Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everyone in government serving more than two terms is MORALLY illegitimate.
Good luck starting a revolution over such a silly idea.
Everyone in government serving more than two terms is MORALLY illegitimate.
Good luck starting a revolution over such a silly idea.
The Founding Fathers including and especially George Washington did not think it was such a silly idea, and large portion of citizens would support term limits for elected officials.
Those who oppose or think term limits are silly, obviously never heard the expression "power corrupts".
Good luck starting a revolution over such a silly idea.
The Founding Fathers including and especially George Washington did not think it was such a silly idea, and large portion of citizens would support term limits for elected officials.
Those who oppose or think term limits are silly, obviously never heard the expression "power corrupts".
We have term limits
2 years for a Congressman and 6 years for a Senator. After that, they start all over
The Founding Fathers including and especially George Washington did not think it was such a silly idea, and large portion of citizens would support term limits for elected officials.
Those who oppose or think term limits are silly, obviously never heard the expression "power corrupts".
We have term limits
2 years for a Congressman and 6 years for a Senator. After that, they start all over
"Term limit" inexplicably and strangely means limit of the number of terms, not the number of years. You know, like the President.
Your hair-splitting is childish.
HOW LEGITIMATE IS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?
HOW LEGITIMATE IS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT? supposedly it is elected by the people but what percentage of population participates in elections any more? The media, which claims to not be a part of the establishment, but rather a government critic, claims that it's more than half the population, but there is very good evidence indicating that the media is a part of the establishment, so we can never really know. And the media always claims before each elections about how the race is very tight and how important it is to go out and vote, how every vote counts. Further more, if the media criticizes the government so much, then question comes to mind, what percentage of population dislikes the government, and vote against politicians rather than for them? And if majority votes against the politicians, then isn't it more logical to have a referendum on the government, rather than forcing people to vote for one politician just to vote against another politician? And with all the government critics, the experts on television - why doesn't anyone ever bring up the idea of a referendum on this government? is this something only a government is allowed to do? or are they all in bed with the government, and understand that criticizing it will not hurt it, but only distract any opposition? - I believe the answer is obvious.
But let us not expect the masses of people to understand this - They are too preoccupied about coming up with money to pay their bills and taxes. They are too discouraged by all the politicians and activists who keep asking for donations. It is up to us, the small group of people who truly care about justice to bring forth this referendum.
FWIW, I agree with you about the lack of participation by 40%-50% of eligible voters represents a significant threat to the "popular acceptance of an authority", but I wonder if injecting a few dozen third-party candidates from both poles of the political spectrum into the House of Representatives next November might give more Americans an incentive to vote.
These candidates already exist on many ballots across the country.
It will not get me back to vote, because I have lost faith in any fair elections hosted by the establishment - just because you put a write in option in some precincts, or even a button with my favorite candidate's name in other's, that does not make the nation wide elections legitimate - it is still the same joke.
The per cent who vote is a disgrace, and part of the long time Pub cynicism campaign...
OP- very legitimate, except for the braindead House- where the Dems got 3 million more votes and lost, a gerrymandered obscenity.
ANOTHER LSM/PPM SECRET...SO WHY IS OUR MEDIA NUMBER 46 AGAIN lol...
We have term limits
2 years for a Congressman and 6 years for a Senator. After that, they start all over
"Term limit" inexplicably and strangely means limit of the number of terms, not the number of years. You know, like the President.
Your hair-splitting is childish.
Let the voters decide how many terms they want from their representatives. Term Limits are for those losers who can't get elected without them
"Term limit" inexplicably and strangely means limit of the number of terms, not the number of years. You know, like the President.
Your hair-splitting is childish.
Let the voters decide how many terms they want from their representatives. Term Limits are for those losers who can't get elected without them
And no term limits is for those who are already corrupted by power or those who sell their soul and dignity for the same, while hypocritically tell you that they are there to serve you.
The most glaring example of the necessity of term limits is FDR, (actually, that mental cripple WAS the reason for term limits) and several ego maniacal and power hungry assholes on both sides of the aisle.
HOW LEGITIMATE IS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT? supposedly it is elected by the people but what percentage of population participates in elections any more? The media, which claims to not be a part of the establishment, but rather a government critic, claims that it's more than half the population, but there is very good evidence indicating that the media is a part of the establishment, so we can never really know. And the media always claims before each elections about how the race is very tight and how important it is to go out and vote, how every vote counts. Further more, if the media criticizes the government so much, then question comes to mind, what percentage of population dislikes the government, and vote against politicians rather than for them? And if majority votes against the politicians, then isn't it more logical to have a referendum on the government, rather than forcing people to vote for one politician just to vote against another politician? And with all the government critics, the experts on television - why doesn't anyone ever bring up the idea of a referendum on this government? is this something only a government is allowed to do? or are they all in bed with the government, and understand that criticizing it will not hurt it, but only distract any opposition? - I believe the answer is obvious.
But let us not expect the masses of people to understand this - They are too preoccupied about coming up with money to pay their bills and taxes. They are too discouraged by all the politicians and activists who keep asking for donations. It is up to us, the small group of people who truly care about justice to bring forth this referendum.
1. Thank you.HOW LEGITIMATE IS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?
1. The government is legitimate when it's engaged in Constitutionally authorized activities, it's not when it is engaged in activities not Constitutionally authorized. So the vast majority of it today is illegitimate.
2. That people vote for people who promise illegitimate functions of government such as welfare, redistribution of income and military to police the world rather than defend the United States doesn't make it legitimate. Only the process of 2/3, 2/3 and 3/4 can make an illegitimate function legitimate.
I just want you to know that in USSR we also used to have elections, and so did people in Iraq, but for whatever reason, USA needed to use force in those nations to bring changes, while these puppets such as Hillary Clinton, John McCain, John Kerry and other old farts have been sitting in Washington for decadesIf you don't like an elected official.....beat him fair and square in an election
It has happened thousands of times in our history
Because I got tired of explaining myself to people like you, I made a video - if you have comment, you can post it, but the video explains why I will never be voting in establishment hosted US elections again:Making no decision is to make a decision. People who don't go to the polls to vote have cast their vote for whatever the rest of us vote in as the status quo.HOW LEGITIMATE IS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?
FWIW, I agree with you about the lack of participation by 40%-50% of eligible voters represents a significant threat to the "popular acceptance of an authority", but I wonder if injecting a few dozen third-party candidates from both poles of the political spectrum into the House of Representatives next November might give more Americans an incentive to vote.
These candidates already exist on many ballots across the country.
It will not get me back to vote, because I have lost faith in any fair elections hosted by the establishment - just because you put a write in option in some precincts, or even a button with my favorite candidate's name in other's, that does not make the nation wide elections legitimate - it is still the same joke.
All people were also allowed to vote under Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and all people were allowed to vote in USSR - I even remember some government men came to our house and asked us how come we are not voting for mister AndropovOur system today allows all people to vote if they want and are eligible.
If you lived 230 years ago in the USA, that would not be the case.
