debbiedowner
Gold Member
- Feb 12, 2017
- 12,279
- 3,286
- 275
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:
Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school
"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:
Screenshot: "
OOoops!!!
i am talking about her therapist & her husband.
oopsie.
You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.
They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.
lol... the FBI can very well prove her nuts.... not until president pussy grabber gives the OK.
The FBI has stated they will NOT investigate Kavanaugh because it is not a federal crime and exceeds the statute of limitations.
Breaking: FBI Will Not Investigate Christine Ford 36-Year-Old ever-Changing Allegations of Abuse
And you are the first conservative on this board to join me in this assessment.
I got crucified pre election for constantly pointing this out.
One thing I have noticed about this board is your values, no matter which side, are secondary to group think.
No, one of them totally contradicted what Blasey said:
Woman claimed in now-deleted tweet to have gone to school with Christine Blasey Ford and said the ‘incident was spoken about for days’ in school
"In a now-deleted tweet, a woman named Cristina King Miranda, responding to actress Julia Louis-Dreyfus regarding the letter circulated by alumnae of the Holton Arms school in Maryland, says she remembers Christine Blasey Ford, “knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge,” and that the “incident was spoken about for days afterwords [sic] in school”:
Screenshot: "
OOoops!!!
i am talking about her therapist & her husband.
oopsie.
You are going to ignore the lies surrounding the accusations. Blasey.. She is NUTS for insisting the FBI investigate it, when that idea blew up on Anita Hill's face, when they said after 3 days that her claims were UNFOUNDED.
They are deliberately STALLING hoping to avoid the next Monday testimony where she will be destroyed over her inconsistent claims.
lol... the FBI can very well prove her nuts.... not until president pussy grabber gives the OK.
The FBI has stated they will NOT investigate Kavanaugh because it is not a federal crime and exceeds the statute of limitations.
Breaking: FBI Will Not Investigate Christine Ford 36-Year-Old ever-Changing Allegations of Abuse
so no actual FBI official on camera saying it. & no google search for it turns up nothing either. the FBI can't actually do anything unless trump says so. & he won't.
at least 6The FBI already said they couldn’t. A. You can’t investigate something you don’t have a date, or time, specific location, any wittnesses present during the time, that was also 36 years ago. B. It’s not even an FBI matter, it’s a state matter.No no no, she has a lie detector test saying that the reported statement is correct, as in, in line with the letter to fienstien. With lie detector tests, they’ll ask the same question in a few different ways, as well as the control questions. The question posed is a sneaky little lawyer trick. I think it’s telling that that was the only question offered to the public, or if that was the only question operator asked her on the subject.she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
And she has one person backing up her account, that would be her husband, who got it second hand from her. And the other (who is also a second hand source) contradicts her account, with notes from the time she heard this second hand account (I think the therapy session was in 2012), vs the husbands memory of the session.
That’s some murky water there. Especially considering that she is not offering a date of the event, or the location of the event. With those two items one could at least attempt to verify/corroborate the story, (or in kavanaughs case) try to vindicate himself on the matter. Which would still be difficult because it was allegedly 36 years ago.
the FBI can look into it. trump says no. why?
the FBI did not say anything. they are the fucking FBI... they can't investigate? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
how many times have they already investigated his background?
If Only,
That was alleged and proven to be untruehe committed pergury on unrelated matters during his interview... so there is that.
Reasonable people doPeople don’t find the timing of all this suspicious?Sure they can, but there has to be a crime for thatthey are the fucking FBI... they can't investigate?
Of course not, he's busy planning the re-education CAMPShe won't.
only when it's a white boy in prison, right?Sexual Assault is always funny.
Are you a truncated version of Politichic?Next it will apply to parents and ancestors.
A race car driver actually lost a sponsor temporarily over something his father had said when he wasn't even born. This is freaking nuts.
NASCAR Xfinity driver Conor Daly, 26, loses his sponsorship after his father admitted to using the N-word in a 1980s radio interview before his son was even born
- Lilly Diabetes pulled its sponsorship of 26-year-old driver Conor Daly on Friday
- Company said it was in response to the racially insensitive remark made by his father Derek Daly during an interview in the 1980s
- Derek, who is a former driver, was fired from his job as a racing analyst after it resurfaced that he had said the N-word during the interview
- Conor will make his NASCAR debut at the rural Wisconsin road course on Saturday with Roush Fenway Racing
NASCAR driver Conor Daly loses sponsorship over father's racial slur | Daily Mail Online
17 is absurd in my opinion. How bout 4?
17 is absurd in my opinion. How bout 4?
We throw black kids in jail for stuff they do at 17.
A lot of states try them as adults and their records follow them around their whole lives.
so why does Kavanaugh get a pass because he is white and privileged.
But here's the thing... I would have no problem with Kavanaugh if he said, "You know what, I was drunk, 17 and stupid and did a stupid thing at a party and I apologize to Dr. Ford for any pain I caused her."
That's not what he's doing.
"You know what, I was drunk, 17 and stupid and did a stupid thing at a party and I apologize to Dr. Ford for any pain I caused her."
Sexual Assault is always funny.
17 is absurd in my opinion. How bout 4?
We throw black kids in jail for stuff they do at 17.
A lot of states try them as adults and their records follow them around their whole lives.
so why does Kavanaugh get a pass because he is white and privileged.
But here's the thing... I would have no problem with Kavanaugh if he said, "You know what, I was drunk, 17 and stupid and did a stupid thing at a party and I apologize to Dr. Ford for any pain I caused her."
That's not what he's doing.
This isn’t a tv show, the FBI mandate only covers a very select type of crimes, or more commonly, crimes that cross state boarders. So, if kavanaugh threw her in a car, drove her to Georgia, then groped her and tried to take off her shirt, maybe they could. The other problem with that, depending on the specific states law, this would probably be classified as a misdomeanor, where the statute of limitations are only a year.The FBI already said they couldn’t. A. You can’t investigate something you don’t have a date, or time, specific location, any wittnesses present during the time, that was also 36 years ago. B. It’s not even an FBI matter, it’s a state matter.No no no, she has a lie detector test saying that the reported statement is correct, as in, in line with the letter to fienstien. With lie detector tests, they’ll ask the same question in a few different ways, as well as the control questions. The question posed is a sneaky little lawyer trick. I think it’s telling that that was the only question offered to the public, or if that was the only question operator asked her on the subject.It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
And she has one person backing up her account, that would be her husband, who got it second hand from her. And the other (who is also a second hand source) contradicts her account, with notes from the time she heard this second hand account (I think the therapy session was in 2012), vs the husbands memory of the session.
That’s some murky water there. Especially considering that she is not offering a date of the event, or the location of the event. With those two items one could at least attempt to verify/corroborate the story, (or in kavanaughs case) try to vindicate himself on the matter. Which would still be difficult because it was allegedly 36 years ago.
the FBI can look into it. trump says no. why?
the FBI did not say anything. they are the fucking FBI... they can't investigate? lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!