How EVIL is liberalism anyway?

[daws101]

This is how evil liberalism is...

On a break during a business trip to Washington last year, David Panton hailed a cab to take him to the Capitol. He told the driver he was going to see the Texas senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

“He’s racist,” the cabdriver replied, according to Mr. Panton.

Mr. Panton, taken aback, informed his driver that Mr. Cruz had a bust of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the right side of his desk, that he was the only senator to attend the funeral of Nelson Mandela and that he had a “black guy” as a college roommate and best man at his wedding.

“I don’t believe that,” the cabby said, as Mr. Panton tells it.

“Well,” Mr. Panton replied, “you’re talking to him"

This is the essence of liberalism. Completely ignorant of all facts, of all reality, without any knowledge of the person, they attempt to ruin their reputation and career with very serious accusations (racism).

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/ted-cruz-college-roommate.html?_r=0

How is this Germaine?

 

[P@triot]

When is the last time conservatives won a major victory in advancing the conservative agenda?

You mean other than the rise of the Tea Party (the first true conservatism since the Ronald Reagan administration). You mean other than the House of Representatives going from a liberal super-majority to a conservative majority? You mean other than Nancy Pelosi being forced to hand the gavel over, and then getting such monumental conservative victory that even RINO John Boehner was forced out by the right and replaced with true conservative Paul Ryan? You mean other than the liberals being forced out of the Senate and being handed over to the Tea Party? You mean other than the biggest political beat down in U.S. history in 2010 when governors, mayors, city councils, etc. were turned over to Tea Party candidates (even radical left wing states like Wisconsin - turned over to Walker - and Michigan, being turned over to conservatives)? You mean other than people like Rand Paul (Tea Party) leaving private practice to run for office the first time ever and not only winning, but being appointed to major positions like the Senate? You mean other than North Carolina and South Dakota passing legislation preventing the type of sexual predators and crimes against children that you support and which arouse you? Gee....I don't know NY....if only I could think of a "major victory" advancing the "conservative agenda"

I'm referring to actual legislation advancing the actual conservative agenda.

Moving the goal posts now?

Well, I already mentioned the North Carolina and South Dakota laws. There have also been a slew of religious liberty laws (Mississippi, Georgia, etc.). Planned Parenthood funding has been decimated around the nation - to the point where some states have even a single Planned Parenthood facility in operation. Wisconsin, Michigan, West Virginia and more have passed "Right to Work" legislation ending the racketeering and coercion of unions. And then there is this little gem:

Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th Time Since 2012

Is that enough for you, or are you going to move the goalposts yet again?

 

[Rustic]

By any reasonable measure of evil,

what is evil about liberalism? Be specific.

It breeds control freaks....

That is baseless platitude.

The charge was to be specific.

Na, not really.
Never heard of a liberal not wanting to control what other people think/do... Lol

 

[Bob Blaylock]

This is how evil liberalism is...

·
·
·​

This is the essence of liberalism. Completely ignorant of all facts, of all reality, without any knowledge of the person, they attempt to ruin their reputation and career with very serious accusations (racism).

They try, but I don't think it works nearly as well as it used to. Like the classic Æsop fable about the boy who cried “Wolf!”, liberals have cried “Racist!” or “Bigot!” soften and so frivolously, that nobody gives any credence to it any more.

 

[P@triot]

Ayn Rand was an idiot.

Any quote of Ayn Rand is a tale told by an idiot.

The funny thing about liberal responses like this - they can't articulate why Ayn Rand is (quote) "an idiot". Because, like everything else, they have no facts. Outside of a few inaccurate liberal talking points, they couldn't tel you a single thing about Ayn Rand.

 

[Rustic]

 

[Rustic]

 

[daws101]

Ayn Rand was an idiot.

Any quote of Ayn Rand is a tale told by an idiot.

As homophobic as th

This is how evil liberalism is...

·
·
·​

This is the essence of liberalism. Completely ignorant of all facts, of all reality, without any knowledge of the person, they attempt to ruin their reputation and career with very serious accusations (racism).

They try, but I don't think it works nearly as well as it used to. Like the classic Æsop fable about the boy who cried “Wolf!”, liberals have cried “Racist!” or “Bigot!” soften and so frivolously, that nobody gives any credence to it any more.

Who's nobody?
You must mean people who deny it under any circumstances.

 

[Rustic]

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is how evil liberalism is...

On a break during a business trip to Washington last year, David Panton hailed a cab to take him to the Capitol. He told the driver he was going to see the Texas senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

“He’s racist,” the cabdriver replied, according to Mr. Panton.

Mr. Panton, taken aback, informed his driver that Mr. Cruz had a bust of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the right side of his desk, that he was the only senator to attend the funeral of Nelson Mandela and that he had a “black guy” as a college roommate and best man at his wedding.

“I don’t believe that,” the cabby said, as Mr. Panton tells it.

“Well,” Mr. Panton replied, “you’re talking to him"

This is the essence of liberalism. Completely ignorant of all facts, of all reality, without any knowledge of the person, they attempt to ruin their reputation and career with very serious accusations (racism).

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/ted-cruz-college-roommate.html?_r=0

Conservatism is evil because Tim McVeigh blew up the federal building in Oklahoma.

Want to keep playing this game?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Adults debate with words, preferably in complete sentences.

 

[P@triot]

By any reasonable measure of evil,

what is evil about liberalism? Be specific.

The fact that they violate the U.S. Constitution and other laws is evil. The fact they desire power and control over other is evil. The fact that they bear false witness and will ruin the reputation, career, and life of an individual by falsely calling them "racist" or "bigot" or "homophobic" is pure evil. The fact that they were never taught by their mommy and daddy (probably because liberal parents are absent parents who don't take care of their children) that stealing is wrong is evil. The fact that liberals believe it's ok to be a parasite on society and never produce anything in return for society is evil.

Is that enough for you NY or will you just pretend like none of that counts and then move the goal posts again?

 

[Rustic]

 

[bripat9643]

No you posted an opinion based on ignorance about AGW (climate change)

Ohhh...so now you want an education on climate change? Ok. Here you go junior. This is packed full of more indisputable and undeniable facts than you could ever be capable of absorbing (but hey, it's a good start for you anyway)...

England Court PROVES "climate change" is a FARCE

It's not possible to "prove" that, stupid. Nobody exists who's old enough.

What a maroon.

So then, all your claims that AGW is true are bogus?

Could you be any less ignorant?

You just said that it's not possible to prove that AGW is a farce. If that's the case, then it's also not possible to prove that it's not a farce.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism

Here is the problem - being the typical, uneducated, high school drop-out liberal that you are, you truly have no idea what "Stalinism" is. I guarantee you don't even know who it was (except you're going to Google it right now and pretend). I've yet to meet a liberal who had the slightest clue about history, which is why you moron's are doomed to repeat it. It's why you dummies keep employing the same failed policies and then sit around scratching your heads trying to figure out why you keep getting the same failed results.

WooooOooooo, brave words from an asshat who doesn't know what "Liberal" means. The same clown who tried to tell this board that the difference between right and left is how big the government is... :

Today "liberalism" means Stalinism. In the 18th century it meant capitalism and the market economy.

How many American liberals of any consequence can you name that you can prove support a dictatorship where no one is allowed private property and no one can run a private business?

 

[P@triot]

This is how evil liberalism is...

On a break during a business trip to Washington last year, David Panton hailed a cab to take him to the Capitol. He told the driver he was going to see the Texas senator and presidential candidate Ted Cruz.

“He’s racist,” the cabdriver replied, according to Mr. Panton.

Mr. Panton, taken aback, informed his driver that Mr. Cruz had a bust of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. on the right side of his desk, that he was the only senator to attend the funeral of Nelson Mandela and that he had a “black guy” as a college roommate and best man at his wedding.

“I don’t believe that,” the cabby said, as Mr. Panton tells it.

“Well,” Mr. Panton replied, “you’re talking to him"

This is the essence of liberalism. Completely ignorant of all facts, of all reality, without any knowledge of the person, they attempt to ruin their reputation and career with very serious accusations (racism).

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/ted-cruz-college-roommate.html?_r=0

Conservatism is evil because Tim McVeigh blew up the federal building in Oklahoma.

Want to keep playing this game?

Except that Tim McVeigh was an extremely rare lone wolf, while liberals falsely screaming "racist", "bigot", or "homophobe" is universal, rampant, and systemic. Happens dozens of times per minute just on this board alone.

Would you like another shot at this NY?

 

[NYcarbineer]

By any reasonable measure of evil,

what is evil about liberalism? Be specific.

The fact that they violate the U.S. Constitution and other laws is evil. The fact they desire power and control over other is evil. The fact that they bear false witness and will ruin the reputation, career, and life of an individual by falsely calling them "racist" or "bigot" or "homophobic" is pure evil. The fact that they were never taught by their mommy and daddy (probably because liberal parents are absent parents who don't take care of their children) that stealing is wrong is evil. The fact that liberals believe it's ok to be a parasite on society and never produce anything in return for society is evil.

Is that enough for you NY or will you just pretend like none of that counts and then move the goal posts again?

All of what you've just say is unsubstantiated, baseless, garbage.

 

[bripat9643]

Whether it's a con or not is irrelevant to my point.

The fines incurred? What the hell does that mean? State AGs are trying to prosecute people merely for stating an opinion. That is the essence of Stalinism. Anyone who supports it, as you obviously do, is a Stalinist piece of shit.

When I get behind, I'll let you know. I've been watching you in my rear view mirror for miles and miles, Stalin.

Your whole point is its a con job.
If you are conceding it's not a con job then all your whining is meaningless, making the prosecution of offenders legal.
None of what you claim to be Stalinism is .
You lost before you started.

No, my point is that left wingers are Stalinists because they always try to criminalize any dispute with their idiocies.

What law did the "offenders" break? When did disputing scientific theories become a crime? Only a Stalinist would believe people should be prosecuted for expressing an opinion. There isn't the slightest thing legal about the government pissing on the First Amendment.

You're a Stalinist left wing douche bag who enjoys pissing on the Bill of Rights.

your argument is also based on willfully misrepresentation
As this link proves

http://www.newsweek.com/should-climate-change-deniers-be-prosecuted-378652

The 1st Amendment is in no way being pissed on .

ROFL! Your article doesn't support your position, moron. It supports mine. You should try reading stuff before you post links to it.

Of course the 1st Amendment is being pissed on. Criticism of scientific theories is clearly protected by the First Amendment. Any attempt by government to prosecute people for doing so is a fucking douche bag Stalinist piece of shit. No one is surprised that you support such behavior.

It does? post where in the article it does .
Who is no one?

It is not clear that all the scientists who signed the letter have thought carefully about the tension between what they are asking and the continuing freedom to pursue lines of inquiry in public debate that the government may find unwelcome or unreasonable. “I have no idea how it affects the First Amendment,” says one Vermont scientist who backs the probe, quoted by Bruce Parker of Vermont Watchdog.

In a companion piece, Parker interviewed me about the constitutional implications of this extremely bad idea. (I should note that when I discuss RICO in the interview transcript, I’m referring to the civil-litigation side of the law, so-called civil RICO, which seems to be the part of the law the advocates hope to use.)

It is remarkable how many advocates of this scheme seem to imagine that the First Amendment protects only truthful speech and thus (they think) has no application here because climate skepticism is false.​

 

[P@triot]

Then claiming the fines incurred for adding to are Stalinism

Here is the problem - being the typical, uneducated, high school drop-out liberal that you are, you truly have no idea what "Stalinism" is. I guarantee you don't even know who it was (except you're going to Google it right now and pretend). I've yet to meet a liberal who had the slightest clue about history, which is why you moron's are doomed to repeat it. It's why you dummies keep employing the same failed policies and then sit around scratching your heads trying to figure out why you keep getting the same failed results.

WooooOooooo, brave words from an asshat who doesn't know what "Liberal" means. The same clown who tried to tell this board that the difference between right and left is how big the government is... :

Today "liberalism" means Stalinism. In the 18th century it meant capitalism and the market economy.

How many American liberals of any consequence can you name that you can prove support a dictatorship where no one is allowed private property and no one can run a private business?

Barack Obama. Nancy Pelosi. Harry Reid. Hillary Clinton. Bernie Sanders. Maxine Waters...

 

[bripat9643]

Ayn Rand was an idiot.

Any quote of Ayn Rand is a tale told by an idiot.

What an ignominious douche bag you are. Rand was a genius.