism is...

On a break during a business trip to Washington last year, David Panton hailed a cab to take him to the Capitol. He told the driver he was going to see the Texas senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

“He’s racist,” the cabdriver replied, according to Mr. Panton.

Mr. Panton, taken aback, informed his driver that Mr. Cruz had a bust of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the right side of his desk, that he was the only senator to attend the funeral of Nelson Mandela and that he had a “black guy” as a college roommate and best man at his wedding.


“I don’t believe that,” the cabby said, as Mr. Panton tells it.

“Well,” Mr. Panton replied, “you’re talking to him"


This is the essence of liberalism. Completely ignorant of all facts, of all reality, without any knowledge of the person, they attempt to ruin their reputation and career with very serious accusations (racism).

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/ted-cruz-college-roommate.html?_r=0
 
Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism

Here is the problem - being the typical, uneducated, high school drop-out liberal that you are, you truly have no idea what "Stalinism" is. I guarantee you don't even know who it was (except you're going to Google it right now and pretend). I've yet to meet a liberal who had the slightest clue about history, which is why you moron's are doomed to repeat it. It's why you dummies keep employing the same failed policies and then sit around scratching your heads trying to figure out why you keep getting the same failed results.

There are plenty of liberals in this forum who claim the USSR wasn't socialist. That's how deluded and ignorant they are.

Name five and link to their quotes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top